More

HuffPost Social Reading

Gay Marriage Returns To The Political Spotlight As States Face Potential Votes

Gay Marriage

DAVID CRARY   01/25/12 05:04 PM ET  AP

With a flurry of coast-to-coast developments this week, same-sex marriage is back in the political spotlight and likely to remain there through Election Day as a half-dozen states face potentially wrenching votes on the issue.

In Maryland, New Jersey and Washington, bills to legalize same-sex marriage have high-powered support and good chances of passage in the legislature. Gay-marriage opponents in Maryland and Washington would likely react by seeking referendums in November to overturn those laws, while New Jersey's Republican governor, Chris Christie, says he'll veto the bill if it reaches him and prefers that lawmakers OK a referendum so voters can decide.

In all three states, polls suggest voters are closely divided on whether gays should have the right to marry, so there's a chance one could emerge as the first state to support same-sex marriage in a statewide vote.

Maine voters also may have an opportunity to vote for same-sex marriage in November; an announcement by gay-rights activists about a ballot-measure campaign is set for Thursday. Proposed amendments for constitutional bans on gay marriage will be on the ballots in North Carolina on May 8 and in Minnesota on Nov. 6.

In New Hampshire, Republicans who now control the legislature are mulling whether to repeal the 2009 law legalizing same-sex marriage. Their state is one of six with such laws, along with Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New York and Vermont, as well as the District of Columbia.

Added together, the state-level showdowns will likely raise the prominence of the marriage issue in the presidential campaign, even though it's not a topic that the leading candidates tend to broach proactively.

"There's a lot going on," said gay-marriage advocate Evan Wolfson, president of Freedom to Marry. "It means that candidates – whether Romney or Obama – who hope to avoid the discussion will not be able to."

Three of the remaining Republican presidential contenders, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum, have signed a National Organization for Marriage pledge opposing same-sex marriage and endorsing a federal constitutional amendment to ban it. But it's not among the topics prominent in the stump speeches of Romney or Newt Gingrich, the two front-runners.

On the Democratic side, President Barack Obama has taken several steps during his first term that have pleased gay-rights advocates, but says he is still "evolving" in regard to same-sex marriage and isn't ready to endorse it. Some activists hope he will do so before the election, though there's been no strong hint of that from the White House.

"Obama will get asked about it, and you can't straddle both sides of this forever," said Richard Socarides, a former Clinton White House adviser on gay rights. "Clearly he's not going to retreat, so he only has one place to go, and I think he will do it before the election."

Another potential factor: Judgments could be issued during the campaign in one or more of several pending federal court cases about same-sex marriage. Appeals could result in the issue heading toward the Supreme Court, and the presidential candidates would be expected to comment on any major development.

A summary of the latest state-by-state events:

NEW JERSEY: Thanks to a change of heart by Senate President Stephen Sweeney, a gay marriage bill is now seen as having a strong chance of passage in the Democratic-controlled legislature. Christie, a Roman Catholic who has long opposed gay marriage, says he'd veto the bill if it reaches him, but on Tuesday he urged lawmakers to put the issue before voters in a statewide ballot measure.

"Let us have a discussion about this in halls of schools and homes and synagogues and churches and ball fields across New Jersey, and let people decide," Christie said.

Sweeney rejected the suggestion, saying, "Civil rights is not to be placed on the ballot."

MARYLAND: In contrast to Christie, Maryland's Catholic governor – Democrat Martin O'Malley – supports gay marriage. Unlike last year, when a marriage bill stalled in the House of Delegates, O'Malley is now making the issue one of his top legislative priorities. He and his allies hope to broaden support among lawmakers and the public by making clear in the new bill that religious freedom will be protected. Public opinion could be crucial, because opponents of gay marriage are expected to seek a referendum in November to overturn a marriage bill if one passes in the legislature.

WASHINGTON: Like O'Malley, Democratic Gov. Chris Gregoire has strongly endorsed a pending gay-marriage bill, which received its first legislative hearing this week. Based on public commitments from lawmakers, the bill has enough votes to win passage. However, as in Maryland, opponents are poised to petition for a referendum challenging the law.

NEW HAMPSHIRE: A bill pending in a House committee would repeal the state's same-sex marriage law and replace it with civil unions for any unmarried adults. It would not invalidate the same-sex marriages already legalized since 2009. The fate of the bill is uncertain, facing possible revisions before a vote and a promised veto by Democratic Gov. John Lynch if it does pass. If it gets that far, and lawmakers override a veto, the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union has indicated it would challenge the new law in court.

MAINE: Gay marriage supporters in Maine have spent several months assessing whether they would seek a referendum in November to legalize same-sex marriage. Their decision will be announced Thursday, and national gay-rights leaders believe the campaign will be launched. Maine is the only state in New England that doesn't allow either gay marriage or civil unions. Its lawmakers approved a gay marriage law in 2009, but it was overturned months later by a statewide referendum.

NORTH CAROLINA and MINNESOTA:

Voters in 30 states have approved constitutional amendments aimed at solidifying bans on gay marriage; Minnesota and North Carolina could join those ranks if measures placed on the ballot by Republican-controlled legislatures win approval later this year. Neither Minnesota nor North Carolina allow gay marriage now, but supporters say the amendments are needed to prevent judges or lawmakers from changing that policy in the future. The North Carolina amendment also would prevent the state from recognizing civil unions or domestic partnerships.

In all the showdown states, national advocacy groups are expected to be active on both sides. The Human Rights Campaign, for example, has promised to provide funding, strategic advice and field staff for the various campaigns supporting same-sex marriage.

On the other side, the National Organization for Marriage is vowing a multistate effort, including promises of financial support in the primaries to defeat any Republican lawmakers who support gay marriage in Washington.

Though several major national polls now show that a slight majority of Americans support same-sex marriage, National Organization for Marriage president Brian Brown predicts his side will continue its winning streak and prevail in any state referendums that are held this fall.

"There's a myth that history is on a trajectory moving toward same-sex marriage," Brown said. "There is no such momentum."

___

Online:

Human Rights Campaign: http://www.hrc.org/

National Organization for Marriage: http://bit.ly/14OBri

___

David Crary can be followed on Twitter at http://twitter.com/CraryAP

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
With a flurry of coast-to-coast developments this week, same-sex marriage is back in the political spotlight and likely to remain there through Election Day as a half-dozen states face potentially wre...
With a flurry of coast-to-coast developments this week, same-sex marriage is back in the political spotlight and likely to remain there through Election Day as a half-dozen states face potentially wre...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 373
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
TBJ
Irrelevent Blurb
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:06 AM on 01/27/2012
"Neither Minnesota nor North Carolina allow gay marriage now, but supporters say the amendments are needed to prevent judges or lawmakers from changing that policy in the future."

what idiots. don't they realize that state constitutional amendments are not immune to being turned over? If it's unconstitutional, it'll be changed just the same...ask colorado.

"The North Carolina amendment also would prevent the state from recognizing civil unions or domestic partnerships."

This puts the lie to the whole "just don't call it marriage and we're fine with it" argument.
photo
WheelsOnFire
Fiercely Independent
10:10 PM on 01/27/2012
Excellent points.

Virginia and several other states thought they could make interracial marriage illegal, but they were struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court back in 1967. Their laws were unconstitutional.

Great job in pointing out the lie about civil unions.
photo
antigaychristianssuck
deus cinaedus est
12:55 AM on 01/27/2012
Those Christians who are anti-gay simply cannot be allowed to impose their anti-gay religious beliefs on the rest of the country. If they don't like gay marriage, no one is forcing them to have a gay marriage. The US is not a theocracy. Fortunately more and more Christians and Jews are supporting marriage equality.
03:14 PM on 01/27/2012
like me whose bi ^^
photo
antigaychristianssuck
deus cinaedus est
03:27 PM on 01/27/2012
good for you! the best of both worlds!
10:18 PM on 01/26/2012
If you don't like gays, don't marry one! But let love shine!
04:03 PM on 01/26/2012
What you say is true, but times change. Please return to the mid twentieth century and move slowly up to 2012. Lyndon Johnson, a Democrat, helped usher in the civil rights movement in the 60s. Do you remember the 60s? America's Apartheid?----Lou on Vancouver Island

Lou, I remember when Pres. Dwight D. Eisenhower, a Republican, was trying to pass Civil Rights Legislation in 1957. Lyndon Johnson was the Senate Majority Leader, and had blocked Civil Rights Bills for years. Eisenhower got it passed but LBJ had watered it down. It was the FIRST civil rights bill passed since 1875. This is LBJ explaining why he didn't KILL it:

"These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do something about this, we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. For if we don't move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there'll be no way of stopping them, we'll lose the filibuster and there'll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of wild legislation. It'll be Reconstruction all over again."--LBJ, Senate Majority Leader (1957)

Isn't it "funny" how we NEVER hear about Pres. Eisenhower (a Republican) passing Civil Rights Bills (he also passed one in 1960..which LBJ again, watered down).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ceeenbee
04:52 PM on 01/26/2012
I always have to ask the question . . . "That's nice but, what have you done for us lately?'"
05:35 PM on 01/26/2012
ceenbee, nothing will convince you, but here's a better question: Why don't we EVER hear about the FIRST Civil Rights Bills passed after Reconstruction -- all of us would've said, '64 and '65..'cause that's all we EVER hear about.

But Pres. Eisenhower passed Civil Rights Bills in 1957 and 1960. Why are they hiding Dwight D. Eisenhower's contributions to black Civil Rights?

Why do they EXALT the contributions of a racist that BLOCKED black Civil Rights Bills left and right? Guess what LBJ said, after one of his Bills were passed in the 60's:

"I'll have them (n-words) voting Democratic for the next 200 years"! ---Does that sound like a man that cares about blacks??

That's the Democratic Party..that's who we're TOLD to support?? And people wonder WHY I'm NOT a Democrat, really?

Why are we LIED to about Civil Rights? Now I fully understand why MLK and his Dad were registered Republicans.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
12:49 PM on 01/26/2012
I'm from NJ and gay and I'd rather have the people vote on the bill. I mean, if it passes, people like NOM won't be coming into the state to try and change it because its what the people wanted.
photo
lovingthismoment50
I cringe at the past and dream for the future.
01:47 PM on 01/26/2012
Guarantee, NOM doesn't care about what the people want.

There's no end to their hate.

These bigots won't give up until their entire organization is crushed to the ground.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
04:53 PM on 01/26/2012
Trust me, they will not stop. They are fueled by hate and will not stop.
12:04 PM on 01/26/2012
You didn't mention Indiana. Perhaps it is because it is because we are going backwards and take rights and other states are going forward and expanding rights.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam of CA
Independent Information Hunter
10:57 AM on 01/26/2012
S.C. social conservatives sold their soul to Mr. GetRich who committed every sin against social conservatives. Now S.C. can support Gay Marriage since they lost their claim to self-righteousness.
09:48 AM on 01/26/2012
Re: " Chris Christie, says he'll veto the bill if it reaches him and prefers that lawmakers OK a referendum so voters can decide."

Voting on other people's rights and freedoms is an affront to the Constitution and an obscenity unworthy of America or Americans.

Shame on Christie for not doing the right thing, the just thing, the fair thing. Not that Republicants know much about any of those.
pavementends42
Micro-bio is a study, not a blurb.
11:16 AM on 01/26/2012
Right again, tbta. The District turned down a referendum on appealing same-sex marriages because it was deemed inappropriate to vote on minority rights. I'm just amazed it's allowed to proceed in so many other places!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lou on Vancouver Island
Allin, Lou: Mystery Author
11:53 AM on 01/26/2012
People should not get to vote on other people's rights. We'd still have slavery and no franchise for women or minorities.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bully2
Individual rights are not subject to a public vote
01:47 AM on 01/27/2012
Truth be told is absolutely right, and it was said very well by an author who is ironically most often cited by very conservative, very right wing republicans:

"Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities (and the smallest minority on earth is the individual)." - Ayn Rand

(describing a vote within Nazi Germany)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robbert Bricker
The Undeniable
08:48 AM on 01/26/2012
"We define Marriage as: a religious solemnization of vows between one man and one woman of age to consent. Even those performed by a Justice of the Peace or Judge are not, by our understanding "marriages" but rather civil ceremonies (unions). We see no issue with civil unions for homosexuals"

This is a quote from the KKK's website. What I find most interesting is that their view is less hate-filled than the average evangelical or fundie. WOW. Its a sad day when evangelical and fundie christianity is more hateful than the KKK.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cwebster
predominantly exasperated
10:42 AM on 01/26/2012
It is indeed.
photo
TXanimal
Somewhere between Occam's Razor & Murphy's Law
11:30 AM on 01/26/2012
WOW indeed. Thanks for posting this!
photo
TBJ
Irrelevent Blurb
08:09 AM on 01/26/2012
"There's a myth that history is on a trajectory moving toward same-sex marriage," Brown said. "There is no such momentum."

http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/first-time-majority-americans-favor-legal-gay-marriage.aspx

Graph slopes don't lie, Brownie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ceeenbee
09:37 AM on 01/26/2012
My eyes don't lie. I believe that I an upward trajectory.
09:52 AM on 01/26/2012
TBJ, just a point of clarification. That wasn't the first time a majority of Americans favored equal marriage - it was just the first time Gallup REPORTED it.

There's also the ABC/Washington Post poll and the CNN poll of the same year that showed almost identical results.

But of course, Brown gets PAID to lie about gay people. That is his job, so no wonder he repeats the lies.
05:47 AM on 01/26/2012
"SORRY, the repub party of 150 years ago is not that of today - the Dixiecrat democrats bolted to the repubs 49 years ago"---Bob Kellerman

Bob, a few racist Dems left in protest. But the majority of those men (such as Robert Byrd) DID NOT join the Party of BLACK LIBERATION and FREEDOM (Republican) but kept their racist behinds in their racist Party of bricks, batons, fire hoses, and police dogs -- yelp..The Democratic Party!
photo
Angel1999
Microbiologist & Historian
09:14 AM on 01/26/2012
And changed their views to reflect the new democratic party that emerged from those contentious times. It has been the liberal party, regardless of which name you attach to it, that has been behind every civil rights advancement in this country from emancipation to women's suffrage to ending Jim Crow and segregation and now to gay rights.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Kellerman
Let's have more sanity toward each other
02:36 AM on 01/26/2012
kingjs3807
Same-Sex Marriage is NOT a civil right..and STOP comparing it to being black. You gays try to bully people..we­ll I can't be bullied.

You will lose black support in the Democratic Party with gay marriage -- so keep pushing it! It's time for black people to wake up and see what that Party is all about.

TRANSLATION -- YOU GAYS ARE HURTING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, BECAUSE I THINK BLACK PEOPLE ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO VOTE FOR REPUBLICANS WHO HATE THEM

Some of us think better of our Black Americans
03:27 AM on 01/26/2012
Listen to my little friend..spouting more Democratic Party LIES and propaganda. The Republican Party was founded in 1854 in opposition to slavery, Bob. Your Democratic Party is the Party of SLAVERY, of the KLAN, of Jim Crow, of Segregation..they even bled and died trying to keep slavery legal, Bob -- FACTS don't lie, friend!

And today, they're the Party of lies and deceptions..denying their own racist past and blaming the liberators of blacks for their crimes against humanity -- but really, it's not surprising that the Party of abortion and same-sex marriage would lie and blame others for their crimes.

I'm sure Ole Slew Foot is PROUD of the Democrats..cause only SATAN, himself..could pull off such an obvious lie.

But the TRUTH remains -- The Republican Party liberated black people, and passed the 13, 14, and 15th amendments giving blacks freedom, citizenship and the right to vote..AGAINST Democratic opposition!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AngryHarpy
I dwell in possibility.
04:17 AM on 01/26/2012
The Republican Party of the 1860's is nothing like today's Republican Party.

If Lincoln were alive today he'd be a Democrat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Kellerman
Let's have more sanity toward each other
04:20 AM on 01/26/2012
SORRY, the repub party of 150 years ago is not that of today - the Dixiecrat democrats bolted to the repubs 49 years ago
03:52 AM on 01/26/2012
Ummm, newsflash. There are thousands upon thousands of black Americans that are GAY! doh! Betcha didn't think of that one!

And guess what, noone compares what blacks endured as it IS different. But there is a template that was created in the civil rights movement that is being referenced. Stop showing your prejudice.. and ignorance for that matter.

Guess what. There are men being killed and bullied because they are, ... guess what... GAY! If you can't find it in your heart to show compassion for someone that is not in the majority, then you have not learned anything from the people that endured true prejudice in the civil rights movement. You're just as bad as the crazies that threw hate at your ancestors.

Grow up and evolve already, will ya!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Kellerman
Let's have more sanity toward each other
04:18 AM on 01/26/2012
YOU READ ME WRONG -- read again and blast the idiot to whom I replied