iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Poll: Preachy Politicians Turn Off Many Voters

Preachy Politicians

First Posted: 01/23/2012 6:24 pm Updated: 01/23/2012 6:24 pm

By David Gibson
Religion News Service

(RNS) If there's one thing the fractious Republican field agrees on, it's that personal religious devotion is central to their campaign message.

Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney and even Ron Paul stress their faith on the stump; Romney plays up his religion, though he downplays his Mormonism because of lingering evangelical suspicion toward his church.

But a new survey indicates that such a liberal use of "God talk" may actually be more likely to hurt rather than help a candidate's chances with voters.

According to an online poll conducted last September by the research arm of the Southern Baptist Convention, only 1 in 6 Americans (16 percent) said they are more likely to vote for a candidate who regularly shares their religious beliefs.

The poll by LifeWay Research showed that 30 percent of respondents indicated they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who prominently touts their religious beliefs and practices; 28 percent said it would have no impact, and 21 percent said it would depend on the candidate's religion.

"Different people get a different picture in their mind when a political candidate shares or shows their religious convictions," said Scott McConnell, director of LifeWay Research. "While some Americans warm up to this, many don't see it as a positive."

The poll reinforces the conflicted feelings Americans have toward their politicians: A survey last year conducted by Public Religion Research Institute and Religion News Service found majorities of every religious group say it is important that a presidential candidate have strong religious beliefs.

At the same time, respondents -- including evangelical Christians -- had a hard time identifying the religious affiliation of either President Obama or Romney.

Taken together, the two polls seem to suggest Americans want their politicians to be pious but not preachy.

Not surprisingly, the LifeWay poll found that Americans who consider themselves to be "born-again, evangelical or fundamentalist" Christians are much more likely than nonreligious voters to support a candidate who deploys a very public piety on the stump, by a 28 percent to 11 percent margin.

Similarly, these conservative Christians are more likely to say their support also "depends on the religion" of the candidate.

That may matter more in the GOP primaries than the general election given evangelicals' outsized role in determining the outcome of the primaries, as was shown in the results of Saturday's (Jan. 21) South Carolina contest.

The fact that those same evangelicals also say the religion of the candidate matters may be further cause for concern for Romney, who not only lost the South Carolina primary to Gingrich, but also the evangelical vote.

In the survey, respondents were asked: "When a candidate running for office regularly expresses religious conviction or activity, how does that impact your vote?"

The online survey of 2,144 Americans was conducted in September 2011 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By David Gibson Religion News Service (RNS) If there's one thing the fractious Republican field agrees on, it's that personal religious devotion is central to their campaign message. Rick Santo...
By David Gibson Religion News Service (RNS) If there's one thing the fractious Republican field agrees on, it's that personal religious devotion is central to their campaign message. Rick Santo...
Filed by Jahnabi Barooah  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 101
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
iridium53
Semper Fi
01:05 AM on 02/08/2012
"....the accumulations and encroachments by ecclesiastical bodies have been silently engaged in for some time now, centuries, but the encroachment has been consistent and today it has grown to a level where it is no longer silent.

"The separation of Church and State is not meant to hinder religion, or to deny the role of religion in society or in our history. Many of the founders were Christians, even James Madison was a Christian, but what they established was a government that was non-religious - a secular government. That does not mean that they rejected religion; their purpose was to establish a government whose sole function was to administer earthy matters, while matters of religion were left purely to ecclesiastical institutions. The founders, by and large, were very much supportive of the role of religion in society, but they separated the ideas of society and government, leaving religion to play a role in society, not government."

http://rationalrevolution.net/articles/history_of_the_separation_of_chu.htm
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people taste like crap!
07:01 PM on 01/27/2012
Poll: Preachy Politicians Turn Off Many Voters....

But not the evangelical Jesus freaky bible backs in the mid-west or south.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JonW
11:53 PM on 01/25/2012
Undoubtedly the public is getting weary of the hypocritical politicos who preach but don't practice the "Good Word". Such is the danger of overexposure.
06:35 AM on 01/25/2012
Our constitution was written with religion at the core of it: the founding fathers were themselves very religious men. So, I don't see why we would not want to keep it that way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:39 AM on 01/25/2012
First, "the founding fathers were themselves very religious men" is not really true, some were and some weren't.
Second, that alone does not prove that the "Constitution was written with religion at the core of it". Seriously, the leap from one to the other is extraordinary. I wrote an email and I believe strong in God, does that mean that my email is religious at the core?
Third, it specifically says to separate the religious and secular, with the realm of the secular being the state and the religious being the private church. I mean, even in Christianity that is a common ideal, consider Caesar's Coin.
photo
phal4875
The world is run by cats; we just feed them.
05:16 PM on 01/25/2012
Which founding fathers were religious? Some were and others were not. They were all white; does that mean that whiteness is at the core of our Constitution?
05:50 PM on 01/26/2012
You all need to read Original Intent By David Barton. That is all about the Constitution and you will see who is right. He never loses.
06:09 AM on 01/25/2012
I'm quite the opposite! I like a candidate that shows reverence and faith that is a deep part of their life. This is because I can relate to this since faith is central to my life.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:39 AM on 01/25/2012
Yes, but most people are not like you.
photo
jestermarcus
Enough about me.....
03:26 PM on 01/26/2012
How often are politicians sincere in their preaching though?
02:21 AM on 01/25/2012
If you are voting on religion then you should not be voting.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people taste like crap!
07:06 PM on 01/27/2012
Most in the mid-west and south vote their bible beliefs...that's why they're the red states..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ttsgw
Atheist and secular humanist
01:25 AM on 01/25/2012
This happen when common sense prevails.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeterinSydney
12:56 AM on 01/25/2012
I bet most American people do not want the Bible and religion with its narrow world views to be rammed down their throats.
07:06 PM on 01/24/2012
Many voters disagree with politicians who take a pro Christian stance. Many other voters disagree with politicians who take an anti Christ stance. Come November, we'll find out who out numbers who, IF we have a requirement for voter ID by then.
photo
goatini
We are two-legged wombs, that’s all
08:48 PM on 01/24/2012
You misspelled "theocratic".
09:31 PM on 01/24/2012
“You misspelled "theocrati­c".”>>>That sounds like something I might do, except, I don't remember using the word theocratic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yoyo1900
03:26 PM on 01/24/2012
Newt converted to Catholicism. He should review the church's policy on divorce.
02:22 AM on 01/25/2012
He is pretty sure this on won't get sick.
photo
phal4875
The world is run by cats; we just feed them.
05:18 PM on 01/25/2012
He has reviewed it since he has a few more planned.
06:31 AM on 01/26/2012
Powerful and/or rich Catholics can get "annulments" and don't have to worry about divorce.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rMatey
old, recovered Xtian, Liberal
03:06 PM on 01/24/2012
I think fundamentalists in any religion are dangerous. Pass the snake, please.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:21 PM on 01/25/2012
I agree with your statement that fundamentalists in any religion are dangerous.

When it comes to the political arena, when politicians enact laws that are based on the moral teachings of their religions, they are taking away freedom and liberty from people. There is no way that I can condone that. They can be as religious as they want in their private lives (we've seen quite often that the most religious are the worst in practice), but no one has the right to shove their morals upon other people. We, the People, are capable of making our own decisions. If you want to influence our decisions, go knocking door to door to try to spread your word, but keep it out of our laws.
01:39 PM on 01/24/2012
(It is important that a presidential candidate have strong religious beliefs)

.
I could care less if the a President has Religious Beliefs or not. Just do your
job when Elected.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Summer77
12:51 PM on 01/24/2012
Politicians give Religion a bad name period. That is why is so impotent that we don't mix the two the Church has in a way advocated its responsibility and have turned it over to the Politicians AKA Republicans they now lead the Church instead of the Church leading the Sheep they are being led by their noses by Republicans and Mega Church Pastors! The Church and the Republican Party have managed to make God the Tail and not the Head of the Church in fact the Christian Church has sold out to the Politicians. Churches need to ck out their attendance the People are trying to tell you something more of us believe in The Separation Of Church and State it was put there for a reason. Think about it!
12:09 PM on 01/24/2012
Religion is inherently undemocratic.

Democracy requires compromise and concessions. But once "God says" to do/not do something, all discussion stops. Witness the abortion and gay marriage standoff in this country.

And note that you have people like James Dobson (Focus on the Family, the Family Research Council) who writes that only CAPITALISM is consistent with Christianity. So now God demands that we all support capitalism. Any wonder that any alternative such as socialism is demonized and EXCLUDED from even being considered?

Christ.
photo
goatini
We are two-legged wombs, that’s all
08:49 PM on 01/24/2012
"Supply Side Jesus".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pearl0002
Blue Texas Valley
05:41 PM on 01/26/2012
I would dearly like to see just one bit of evidence from/in the Bible which proves Jesus to have been a capitalist. Just one. Everything I've read indicated that he depended on other people to feed and house him and his disciples. THAT"S not capitalism. It's called what, boys and girls?
11:59 AM on 01/24/2012
21% say "religion matter" in voting for a candidate. My bet is that pretty much all of them are Republicans. Bad news for Mittens.