iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitt Romney's Offshore Accounts Contain Up To $32 Million

Mitt Romney Offshore Cayman

By STEPHEN BRAUN and STEPHEN OHLEMACHER   01/20/12 03:28 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney owns investments worth between $7 million and $32 million in offshore-based holdings, which are often used legitimately by private equity firms to attract foreign investors. Such offshore accounts also can enable wealthy investors to defer paying U.S. taxes on some assets, according to tax experts.

An Associated Press examination of Romney's financial records identified at least six funds set up in the Cayman Islands, a small Caribbean island chain that has long been used as a base for international investments because of low tax rates and financial secrecy. Romney has acknowledged that some of his investments are based in the Caymans, but he has not identified all of the specific accounts and the amounts based there. There is no indication Romney uses the accounts to dodge any U.S. tax obligations.

The Caymans have often been associated with individuals and corporations seeking to avoid paying U.S. taxes. However, it is legal for U.S. residents to own investment accounts that are set up there – if they file the proper forms with the Internal Revenue Service and pay the appropriate taxes.

"If you file the forms and report the income, you are 100 percent legal," said Kevin Packman, a Miami lawyer who chairs the offshore tax compliance team at the law firm of Holland & Knight.

Independent tax policy experts said Romney's use of the Cayman-based investments was legal, but some criticized the strategy as a province of wealthy investors allowed by a tax code studded with loopholes.

"The bottom line is, they're taking advantage of a system that's flawed," said Nicole Tichon, director of Tax Justice Network USA, part of a global network promoting tax transparency. "It may be legal, but these are loopholes that show problems in our tax code."

The six Romney offshore holdings are in investment funds run by Bain Capital, the private equity powerhouse he led in the 1980s and 1990s. The six funds are listed only by name and a range of amounts in Romney's financial records, but the Cayman addresses are in other corporate documents filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and in foreign investment portfolios.

Five of the Cayman-based funds are included within a blind trust for Romney's wife, Ann, and worth between $2.8 million and $7.6 million.

A sixth fund, called Bain Capital Investment Partners Trust Associates lll, is part of Romney's IRA retirement account and worth between $5 million and $25 million.

In a financial report last August, Romney declared a family fortune worth as much as $250 million. The six Cayman funds are among dozens of investments the Romneys have owned since he left Bain in 1999 to organize the 2002 Olympic Games in Salt Lake City and then pursue a career in politics.

A Romney spokeswoman, Andrea Saul, said the Cayman funds "are taxed in the very same way they would be if those funds were established in the United States." She noted that because many of the funds are in a trust directed by a Boston lawyer, the Romneys played no role in deciding how the money was invested.

Saul said the decision to set up the funds in the Caymans was made by the funds' sponsors – in this case, senior partners at Bain Capital, not Romney. A Bain spokesman declined to comment on the funds' origins.

Tax experts and lawyers said using offshore funds to attract foreign investors is a legitimate and standard business practice. Increased foreign investment in a U.S. fund based abroad could increase financial returns for American investors. Offshore funds offer advantages for U.S. investors looking to diversify their portfolios and for foreign investors seeking to avoid U.S. reporting and tax-withholding requirements.

"If you have a foreign investor who is making income largely abroad and doesn't want to be subject to U.S. regulations and reporting, it's a plus," said C. Eugene Steuerle, co-founder of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center and former deputy assistant treasury secretary for tax analysis.

Under American law, U.S. investors must pay taxes on profits made from offshore investment funds. However, U.S. investors may be able to defer those taxes until later as they bring the profits into the U.S., depending on how the fund is structured, said Kevin Packman, chairman of his firm's offshore compliance team at Holland & Knight of Miami.

Some hedge fund and private equity managers route IRA retirement holdings through an offshore entity set up as a "blocker corporation," an affiliate of a private equity fund that acts as a way-station, storing the retirement funds while investing an identical amount in the actual fund. This complicated maneuver allows the investor to defer paying a 35 percent tax on earnings that the IRS considers "unrelated business income," said Michael J. Graetz, a Columbia University law professor and an authority on national and international tax law.

The 35 percent tax is aimed at pension funds, university endowments, hospitals and other nonprofit organizations when they invest in private equity funds that borrow large amounts of money to buy other companies. But nonprofits can use the offshore blocker funds to defer those tax payments, and similarly, IRA accounts can be routed through blocker accounts, depending on how tax plans are structured, Graetz said.

"One of the major functions of tax planning is to defer payments and deal with them down the road instead of today," Graetz said. "For an IRA account, it's not so much a tax rate game as it is a timing game."

Romney's other offshore-based investments would not benefit from that structure, Graetz said. But their earnings could be boosted by blocker corporations that promote investments by nonprofits, he said.

Romney's taxpaying strategy may become clearer when he makes his 2012 tax returns available in April as he has promised.

Congress has tried to make it harder for investors to defer tax payments by broadening requirements that U.S. investors in foreign-based funds pay taxes as they earn profits. But aggressive tax planners can still find ways to get around the rules, experts said.

"You have to look at each investment and its structure before you can pass judgment," Steuerle said.

Benefits to deferring tax payments include the ability to reinvest the deferred taxes, earning higher returns before bringing the money into the U.S. A wealthy investor who has no immediate need for the money would be able to keep the investment offshore indefinitely, never paying U.S. taxes on it.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney owns investments worth between $7 million and $32 million in offshore-based holdings, which are often used legitimately by private equity fi...
WASHINGTON -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney owns investments worth between $7 million and $32 million in offshore-based holdings, which are often used legitimately by private equity fi...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 497
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
02:25 AM on 06/23/2012
Ok I definitely don't want a Uber wealthy POTUS that has (known) Offshore accounts. That is just downright stupid to trust a man that uses such financial strategys (whetehr legal or not)... Furthermore -- Bain Capital is heavily tied with the Chinese (Note recent sell of AMC - Movie Theatres to China by Bain Capital.) --- and lets not forget the Monsanto connection. --- can America afford to put a person in office right now like Mitt who would selll out the USA to the highest bidder? Mitt is definitly Lobbyist Friendly as he proved as govenor.-- Elect Mitt and - We the People be damned!...
09:45 AM on 04/12/2012
The Bain company history is as interesting as Enron, including the people who are within the 'Company'.
And Office Depot didn't need Staples. Their so-called Management Counseling was more like an invasion theory for takeovers. Wikipedia...I love you!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
01:52 AM on 01/22/2012
"Independent tax policy experts said Romney's use of the Cayman-based investments was legal, but some criticized the strategy as a province of wealthy investors allowed by a tax code studded with loopholes."
--------------------------------------------------->

The fact is that regardless of what Romney says, even the tax policy experts can't make this statement until Romney's taxes have been released.
12:30 AM on 01/22/2012
Beevis and Butthead....alias Romney-Gingrich 2012.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
uncle george
12:19 AM on 01/22/2012
Regardless of what the tax lawyers say about legality it show how far they have gone to escape paying the taxes that the rest of America pays..They tell you how much taxes they pay but they don't tell you how much they are not paying..If they are not hiding their assets why is it that we have no knowlege of who is hiding What ,Where ,When and How. How long has this been going on and how much of Americas wealth has been hidden to avoid taxes. How much income has America lost to hidden accounts off shore.that would have been taxable? Saying that it is legal only show how much they have gotten away with not paying taxes legally. Hpw about morally? does it mean that once you become wealthy you can afford the best lawyers and accountants that know how to get laws passed that can hide their wealth "Legally" so that they can escape paying taxes to their country?I know. "That's business!!!. That's cheating. "Legally"
11:30 PM on 01/21/2012
So what? He's done nothing illegal. In today's Obamaworld it's a crime to have a lot of money. Unless of course, you are Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Standley
opinionated jerk
11:55 PM on 01/21/2012
Why, of course. That's why Mittens is in such a hurry to release his tax records as all other candidates have. :)
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JessWonderin
12:10 AM on 01/22/2012
Obama: claimed ALL his income and paid about 30% . .
Mitt: "didn't and paid not so much . . ."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cogs
10:57 PM on 01/21/2012
Mitt's fumbling of the questions about his wealth might result in big changes within his campaign. How could he be so unprepared to address the issue?
10:40 PM on 01/21/2012
Mitt has been running for President for at least five years and he has not gotten his taxes filed properly in all that time; he is not smart at all.
10:29 PM on 01/21/2012
A True Patriot. LOL
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Breth
GOTP : Kidnapping the nation since 2009
10:21 PM on 01/21/2012
If Romney is to be believed, the income made from shuffling money from one spot to another should be taxed at a lower rate than that which is earned by the sweat of one's brow.

Typical GOTP thinking.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
knott wrench
11:07 PM on 01/21/2012
15%. And Newton wants to do away with Capital Gains Tax, which means Willard would pay 0% and others would pay more as the USA Deficit goes up.
08:58 PM on 01/21/2012
Mitt hopes to keep his millions off-shore until he becomes President, change the tax code so that he can bring the money back with no tax penalty...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:20 AM on 01/22/2012
What penalty would he have now?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gdfreethinker
Wisconsin rabble-rouser
08:45 PM on 01/21/2012
And what about the accounts in Switzerland and the Caymans?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carbon Forteetoo
Not enough characters to say anything clev
07:54 PM on 01/21/2012
If we think we know about $32 Million, that means there's probably twice that amount.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
D-V-H
I am a Damn Liberal
06:58 PM on 01/21/2012
This is why income, no matter how derived, should all be treated the same. Why is one person's "investment" income more special than another person's actual work income?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JessWonderin
12:05 AM on 01/22/2012
. . easy . . because the INVESTORS wrote the Tax Codes . . . whatever happened to the "Ike 91%" on uber wealthy? . . GONE like the prosperity of the 50's which FORCED them to "invest it" or be taxed . . .
06:51 PM on 01/21/2012
Romney is doing as anyone with half a brain should do and that is to diversify and do whatever is allowed by law to maximize the value of his savings and investments. Everything he has done is legal and typical of investors of all backgrounds and political affiliation. What I see within the comments herein are a lot of people who are envious of the wealth of Romney and want to demonize him in the process. Maybe you should take a look at Oprah Windfrey or Tiger Woods, who are much wealthier then Romney, as to where they invest their money and which tax "loopholes" they take advantage of with their earnings. This whole issue of tax statements and Cayman Island accounts, etc. mean nothing in the overall scheme of things. What you should be concerned about is finding someone to replace Obama before it is too late to save our country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marionette
09:31 PM on 01/21/2012
instead of stashing it away and using loopholes at all, how about they use their 'gains' to enrich their local communities?

i never understood how folks even *need* that much money.. i could spend maybe 10 million total, and that'd be buying houses for myself, family members, college tuition, a few decent cars etc etc and *still* have money left over..

32 million just sitting there? tell ya what mitt, put your money where your mouth is and create a few jobs, huh? and not like the illegal alien fiasco..

shister..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Hoosierbrad
I know it when I see it.
10:40 PM on 01/21/2012
You Republicans always think the sky is falling when Democrats are in charge, but the fact is Democrats controlled Congress from 1933 to 1948, and from 1953 to 1995. That is the period of time when we went from a majority rural economy to the wealthiest nation on earth! Don't think for a second that the liberal people of this planet will buy your revisionist snake oil.