iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Details Emerge of New Financial Fraud Unit

Financial Crimes Unit

First Posted: 01/26/2012 5:56 pm Updated: 01/30/2012 10:41 pm

The new financial crimes unit announced by President Barack Obama during Tuesday's State of the Union address will have the power to investigate mortgage fraud going back at least 10 years, according to senior officials at the Department of Justice.

The new unit, however, could jeopardize the negotiations now taking place between five of the country's largest banks, the states' attorneys general and the Obama administration over mortgage fraud and wrongful foreclosures, some observers say.

In a conference call with reporters on Thursday afternoon, senior officials at the Department of Justice fleshed out details of the new unit. The new unit will focus on both the origination and securitization (or packaging) of mortgage loans. The unit will also investigate loans that were sold to, and insured by, government agencies, said Justice Department officials.

The new unit "has a pretty good chance of derailing it," JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon told CNBC on Thursday, referring to the settlement. JPMorgan is one of the five banks involved in those negotiations. It is likely that under the settlement investigators could pursue cases only from as early as January 2008, said a source close to the negotiations who is prohibited from speaking on the record.

The banks are interested in the settlement because it will protect them from future liability, according to one industry insider who agreed to speak on the condition of anonymity. If they agree to spend $25 billion to guarantee such protection, then find themselves facing the exact same cases with the new investigative unit, they no longer have an incentive to bother with the settlement.

Senior officials at the Department of Justice were quick to emphasize that the fate of the settlement talks is unrelated to the new unit. "We have certainly heard criticisms that the settlement would give immunity for all [the mortgage-related misconduct], but that's simply not true ...This [unit] is addressing a very different problem than the servicing settlement," said one official.

Some view the new unit as a response to the growing criticism that the Obama administration has yet to seriously pursue the big banks and high-level executives responsible for the housing crash that led to the worst financial crisis since the Depression. "This new unit will hold accountable those who broke the law, speed assistance to homeowners and help turn the page on an era of recklessness that hurt so many Americans," Obama said on Tuesday.

The investigators will consider a variety of cases, including false statements, mail and wire fraud, and failure to comply with the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, established in the wake of the savings and loan crisis. This law empowers investigators to examine wrongdoings going back a decade. Many other mortgage-related laws have statutes of limitations for less than half as long.

Already the new unit has 15 attorneys and 10 investigators, including FBI agents. Once fully staffed, it will employ roughly 55 people, in addition to the five co-chairs, and include a mix of new hires and existing personnel from participating agencies, including the Treasury Department, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Housing and Urban Development and Federal Housing Administration as well as the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. A "significant portion" of the unit will be based in Washington, D.C., though officials anticipate expanding to "at least three or four U.S. attorney offices," as the cases unfold, said a Justice Department official.

The new unit's co-chairs had their first call Wednesday and included staff from the office of Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, who has resisted signing on to a settlement deal. The unit is funded through "existing resources," according to the Justice Department officials and is part of the larger Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force established in 2009 to investigate the roots of the 2008 financial crisis.

With representatives from more than 20 federal agencies and 94 U.S. attorneys offices, the 2009 task force has disappointed critics who argue that it has chosen to pursue relatively small fraudsters while leaving alone the major offenders, including the CEOs of banks that wrongfully foreclosed on struggling homeowners.

Eric Schneiderman, the New York attorney general, is one of the new unit's five co-chairs. He gained prominence last year with his repeated assertions that the pending deal between the administration and the five banks would be too soft on the Wall Street behemoths, which are accused of falsifying mortgage documents and inappropriately denying loan modifications to needy homeowners. Specifically, Schneiderman has said he is worried that states would be required to drop potential legal battles against the banks in exchange for securing $25 billion in assistance for struggling homeowners.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The new financial crimes unit announced by President Barack Obama during Tuesday's State of the Union address will have the power to investigate mortgage fraud going back at least 10 years, according ...
The new financial crimes unit announced by President Barack Obama during Tuesday's State of the Union address will have the power to investigate mortgage fraud going back at least 10 years, according ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 526
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
01:50 PM on 01/30/2012
I hope this actually goes somewhere. I was happy when Schneiderman and Bo Biden refused to signon to the settlement with the banks because it included a pass for crimes not yet discovered. We cannot keep sueing banks, settling with them because they agree to not do it again, and then have them do it again. If you violate a court approved settlement, isn't that contempt of court?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Badforamerica
11:22 PM on 01/29/2012
Will he invesitgate the farud commited by borrowers too? I dought it! Obama panders for votes! Disgusting!
11:19 PM on 01/29/2012
The horse left the barn
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
derealest
04:15 PM on 01/29/2012
Financial FRAUD......hmmmmmmm.....Giving GM to the Unions, Obamacare, Stimulus, Solyndra, Fisker, $2B to Brazil oil, The Gulf Oil fiasco, Chrysler to Fiat......??????? ACORN, Boeing in SC, SEIU, Rezco..??? Are you kidding.....more election year fluff. Wake up America, you are being sold down the toilet.
03:29 PM on 01/29/2012
Fraud and crime against the mortgage companies or crimes done by the mortgage companies?

A mortgage company is eager to make a profit and as such will not make a bad loan knowingly, unless a government agency says they have to. I am just not getting the jest of this investigation which should be directed against Congress, Barney Franks, and the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae agencies.

The rules and standards for loans are drasfted by Freddie and Fannie under federal law. Often as not the rukles are not acceptable to the banks who have to follow the rules and obtain approval
.......................So who is investigating who?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EHenry
Author of the new book - How We Got Swindled by Wa
01:54 PM on 01/29/2012
Dimon - does not have a conflict warning that the investigation could derail the self-serving negotiations to settle an Everest sized, what appears to be, mountain of fraud.

We should listen to Jamie who expressed dismay over the antipathy directed toward banks? He does not feel appreciated!

Americans need to be better informed. Which is why I wrote - How We Got Swindled by Wall Street Godfathers, Greed & Financial Darwinism ~ The 30-Year War Against the American Dream.

If Jamie were to read Swindled he could conclude the investigation should extend to all the "too complex to explain" financial instruments that severely violated SEC and Fed bank regulations - so anything that could not be explained well enough to be understood broke the law. Swindled stipulates the specific regulations and why the securities were illegal - and what constitutes fraud.

So if you want to be better informed, want the brutally candid whole truth about all the culprits and controlling issues - to know more: www.howwegotswindled.com
10:58 AM on 01/29/2012
There was systematic fraud going on against the whole country, yet no convictions of those at the top who knew exactly what they were doing in the name of GREED!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=731G71Sahok&feature=player_embedded
05:47 AM on 01/29/2012
The key is going to get regulators who are not bought off or corrupted which is why every enforcement or oversight mechanism has always failed.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/26/us-sec-stanford-idUSTRE80P22R20120126
05:37 AM on 01/29/2012
This means whatever negotiating they were doing will now stop and it will start over and by the time anything is found out no legal charges will be able to be charged and only a fine.. Thats how it usually works up there
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lowfiron
10:43 PM on 01/28/2012
See who the other co chairs are. They might not have the people's interests at heart.
Why wasn't a committee like this put together in the first year of Obama's administration?
10:38 PM on 01/28/2012
Matt Taibi's take:

http://www­.rollingst­one.com/po­litics/blo­gs/taibblo­g/is-obama­s-economic­-populism-­for-real-2­0120126#ix­zz1kcXokk4­P
10:35 PM on 01/28/2012
The problem with these types of things is that they never will be solved until we get regulators and agencies that aren't totally corrupted. Until then what is the point?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/26/us-sec-stanford-idUSTRE80P22R20120126
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Leslie
09:21 PM on 01/28/2012
What amazes me is that President Obama is putting the "bell on the cat" to protect us mice and the Republicans are doing everything they can to warn the cat, so that it can cover it's as*! I wonder whose side the Republicans are on! Our side or the cat's side?
01:27 AM on 01/29/2012
That's easy - the cat's!!
10:05 AM on 01/28/2012
More of nothing from the Man who's knows only to spend tax dollars. This unit is a farce, just like most everything else he has created.
10:33 PM on 01/28/2012
I think you should wait and see what happens and then make up your mind. Seems like the only fair thing to do.
09:36 AM on 01/30/2012
A pure waste of beaurocratic gobbledy hogwash.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MSROADKILL612
love auto biographys. any appS to write mine?
02:07 AM on 01/28/2012
& why on earth no t - i recently heard there was a spate of maddoff suits b4 the 2 yr statute of limitations on these matters - 2 yrs?

moral - make the fraud fancy enough & no way u will be charged