iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Newt Gingrich Admits He Hired Experts To Help Avoid Lobbyist Registration (VIDEO)

First Posted: 01/23/2012 9:05 pm Updated: 01/24/2012 7:23 am

Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich tangled Monday night over whether the former House speaker engaged in "influence peddling," was a citizen publicly advocating for a certain position, or a "consultant" skirting lobbying disclosure rules.

Romney charged Gingrich with effectively lobbying on behalf of Freddie Mac, despite not having registered. Gingrich responded with a telling admission: That he hired lobbying disclosure experts to study the regulations and advise him of what he could and couldn't do in order to legally avoid registering as a lobbyist. The reason he didn't want to register, he said, was to avoid being accused later of influence peddling.

"I think it's pretty clear to say that i have never, ever gone and done any lobbying. In fact, we brought in an expert on lobbying law and trained all of our staff -- and the expert is prepared to testify that he was brought in to say, here is the bright line between what you can do as a citizen and what you do as a lobbyist. For 12 years consistently running four small businesses, we stayed away from lobbying precisely because I thought this kind of defamatory and factually false charge would be made," said Gingrich.

Gingrich had previously claimed that Freddie Mac hired him as a "historian," but he may be the first historian in history to have hired a consultant to make sure his historical work didn't accidentally drift into the legal definition of lobbying.

The Gingrich campaign quickly blasted out a release calling the candidate a "small businessman," but few small businessmen would see the need to hire such a consultant, either.

The conversation quickly moved past Gingrich's admission, however.

"What's the gross revenue of Bain in the years you were associated with it? What's the gross revenue?" Gingrich asked Romney.

"Very substantial. But I think it's irrelevant compared with the fact you were working for Freddie Mac," he said.

"Wait a minute. Very substantial? Does Bain do any work with companies that did work ... with Medicare, Medicaid?" Gingrich challenged.

Romney categorically denied it. "We didn't do any work with the government. I didn't have an office on K Street. I wasn't a lobbyist. I've never worked in Washington. We have congressman who say you lobbied them," he said.

"I didn't lobby them," Gingrich said.

"We have congressmen who say you lobbied them with regard to Medicare Part D," Romney followed up.

"Whoa, whoa. You just jumped a long way over here, friend," Gingrich said, becoming agitated that the conversation moved from Freddie Mac to Medicare. Gingrich paused for an uncomfortably long time before delivering a stemwinder.

"Let me be very clear," he said, "because I understand your technique which you used on [John] McCain, you used on [Mike] Huckabee. You have used consistently. It's unfortunate and it's not going to work well because the American people see through it. I have always publicly favored a stronger Medicare program. I wrote a book in 2002 called 'Saving Lives and Saving Money.' I publicly favored Medicare Part D for a practical reason. That reason is simple. The U.S. government was not prepared to give people anything -- insulin, for example -- but they would pay for kidney dialysis. They weren't prepared to give Lipitor, but they would pay for open heart surgery. That is a terrible way to run Medicare. I'll say this in Florida. I'm proud that I publicly advocated Medicare Part D. It saved lives. It's run on a free enterprise model, includes health savings accounts and includes Medicare alternatives which gave people choices. And I did it publically and it is not correct, Mitt. I'm saying it flatly because you have been walking around this state saying things that are untrue. It is not correct to describe public citizenship having public advocacy as lobbying. Every citizen has the right to do it."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich tangled Monday night over whether the former House speaker engaged in "influence peddling," was a citizen publicly advocating for a certain position, or a "consultant" sk...
Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich tangled Monday night over whether the former House speaker engaged in "influence peddling," was a citizen publicly advocating for a certain position, or a "consultant" sk...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,141
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (48 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
realpolitic 11:47 PM on 01/23/2012
Why doesn't the article include Romney's response? Romney said. “If you’re getting paid by health companies. If your entities are getting paid by health companies that could benefit from a piece of legislation and you then meet with republican congressmen and encourage them to support the legislation you can call it whatever you’d like. I call it influence peddling. It is not right. It is not right.  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
10:35 PM on 01/25/2012
The threads of the lie are wearing very thin,
01:02 PM on 01/25/2012
Newt is now exposed!! The Ethics Reform Act of 1989 prohibits ex-congress members (Newt) from lobbying for ONE YEAR after leaving office. So of course he has a contract written for that ONE YEAR that prohibits "lobbying services". Then after the 1 year restriction has a new contract made where his restrictions from lobbying have magically disappeared!! This is a new reveal indeed. Newt is a lobbyist.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ProgressivesWin
TeaParty? We don' need no steenkin' TeaParty
01:40 AM on 01/25/2012
Why the big pretense of hoopla and banner waving for candidates that I wouldn't trust as babysitters, let alone high office? Scumbagsoneandall.
08:39 PM on 01/24/2012
It all means nothing to me.

I’m a registered Democrat (since 1973): will I vote for Obama – I don’t know; will I vote for the GOP nominee – I don’t know that either; will I vote for a 3rd party candidate – hmm, maybe.

What I will do in late October is see how the NRA scores all the candidates and I will vote for whomever they give the highest score. There was a time when that would have probably been the Democrat, but, lately, that seem unlikely.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Watching rock grow
FE = Iron, and Female = Iron Male :)
01:22 AM on 01/25/2012
I rejoice to hear you admit to being just a NRA puppet, and not an American voter. I knew folks like you existed thanks for proving it!
07:11 AM on 01/26/2012
The 2nd Amendment is the foundation of my freedom. I've felt that way for 40+ years. The NRA does the research that I would otherwise have to do own my own. I trust them - they are the only organization that truly has my freedom in mind.

I'm sorry to see you're just another ignorant liberal.
05:27 PM on 01/24/2012
Newt Gingrich is not a lobbyist, just someone who took hundreds of thousands of dollars from corporate clients whose interests he happened to be promoting http://tinyurl.com/6vkd5y8
photo
Barbara DeZan
Knowledge is Power
04:23 PM on 01/24/2012
When I served in the Marines, we had a phrase and a name for people like Gingrich. I cannot use it hear ......guidelines, dontcha know. Anyone who has "been there, done that" will know exactly what it is.

This lying creep has no business anywhere near government of any kind. He is a wheeler, dealer who is only interested in his own wealth and his scams.

"The consulting firm founded by Newt Gingrich on Monday night released a copy of its 2006 contract with Freddie Mac showing it was paid $300,000 to provide unspecified "consulting and related services" for one of the federally sponsored housing agency's top lobbyists.

The contract between the Center for Health Transformation, an arm of the Gingrich Group, and Freddie Mac shows that Gingrich REPORTED DIRECTLY TO CRAIG THOMAS, who at the time served as the agency’s director of public policy and was one of its REGISTERED LOBBYISTS on Capitol Hill.

But a spokeswoman for the firm said it was unable to find an earlier contract dating to 1999 and renewed until 2002. The spokeswoman, Susan Meyers, also could not say whether Gingrich or any of its employees produced any written reports for Freddie Mac as part of the nearly $1.8 million in consulting fees it was paid."

How convenient that the earilier contracts can't be found.

Why would anybody vote for this super unethical waste of time.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PunKinPai
Tact is just not saying true stuff. I’ll pass.
04:11 PM on 01/24/2012
Bill Clinton: It depends on what your definition of "is" is.
Newt Gingrich: It depends on what your definition of "lobbyist" is.
photo
acalm
truthiness
03:09 PM on 01/24/2012
So Newt was never a lobbyist and hired and expert to tell him what he could and couldn't do as a citizen and drew him a bright big line to tell him what he could and couldn't do. Who did he hire so he wouldn't be an adulterer and tell him what he could and couldn't do as a husband...and was there a big bright line for that also?
photo
ibsteve2u
Someone who cares - to his unending regret
03:07 PM on 01/24/2012
Gingrich's story reminds me of the pimp who declared that he wasn't pimping, he was merely providing dates.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanrenoir
03:00 PM on 01/24/2012
Gingrich is the sleaziest serious candidate for the Presidency I've ever seen in my mere 68 years. It's a telling commentary on how hate-filled his grotesque base of numbskulls is that they would abandon all their supposed "Christian" family values to support this jerk.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ProgressivesWin
TeaParty? We don' need no steenkin' TeaParty
01:44 AM on 01/25/2012
That is the tale in a nutshell. Well and succinctly put!
photo
santafesam
smart&snarky
02:58 PM on 01/24/2012
What an embarrassing spectacle.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ssassy78
Laughter is the best medicine.
02:58 PM on 01/24/2012
It's like hiring a surrogate and then claiming you're not a parent.

Come on, Newt! You know you benefited from YOUR lobbyist! Just like parents benefit from a surrogate!
02:54 PM on 01/24/2012
So Newt hired "lobbying disclosure experts" to make sure he knew how to skirt the law so he would not be accused later on of influence peddling while he was working for Freddie Mac. What exactly was he doing when he was trying to press Freddie Mac's case with Congress? Just being friendly I guess.

I smell a rat - and his name is Gingrich.

Vote Democrat !
02:49 PM on 01/24/2012
This all boils down to being a lobbyist no matter how you sugar coat it. If you were not one, why would you worry what other people think---that is the tale tale sign right there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
champa10
Lady With A Voice
02:44 PM on 01/24/2012
DING DONG!