More

Beijing Pollution Data: Authorities Release Detailed Information

Beijing Pollution

By LOUISE WATT   01/21/12 09:16 PM ET   AP

BEIJING -- Caving to public pressure, Beijing environmental authorities started releasing more detailed air quality data Saturday that may better reflect how bad the Chinese capital's air pollution is. But one expert says measurements from the first day were low compared with data U.S. officials have been collecting for years.

The initial measurements were low on a day where you could see blue sky. After a week of smothering smog, the skies over the city were being cleared by a north wind.

The readings of PM2.5 – particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in size or about 1/30th the average width of a human hair – were being posted on Beijing's environmental monitoring center's website. Such small particulates can penetrate deep into the lungs, so measuring them is considered a more accurate reflection of air quality than other methods.

It is the first time Beijing has publicly revealed PM2.5 data and follows a clamor of calls by citizens on social networking sites tired of breathing in gray and yellow air. The U.S. Embassy measures PM2.5 from a device on its rooftop and releases the results, and some residents have even tested the air around their neighborhoods and posted the results online.

Beijing is releasing hourly readings of PM2.5 that are taken from one monitoring site about 4 miles (7 kilometers) west of Tiananmen Square, the monitoring center's website said Saturday. It said the data was for research purposes and the public should only use it as a reference.

The reading at noon Saturday was 0.015 milligrams per cubic meter, which would be classed as "good" for a 24-hour exposure at that level, according to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency standards. The U.S. Embassy reading taken from its site on the eastern edge of downtown Beijing said its noon reading was "moderate." Its readings are posted on Twitter.

Steven Andrews, an environmental consultant who has studied Beijing's pollution data since 2006, said he was "already a bit suspicious" of Beijing's PM2.5 data. Within the 24-hour period to noon Saturday, Beijing reported seven hourly figures "at the very low level" of 0.003 milligrams per cubic meter.

"In all of 2010 and 2011, the U.S. Embassy reported values at or below that level only 18 times out of over 15,000 hourly values or about 0.1 percent of the time," said Andrews. "PM2.5 concentrations vary by area so a direct comparison between sites isn't possible, but the numbers being reported during some hours seem surpisingly low."

The Beijing center had promised to release PM2.5 data by the start of the Chinese Lunar New Year on Monday. It has six sites that can test for PM2.5 and 27 that can test for the larger, coarser PM10 particles that are considered less hazardous. The center is expected to buy equipment and build more monitoring sites to enable PM2.5 testing.

Beijing wasn't expected to include PM2.5 in its daily roundups of the air quality anytime soon. Those disclosures, for example "light" or "serious," are based on the amount of PM10, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide in the air.

Beijing interprets air quality using less stringent standards than the U.S. Embassy, so often when the government says pollution is "light," the embassy terms it "hazardous."

"There has been tremendous amounts of attention in the Chinese media – whichever newspaper you pick up, whichever radio station you listen to, channel you watch – they are all talking about PM2.5 and how levels are so high," said Andrews.

"What has been so powerful is that people are skeptical, and I think rightly skeptical," about the government's descriptions of data, he said.

___

Online:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

BEIJING -- Caving to public pressure, Beijing environmental authorities started releasing more detailed air quality data Saturday that may better reflect how bad the Chinese capital's air pollution is...
BEIJING -- Caving to public pressure, Beijing environmental authorities started releasing more detailed air quality data Saturday that may better reflect how bad the Chinese capital's air pollution is...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 46
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:20 PM on 01/24/2012
I think you will be surprised how fast China gets pollution under control. Already they are spending like crazy on green tech and pollution control. They don't like pollution either.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:41 AM on 01/25/2012
All their government is interested in getting "under control" is any dissident interested in publishing honest data that might impugn the officials taking payoffs to do nothing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:41 PM on 01/23/2012
Ha! A communist country finally releases pollution data? And the "facts" are not to be believed. The last sentence says more than the whole article, as of 20:40, 1/23/12.
10:11 PM on 01/24/2012
They had better get the motorcycles and motorbikes off the road...A motorcycle pollutes the air more than an SUV especially the pollutants that cause smog and health hazards that can't be turned into oxygen by photosynthesis. Motorcycles may emit less CO2 but they emit large amounts of nitrogen oxides, which along with hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide make them 10 times more polluting than even an SUV.
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2008/06/motorcycles-pol/
http://evworld.com/article.cfm?storyid=260&first=4649&end=4648
If the G20 nations would remunerate nations that are destroying the Earth's lungs by leveling the rainforests man couldn't produce enough CO2 that wouldn't be turned into oxygen by photosynthesis. Our present approach is the same as getting someone to stop smoking then surgically remove his lungs and expect him to live. I returned to Laos where as a US Army Ranger the jungle gave me cover and refuge...now it is clear cut. The Amazon Rainforest is half the size it was in 1980 when it produced 40% of the Earth's oxygen.
http://www.countercurrents.org/howden140507.htm
“Sua Sponte”
75th Regiment
Company O
3rd Brigade
82nd Airborne (’66 -’73)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:05 PM on 01/25/2012
Thanks for the links. Well said.
02:40 PM on 01/23/2012
China's economy is beginning to change. Their wages are slowly rising. They are investing in more pollution controls and they are investing in clean energy technologies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:41 PM on 01/23/2012
It's that or die.
photo
kwaut lizard
Reductio ad Absurdum
02:23 AM on 01/24/2012
"China's economy is beginning to change." .... are you in a time machine? A tourist in Tibet?

In the 1990s, the Chinese economy continued to grow at a rapid pace, at about 9.5%, accompanied by a rapidly increasing inflation, which reached over 20 percent in 1994.

China is today the second largest standing economy on this planet. China is also the largest exporter and second largest importer of goods in the world. The country's per capita GDP (PPP) was 8,394 (International Monetary Fund, 90th in the world) in 2011.
11:37 AM on 01/25/2012
The article was about pollution in China.... not the Chinese economy.

They are beginning to take pollution controls and clean energy production more seriously each year. They have a long way to go. They are the worlds largest investors in wind and solar technologies and are promoting electric vehicle production and use with tax incentives.

The wages are also beginning to rise after decades of cheap labor.
02:37 PM on 01/23/2012
China has realized the problems with its pollution and is now moving to reduce it. They are making huge investments in wind and solar technology. They are actively promoting the adoption of electric vehicles with subsidies for purchase. China sees these as the industries of the future and wants to have them for themselves and to sell to the world.
photo
Monk Monkey
Watching probability clouds precipitate
03:41 PM on 01/23/2012
Yeah - while turning online more and more coal powered generators.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:42 PM on 01/23/2012
They are doing both.
07:06 PM on 01/23/2012
They just realized it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:51 PM on 01/23/2012
No.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:21 PM on 01/24/2012
How long did it take the USA? Or have they yet?
01:26 PM on 01/23/2012
Think about it.... Our DOE, forces companies to go out of the country. Also the cost of labor is another reason these companies have gone to China. China loves it. Guess what... we have clean air and water. It is just a matter of time before China experiences huge amounts of health issues.

If the US is astute, they would delve into the medical industry, with all their resources. China will then be importing more medical from the US. Thus.... a new trade imbalance for the US.
photo
kwaut lizard
Reductio ad Absurdum
02:55 AM on 01/24/2012
A matter of time .... you are kidding right?

China will sacrifice the health of several generations to lead the world economically. China already imports 35 million tonnes of E-waste per year, the biggest E-waste processing area in the world is Guiyu, China. The biggest waste market in the world for Europe, England and Los Angeles is ... you guessed it, China. The UK alone sends 15,000 tonnes per week.

And they will NOT be a market for American Pharmaceuticals. Cadila, Glaxo, Smith-Kline, Ranbaxy, BioPharma ... you name the pharmaceutical firm and they are moving their operations to India. India's biopharmaceutical industry clocked a 17 percent growth in the 2009-10 financial year over the previous fiscal.

This is how the 1% treat their biggest market. It's about the profits! Eating their children.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:21 PM on 01/24/2012
The IRS rewards companies that offshore. Don't get your facts wrong.
photo
Halsey
"There is a price to pay for speaking the truth. T
11:55 AM on 01/23/2012
This is the type of non-protective environmental standards the current GOP crop seems to extol, esp. R. Paul. I KNOW they make more "stuff" than us..the toys and junk..I don't care..just don't BUY it. Steel is a harder issue. We do have steel in our country..and come on, there MUST be a way to refine it with minimal pollution. I don't expect ZERO..but filters and scrubbers do help. And "clean"(sic) coal as well as strip mining. We've GOT to look to the future..not yours and mine but your grandchildren..great grand children. do you want them born needing gills? (nature has a strange was of adapting you know). I don't WANT Los Angeles, or St. Louis, or Scranton to have air like Bejing..do you?
We have national myopia..wait, in 20-30 years, the rate of severe pulmonary and heart disease in China will make smokers seem healthy..BABIES trying to grow up inhaling particulate smog..it is a crime.
photo
kwaut lizard
Reductio ad Absurdum
03:04 AM on 01/24/2012
No need to wait. It's already happening. America is way behind in the times, the media have just extolled China's virtues as companies moved their operations to this enormous waste bin.
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:39 AM on 01/23/2012
Gee, we should sign a treaty with China giving them a free pass on polluting while imposing huge new costs and regulations on our already cleaner industry.
That would mean more production would move to China so there would be more pollution!

We could call it the Kyoto treaty!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:55 PM on 01/23/2012
Somewhat relatively clean. We produce most of our electricity by burning coal.
You are entitled to your own opinion....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
11:15 AM on 01/23/2012
Don't we have an almost $300 billion trade deficit with China?

Those high tech jobs - weren't we promised by our politicians when we went into unrestricted free trade we would do well in these fields? Solar Company Solyndra Follows Evergreen and SpectraWatt into Bankruptcy Court.
http://news.yahoo.com/solar-company-solyndra-follows-evergreen-spectrawatt-bankruptcy-court-223500220.html

How about steel? Another energy intensive industry? Read this:

http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/tag/caltrans/

Our own state governments are abandoning us! Building a bridge in S.F. with Chinese Steel!

See a connection yet with the air pollution in China?

Cheap dirty coal energy; we are not losing jobs to China because of labor! You can automate around labor! No we are losing jobs to China because of cheap dirty coal energy! China last year consumed 49% of all the coal burnt on the planet!

Do I want us to follow this path? Of course not! We need an environmental tariff on imports to level the playing field! Place an environmental tax on us local manufactures we already paying it with scrubbers and using natural gas and green energy sources.

The irony of this situation is today a sizable percentage of smog in S.F. & L.A. now comes from China! The winds they're a blowing!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:05 PM on 01/23/2012
You are surprised or just stating facts as you see them?
Companies/corporations make huge political donations. Never heard of Free Trade Agreements? Sure you have.
Most of our electricity is produced by burning coal, in the US. No, US citizens do not work for Chinese coal burning, electrical plants, in China. So, we do not lose jobs to China because of their coal production. That's a thinking error. Yes, their cheap labor has been allowed by US "laws", like the Free Trade Agreement we have with China, and their favored nation status, to supplant production and jobs in this country. Free Trade is a license for unbalanced trade and job losses here. Modifying Free Trade Agreements to be equal trade agreements is only the first step to rebuilding the US economy.

Please do not expect me to hang on your every word, whomever replies to this, if anyone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
09:35 PM on 01/23/2012
I run a manufacturing plant my industrial electricity rates much like Solyndra is $0.13/kwh.

I have a friend working in China in manufacturing the government charges him less than $0.03/kwh. For this to be practical they need a going rate og less than $60.00/ton for coal which is below world market price.
photo
kwaut lizard
Reductio ad Absurdum
03:15 AM on 01/24/2012
Living in Asia, I can assure you that nearly every major and business limiting cost is subsidized in some way. The coal generated electricity is provided at subsidized rates to promote industrial development, gasoline and other fuel oils are subsidized to the public in the petroleum producing country I live in, government earth moving equipment is used at cost for industrial infrastructure development, even fish feed for aquaculture farms is subsidized by the government, .... all of these require energy and most are extremely labor intensive. The truth is that the last 8 political administrations offshored as many American jobs as possible in the name of Capitalist profits.

China is putting on average one coal burning power plant online per day. Development of green energies is way beyond the point of diminishing returns in China. They are simply looking at every possible energy stream possible for their insatiable and exponentially increasing energy demands. They are doing business with Somalia for gawds sake.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dennis Higgins
10:31 AM on 01/23/2012
Gee. China sounds like the GOP. There is no air/water pollution, and if there is, they didn't cause it. It's all "Junk Science" Just ask any GOP politician. What fools!
Michael5555
Explain how my micro-bio doesn't meet your guidel
10:45 AM on 01/23/2012
Geem where do you even start when it comes to debunking your post ?
photo
Monk Monkey
Watching probability clouds precipitate
03:44 PM on 01/23/2012
Huh? You tell me, where do you start debunking his post?

He's entirely spot on.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:44 PM on 01/23/2012
Who's Geem? Your fact checker?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
10:58 AM on 01/23/2012
They do have a strong exporting economy though. Not like ours at all. What was our trade deficit last year $500+ billion. And to think before NAFTA and MFTS for China it was $30-60 billion mostly for oil.
Not saying we should emulate China just pointing out what cheap dirty coal energy can do for an economy.