iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Quantum Computing In 'Cloud' Can Be Made 'Perfectly Secure'

First Posted: 01/20/12 05:03 PM ET Updated: 01/20/12 06:29 PM ET

Quantum Computer

Have computer hackers met their match? Not quite yet. But new research suggests that so-called quantum computers now in development could lead to data transfer that is "perfectly secure."

Quantum computers may sound like a dream, promising to make massive calculations atblazing speeds, but some experts have dreaded them. To a computer security specialist, the fact that a quantum computer can break encryption codes is exciting, but it's also scary; how are you supposed to keep quantum data safe? A paper published in the latest issue of Science appears to fill this major gap in quantum computers' defenses before any hackers are able to take advantage of it.

Even after quantum computers become advanced enough to be useful, not everyone's going to have their own. There will may be just a few of them in the world, and users will connect with them to use their computational power the same way you might log onto Dropbox to get a file. With so many users on the system, it could be a disaster if someone compromised the security.

It may come as no surprise that the solution to the quantum problem is itself founded in quantum physics. As Stefanie Barz, lead author of the study said, "Quantum physics solves one of the key challenges in distributed computing. It can preserve data privacy when users interact with remote computing centers." The new scheme takes advantage of the fact that, in a quantum mechanical system, one can't observe certain objects without changing them. In the same way, if someone were spying on data you sent to a quantum computer with the new technique, not only would the spy learn nothing, you'd be able to tell that your data had been compromised.

This is has the potential to be much more useful than old-fashioned encryption, which relies on the assumption that your computer can create a code that's too difficult for someone else to crack in a reasonable amount of time. Under the new quantum encryption scheme, it's not just unlikely that someone else will be able to break into your data—it's impossible.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

Have computer hackers met their match? Not quite yet. But new research suggests that so-called quantum computers now in development could lead to data transfer that is "perfectly secure." Quantum c...
Have computer hackers met their match? Not quite yet. But new research suggests that so-called quantum computers now in development could lead to data transfer that is "perfectly secure." Quantum c...
Filed by Travis Korte  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 70
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:50 AM on 01/25/2012
Not 100% true...there are mirror images and they can and will be easily tapped into for monitoring.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:15 AM on 01/24/2012
I dunno. Humanity has invented a ton of locks and traps, and each one was "absolutely unbreakable" or "Pick-proof" or "inescapable". Someone always came up with a way to pick it open or best them all. Took time...but all there is is time. And sneaky, underhanded ingenuity.
08:58 AM on 01/24/2012
Quantum computing and quantum mechanics use very different rules then we are used to.

Hacking a quantum computer system would be virtually impossible due to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and quantum entanglement.

http://www.science20.com/news_articles/heisenbergs_uncertainty_principle_only_mostly_uncertain
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
normanx
06:54 PM on 01/23/2012
Nothing is impossible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allen Bouchard
I worship His Divine Shadow.
11:14 AM on 01/23/2012
Maybe you should rename the headline for this article to FACEPALM. It is that full of fail.

Oddly, the biggest laugh I got was from one of the most trivial statements: "There will may be just a few of them in the world, and users will connect with them to use their computational power the same way you might log onto Dropbox to get a file."

Was this really the best analogy you could come with? Or should the byline read "Sponsored by Dropbox"?
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
06:27 AM on 01/23/2012
"Even after quantum computers become advanced enough to be useful, not everyone's going to have their own. There will may be just a few of them in the world,"

I remember hearing something very similar about regular computers in the 1970s.
photo
Priori Decoherence
SkÄl til fitte og brannvesenet
01:24 PM on 01/23/2012
And it was true for the first ten-twenty years
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nicholas Hylton
Earth, Orion Spiral Arm
04:04 AM on 01/23/2012
An amazing documentary... if you can fine it... that explores the realm of mind-bending quantum 'weirdness' and harnessing its possibilities is, "The Quantum Tamers." Created by The Perimeter Institute (part of RIM... the Blackberry maker), the documentary features Stephen Hawking, Dr. Kaku,, Dr. Anton Zeilinger, Dr. Alain Aspect and many other prominent theoretical and experimental physicists from around the world. They explain, in layman's terms (well... as best they can given the inherently unintuitive nature of quantum dynamics), when the first hints of the quantum world emerged, what it all means and where it may lead us in the coming decades. (IF... we can ever build a working *practical* quantum computer of course.)
Find the documentary and watch it. You will be glad you did.

"Shut up and calculate." lol! I love that quote. (It will make sense once you see the doc.)
03:29 PM on 01/23/2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J72pnLMlhKU

Joseph Emerson of the Department of Applied Math at the University of Waterloo on the documentary The Quantum Tamers which he co-produced at the Perimeter Institute
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:19 AM on 01/24/2012
interesting, thanks
photo
EntanglementTrick
words the birds call cheap...
01:46 AM on 01/23/2012
you mean big brother's quantum computer that makes sure you follow all of its rules?

'Needs to be protected from special interest lawyering IMO...the internet does not belong to the so-called intellectual property mafia's domain yet. I just imagine a world of strategic woops' where law enforcement 'makes mistakes' in 'good faith' leading to the demise of life as we know it.

If we can crunch the entire internet one can only guess at the magnitude of malicious processes that may hold sway over it...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arturo Ramrez
08:52 PM on 01/22/2012
They can clone the user's computer information (MAC, IP or whatever they might have then). They can get in through the original user's computer...they can hack through social engineering. The user would know that somebody got in, but he wouldn't be able to stop people from getting his information.

Also, cracking codes is just one of many processes in hacking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allen Bouchard
I worship His Divine Shadow.
11:17 AM on 01/23/2012
"The user would know that somebody got in, but he wouldn't be able to stop people from getting his informatio­n."

The easiest way to get around the problem of the target knowing you accessed the data is to use traditional social engineering techniques. No one cares that you accessed their data if they think you were doing so legitimately.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arturo Ramrez
11:57 AM on 01/23/2012
I thought that after posting, but yeah, definitively.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:13 PM on 01/22/2012
you do realize that hacker & crackers are completely dif things. right?
photo
Odd Man Out
absit iniuria verbis
04:09 PM on 01/22/2012
Note to Editor. Last paragraph, "This is has the potential to be much.."
04:14 PM on 01/22/2012
A superposition of grammar
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arturo Ramrez
08:52 PM on 01/22/2012
Quantum speech.
photo
Odd Man Out
absit iniuria verbis
02:11 AM on 01/23/2012
Too funny. Thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thinkster
I Think, therefore I POST!
01:11 PM on 01/22/2012
We are a very long way from having useful quantum computers - current systems barely fit the definition of quantum computers, and are much more like tinier version of conventional computers that use the "Von Neumann" architecture. Below are links to two articles that discuss this in more detail, including Dr. Kaku's QC that was able to multiply 3x5=15 -

http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/practical-quantum-computers-creep-closer-to-reality
http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/chip-does-part-of-codecracking-quantum-algorithm

There are examples of single atom switches and memory devices - molecular computing - the molecules are not the important part - they are just examples of extremely small switches - perhaps as small as we can get them - if we can control the spin directions of sub-atomic particles (electrons or quarks) that would represent an even smaller device - but this is still conventional computing, not quantum computing - smaller scale - same Von Neumann methods.

Very exciting - but a long way to go.
02:38 PM on 01/22/2012
It seems, at this time, that quantum computers can only solve a very limited number of speedup problems compared to known classical algorithms. There doesn't seem to be much research on practical quantum Turing machines, at all (not sure anybody has the slightest idea how this could be done, at all, with existing elements) and QCs can not solve any problem that a regular Turing machine can't solve. So at the very best we will have a number of problems that can be brought down from exponential to polynomial time.... and how important those problems are in reality is questionable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thinkster
I Think, therefore I POST!
10:49 AM on 01/23/2012
QC's do seem a bit useless at the moment - I also wonder if they will become practicle. I look forward to the continuing research.
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
05:28 AM on 01/22/2012
I'm starting to believe Dr. Michio Kaku is literally a quantum physicist/human...for quite some time, I see him everywhere. It's good too, he seems to have answers to infinite questions.
photo
liveinhope23
My unauthorized autobiography
10:58 AM on 01/22/2012
I've really enjoyed all of his books. Yes, I realize he has to translate a bit them from hard science to readable layman's terms, but as a non-scientist, I truly appreciate the effort. It's done without being condescending and between him, Brian Greene and a few others, I feel that I have had great instructors. Thanks, Dr. Kaku!
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
11:13 AM on 01/22/2012
Yes! Brian Greene and Michio Kaku are both great. I enjoy both of them too. They both have the gift for simplifying complicated subjects.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:05 AM on 01/22/2012
"Under the new quantum encryption scheme, it's not just unlikely that someone else will be able to break into your data—it's impossible." Not true -- inferring from the article, it is impossible to break into data undetected because of the Uncertainty Principle.
02:40 PM on 01/22/2012
That's only true for perfect implementations of quantum computers. As soon as you take decoherence into account, that claim falls apart, too, although it might only be possible to break in in theory and not in an experimental scenario.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GabrielGrey
01:31 AM on 01/22/2012
soooo many nerd reply to post, so many nerd
GonzoFactor
Rationality and rationalization are not the same
08:14 AM on 01/22/2012
Nerd? You mean people who actually know something instead of loudmouth ignoramuses?
09:06 AM on 01/24/2012
They are afraid of what they do not understand.