More

Hollywood Activists Protest FedEx's Low Corporate Tax Rate (PHOTOS)

Hollywood Protest Fedex

First Posted: 01/25/2012 9:55 pm Updated: 01/26/2012 12:49 pm

Unfair tax rates are the topic du jour when it comes to inequality in America and protesters in Hollywood put the issue center stage on Wednesday afternoon with a march down Hollywood's Sunset Boulevard to highlight what they called FedEx's excesssively low rate.

Organized by Good Jobs LA, Service Employees International Union, the Teamsters and a smattering of Occupy LA members, the protestors took to the streets at noon with bullhorns, drums and provocative signs, traveling from the CNN building at Cahuenga Boulevard to a FedEx branch at Vine Street to deliver boxes of what they called "unpaid" tax bills.

Good Jobs LA claims that FedEx received a federal tax subsidy of more than $552 million, which could have created over 1,000 jobs, contributed tens of millions for Medicaid and food stamp benefits, and added more than $11 million for education programs.

Good Jobs LA points out FedEx is part of a group of 78 companies that paid less than 1 percent tax for at least one year from 2008 to 2010, according to the study "Corporate Taxpayers & Corporate Tax Dodgers." FedEx paid a rate of -3.2 percent, according to the study.

The study, published in November by Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, lists, among other things, companies that paid a tax of 1 percent or less for at least one year from 2008 to 2010. When the report was released, the Washington Post highlighted companies on the list that actually paid a negative tax rate, including General Electric (-45 percent) and Pepco Holdings (-118 percent).

Anyone outraged by companies finding enough loopholes to legally dodge their 35 percent tax responsibility would have fit right in with the protesters in Hollywood Wednesday. Signs with messages like "We Are The 99%" and "If protesting is terrorism, Martin Luther King Jr. would be in Gitmo" made an appearance. The marchers also noted with pleasure that they loudly passed by the office buildings of other large corporations.

Refugio Mata, a spokesperson for Good Jobs LA, explained to The Huffington Post over the phone that the banks have come under activists' scrutiny for their foreclosure and consumer practices, while Verizon and FedEx are companies that paid less than 1 percent of taxes per year from 2008 to 2010.

By 1:30 p.m., the march had ended, and by 2 p.m. the protesters had already dispersed. Mata claimed that there were no confrontations between what she estimated were 400 gathered protesters and the riot units of assembled police. Officer Larry Park, a spokesman for the Los Angeles Police Department, told The Huffington Post that the march was peaceful and there were no incidents.

A FedEx employee at the Hollywood branch declined to comment to The Huffington Post but confirmed that the company closed only for a short period of time.

View a selection of photos of the event posted on Twitter.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

Unfair tax rates are the topic du jour when it comes to inequality in America and protesters in Hollywood put the issue center stage on Wednesday afternoon with a march down Hollywood's Sunset Bouleva...
Unfair tax rates are the topic du jour when it comes to inequality in America and protesters in Hollywood put the issue center stage on Wednesday afternoon with a march down Hollywood's Sunset Bouleva...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 86
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:43 AM on 01/30/2012
Is this group represents special interests. Unions....Political types. Are they in front of UPS. Are they going to strike in front of restaurants to make sure we come up with a better way of tracking tips for income reporting. Of course not. If you don't like the tax laws then go on strike in front of city councils, state government, and federal government. Every company is responsible for managing their business....their money. i don't want to make less money, have less job security, and less opportunity for advancement because they didn't manage their business well. It is in everyones best interest that their employers pay what they owe and nothing more. How many tax payers try to find every exemption, and deduction they can find to pay less taxes? Are the teamsters and other organizations involved in this protest managing their business well? Are they trying to avoid taxes that they legitimately can avoid. Are they claiming tax exemptions? How many employees and employee wages and benefits did Fedex protect by managing their business well? I question the intelligence and motivation of these groups focus on Fedex. If you don't like the laws, then protest and vote. Majority rules. You did not convince me.
04:32 PM on 01/27/2012
This all about the unions. SEIU and teamsters want in. As a long time FedEx worker we don't need them. Fred has taken good care of me for over 20 years, during that time I have paid alot of taxes
and done my fair share, as have thousands of others. Unions are a thing of the past. Get an education, learn a skill and take care of yourself.
11:10 PM on 01/30/2012
R you so Serious!!!!!!!!!! Fred Has taken care of you?? Your special then. Some of us in FedEx office have been there over 5 Years and we have never ever had a pay increase!!!!!!
photo
studioh!
just.words.
12:16 PM on 01/27/2012
well, as long as they weren't shootin' at drivers and pedestrians...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fran04
08:36 AM on 01/27/2012
People get the impression that paying taxes are unfair. Wrong, taxes pay for goods and services that people and corporations used. For example, FedEx utilizes road and bridges. Who do you think maintain those roads and bridges? It is not FedEx. FedEx carries cargo. They don’t worry about their cargo being stolen or hijacked. Who do think provide the security on the roads and highway? It is not FedEx. FedEx hires drivers. Who do you think administer the Commercial Driver License test and provide the standards that ensure that truck drivers are competent? Corporations utilize our water and air. They do not work in a vacuum. In fact, they impact our environment more than an individual. The old argument that FedEx provides jobs, FedEx provides a service; they need people to help them provide these services so that they will be paid. When FedEx deliver a package, they are paid for this service. They do not deliver the packages for free. The customers by utilizing FedEx over UPS or other carrier keep FedEx in business; FedEx is providing jobs out of necessity not charity. I think that FedEx should pay taxes, because they are utilizing services and impacting our environment like everyone else. Until FedEx starts delivering packages for free, they should taxes.
01:42 PM on 01/29/2012
Lets follow your logic a bit. You are upset that FedEx did not pay their "fair share" of taxes. But when I complain that 47% of the workers in the U. S. pay no federal income tax at all the excuses start coming out that these people pay other taxes such as sales tax, gas tax, property taxes etc., you get the point. So now change the name to Fedex and all is wrong in the world.
The problem is not Fedex it is Congress picking winners and losers. Fedex, GE and 47% of the population didn't pay their "fair share" of taxes. According to Warren Buffet he didn't either. All of those paying taxes or not paying taxes can always send in more, but they don't. They want to other guy to have to send in more.
Everyone should have to pay something, flat tax anyone?
10:50 PM on 01/26/2012
Fedex should not have to pay any taxes at all. How many living wage jobs do they create for Americans? 10's of thousands. I believe any company or corporation that creates living wage jobs right here in America should pay zero taxes. Companies that outsource and ship the jobs overseas should have their profits taxed at 35-50%
Steve68112
Provoking thought through sarcasm
01:19 AM on 02/02/2012
That is exactly the problem. 'Profits' are just a shell game for corporations. As long as their expenses are almost as much as their income, they have no profits to tax! And for their 'expenses', they purchase their own stock and grant 'stock options' to their corporate bigwigs, who only have to hold the stocks for a year to be considered long term. Then the bigwigs can sell the stock and get all the money and only have to pay 15% tax on it. THAT, is the problem. But if you go out and work your a$$ off you only get slammed with 20% or more tax on the money you make. Thus there is little incentive to work hard, either.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truthfulman
07:23 PM on 01/26/2012
... only in Los Angeles...
01:43 PM on 01/29/2012
Not true, Oakland too. It is nutty eveywhere, the weather is nicer here in LA so they can come out in the winter here.
06:40 PM on 01/26/2012
Don't blame FedEx, they play by the rules that are in place. Now if they falsified their taxes or somehow cheated, by all means, hold their feet to the fire. Instead, go after the fools that put the loopholes in place to begin with. What a bunch of wasted energy. And funny that the unions are spending so many dues on this and then people wonder why they get such a bad name. OH, could it be they aren't unionized?! No, of course not! UPS wants them to be unionized so their pricing will be competitive which only means that the consumer will pay MORE!
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
05:34 PM on 01/26/2012
"FedEx is part of a group of 78 companies that paid less than 1 percent tax for at least one year from 2008 to 2010"

And yet...

Fox disinformation network and conservatives continue to lie by saying U.S. corporate taxes are the highest in the world. Last year, Exxon paid $10 billion in taxes to Europe, while paying nothing here at home. Thanks GOP.

Corporate interest first, American citizen interest -- doesn't matter.
06:45 PM on 01/26/2012
They are the highest, why do you think Exxon is willing to pay the taxes to Europe and not here. This is why they, and Obama talked about, lowering the tax rate so people will actually keep their money here.
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
07:02 PM on 01/26/2012
I'm familiar with your consistent economic/political positions, Z; I've read many of your posts. You're either extremely misinformed, or intellectually dishonest. No amount of factual evidence ever moves you.

If you ever open your mind to reality, there are plenty of references on this site and it would only take you minutes to Google relevant information demonstrating you're wrong about corporate taxes.

Did you even bother to reference the link in the article before responding to me?
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
02:14 AM on 01/27/2012
Appreciate the reasonable response. Your suggested 25% corporate rate is interesting. So, I though it would be good to include a few references including countries high on the quality of life scale. Germany is very high and their corporate tax structure is close to your number at roughly 30%. Notice personal progressive tax rate too.

http://www.worldwide-tax.com/germany/germany_tax.asp

I also thought you might like to reference comparable world wide tax to GDP rates
to see how the U.S. compares with a few examples in the graphic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tax-Revenues-As-GDP-Percentage-(75-05).JPG

Finally, standard of living, with many considerations, might be useful because people matter more than corporations.

http://www.mercer.com/press-releases/quality-of-living-report-2011

Since you mentioned a corporate tax figure: 25%, maybe it wouldn't be hard to solve the tax problem at all. With a few successful references around the world and a historical perspective, it might be easy.
03:54 PM on 01/26/2012
THATS WHY I DONT USE THEM ! OR BUY GE PRODUCTS.
photo
FTracy3
My micro-bio is as empty as the rest of my life.
02:44 PM on 01/26/2012
Oh, tax rates. I thought they were protesting their computer monitors and flat screen TV's being thrown over fences.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blizzard man robot voice
Mark 13:13
02:25 PM on 01/26/2012
I like FedEx when I'm using someone else's account number.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leorangerie
02:18 PM on 01/26/2012
Yes, burn down FedEx and fire all of its employees. Good thinking.
04:33 PM on 01/26/2012
Where in the article was someone saying to do that? These people seem to be asking that FedEx, like a lot of companies, should be paying their fair share. And why should a private company that does as well as Fed Ex receive Federal tax subsidies while the USPS is having trouble surviving. Shouldn't any tax money that goes into a form of mail delivery be going towards the USPS? If I want to give money to Fed Ex I'll pay them directly. Otherwise they should be sending my parcels without direct payment whenever I want seeing as how, through my taxes, I've already paid them.
06:48 PM on 01/26/2012
Simple, USPS is not competitve because they have unions and FedEx does not. The burden on pensions alone is BILLIONS! And they have a monopoly on the mailbox deliveries!
photo
With Your Consent
Speak Truth to Power
02:18 PM on 01/26/2012
FedEx is lobbying against the US Post Office.

They're going to destroy it just like the banks and the lobby destroyed Japan's Post Office when Japan was on its knees after the crash.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LiberalDemIda
Pragmatic Progressives 4 Obama 2012
06:05 PM on 01/26/2012
Yep. And Bush and the Republicans passed a law forcing the U.S.P.S. to put aside money for retirement accounts for employees they have yet to hire! All they want to do is get rid of the unions and have Americans work at the mercy of people like Romney and KochBros.

"The Republican-imposed pre-funding requirement, which postal unions never asked for, has proven to be less a booster shot than a kiss of death. No health plan, public or private, operates under such an extreme mandate – and no government or business program is required to be fully funded 75 years ahead of time in order to be considered solvent.

Republican demands to lay off 100,000 workers now so that pensions are funded for 75 years is just as cruel a joke as insisting on throwing millions of Americans off of Social Security now to improve its financial outlook for 2086."
http://www.alternet.org/story/152451/3_big_lies_at_the_heart_of_republican_attacks_on_the_post_office?page=2

Issa needs to GO.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mailman
06:31 PM on 01/26/2012
Let's get our facts straight there, the Postal Service is it's own worse enemy not the republicans. I know that you are left leaning and don't see anything any other. Sure the republicans don't agree with the unions, hell I work for the Postal Service for 27 years and I don't agree with the unions. As for layoffs, when a company loses 6.8 billions dollars something has to happen. Going to five days is a smart thing because the demand is dropping every single year and if you just keep people for no other reason than they can't get laid off you'll sink and they are sinking.
06:54 PM on 01/26/2012
Indeed a rather silly bill but just think if we forced our government to set aside money for future generations instead of spending it all and then taking out loans from the Chinese so they can have more? By the way, this was co-sponsored by 2 Dems and 1 R and passed unanimously. But you go ahead and just blame the R's if it makes you feel better.
04:35 PM on 01/27/2012
FedEx's biggest customer is the USPS. What are the lobbying against?
It is the unions that are taking down the post office.
01:47 PM on 01/26/2012
They shouldn't be taxed at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
D.C. Douglas
Actor, voice over artist, and part-time gadfly.
01:51 PM on 01/26/2012
Then everybody would incorporate and then there would be no money to pay our soldiers, pave our streets, educate our children, etc etc. You're a bright glowstick at the rave of higher thinking, aintcha?
01:56 PM on 01/26/2012
Thanks, Karl.
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
05:35 PM on 01/26/2012
Yes, H is part of the problem.
03:54 PM on 01/26/2012
GET OUT OF OUR COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
04:23 PM on 01/26/2012
That's funny.
InLosAngeles
Speaking Truth to Groupthink
01:40 PM on 01/26/2012
What this nation needs is $2 postage stamps and $100 overnight shipping and a 30 minute line to wait in to pay for the pleasure.

"We Are The 99%" and "If protesting is terrorism, Martin Luther King Jr. would be in Gitmo" made an appearance."

Nobody thinks you are are terrorist, they think you're a lunatic. Protest away! Just don't block traffic. And please, bring back those goofy paper mache protest creations. I love those.
01:51 PM on 01/26/2012
Unless you one of the 1% then these people are protesting to help you even if your incapable of understanding it. The problem in this country is that too many are easily fooled by simplistic BS and content to stay ignorant.
InLosAngeles
Speaking Truth to Groupthink
02:15 PM on 01/26/2012
"The problem in this country is that too many are easily fooled by simplistic BS and content to stay ignorant."

Yeah, I get that part. I was around for the whole "Hope and Change" medicine show scam.
02:15 PM on 01/26/2012
What's even more ridiculous, is the fact that individuals relinquish their individual sovereignty, become a collective, and complain that certain individuals aren't paying enough taxes (when most of the "99%" pay no income tax at all).
53% of my fellow Californians are paying their "fair share", while the collective "99%"
destroys the lawn in downtown Los Angeles, which they do not pay into.
Yes, there are certain individuals who have valid points on the horrors of crony capitalism, but most of the rhetoric is patterned after a certain socialist theory which progresses to only one outcome. Free yourselves, my friends.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
D.C. Douglas
Actor, voice over artist, and part-time gadfly.
01:52 PM on 01/26/2012
Romney supporter, eh?