More

Symantec: pcAnywhere Source Code Stolen; Customers Should Disable Software

Symantec Pcanywhere

First Posted: 01/25/2012 12:33 pm Updated: 01/25/2012 3:26 pm


By Jim Finkle

(Reuters) - Symantec Corp took the rare step of advising customers to stop using one of its products, saying its pcAnywhere software for accessing remote PCs is at increased risk of getting hacked after blueprints of that software were stolen.

The announcement is the company's most direct acknowledgement to date that a 2006 theft of its source code put customers at risk of attack.

Symantec said it was only asking customers to temporarily stop using the product, until it releases an update to the software that will mitigate the risk of an attack.

It acknowledged that some customers would need to continue using the software for "business critical purposes," saying they should make sure they were using the most recent version of the product and "understand the current risks," which include the possibility that hackers could steal data or credentials.

Still, it is highly unusual for a software maker to advise customers to disable a product completely while engineers develop an update to fix bugs. Companies typically recommend mitigating factors that will reduce the risk of an attack.

"That's crazy. That's pretty much unheard of to just say 'Stop using it.' Especially a vendor as large as Symantec," said H.D. Moore, chief architect of Metasploit, a platform that security experts use to test whether computer systems are vulnerable to attack.

PcAnywhere is a software program that is also bundled with some titles in Symantec's Altiris line of software for managing corporate PCs, Symantec said in a white paper and note to customers released on its website overnight where it disclosed the warning.

Company spokesman Cris Paden said that Symantec has fewer than 50,000 customers using the stand-alone version of pcAnywhere, which was available for sale on its website for $100 and $200 as of early Wednesday afternoon.

The company last week warned customers of the 2006 theft of the source code, or blueprints, to pcAnywhere and several other titles: Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition, Norton Internet Security, Norton Utilities and Norton GoBack.

It made the announcement after a hacker who goes by the name YamaTough released the source code to its Norton Utilities PC software and had threatened to publish its widely used anti-virus programs. Authorities have yet to apprehend that hacker.

At the time, Paden said that the theft of the code posed no threat as long as customers were using the most recent versions of Symantec's software, with one exception: users of pcAnywhere might face "a slightly increased security risk."

In the white paper published early on Wednesday morning, the company indicated the situation was more serious.

"At this time, Symantec recommends disabling the product until Symantec releases a final set of software updates that resolve currently known vulnerability risks," it said in the white paper. (http://bit.ly/wPzX7v)

The company also reiterated its previous guidance that users of its other software titles were not at heightened risk because of the breach in 2006.

"The code that has been exposed is so old that current out-of-the-box security settings will suffice against any possible threats that might materialize as a result of this incident," it said on its website. (http://bit.ly/wqtxTI)

(Reporting By Jim Finkle in Boston, editing by Matthew Lewis)

Flickr photo by sfxeric.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

By Jim Finkle (Reuters) - Symantec Corp took the rare step of advising customers to stop using one of its products, saying its pcAnywhere software for accessing remote PCs is at increas...
By Jim Finkle (Reuters) - Symantec Corp took the rare step of advising customers to stop using one of its products, saying its pcAnywhere software for accessing remote PCs is at increas...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:57 PM on 01/27/2012
Symantec has admitted that their own network was compromised, per an article in Computerweek.

Their original claim that the source code was taken in India is a complete falsehood.

Anonymous threatened Symantec a few weeks ago, and now this revelation comes out

===

5 years after the fact.

What's with security companies not being able to secure their own stuff?
11:01 AM on 01/27/2012
Huffington Post is infected with the JS: Trojan.Downloader.JSAgent.D virus.

Everytime I come on to this site, my security service has to quarantine this virus.

I have advised HP with no response from them.
04:41 PM on 01/26/2012
So glad I own a Macintosh.
08:29 PM on 01/27/2012
Yeah. That's why Apple warns users of viruses and malware...

http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.7/en/mh27449.html

===

Yeah. That's why Apple and others sell anti-virus/anti-malware software

http://store.apple.com/us/product/H7310LL/A
04:17 PM on 01/26/2012
Good encryption and security software can be released to the public domain (AND IS) because the security is in the keys themselves. The only way the software should be vulnerable is if it has a back door, poorly written code, or tragically simple encryption
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BravoFour
04:33 PM on 01/26/2012
Seems like having a back door would expose them to legal liability.
04:40 PM on 01/26/2012
It could, but it would depend on the EULA wording and government regulations, and laws in effect at the time the software was released. (think TSA padlocks)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:52 PM on 01/26/2012
It took them this long to say that? For weeks now, anyone who even pays attention to the surface level of the hacker underground (aka. something as hard to find as various twitter accounts) knew that individual hackers were claiming to have found zero day exploits in PCAnywhere's source code and were boasting about it. What the heck has Symantec been doing in that time?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Kenan
Writer. Worked for Tennessee Williams.
12:47 PM on 01/26/2012
THREE CHEERS FOR SYMANTEC!!! I love and use Norton 360 -- because its the BEST. And the company CARES enough to warn its customers NOT to use one of its products.

See how I'm working informally with HuffPost, my distant Kenan relatives who founded UNC at Chapel Hill, and others to put some top Republicans in Federal Prison for RUNNING all the narco-trafficking in the US and using the profits to corrupt government and hack coumputers and cell phones with Fox News -- like Fox got convicted of in England (NEWS OF THE WORLD).

See more on my blog. Index to subjects is a couple of scrolls below link to my memoir of having worked for playwright Tennessee Williams.

http://scottkenan.blogspot.com

Thanks!
Scott
08:38 PM on 01/27/2012
Yeah. 5 years after Symantec's sites were hacked and their code was stolen.

If it wasn't for Anonymous reverse engineering some of their software and posting it the other week, you probably wouldn't have gotten that notice last week that there was a risk.

Oh, BTW. When this first broke, they accused India of allowing their code to be leaked, when in fact it was their own site that was hacked.

Nothing like buying security software from a company that can't secure its own software!

===

Here are the links...

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9223725/Threatened_by_Anonymous_Symantec_tells_users_to_pull_pcAnywhere_s_plug?taxonomyId=17

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9223495/Symantec_backtracks_admits_own_network_hacked
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:51 AM on 01/26/2012
Not too worry Symantec customers. The patch is expected by early next year.
07:23 PM on 01/25/2012
so, the INDIAN OUTSOURCER­S are also stealing our products, not to mention our JOBS!!! http://www­.securityw­eek.com/sy­mantec-say­s-norton-s­ource-code­-was-stole­n-2006
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drosco
10:29 PM on 01/25/2012
What you got against Indians ? Blame people like Romney who promote outsourcing.
08:48 PM on 01/27/2012
Check this thread, I put a few updates that shows it wasn't India.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anthonytaurus
don't f&f me. you dont' know what I'll say next
11:07 PM on 01/25/2012
All of the outsourcers are doing this. I first noticed this when Ericsson came out with that first Xperia phone, before Sony jumped on board. That's when AT&T stopped carrying most Ericsson phones and picked up HTC phones which were very much similar. But, this is what we get when we outsource everything. Eventually, they're going to start counterfeiting. Now, the counterfeiters have become basically legitimate companies. When you think about it, this has been going on since the US outsourced the textile industry 100 years ago. Industry after industry has followed suit.
07:19 PM on 01/25/2012
so, the INDIAN OUTSOURCERS are also stealing our products, not to mention our JOBS!!! http://www.securityweek.com/symantec-says-norton-source-code-was-stolen-2006
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darth Cheney
03:40 PM on 01/26/2012
I think you mean jerbs.
08:45 PM on 01/27/2012
No, Symantec now admits their own site was h-a-c-k-e-d.
05:41 PM on 01/25/2012
well they didn't know it was gone till 2012
it's very common to just be able to check out a branch and have that code on your laptop.
Symantec does not have crazy source control like lets say Microsoft.

I have lot's of store's of code from company's I've worked for in the past.
not that i'm going to post it .. but it's something you had written so you keep it around.
photo
silkphoenix
To Boldly Go Where No Man Has Gone Before
05:16 PM on 01/25/2012
So the theft happened in 2006 and Symantec announced that in 2012? I found it very odd that a company manufactured security softwares was actually hacked by somebody else. It raised my doubt about how good their security softwares really are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
unbozo
04:55 PM on 01/25/2012
Plenty of free and open source products out there to replace this TightVNC comes to mind. Funny, if their product relies on someone not having access to their source code, then, yeah, it was probably not that secure anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rMatey
old, recovered Xtian, Liberal
03:54 PM on 01/25/2012
The security firms all need to protect us a little better. Security professionals, indeed.