More

Obama Expected To Tout Mortgage Settlement In State Of The Union Address

Barack Obama

DEREK KRAVITZ   01/23/12 05:02 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The nation's five largest mortgage lenders have agreed to overhaul their industry after deceptive foreclosure practices drove homeowners out of their homes, government officials said Monday.

A draft settlement between the banks and U.S. states has been sent to state officials for review.

Those who lost their homes to foreclosure are unlikely to get their homes back or benefit much financially from the settlement, which could be as high as $25 billion. About 750,000 Americans – about half of the households who might be eligible for assistance under the deal – will likely receive checks for about $1,800.

But the agreement could reshape long-standing mortgage lending guidelines and make it easier for those at risk of foreclosure to restructure their loans. And roughly 1 million homeowners could see the size of their mortgage reduced.

Five major banks – Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citibank and Ally Financial – and U.S. state attorneys general could adopt the agreement within weeks, according to two officials briefed on the discussions. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss the agreement publicly.

The settlement would be the biggest of a single industry since the 1998 multistate tobacco deal. And it would end a painful chapter that grew out of the 2008 financial crisis.

Nearly 8 million Americans have faced foreclosure since the housing bubble burst. In some cases, companies that process mortgages failed to verify the information on foreclosure documents. The worst practices, known collectively as "robo-signing," included employees signing documents they hadn't read or using fake signatures to sign off on foreclosures.

President Barack Obama is expected to tout the settlement in his State of the Union address Tuesday. His administration has put pressure on state officials to wrap up a deal more than a year in the making.

But some say the proposed deal doesn't go far enough. They have argued for a thorough investigation of potentially illegal foreclosure practices before a settlement is hammered out.

New York, Delaware, Nevada and Massachusetts have argued that banks should not be protected from future civil liability. The deal will not fully release banks from future criminal lawsuits by individual states.

In December, Massachusetts sued the five major banks over deceptive foreclosure practices.

Ian McConnell, director of the fraud division for Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, said Monday that Biden is "opposed to the proposed settlement as drafted."

"This position, given his prior public comments, should come as no surprise," McConnell said, adding that Biden will comment further when the still-confidential deal is made public.

California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris said in a statement that her ability to go after potential wrongdoing by mortgage lenders "remains a key lens through which she will evaluate any proposals." In September, California announced it would not agree to an earlier version of a settlement over foreclosure abuses that state and federal officials have been working on for more than a year.

But her office declined to comment on the proposed deal circulating among the states. And it wouldn't say whether California, the state with the greatest number of people who lost their homes to foreclosure, would agree to the deal.

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who has taken a public stance against halting investigations of fraudulent business practices as part of a national settlement, had no immediate comment Monday.

A signed deal is not expected this week, said Geoff Greenwood, a spokesman for Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, who has led the 50-state negotiations. Greenwood said late Monday that there are "terms we must still resolve."

The settlement would only apply to privately held mortgages issued between 2008 and 2011, not those held by government-controlled Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Fannie and Freddie own about half of all U.S. mortgages, roughly about 31 million U.S. home loans.

As part of the deal, about 1 million homeowners could also get the principal amount of their mortgages written down by an average of $20,000. One in four homeowners with a mortgage – or roughly 11 million people – owe more than their home is worth. These so-called "underwater" borrowers have little chance at refinancing.

Democratic attorneys general met Monday in Chicago to discuss the deal with Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan. Republican attorneys general were briefed about the deals via conference call later in the day.

Under the deal:

_ $17 billion would go toward reducing the principal that struggling homeowners owe on their mortgages.

_ $5 billion would be placed in a reserve account for various state and federal programs; a portion of that money would cover the $1,800 checks sent to those homeowners affected by the deceptive practices.

_ $3 billion would to help homeowners refinance at 5.25 percent.

In October 2010, major banks temporarily suspended foreclosures following revelations of widespread deceptive foreclosure practices by banks. Discussions then began over a national settlement.

Both sides have fought over the amounts of money that should be placed in the reserve account for property owners who were improperly foreclosed upon. Many of the larger points of the deal, including a $25 billion cost for the banks, have long been worked out, officials say.

Associated Press Writers Michael Virtanen in Albany, N.Y., Randall Chase in Dover, Del., and Ben Feller in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The nation's five largest mortgage lenders have agreed to overhaul their industry after deceptive foreclosure practices drove homeowners out of their homes, government officials sai...
WASHINGTON — The nation's five largest mortgage lenders have agreed to overhaul their industry after deceptive foreclosure practices drove homeowners out of their homes, government officials sai...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 150
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LongRunAggregateSupply
Stare Decisis, Inter Alia
04:54 PM on 01/24/2012
I would like some free money for being financially responsible an paying all of my bills on time.
11:55 AM on 02/09/2012
Utterly ignorant statement. Be sure to get your facts before posting. This abuse is not due to homeowners not paying their bills on time. It's due to the banks fraudulent activities and the government's "bail out" programs that took advantage of homeowners believing in the "system". They still have way too much of the consumer's money, never have been applied to accounts, homes "stolen" from owners, and noone is accountable. I'm sure that there are some homeowners that did not "do their part", but do you really think this lawsuit would be so large if that were the only reason? C'mon, do your research.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LongRunAggregateSupply
Stare Decisis, Inter Alia
04:46 PM on 01/24/2012
So Obama's crowning achievement of the year is helping out people who, in the future, do not keep their finances in order, overspend, and do not pay their bills? What about the majority of responsible citizens who manage their money (and end up paying for the mistakes of others, as in cases such as this).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndyFem
03:52 PM on 01/24/2012
Only about half of the existing mortgages are insured by Fannie and Freddie....That leaves the other half without even the "fantasy' of being one of the select few to get any relief under this plan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeckyJustice
Stop the frickin Fracking. NOW!
02:51 PM on 01/24/2012
"Nearly 8 million Americans have faced foreclosure since the housing bubble burst. In some cases, companies that process mortgages failed to verify the information on foreclosure documents. The worst practices, known collectively as "robo-signing," included employees signing documents they hadn't read or using fake signatures to sign off on foreclosures."

Please, someone, tell me why these people are not in Prison?
http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2010/03/20/indymac-federal-bank-fsb-v-israel-a-machado-deposition-of-erica-johnson-seck/

One West is our SERVICER. Johnson-Seck is an Employee of One West and CLAIMED she was ALSO a VP of MERS, but in this deposition admits she has no ties to MERS at all. She admits, she and her employees, also signing documents as MERS VPs, spend no more than 30 seconds on each document, and do NOT sign these documents in the presence of the Notaries who Notarize them.

Big problem here when they are transferring Deeds of Trust from the previous owner to One West, who hasn't paid a penny for that Deed of Trust.? Neat. They are giving their employer a Deed of Trust by the bogus claim that they are also MERS VPs?

Why aren't they in Prison???
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:54 PM on 01/24/2012
Money, lotsa money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hwc4577
02:47 PM on 01/24/2012
Just another ELITIST protecting the elite! what about homeowners who had artificially inflated Home values?
Once again Obama has no problem helping bailed out banks but not the homeowners!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LongRunAggregateSupply
Stare Decisis, Inter Alia
04:48 PM on 01/24/2012
Thats why you get a home appraised by more than one agency prior to purchase. If you practice a little CYA, you can avoid many problems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TaiJi2
02:18 PM on 01/24/2012
"A signed deal is not expected this week, said Geoff Greenwood, a spokesman for Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, who has led the 50-state negotiations. Greenwood said late Monday that there are "terms we must still resolve."

Then the President would do well NOT to mention it at all.
iam99
To know what you prefer...
02:12 PM on 01/24/2012
This would be the Royal(s') Scam.
That financial frauds go unpunished.
Who have been recipients of the $$$?
02:08 PM on 01/24/2012
Is anyone who bought a house from 2008 to 2011 and currently underwater whose mortgages are not owned by fannie or freddie getting the $1800 or just those who didn't pay their mortgage?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:39 PM on 01/24/2012
Compared to workers' share of national income, housing prices are too high.

IIRC, 60% of shipping containers are returned to China.

Perhaps it's time to use the empty shipping containers for housing...

http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2011/news/companies/1111/gallery.shipping_container_homes.fortune/index.html
6 incredible shipping container homes - DeMaria Design, Redondo Beach House (1) - CNNMoney

"These aren't your typical mobile homes. They're swanky, beautifully designed and, well, made out of recycled shipping containers."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:26 PM on 01/24/2012
From the National Association of Land Title Examiners and Abstractors

http://www.naltea.org/pdf/2a2d76ce-4497-466b-965b-47e0e93aa36c.pdf
Restoring Integrity to the Land Title Records – A Commentary on MERS

"...We also recognize the importance of the public record to the fundamental value of land
ownership. It is long since established in these United States that a public record of all
interest in real estate is necessary to maintain the confidence in the security of land
ownership. When we purchase property, we seek to do so with a reasonable certainty that
the property is free of unknown claims. Any claims of interest in that property, whether
voluntarily granted (as in a mortgage or deed of trust) or involuntary (as in a mechanics
lien or property taxes) are to be publicly noted. At, or prior to settlement of the land
purchase, the known claims are paid or otherwise satisfied – with the exception of those
which ‘run with the land’, such as easements conditions and restrictions..."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hammer0311
Govt is the problem
01:19 PM on 01/24/2012
To even think this could be is a twlight episode, same ol Chi town vote buying
01:06 PM on 01/24/2012
"The settlement would only apply to privately held mortgages issued between 2008 and 2011, not those held by government-controlled Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Fannie and Freddie own about half of all U.S. mortgages, roughly about 31 million U.S. home loans."

The worst offenders were Fannie and Freedie yet they are let off the hook. Shocking.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/story/2012-01-23/landmark-mortgage-settlement/52757250/1
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UberdanSounds
I make music(al), funnies.
11:49 AM on 01/24/2012
So...You were illegally marketed to, illegally taken advantage of or your contract w/the Bank was "not in good faith", & your home was illegally stolen back from you by that very Bank, & all you get to show for it is $1800 bucks...wowsers! We hit the lottery I tell ya!!

We're living in the matrix.
01:07 PM on 01/24/2012
Did the bank sell the house to you? No. You bought it. They loaned you the money.
01:45 PM on 01/24/2012
Right , they LOAN us that money that CONGRESS gave them to do what ever the hell they please with it
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UberdanSounds
I make music(al), funnies.
03:44 PM on 01/24/2012
Great, & if you fall on hard times & ask to refinance your mortgage and the bank tells you to stop paying it because they're going to refinance it, don't come crying to us when they evict you because they lied about helping you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:35 AM on 01/24/2012
This shows how ineffective petitions are, even if they have over 300,000 signatures...

http://www.ourfuture.org/features/no-sweetheart-deal-big-banks
No Sweetheart Deal For Big Banks

"Bankers who commit fraud ought to be prosecuted and sent to jail. But Obama administration officials are encouraging state attorneys general to cut a deal with bankers who broke the law and devastated the economy. Learn more about the issue on this page...."

The First Amendment gives citizens the right to petition the government, but money allows the government to ignore petitions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:37 PM on 01/24/2012
Obama didn't ignore the petitions ?
10:07 AM on 01/24/2012
The solution is simple. Auction off the homes that are in foreclosure at rock bottom prices. Do not count the homes in with the rest of the neighborhood. This will keep their prices and tax base stable.
Get the mega banks out of the mortgage business. This is best done at a local level. We cannot have a society where India, China and others own our homes. If so they should pick up the tab for the taxes and upkeep of the homes.


Why did they get rid of GlassStegal to replace it with this disaster?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:42 AM on 01/24/2012
Part of globalization...

http://www.citizen.org/documents/FinanceReregulationFactSheetFINAL.pdf
To Rescue Main Street, We Need to Curb the WTO

"...Starti­ng in the late 1970s, the U.S. government and corporatio­ns pushed to redefine “finance” from a service that supports the real economy to a tradable commodity whose flow across borders should be uninhibite­d. Starting in the late 1980s, they successful­ly pushed for financial services to be included in “trade” negotiatio­ns, including those establishi­ng the World Trade Organizati­on (WTO). “The sector was truly unique in that respect, and there is little doubt within the trade policy community that financial sector support in the European Union and the United States was a determinin­g force in concluding the FSA [WTO Financial Services Agreement]­” notes a study posted on the WTO’s own website “Financial Services and the WTO: What Next?”

The WTO rules require deregulati­­on – and lock-in – of financial services that countries “liberaliz­­e” under these terms.

[snip]

For instance, the Glass-Stea­­gall Act created a firewall between commercial and investment banks to prevent the former from speculatin­­g with consumers’ savings. But the U.S.’ 1997 FSA commitment­­s noted an intent to change Glass-Stea­­gall to conform with WTO rules. The Gramm-Leac­­h-Bliley Act, which did so, passed in 1999 – the year the FSA went into effect....­­"
10:52 AM on 01/24/2012
If you think prices are at "rock bottom" now, you're going to be stunned over the next decade.