iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.S. Mulls Closing Embassy In Syria

Syria Us Embassy

First Posted: 01/20/12 04:35 PM ET Updated: 01/20/12 05:35 PM ET

The U.S. is considering closing its embassy in Damascus amid concerns about the security of the staff there, The Huffington Post has confirmed.

The Washington Post and Foreign Policy magazine first reported Friday afternoon that American officials have been in discussions with the regime of Bashar al-Assad regarding security arrangements around the U.S. embassy.

A U.S. official told the Post that the Obama administration will close the embassy and evacuate all personnel unless the Assad regime provides enhanced protection.

American officials recently scaled down the presence of U.S. diplomats at the embassy in Damascus.

The embassy came under attack in July by protesters thought to be affiliated with the government, and the U.S. ambassador was briefly recalled to the United States in October, amid growing diplomatic tensions between the two countries.

Nevertheless, State Department officials have repeatedly defended their decision to send an ambassador to Syria in the first place and to keep the embassy fully functioning amid the unfolding turmoil in the country. They have said that having a diplomatic presence there allows the U.S. to best express its political views to the regime, and to understand conditions on the ground.

The reports come as a highly controversial Arab League observer mission to Syria was said to be considering extending its mission by another month, despite complaints by Syrian protesters that the mission failed to quell violence or government attacks on demonstrations.

A U.S. official told Reuters that the administration has made no final decision yet. "We want something to happen sooner rather than later," the official said.

The U.N. estimates that at least 5,400 people have died in the Syrian regime's crackdown on an uprising that began last March.

UPDATE: 5:30 p.m. -- The State Department put out a statement confirming the reports late on Friday.

"While no decision has been made, we have serious concerns about the deteriorating security situation in Damascus, including the recent spate of car bombs, and about the safety and security of embassy personnel. We have requested that the government of Syria take additional security measures to protect our embassy, and the Syrian government is considering that request. We have also advised the Syrian government that unless concrete steps are taken in the coming days we may have no choice but to close the mission."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

 
 
  • Comments
  • 447
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ansdlmol
10:28 PM on 01/21/2012
Not only should America close its embassy but all the EU countries with embassys there should do likewise. Also all the western world should shut down every financial outlet Syria has in the west and cut off all ties with Syria. They should also lean on other countries like Japan, India, Australia, NZ to do the same. It may not be well known but Australia and NZ are two of the main suppliers of lamb and mutton to the Arab world where pork is an anathema. Every little turn of the screw helps as the inquisition found in 15th century Spain
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
01:43 AM on 01/22/2012
Great stuff. Let them all starve and die. Oh wait, they won't sit down and die, they'll come to Europe and Australia - and we'd have to feed, house them as well as school their children. We are not happy about these costs, and them coming here forever, so we'd rather sell them lamb and mutton.

What Syrians do in their country is a matter for Syrians. I agree with the US closing their embasssy unless it is obvious where the gains are, appropriate gains for the costs involved. Close it down and use the money for the war veterans.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ansdlmol
02:47 PM on 01/22/2012
They would not starve but it would put terrific pressure on Assad to step down.
Now as for allowing people to decide their own destiny I am also of that belief so you would therefor bring every American soldier stationed abroad home and let the world get on with it. America tried an isolationist policy before WW11 and that didn't turn out to well. America's interests will not be served regardless who eventually gains the upper hand in Syria nor for that matter in any of the countries of the middle east. Muslim doctrine and that of the USA are diametrically opposed and will eventuall lead to armed conflict on a great scale. The third crusade.
10:11 PM on 01/21/2012
America should abandon every single country that isn't theirs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leon Engelun
07:41 PM on 01/21/2012
They have been saying it for most of a week now. What is the hold up?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brehas2
04:49 PM on 01/21/2012
All the Libs and Dems dreams about Obama and his corrupt govt are now crashing about their ears. Every Arab I met hate Obama and his ilk. All the corruption in the Arab countries are now paying big dividends. Revolution, death , exiles and terror. Dems, has sure chosen a wacko for a President.
05:32 PM on 01/21/2012
Think the Arabs liked Bush or would enjoy Newt? Have you perhaps considered coming to the logical conclusion that between Islamism, Pan Arabism, Arab Socialism and anti colonialism that Arabs are raised and educated to hate our government? Have you considered that they might be a wee bit unhappy how we have managed the oil flow from the region and how all their oil is priced in dollars? Have you considered that most Arabs in leadership roles today grew up at a time when the nation they lived in was either allied with the USSR or influenced by it? That we have supported Israel over the screaming protest of just about every Arab on the planet Earth? Would you have been happier of all the Arabs just loved us? All we would have to do is dump Israel and adopt a pro islamist global strategy. I don't favor either and if you do you're in a minority.
10:13 PM on 01/21/2012
all a lib knows how to do is attack the other side while failing to defend their own
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:11 PM on 01/21/2012
Be quick about getting out...
12:47 PM on 01/21/2012
I wonder if by "unless concrete steps are taken..." the State Department means "unless a large contribution to the Clinton Global Initiative is made...".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:16 PM on 01/21/2012
Clinton Global Initiative?
10:55 PM on 01/21/2012
Yes, the husband of the Secretary of State of the United States of America takes "contributions" from foriegn governments. Perhaps that's why she preferred that job to the presidency. It pays better.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mikebw1
12:44 PM on 01/21/2012
The leadrer of Syria and the rest of the world leaders need to think about Iraq and Lybia. Two leaders DEAD! The best way to handle this is to offer Assad a ton of cash and a place to spend the rest of his life in peace if he leaves NOW and at the same time hand him mulitple pictures of Saddam, Gaddify, and the guy from Egypt. Give him plenty to think about. Even forcefully broadcast it on all their tv channels for about a month. Assad may be a killer, but I'd also imagine he's a coward as well and wouldn't want the same fate as the others. Cash and life versus what the others got. Take the cash and run or DIE! Promise him the same as he gave his citizens if he doesn't go. Also remind him a bomb might be anywhere. His phone, his car, and even his toilet may hide one. Fear works wonders.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:17 PM on 01/21/2012
Right; so he can be replaced by an Islamist government that Israel can fight with non-stop?
12:43 PM on 01/21/2012
Well Mr. President? Which is it? Do you want "enhanced security" or do you want the government of Syria to stop killing protesters? Come on! Choose! You wanted this job remember?! Will you be remembered as the President that abandoned the "freedom fighters" in their hour of need? Will you go into the next election with American citizens being held hostage in Syria? Will you support the Syrian government's version of "enhanced security"? Come on! Put on your big girl panties and decide! What a joke.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brehas2
04:42 PM on 01/21/2012
Does he keep big girl panties in his bedroom.....?
05:09 PM on 01/21/2012
Don't care. I just wish he'd wear them to work.
05:41 PM on 01/21/2012
Which do you favor? Less security from possible terror attacks against US Diplomats or no crticism of Assad? Maybe your big girl panties are over your head. Next time try thinking before typing. Better yet, just stop talking about things of which you are entirely ignorant. If we are going to continue to have diplomatic relations with Syria and as there are now terror attacks against governmental installations only an idiot would suggest keeping US civilian personnel and a contingent of Marines in harm's way without enhancing perimter security around the Embassy. As you are likely unaware, the Embassy is, legally, US territory. The street outside is Syria. Cutting off diplomatic relations or closing our embassy would provide us with less on the ground intelliegence and deprive us of a position to conduct Electronic intelligence gathering. Not asking for increased perimter security would be criminal negligence. You're not qualified to guard a junk yard so why not just cram it and listen to people who have a grasp of the world that you clearly do not.
10:37 PM on 01/21/2012
As you may not have noticed I didn't express an opinion regarding what I think should be done. Speaking strictly from a military perspective an Embassy is a uniquely indefensible position. The people inside of that Embassy are in my opinion at the mercy of those on the outside of it. It certainly takes a lot more information and expertise than I have to decide the moment it makes sense to abandon it. I simply was having a little fun with the fact that big decisions involving the lives of others is probably just as foriegn to the Campaigner in Chief, your King and our Dear Leader Barak Hussein Obama. I had no idea that I would upset you so. I was, however, fully expecting people like you to comment that because I don't express unwavering devotion to this president that I must be ignorant and have no right to express an opinion. Perhaps even criticism from me is just more than he can bear. He needs the likes of you to tell me to leave him alone. He makes choices. Those choices put peoples lives at risk. That's the difference between being a community organizer and president. Or maybe nobody told him there was a difference. He doesn't seem to know. In the meantime, even I have a right to an opinion and to express that opinion freely. Not even you can take that away.
12:40 PM on 01/21/2012
Looks like this country should have built Fortress America in SYRIA as well as Iraq. :-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wildbill654
information/misinformation age?
11:47 AM on 01/21/2012
All logic says - lock doors and leave. There is little purpose being there as they only thing that is likely is to be targeted by Assad as supporting what he calls "terrorists". Do we have an embassy in Iran? Do we have an embassy in North Korea?
05:44 PM on 01/21/2012
Having an embassy open is a tremendous advantage in terms of intelligence gathering. Losing the connections one builds through on site diplomatic presence takes years to re build. Failing to have a continuity in that presence dimnishes our understanding the facts on the ground as they occur and restricts our ability to influence events. Hence cutting off diplomatic relations and withdrawing US State Dept personnel is always a bad last resort.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:18 PM on 01/21/2012
Unfortunately, no.
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
11:28 AM on 01/21/2012
Where is the story about the bus bombing by the "freedom fighters"? Guess it doesn't fit the agenda of regime change here.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2012/01/20121219212823456.html
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
11:04 AM on 01/21/2012
The Syrian government may not see the embassy as helpful to them. It is hard to see why they would.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:19 PM on 01/21/2012
Good point.
11:01 AM on 01/21/2012
Why do we have an embassy in Syria? So long as we continue our path of European Colonialism in the Middle East we have no reason to place our people in danger by being in this part of the world. Only to destabilize their government or to spy on them can an excuse be made for our presence there. If we want an exchange of ideas or policy we can contact them through someone they trust. Get our people out before they are murdered by them or one of their enemies (our ally) and the blame causes another needless war. I can not understand why they allowed us to have an embassy there anyway. We hate them and they hate us.
10:42 AM on 01/21/2012
Dumb, real dumb request of Syria. We can not depend on those people for anything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:19 PM on 01/21/2012
Nor can they depend on us.
08:22 AM on 01/23/2012
All our fault that they are backward and ignorant, unable to live with a neighbor who believes different from their teachings. You can not help improve what you disslike or hate. There may be openings in other countries for you.
dancingbones
Teach, lead by example, example, exampl
10:41 AM on 01/21/2012
All these posts about leaving...of course the Syrian government is abusive and violent, but does that mean we take our ball and leave in a huff? What good would that do? Like Obama says, we can best express our position to the world by being there, not running off with our nose in the air.

We should think and consider before we, like conservatives, start shooting from the hip without thought or getting the facts.
01:06 PM on 01/21/2012
What good does it ? it saves us a billion + in operating funds ! every nation that is worth a grain of salt should pull out of this mess !
01:17 PM on 01/21/2012
I sincerely hope your King and our Dear Leader Chairman Barak Hussein Obama takes your advice. Nothing would be better for the country than to go into the next election with American citizens being held hostage in Syria. That would complete the comparison of this Marxist president with our last Marxist president Jimmy Carter. Perhaps then we can all start hoping for change again.
05:47 PM on 01/21/2012
First off, its interesting you support violence against America. Maybe you can make the no fly list of you keep it up. You are also a totally ignorant fool. Having an embassy open is a tremendous advantage in terms of intelligen­ce gathering. Losing the connection­s one gains through on site diplomatic presence takes years to re build. Failing to have a continuity in that presence dimnishes our understand­ing of the facts on the ground as they occur and restricts our ability to influence events. Hence cutting off diplomatic relations and withdrawin­g US State Dept personnel is always a bad last resort. Your hatred of America is noted, terrorist lover.