More

Laser Scientists Create World's Most Powerful And Precise X-Ray Lasers

Xray Laser

First Posted: 01/25/2012 6:57 pm Updated: 01/31/2012 3:41 pm

Laser researchers at Stanford University's SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory are beaming over a pair of research papers they've just published.

One paper details what's being called the world's most powerful laser, the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS). Its beam is "a billion times brighter than those of any X-ray source before it," according to a SLAC statement.

The other paper presents the world's most precise laser, which uses individual atoms to fire off a beam of high-energy electrons. It's been dubbed an atomic laser.

The LCLS managed to heat a piece of aluminum foil to 2 million degrees. As one writer noted, that's hotter than the sun. The researchers called the laser "a significant step forward in understanding the most extreme matter found in the hearts of stars and giant planets, and could help experiments aimed at recreating the nuclear fusion process that powers the sun."

Yes, the LCLS sounds pretty impressive. But don't forget about the atomic laser. It stimulates neon atoms in such a way that some of their electrons shoot off and stimulate other atoms, and the ensuing chain reaction amplifies the initial laser pulse by a factor of 200 million.

"We envision researchers using this new type of laser for all sorts of interesting things, such as teasing out the details of chemical reactions or watching biological molecules at work," said Nina Rohringer, the Stanford physicist who lead the research. "The shorter the pulses, the faster the changes we can capture. And the purer the light, the sharper the details we can see."

Both devices are X-ray lasers (Xasers), which work by like conventional visible light lasers but use shorter wavelengths and produce much higher power.

Correction: An earlier version of this article stated that the LCLS produces temperatures never before seen in a lab. In fact, it produces a beam brighter than any X-ray before it.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

Laser researchers at Stanford University's SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory are beaming over a pair of research papers they've just published. One paper details what's being called the world's...
Laser researchers at Stanford University's SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory are beaming over a pair of research papers they've just published. One paper details what's being called the world's...
Filed by Travis Korte  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 357
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jennielake
Intellect is Learned... Wisdom Already Knows
01:55 AM on 01/29/2012
WoW MaN

... thats cool
photo
CSDofNM
I speak lolcat
01:10 PM on 01/28/2012
One problem with creating the Science page. Science requires facts.

"Laser Beam Is Strongest Ever Created" just isn't true.

Highest frequency, yes. Highest power, no.

[Airborne Laser Laboratory]
http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/program/all.htm

[National Ignition Facility]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Ignition_Facility

So you also miss the most important story about these lasers. It isn't the power, it's the spectrum. Just like Superman's x-ray vision, we will see things we never could have seen before.
10:12 AM on 01/29/2012
this is what happens when they have liberal arts majors write science. they should hire either a scientist or an engineer to write these, but they cost too much money.
photo
CSDofNM
I speak lolcat
12:26 PM on 01/29/2012
I'm all for reachable, approachable science. Popular Science, Popular Mechanics, National Geographic, Scientific American - all were common monthly subscriptions in my house growing up.

I don't think we engineers are too proud to write at the same rates as liberal arts majors.

What is important is AOL/HuffPo's commitment to real science, and leave the Deepak Chopra crowd for other articles (like on the Religion page).

Splitting the middle just leaves you in the rough, without knowing where the fairway is, much less whether you can play through.

That said, I LOVE THE HUFFPO SCIENCE PAGE!
photo
Anybodyseenthepopos
Like you Really give a rats...
04:17 PM on 01/31/2012
Thanks! Without your comment I'd still be in the dark...
10:55 PM on 01/27/2012
It's kind of sad... world class research in the US... and many of the people it attracts are pyromaniacs who are fascinated by the word "laser" and who are dreaming about blowing up things, and most of the rest are afraid of pyromaniacs wanting to blow up things... and hardly anybody is actually interested what this facility really does...

Good grief... what are they teaching the kids in school these days?
02:47 PM on 01/29/2012
Such small emotions! If you're speaking of military capabilities, employing this technology to avert a military assault, e.g., on the state of Israel, Europe, or the U.S. , by convention or nuclear weapons would be a virtuous exercise. In point of fact, any potentially-military technology can be arrayed to foster aggression or deflect it. The efforts of "pyromaniacs"---as you so grandly label them---built the rockets that led to space exploration and inertial guidance.....

Moralizers(sp?)---as is your bent---would find it more satisfying if they probed the causes in the human psyche of aggression rather than over and over trying to bury its potential manifestations.....
01:12 PM on 01/30/2012
I am sorry... but unlike you I am a physicist who has been around particle accelerators quite a bit.. and they are not death rays. They can give you radiation sickness and they can electrocute, you, but they can not do ANY of the things you seem to be associating with them. Are they hazardous? Absolutely, but no more dangerous to another country than a 9mm mounted on a concrete pillar ten feet in the ground would be.

Please, you need to accept that your knowledge has limits and act appropriately, otherwise you will appear very foolish.

I did, by the way, also participate in a space project, so I do know a little bit about rocketry... and trust me... none of the people I met there were pyromaniacs. They all had a very strong will to live, which you need when you are dealing with equipment for adults all day long.
09:03 PM on 01/27/2012
Is it _Death _Star yet?...
08:58 PM on 01/27/2012
So can these Xasers be mounted on Xarks?
04:02 PM on 01/27/2012
I notice there are alot of people who are looking at this acheivment as some kind of a negative. Obviously something with this kind of power could be used to cause harm, but the research being preformed is the kind of research that allowed for non-invasive surgery for otherwise terminal cancer patients to be possible. With goals of achieving such things as nuclear fusion i would think the good would far outweigh the bad. With the capability to fuse elements in a controlled manner we would no longer worry about limited rescources of rare/heavy elements like gold for instance as they could be created using more abundant elements like hydrogen which is everywhere. Electrical components could be made from this precious metal at much lower cost. That would increase speed at which data is communicated further advancing our capabilities in an already growing technological era. Allowing us to make even more progress in the areas of science, medicine, information, ect. Imagine if everyone could have every answer all of the time. We are getting there. Technology is allowing us to take for granted things that once would have only been able to be described as miracles. Even as little as 100 years ago it would have taken months or years to supply a city with a library of books so that they teach a younger generation. Now I have an entire library in my pocket on a thumb drive and share it with the entire world in seconds.
04:29 PM on 01/27/2012
lets face it - technology like this usually gets funded because some maniac sees it as a way to further keep people in fear and in check - the side benefits that you are talking about are just gravy
05:32 PM on 01/27/2012
Just wait til I blast you with my laser gun Mr Smarty-pants!
12:51 PM on 01/27/2012
My next question is simple, Why do we really need such a monster? A person can only learn so much in a life time and then they are gone. Once they pass all that is left of their knowledge is what they have recorded and everyone knows that once the person who has obtain this knoledge through actual experience is dead and gone, all that data is open to debate as to it's accuracy. So again I ask why? Why not istead work to extend the life span of humans to 200+ years so all this knowledge can be put to use it a constant pregression instead of the sporatic progression we have due to the repeated passing of data due to the passing of scientists. When such knowledge is passed around like a rumour, as it actually is due to sporatic progression, it takes the same path as all information does when it hits the rumour mill, but since the originator is no longer in the loop the rumour mill just keeps turning and the sky does eventually fall.
photo
ssgman
My micro-bio is not empty
02:07 PM on 01/27/2012
Fortunately for all of us science odes not work the way you described. Scientific results are NOT brought into question because someone dies.

That's what makes it science.
09:10 PM on 01/27/2012
I'll smoke what you're smoking....
12:37 PM on 01/27/2012
How can you study a cell or atom when you have just OBLITERATED it into nothing? Is it just me or is the word WEAPON reverberating loadly in the back of every one elses mind also?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KenoshaDan
02:48 PM on 01/27/2012
just because you don't understand the process doesn't make it invalid.
photo
Euglena Vorticella
END "SPECIAL RIGHTS," TAX CHURCHES & HATE GROUPS
04:39 PM on 01/27/2012
give her the benefit of the doubt (I am being kind) Let's pretend she was asking a legitimate question! (LOL!)
09:14 PM on 01/27/2012
No it isn't just you. See my posts above. As conceived and built, no, this powerful X-ray laser is not a weapon. But the priinciples behind it -- the kind of power amplification process the article describes -- certainly sounds as though it could be applied to the design of a very powerful "_death ray" of the sort you see in sci-fi flicks. And if it can be, it will be....
10:52 PM on 01/27/2012
It can't be.

SLAC has visitor tours, I think once a week or so... you are free to go there and look a the accelerator. It's a two mile long building with the support above ground and the actual accelerator below ground... hardly the form factor of a useful weapon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chatnuptime1
Try some Icy cold reality.
05:18 AM on 01/27/2012
Hmm Now we have some fancy high powered lazers that with any luck we can use to see some very tiny tiny things very accurately? What's next? Nano technology replaces people for work! The employment struggle just got one step worse. Pretty soon mankind is gonna be on perminent Vacation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrae2007
09:18 AM on 01/27/2012
Yes our mechanized efficiencies should include some antidote to money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chatnuptime1
Try some Icy cold reality.
04:56 AM on 01/28/2012
its called a resource based economy.. but for that to happen mankind has to get passed this obsession with greed.
photo
hplhenry
Think lucky and be lucky
12:39 PM on 01/27/2012
Yes, technology is bad. Like the computer you used to type your comment. Millions of jobs haven't been created by it's development.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chatnuptime1
Try some Icy cold reality.
04:54 AM on 01/28/2012
oh no tech is not bad.. its our inability to adjust as a society as tech changes our surroundings that is not healthy.. we are living in an age just barely into the computer age when we should have embraced its power and made changes as it came to us.. then our job prospects and expectations would have come about more smoothly..
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ConfuciusSay-
Aglets: their purpose is sinister.
01:12 AM on 01/27/2012
"...which uses individual atoms to fire off a beam of high-energy electrons..."

No. No. No.

Please get a science writer with O levels at least.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atexasdem
Pointing out the foolishness of republican voters.
12:40 AM on 01/27/2012
One of the roadblocks to fusion reactions has been the temperatures required to start the reaction. With these kinds of temperatures generated perhaps we have a potential breakthrough.
photo
Euglena Vorticella
END "SPECIAL RIGHTS," TAX CHURCHES & HATE GROUPS
04:40 PM on 01/27/2012
I remember in the 70's we were told to expect fusion by the turn of the century. IT IS THE ULTIMATE SOLUTION.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
x men
10:31 PM on 01/26/2012
Not true. The most powerful laser was debuted in the first Jonny Quest episode, the Mystery of the Lizard Men.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stickmanmob
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons!
09:15 PM on 01/26/2012
The Death Star needs an upgrade.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GaryNOVA
Fear My Micro-bio!!!!!!!!
09:08 PM on 01/26/2012
Why can't I get fricken sharks with fricken laserbeams on there heads?
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
10:54 PM on 01/26/2012
Unfortunately, due to sharks being on the endangered species list, we could only get ill-tempered sea bass.
09:24 PM on 01/27/2012
And where is my Mr. Fusion-powered antigrav aircar, _dammit!...
photo
Abbey Normal
There is no darkness but ignorance.­
07:32 PM on 01/26/2012
I predict a 'Frankie Goes to Hollywood' revival.
photo
Anybodyseenthepopos
Like you Really give a rats...
04:23 PM on 01/31/2012
oh just RELAX!