iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mike McConnell, Ex-U.S. Spy Chief: It May Take Crisis To Change Cyber Laws

First Posted: 01/23/2012 6:01 pm Updated: 01/24/2012 3:57 pm

Mike Mcconnell


By Tabassum Zakaria

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. intelligence agencies have unique capabilities that can help protect American companies from cyber espionage and attack, but it will probably take a crisis to change laws to allow that type of cooperation, a former spy chief said on Monday.

Intelligence agencies like the National Security Agency are authorized to operate abroad but generally are restricted from working within the United States,

"Until we have a banking collapse or electric power goes off in the middle of a snowstorm for eight weeks, or something of that magnitude, we're likely just to talk about it and not do much," Mike McConnell, former director of national intelligence, said.

The Republican-controlled House of Representatives and the Democratic-controlled Senate have separate efforts under way on legislation aimed at improving cybersecurity.

The House intelligence committee in December approved a bill that would allow U.S. spy agencies to share cyber-threat intelligence with private companies. Some critics worry that could lead to government surveillance of private data.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has said the Senate will take up "comprehensive" cybersecurity legislation this year.

"There are unique things that the government can do. For example code-breaking. The private sector out there does not do code-breaking," McConnell, a former National Security Agency director, told Reuters in an interview.

"How would you harness that capability and then make it available to the private sector in a way that their infrastructure could be better protected?"

A U.S. intelligence report last year pointed the finger at China and Russia as using cyber espionage to steal U.S. trade and technology secrets.

McConnell gives an example that if NSA, which conducts electronic eavesdropping to detect foreign threats, observed a cyberthreat against the U.S. private sector, "NSA is powerless to do a thing other than issue a report."

He said in the area of cyber exploitation, such as reading an adversary's mail without leaving fingerprints, the United States, Britain and Russia are probably the best.

The United States also has the ability to conduct cyber attacks, which would be to degrade or destroy an adversary's computerized system, and has used it.

Has the United States used its cyber attack capability? "Yes," McConnell said. Did it work? "Yes."

McConnell, now vice chairman at the Booz Allen Hamilton consulting firm in charge of cyber activities, did not elaborate on the use of a cyber attack capability.

"Do we have the ability to attack, degrade or destroy? Sure. If you do that, what are the consequences? That is the question," he said.

McConnell said the priority is to protect the country's critical infrastructure such as the financial sector, the electric power grid and transportation from cyber attack and stop the theft of intellectual property through cyber espionage.

"There will be a thousand voices on what is the right thing to do," and it will probably require a crisis to reach consensus, he said.

"All I'm arguing is the government has unique capability, figure out a way to harness the capability in the defense of the nation."

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

By Tabassum Zakaria WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. intelligence agencies have unique capabilities that can help protect American companies from cyber espionage and attack, but it will prob...
By Tabassum Zakaria WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. intelligence agencies have unique capabilities that can help protect American companies from cyber espionage and attack, but it will prob...
Filed by Ramona Emerson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SickHippie
No, YOUR micro-bio is empty.
04:44 PM on 01/25/2012
Has the United States used its cyber attack capability? "Yes," McConnell said. Did it work? "Yes."

Back in May 2011, the Pentagon stated that cyber attacks could be considered an act of war. Feeling guilty, perhaps?
10:37 AM on 01/25/2012
We (federal and even local police!!!) have been doing "intelligence gathering-- a.k.a information-gathering" using ALL AVAILABLE MEANS (including "waterboarding!!!", GPS or cell-phone tracking, CYBER-Attack, secret surveillance", etc., etc.) EVEN on our ALLIES ( http://articles.latimes.com/1995-07-23/news/mn-27056_1_economic-espionage ) and EVEN ON US CITIZENS -- anti-war activists, OWS organizers, civil rights leaders, etc., etc.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rich Cash
Enlisted in 1971 - Retired in 1996
09:55 PM on 01/24/2012
If the NSA really conducted a cyber attack against a froreign government, it had to have been classified Top Secret. So why is McConnell not under arrest?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ur2nutty4me
04:24 PM on 01/24/2012
Nothing like closing the barn doors after the horse got out. What does it matter, we gave our secrets away when we gave our manufacturing away. Whether they steal it or we willingly give it adds up to the same thing. We have no secrets and we have no money........If the US wanted to sell Giant Superbowl tshirts they would need a partnership with another country to split the startup costs.
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
02:06 PM on 01/24/2012
What the republicans won't address is that in order for the NSA or some other agency to perform counter cyber terrorism activities, they will need to staff it meaning they will have to make government bigger.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ur2nutty4me
04:35 PM on 01/24/2012
The only parts of the government they want less of is what oversees and restricts the corporations from abusing us and the environment and agency's that help the needy in this country. Bring on spending in anything else.

Smoke and Mirrors...........Catchy phrases and just general BS.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rich Cash
Enlisted in 1971 - Retired in 1996
09:52 PM on 01/24/2012
No doubt...