More

Fannie, Freddie Writedowns Would Cost Taxpayers $100 Million: Regulator

Fannie Mae

First Posted: 01/23/2012 4:08 pm Updated: 01/23/2012 6:19 pm


WASHINGTON, Jan 23 (Reuters) - The regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac told lawmakers that forcing the two mortgage firms to write down loan principal would require more than $100 billion in fresh taxpayer funds.

In a letter sent on Friday to the Republican and Democratic leaders of a U.S. House of Representatives government oversight panel, the Federal Housing Finance Agency explained why it has long opposed principal reductions for borrowers who owe more than their homes are worth.

It said it had determined that such reductions would be more costly for the two firms than allowing those troubled borrowers to default.

The regulator has been under pressure from Democrats to permit the write-down of principal by the two government-controlled mortgage finance providers as a way to help some of the millions of U.S. homeowners who are "underwater."

Representative Elijah Cummings of Maryland, the top Democrat on the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has pushed the housing regulator to explain its thinking in deciding not to offer principal reductions.

FHFA, however, has maintained widespread principal foregiveness would undercut the finances of Fannie and Freddie, which have already received about $169 billion in taxpayer aid. Republicans have supported FHFA's decision.

"Principal reduction never serves the long-term interest of the taxpayer when compared to foreclosure," FHFA's acting director, Edward DeMarco, wrote in the letter to lawmakers dated January 20.

The Obama administration wants to secure widespread principle reductions in a legal settlement between the government and some of the biggest mortgage servicers that is aimed at cleaning up alleged foreclosure abuses.

About 22 percent of U.S. homes have negative equity totaling about $750 billion, according to CoreLogic.

"Given that any money spent on this endeavor would ultimately come from taxpayers and given that our analysis does not indicate a preservation of assets for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac substantial enough to offset costs, an expenditure of this nature at this time would, in my judgment, require congressional action," DeMarco said in the letter.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were taken over by the government in 2008 as mortgage losses mounted. Millions of soured loans issued during the housing bubble remain on their books and delinquencies on those loans continue to rise.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac own or guarantee roughly half of all outstanding mortgages in the United States. Out of the approximate 30 million mortgages guaranteed by the two firms, close to 3 million of those loans were held by underwater borrowers as of last summer, according to analysis provided in the letter.

Another barrier to principal writedowns, aside from pushing losses at the two firms even further, DeMarco said, was the costs associated with new technology and training to servicers that would be needed to launch a program that offers principal forgiveness.

FHFA told lawmakers that forbearance, which allows the borrower to reduce or suspend payments on a loan for a specific amount of time, is a less costly option. Principal forbearance limits accounting losses and allows Fannie and Freddie to recoup the principal at some later point, according to the letter.

The housing regulator also assured lawmakers that FHFA remains committed to helping borrowers to stay in their homes and will continue to work on such principal forbearance plans and government initiatives to modify or refinance loans.

The Federal Reserve, in a white paper to Congress earlier this month, said write-downs "had the potential to decrease the probability of default" and "improve migration between labor markets."

However, the Fed stopped short of endorsing such an initiative and noted concern that writing down loan balances would create a moral hazard -- the concept that rescue efforts breed further behavior that exacerbates the existing problem -- and could prompt other borrowers to stop making timely loan payments. (Reporting By Margaret Chadbourn; Editing by Dan Grebler)

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
(Corrects by substituting 7th paragraph quote. The original was a summary of the question posed to the FHFA and was used in error.) WASHINGTON, Jan 23 (Reuters) - The regulator for Fan...
(Corrects by substituting 7th paragraph quote. The original was a summary of the question posed to the FHFA and was used in error.) WASHINGTON, Jan 23 (Reuters) - The regulator for Fan...
Filed by Reuters  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:27 AM on 02/09/2012
The headline says $100 million, which is about 14 minutes worth of government spending spread over 24/7/365.

But the story says $100 billion, which is about 9 days worth of federal government spending.

I think I have a sneaky little hunch which is right. Whaddaya think?
09:26 AM on 01/24/2012
Force a reduction of interest on homes valued at less than twice the median home value in the area down to 3% and apply payments over 5% made from 2009 to the present to reduction of the current outstanding mortgage balance.
11:48 PM on 01/23/2012
Why is the government continuing to try to bail out this industry. Get out of the way and let market forces correct the mess that government made.

Poor people should not own houses.

And the government shoudl not be in the business of insuring people and banks againt bad decisions.

We need to get back to free-market capitalism and let people and businesses fail when they make bad decisions.

Kai
06:56 PM on 01/23/2012
this is what obama calls justice for tax payers? Pathetic.
06:41 PM on 01/23/2012
Unacceptable! Fannie Mae & Freddie mac are criminal enterprises, they should eat that debt. We the taxpayers will not pay for any more problems brought on by greed. How about we round up all of the Wall Street "Masters of the Universe" who bundled and sold fraudulent mortgage backed securities that ruined the economy and make them pay for it. Let's put countrywide sub prime mortgage good ol boy Anthony Mozillo at the front of that line, lets see how much did he make off the scam. wasn't it like 470 million in salary & comps