iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Florida GOP Debate: Republican Candidates Face Off

Posted: 01/26/2012 9:02 pm

By DAVID ESPO, ASSOCIATED PRESS

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — An aggressive Mitt Romney repeatedly challenged Republican presidential rival Newt Gingrich in a fast-paced campaign debate Thursday night, ridiculing the former House speaker's call to build costly projects in key primary states and to colonize the moon.

Romney vehemently denied Gingrich's own accusation that he anti-immigrant – more so than any other candidate. And, as charges flew back and forth, Gingrich rebutted any suggestion that he couldn't rein in surging federal spending.

"You don't just have to be cheap everywhere. You can actually have priorities to get things done," Gingrich declared, saying that as speaker of the House he had helped balance the budget while doubling spending on the National Institutes of health.

The debate was the second in four days in the run-up to next Tuesday's Florida primary. Opinion polls make the race a close one – slight advantage Romney – with two other contenders, former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania and Texas Rep. Ron Paul far behind.

Gingrich's upset victory in the South Carolina primary last week upended the race for the nomination to oppose Democratic President Barack Obama in the fall, and Romney in particular can ill-afford a defeat on Tuesday.

While the clashes between Gingrich and Romney dominated the debate, Santorum drew applause from the audience when he called on the two front-runners to stop attacking one another and "focus on the issues."

"Can we set aside that Newt was a member of Congress ... and that Mitt Romney is a wealthy guy?" he said in a tone of exasperation.

There were some moments of levity, including when Paul, 76, was asked whether he would be willing to release his medical records. He said he was, then challenged the other three men on the debate stage to a 25-mile bike race.

He got no takers.

The first clash occurred moments after the debate opened, when Gingrich responded to a question by saying Romney was the most anti-immigrant of all four contenders on stage. "That's simply inexcusable," the former Massachusetts governor responded.

"Mr. Speaker, I'm not anti-immigrant, my father was born in Mexico," Romney declared. "I'm not anti-immigrant."

At the same time, Romney noted that Gingrich's campaign had been pressured to stop running a radio ad that called Romney anti-immigrant after Florida Sen. Marco Rubio called on Gingrich to do so.

He called on Gingrich to apologize for the commercial, but got no commitment.

About an hour later, Romney pounced when the topic turned to Gingrich's proposal for an permanent American colony on the moon – an issue of particular interest to engineers and others who live on Florida's famed Space Coast.

A career businessman before he became a politician, Romney said: "If I had a business executive come to me and say I want to spend a few hundred billion dollars to put a colony on the moon, I'd say, `You're fired.'"

The audience erupted in cheers, but Romney wasn't finished.

He said the former speaker had called for construction of a new Interstate highway in South Carolina, a new VA hospital in northern New Hampshire and widening the port of Jacksonville to accommodate the larger ships that will soon be able to transit the Panama Canal.

"This idea of going state to state and promising people what they want to hear, promising hundreds of billions of dollars to make people happy, that's what got us into trouble in the first place," Romney said.

Gingrich responded that part of campaigning is becoming familiar with local issues, adding, "The port of Jacksonville is going to have to be expanded. I think that's an important thing for a president to know." He went on to refer to completion of an Everglades project that he did not describe, then noted he had worked to expand NIH while he was speaker.

Below, HuffPost's live blog coverage of the debate.

live blog

Oldest Newest

Democratic National Campaign Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz issued a statement in response to Thursday night's GOP debate, but limited her criticisms to one candidate and one issue: Mitt Romney and his propensity for lying.

"We've known for some time now that Mitt Romney will say anything to get elected -- but tonight was truly a breathtaking display of dishonesty. After trying to cater to Hispanic voters this week, Romney kept up the doublespeak tonight -- trying to downplay his extreme positions on immigration and acting as if he had never said that undocumented workers and their families should be rounded up and kicked out of America.

"Romney continues to try to have it both ways on every issue under the sun. Tonight, he lied about not voting for a Democrat if there was a Republican on the ballot -- there was when he voted for Paul Tsongas in a Democratic primary in 1992 in the same election where President George H.W. Bush faced Pat Buchanan. He lied about never saying his Massachusetts health care plan was a model for the nation -- the truth is that he's often said it was. And tonight he even tried to distort the President's strong record of commitment to Israel, claiming that President Obama has not addressed rocket attacks on Israel before the United Nations when in fact he explicitly did so -- and when the President has actually visited Sderot and affirmed Israel's right to defend itself.

"Tonight, Romney called his enormous personal wealth 'an asset to help America.' But there's just one complication: he's not investing in America. He has had millions in investments and accounts in infamous offshore tax havens -- including the Cayman Islands and a Swiss bank account that his advisor closed down for fear it would be politically embarrassing. Those tax havens cost American taxpayers about $100 billion a year. And the hundreds of millions of dollars he raked in at Bain were made in part by laying off American workers and outsourcing their jobs to other countries.

"Mitt Romney must not realize we live in the age of Google, YouTube and DVR -- because he literally shifts from one position to the next without any sense of restraint. It's time for Romney to try something new and finally give the American people the straight answers they deserve -- that’s certainly not what he offered on the debate stage tonight."

-- Jennifer Bendery

Share this:

It was hard not to notice that the debate audience in Jacksonville, Fla., on Thursday night enthusiastically cheered Mitt Romney's performance. That was a big change from the two debates last week in South Carolina, where Newt Gingrich got raucous applause from massive debate crowds in Myrtle Beach and Charleston.

After the debate ended, Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics, wrote on Twitter: "Hidden story of this debate: Why was audience more pro-Mitt & less pro-Newt than others? JAX was pro-Mitt '08, but must be more to it."

HuffPost asked the Florida Republican Party's spokesman, Brian Hughes, how the tickets to the debate were allocated.

Hughes said the state party was responsible for 900 of the 1,200 tickets, and said he "bristled" at any suggestion the audience was stacked in anyone's favor.

"The vast majority of [the tickets] went to rank and file. We did a very thorough job of getting them to the rank and file, vetting them to make sure they went to registered Republicans, and then making sure they went out to people that were not knowingly affiliated" with any of the candidates, Hughes said.

"We worked very hard to ensure that the room was rank-and-file folks who represent the electorate that these guys are trying to speak to," Hughes said.

Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom was asked after the debate if the campaign had worked to get supporters in the crowd. Fehrnstrom said he had invited his parents, who live in Jacksonville.

"The campaign was given an allotment of tickets," Fehrnstrom said. "I don't know how many tickets they received. I assume it's the same as every other campaign."

-- Jon Ward

Share this:

"As a Palestinian-American Republican, I can tell you that such people do exist," a member of the audience told the GOP candidates at Thursday's debate, referring to Newt Gingrich's comments in December that the Palestinians are an "invented people."

But if the man asking the question hoped his presence would goad the candidates into moderating their pro-Israel positions, he was surely disappointed.

"The reason there's not peace between the Palestinians and Israel" is that the Palestinian leaderships in the West Bank and Gaza "have the intent to eliminate Israel," Mitt Romney said.

Romney further rehashed his view that Obama "threw Israel under the bus" by calling for a two-state solution that would be based on Israel's borders before the 1967 War, which resulted in Israel's annexing all of Jerusalem and occupying the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

The 1967 borders have long been the basis for the negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.

Gingrich explained his earlier comments by saying that the Palestinian people was "technically an invention of the 1970s," which he claimed supplanted a general Arab identification that had been prevalent in the region.

In recent weeks, Gingrich-supporting super PACs have received $10 million from casino magnate Sheldon Adelson and his wife. Adelson is known for his hard-right views on Israel and strong support for Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Both Romney and Gingrich criticized President Obama for appeasing Israel's foes and not sufficiently supporting the Jewish state.

In his State of the Union address on Tuesday night, President Obama said, "Our ironclad commitment — and I mean ironclad — to Israel’s security has meant the closest military cooperation between our two countries in history."

-- Mike Sacks

Share this:

The famous author of best-selling children's and young-adult novels took to Twitter to send a single debate-related tweet to her 49,000 followers:

@judyblume I just can't stand these candidates!

-- Dave Jamieson

Share this:
@ jonward11 : Ari Fleischer says Romney showed a bit of "Alpha Dog" tonight

Share this:
@ jonward11 : Romney says in short post-debate interview: "When I'm shot at I'll return fire. I'm no shrinking violet."

Share this:

Each of the four Republican candidates explained in Thursday night's debate why his wife would make a great first lady.

Ron Paul gave a brief answer, referencing his 54-year marriage to Carol Paul and their upcoming anniversary, as well as his wife's cookbook, "The Ron Paul Cookbook."

Mitt Romney was next, and he told moderator Wolf Blitzer, "My wife is a real champion. She was diagnosed with MS and breast cancer," and as first lady "she'll be able to reach out to people who are suffering with compassion and care." Romney also mentioned his wife Ann would likely encourage young people to get married before having children.

Newt Gingrich began by complimenting the other three candidates' spouses, and said his wife is "not necessarily better," but she "brings a couple of things." He went on to describe his third wife's musical talents -- playing French horn, singing in a choir -- and said she "would bring a really strong feeling for music education and for art and why it matters to people" as first lady. He also mentioned her children's book about American exceptionalism and the movies she has produced with Gingrich. "She would bring an artistic flair" and he would "be thrilled to hang out with her at the White House," Gingrich said.

Rick Santorum gave the most eloquent answer of the four, saying his wife wasn't at the debate because "she's doing what she does, incredibly well, which is to be a mother to our seven children and she is -- she's my hero."

"She was a neo-natal intensive care nurse, one of the most advanced nurseries in the country ... and she saw all the ethical challenges there, she went on and got a law degree to deal with those in the legal world."

He also mentioned the child he and his wife lost, as well as their daughter Bella, who has a developmental disability. "We've been through a lot together, losing a child, having a child with a disability ... and the amount of love for these special kids is just palpable."

Santorum also claimed to know that "hundreds of lives that were saved," because people read the book about their lost child, "Letters to Gabriel," and "realized that the child they were carrying had the dignity to be loved and nurtured irrespective of what malady may have befallen that baby in the womb and so many children were born and are alive today because of that book."

-- Christina Wilkie

Share this:
@ HuffPostHill : TONIGHT'S WINNER: Not Newt Gingrich. TONIGHT'S LOSER: Newt Gingrich.

Share this:
@ BuzzFeedBen : Santorum: "Global warming hoax." Haven't heard him say that before.

Share this:
@ MSignorile : Newt: food stamps and saul allinksy, need I say more? @CNNdebate

Share this:
@ howardfineman : Newt finally mentions Saul Alinsky... about time...

Share this:
@ AnthonyNBCNews : Asked why he can beat Obama @RonPaul: My position undermines his foreign policy; it's different, he expands war #fldebate

Share this:

Wolf Blitzer asked about the ongoing debate over whether Gingrich and Romney have been stalwart supporters of Ronald Reagan, prompting this response from Gingrich:

"Its increasingly interesting to watch the Romney attack machine coordinate things. All of a sudden today there are four different articles by four different people that randomly show up," Gingrich said, noting the fusillade of (digital) ink that has come at him the last 24 to 36 hours.

He said that Reagan's son, Michael, endorsed him and that former First Lady Nancy Reagan spoke of him as carrying Reagan's torch forward.

"I am vastly closer to Reagan," Gingrich said.

He added that Romney donated to Democrats in 1992 and voted for Democratic Sen. Paul Tsongas of Massachusetts.

"He's more mature. He's more conservative. I accept that," Gingrich said of Romney. "I think it's a good thing. But those of us who were in the trenches fighting in the '80s, it would be nice to be recognized for what we actually did, and not to have orchestrated attacks that try to distort the history of that period."

Romney could only say: "I've never voted for a Democrat when there was a Republican on the ballot."

-- Jon Ward

Share this:
@ howardfineman : tentative final score: Santorum 9.0, Mitt 8.4, Newt 4.4, Paul 2.0

Share this:
@ jonward11 : not the fireworks i expected tonight

Share this:
@ acarvin : Santorum: no other country in the world is based on God-given rights, not govt-given rights. (Can I get a #factcheck, pls?) #cnndebate

Share this:

An unemployed Floridian in the audience named Lynn asked the candidates what their policies could do to help her get affordable health insurance again. The candidates offered her a host of long-term solutions and big-picture theories in return.

Rep. Ron Paul told her she was the victim of government meddling. "When government gets involved in medicine, you don't [get] better care -- the cost goes up," Paul said. "You're suffering from the consequences of way too much government."

Asked how he'd help Lynn, Gingrich was the first to beat the Obamacare horse. "Repeal Obamacare, repeal Dodd-Frank," the former House speaker said, referring to the financial reform bill. "Give her a chance to have a job ... You combine reforming our insurance system and getting the economy growing again, you cure an awful lot. She is not dependent on Barack Obama to take care of her."

Although his health care overhaul in Massachusetts served as a model for the president's, Mitt Romney, too, grabbed at the opportunity to bash "Obamacare" when asked how his policies could help Lynn. "It's bad medicine," he said of the Affordable Care Act. "The president has failed the American people." Meanwhile, as he has before, Romney admitted that his own plan enacted in Massachusetts was "not perfect," though he said most residents approved of it.

As much as Romney tried to distance "Romneycare" from "Obamacare," Santorum clearly relished drawing a line between the two.

"What he just said is top-down government-run medicine is working pretty well in Massachusetts," Santorum said.

Romney's plan, Santorum went on, has "15 items in common with Obamacare ... 1 in 4 people in Massachusetts don't get the care they need. This is the top-down model that both of these gentlemen" -- Romney and Gingrich (who has voiced support for the individual mandate) -- "say they're against but have been for."

"We cannot give the issue of health care away in this election," Santorum added.

Romney, perhaps taken aback by Santorum's passion, responded, "It's not worth getting angry about...."

-- Dave Jamieson

Share this:
@ MSignorile : Newt loves his "secular elite" bashing. #CNNdebate

Share this:
@ zachdcarter : Romney: Declaration of Independence describes "the relationship between God and Man." #Uhhhhh

Share this:
@ HuffPostHill : These guys are smart. The electoral votes they'll garner from Puerto Rico and the Moon will really help them in the general.

Share this:

HuffPost's Sam Stein reported earlier this month that Ron Paul has a staffer in Puerto Rico, which awards more delegates than New Hampshire:

Puerto Rico is not often considered an active political enclave. It has no representation in Congress, save a non-voting delegate. And with respect to presidential campaigns, it is usually an afterthought. Both John F. Kennedy and Barack Obama visited only after they won office. In the race for delegates in the 2012 Republican primary, however, it will carry twice as much weight as all-critical New Hampshire in the process of determining the nominee.

Click here to read more.

Share this:

BLITZER: Congressman Paul. You said the U.S. should talk to everyone. Imagine you're in the Oval Office, you speak to Raul Castro on the phone. What would you say to him?

PAUL: [pause] Well ... I'd ask him what he called about, you know?

Ha. Nice. Paul continued, "I would ask him, what can we do to improve relations? Because I wouldn't see them as likely to attack us. When I was drafted in October of '62, that was a different world, I mean, there were nuclear weapons in Cuba. That was a different story. But today, to not to talk to them and take the call and see what you can work out, helps Castro. It hurts the people, the dissidents, the people who want to overthrow him ... as well intended as these sanctions are, they almost inevitably backfire and they help the dictators and hurt the people. So, it's time to change. The Cold War, the Cold War is over. They're not going to invade us and I just think that a better relationship and trade relationship [is preferable]."

-- Jason Linkins

Share this:
@ mpoindc : Santorum gives shout-out to Luis Fortuño. Gotta wonder if the other three candidates knew Fortuño is the GOP gov of Puerto Rico.

Share this:
@ BenjySarlin : Fun fact: Rep. Justin Amash, Ron Paul's heir in the House, is a Palestinian-American Republican

Share this:
@ samsteinhp : three people applauded when santorum name-dropped the puerto rican governor

Share this:
@ MSignorile : Romney just goes right to bashing Palestinians right to a Palestinian-American's face. #CNNdebate

Share this:

When Newt Gingrich boasted that Congress balanced the budget four times when he was House Speaker, Ron Paul pounced.

"I went back and looked at the record. The national debt during those four years actually went up about a trillion dollars. What he's talking about is he doesn't count the money he takes out of Social Security," Paul said. "So [neither] Reagan nor you had a truly balanced budget, because the national debt goes up and that's what we pay the interest on."

Gingrich responded: "Under the system that was used, we were $405 billion in balance."

At this point, the audience began to boo Gingrich.

"I agree with Ron. Let me finish," Gingrich said testily. "I actually agree with you and I have proposed that we take Social Security off budget."

The Paul campaign sent out a release moments later with the headline: "Another Fudged Fact By Newt: 'I balanced the budget.'"

FACT: The National Debt went up nearly $1 trillion while he was Speaker · In 1994, the year before Gingrich become Speaker the National Debt was $4.693 trillion · In 1995, the year he become speaker the debt was $4.974 trillion · In 1996 the debt was $ 5.225 trillion · In 1997 the debt was $5.413 trillion · In 1998-- the last year of his speakership-- the debt was $5.526 trillion

(Source: Treasury Direct.gov)

-- Jon Ward

Share this:
@ HuffPostHill : "As a Palestinian American Republican" God Bless America.

Share this:
@ MSignorile : MItt is talking about Castro leaving the planet again. This is a pattern. #CNNdebate

Share this:
@ dave_jamieson : The extent of debate surrounding Latin America tonight is rather striking #cnndebate

Share this:

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,976
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (96 total)
09:15 AM on 01/29/2012
lol - so they're at it again - huh? hope they get something accomplished for the people through all their stupidness... I don't think they will though!!!!!

enlighteningthemind.com
02:30 PM on 01/28/2012
Very interesting comments on the debates in Florida. However, there is nothing any of these Republicans can say that would make me vote for any of them. They lie, cheat and steal with the best of them and haven't a clue about what the people want or need. As an aside, I don't understand why people think what a politician promises can happen. He can have a great idea but if the Congress isn't behind him, there's no way his promises will ever come true. Take Newt's plan to build a colony on the moon. Laughable, at best. It may be a good idea for some point in the future, but not now when there are so many problems right here on earth. I don't believe Congress will support such an outlandish idea.
04:49 AM on 01/29/2012
And that's exactly why thr fear mongering regarding a Ron Paul presidency is unwarranted. There is a separation of powers in America (though some would argue it has been significantly degraded) for precisely this reason. One cannot take over the office and make drastic changes without support from Congress and, to an extent, the people.
01:20 PM on 01/29/2012
I'm not sure I understand your comment. Are you for a Ron Paul presidency or against? I don't want a man in office who wants to abolish Medicare, Social Security, Internal Revenue, etc. While many would be thrilled not to pay taxes, just think of the effect on the country. I suppose Paul thinks "third time's the charm," since he's already lost his bid for presidency twice before.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
07:01 PM on 01/27/2012
"Republican candidates face off!" and face off - and face off - and face off - and face off, and . . . . Ad nauseum!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jnesteljr
Occam's Razor
06:37 PM on 01/27/2012
Sure cut social security, medicaid and medicare and veterans benefits and put it into building a colony on the moon!!

That makes a lot of good common sense!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
07:02 PM on 01/27/2012
Besides, he's touting a mix of John Kennedy and Barak Obama's ideas. Does he know that he's praising Democrats?
06:18 PM on 01/27/2012
Gingrich threw me with the moon colony thing. Then I started thinking about it. I mean we have been doing zero gravity experiments for 50 years now. There are huge untapped possibilities here. Although he may be ahead of the time for people to accept it , he might be on to something. There are huge benefits to anti gravity, from agricultural plant growth to chemical compounds to cancer research to medical advances ( wounds will not heal in zero gravity ) I mean if he could get private industry interested it could be the biggest boom in modern history, And I agree lets not let the Chinese have it...because they will if we don't. I admit it sounds kind of crazy but Gingrich might well be a true visionary...at least on this one
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:06 PM on 01/27/2012
I agree with what you say here, but it's hard not to see this country, if not the whole world, at war within months of a Newt presidency.
04:58 AM on 01/29/2012
I would say within months of any Republican presidency - save for Ron Paul. Each of the other candidates have expressed a desire to preclude Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon by a preemptive strike. I wouldn't be surprised if Obama did the same. Just as happened in the lead up to the Iraq war, the media is helping to spread propaganda about the need for an attack in order to defend Israel. Fool me once, shame on you. You know the rest.
photo
bikefolder32
My micro bio is an honor student.
03:58 PM on 01/28/2012
None of that is what Gingrinch is talking about. We can do anti-gravity with orbiters - we don't have to be on the moon to make those advances. We've done these experiments with sub-orbital aircraft and have already made those medical discoveries. He's talking about sending people there permanently as if it were a U.S. territory - to live. Not a necessary thing when we can't even provide for the home we currently possess. We don't have to pay for colonization of the moon and Mars to make advances.
Frankly, it's insulting to hear them poo-poo the current space program just because the shuttles are gone. We didn't use a shuttle to send probes to Mars and we've learned more from that mission than we did in dozens of Apollo landings. We found water on Mars, for pete's sake. But because we didn't send people up in a plane to do it, that must mean Nasa's sitting on their hands?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:37 PM on 01/28/2012
I agree with you that retiring the shuttles was merely the next step forward in the space program...not the end of it.Spacex...a private American company,,,,has been given the green light to take supplies to the International Space Station....pretty exciting stuff....
05:41 PM on 01/28/2012
I'm pretty sure I understand what he said, I watched the debate. He also said he would look to private sector to finance the majority of it. But the difference between an orbiter and a permanent....say manufacturing plant is two completely different things as well. The difference between limited experiments ( I doubt we have even scratched the surface with what advancements are available with this, we just haven't spent enough time there ) and viable commercial use are worlds apart. I do agree with you that with THIS economy we don't need to spend ANY unnecessary money . BUT if the economy improves as he says it will..in 8 years ...maybe. Like I said before, It has potential to be the next industrial boom and if America doesn't do it China or Russia will. My thought is how would transportation become cost effective.
03:17 PM on 01/27/2012
Let's just say they all lie (all except Obama!!)l; and newt showed on national t.v. on Thursday night that he can and will lie with the best of them and with a great poker face!! Why would Mitt be against immigrants since his parents and his in-laws are immigrants?! But the "key" moment was when Mitt mentioned that and newt stood their knowing he was busted but his facial expression clearly showed "guilty" for having made a false claim..and to go further he's running ads in Florida that does everything to show him in as the "Savior" of the republican party back during the Reagan Era!! He better use his "Historian skills" to dig up the truth about his political history!!
03:15 PM on 01/27/2012
I will be glad when this Political Side Show all comes to an end - its all becoming a JOKE and I don't think anyone is really laughing - We need some serious HELP and a decent, honest person in office that really cares about the people -
03:13 PM on 01/27/2012
2) All anyone in politics think about is what is best for themselves - not for the people - and that should be the first priority "we the people" as to the saying to all those in the government system "YOUR FIRED" we need someone in office that really cares about the people that pay them - not for themselves or putting their names in the "Highlights" hitting the front page being "Glory Hounds" we all need a bit of "GLORY" in our own lives they are Rich "WE ARE NOT"! Its time for the People to take back what we are paying for and not getting! This is a wake up call. We the People Out number the Government but we are the one's that put them their. so who is the one's that are really Stupid? We the people. we have allowed it. the gripe about it. Geez
03:12 PM on 01/27/2012
1) What happened to just plain "health care" why does it have to carry the name of someone? as to schools - they are nothing like they used to be - sure a lot of advanced things but my grand daughter was in a school that had Photography - which she loved but the school was so over crowded my daughter had trandfered her to another school - no photography but got art - which she also loves - after they moved in Dec. another transfer was made - no photograhy and no art classes - more elective classes - what happened to auto repair classes - other classes that benifit kids in their life that can't afford to go to collage - classes that are important for building something in their lives - they add a lot off CR@P classes that most kids fail at - can't keep up and considered as "Stupid Kids" not all kids are brain smart - but will make their living working with their hands - "handy works"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:45 PM on 01/27/2012
let your grand-daughter know that she may be able to get student grants, and tuition assistance should she choose to attend college.. maybe she's an artistic kid that could turn her talent into a decent paying job.. tell her to shoot for the stars!
photo
bikefolder32
My micro bio is an honor student.
04:05 PM on 01/28/2012
These mechanically-inclined jobs are where they're finding there's a gap right now. There is a high demand for skilled welders - you don't have to have a college degree to be a welder, but you DO have to have technical training. Once upon a time they could start that training in high school, but now it's at the 2-year community college level. But people with this training are able to write their own ticket right now.

And as for the "names" and health care - the Republicans are the ones labeling it that way, Obama and his supporters never used the word "Obamacare." It's a way to simplify things to make it easier to refute, i.e. lie about. It makes it sound devious if you call it "Obamacare" and then tell people it's got provisions that will pull the plug on your grandmother and so forth. If you refer to it as the "Healthcare Reform Act" - it's not as easy to make it sound sinister.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tuhloola
The facts have a well-known liberal bias
02:59 PM on 01/27/2012
Newt has quite the excess skin hangin' under his chin. Looks like something the President would pardon on Thanksgiving ! Can't imagine Newt & Callista (with her blond football helmet ), being the First Couple............HOLY VISUAL !!!!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Bronxdude
Integrity has no need of rules
02:37 PM on 01/27/2012
Republicans are singularly obsessed with appeasing Birthers, defending fat-cats, stopping same sex marriage, stripping gays of their citizenship, allowing multinational corporations to operate tax free, abolishing collective bargaining, reducing wages to Truman era levels, creating a permanent underclass, taxing the middleclass into oblivion, scapegoating the disadvantaged, and grabbing power by any means necessary, as evidenced by the lies they propagate, their predilection to blame others for the mess they create, and their repetitive pattern of reckless behavior that goes against traditional moral and ethical standards. Using scripts authored and bankrolled by Charles Koch, a recycled litany of has-been pundits routinely surface on Fox News (aka Republican Television) to spew loathsome, divisive, and inflammatory lies aimed at delegitimizing President Obama and scaring the electorate into endorsing slipshod, failed Republican economic policies. By depicting President Obama as a “foreigner” not born and reared on American soil, Republicans deliberately misrepresented known facts to obtain sleazy Birther backing. The cold truth is that Republicans are very adept at manufacturing deception, especially when facts expose their perverse schemes to hamstring the middleclass. Republicans continue to advance the lie blaming Democrats for the current economic crisis, but it was under Bush 43 that runaway deficit spending tripled, surpluses disappeared, the federal budget expanded by $9 trillion, two unfunded wars were started, borrowing from China reached record levels, defense spending surpassed $2 trillion, 14 million manufacturing jobs were outsourced, unemployment reached unprecedented levels, pork-barrel spending ran-amok, and unfunded subsidies to corporations exceeded $3 trillion, while the wealthy enjoyed mega tax cuts and the number of children living in poverty quadrupled. Enter dumb, dumber and dumbest: Mitt and Newton.
03:16 PM on 01/27/2012
Yes yes! If the Republicans would only open their eyes, to the fact, their super rich idols have taken it all in but haven't given much back!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:59 PM on 01/27/2012
so many people here have this 'victim' mentality.. it's time to stop blaming others for your problems - that's my problem with what Obama's doing.. telling everyone that they've done enough, and they have the right to everything that anyone else has.. it's not true! i didn't work as hard in school as many did, and jerked around in crap jobs for 10 years before going back to school and getting a degree - that let me get a good job that i've kept for the last 24 years.. it wasn't until i realized that the world didn't owe me a thing, that i stopped resenting others success and went after what i wanted.. i know times are tougher, but i'm tired of hearing people buy into the notion that the cards are stacked against them.. stop being victims, and take control of your lives
06:12 PM on 01/27/2012
Wow you say this a week after Obama announces that a huge defense contract will go to Brazil to a company that JUST happens to be owned..or partially so by Soros?? You libwhacks are a delusional lot
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jetncat
02:03 PM on 01/27/2012
Why does anyone want to further their education taking huge risks with student loans if when they become successful and accomplish their dreams of wealth and success our nation will turn against them? Is it ok to Hate success revile it and want to treat it as some sort of evil? Today it has become more popular to live off the govt and be on food stamps then it is to have everything you ever dreamed of work hard and pay your own way.
.... Crony politics has to stop or there will be no future for the younger generations, higher learning or prosperity. Be proud to want more than you ever dreamed of... That is what made us a great nation, a nation of successful people. The American way!
02:51 PM on 01/27/2012
There is nothing wrong with being rich and successful and as far as I know I've never herd anyone say that! However, when the top five percent has over ninety percent of the wealth in our country, then we have a problem! Especial, when when most of super rich have gotten their money from the middle class worker. What has made a lot of people pissed is the super rich has sat on their wealth and outsourced their businesses to other countries! The rich get richer and out of work people endup with a government handout in order to survive! Trickle down economics hasn't worked very well for many out of work people!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jetncat
03:18 PM on 01/27/2012
you missed the point. They earned it by taking risks we didn't. However we need to stop crony capitalism like we see now with GE and wallstreet. Congress should trade on insider info and get govt contracts in return for favors. Govt is the problem not the people. Turbo tax Tim Geithner doesn't go to jail for not paying his fair share but you would. See the problem?
05:29 AM on 01/29/2012
What do you propose we do? Since the top 5% owns over 90% of the wealth we ought to take it away from them? If it is wrong for me asan indivual to force them to give me a share of their wealth then what makes it right for collective society to essentially do the same thing?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Lebro
02:03 PM on 01/27/2012
One can always tell the heart beat of the nations people, buy who they choose as their leaders. Right now Newt and Mitt are winning. And I can't find a pulse. I really don't like either of these two. But who in their right mind would even think of Newt as our next leader. To me Ron Paul is the only one that is honest. Newt! Are you people serious?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigteffie
settle down people
02:01 PM on 01/27/2012
Okay guys let's talk aboout this moon thing ....First are we going to put McDonalds on the moon, will Walmart build stores up there ? or are we going to put all the illegals up there and will they be illegals if they are there. Will there be moon tax. Will you be a citizen of the US or a moon citizen.... does the constitution reach that far. Will Mittens own most of the moon land and bank his money on Mars? Will Newton start a janitorial service using eight years for labor. What if the housing market on the moon caves in, will we move on to Venus and Saturn? Enquiring people want to know.
01:46 PM on 01/27/2012
Tea Party wants to elect our next president---we know in what regard our current Tea Party members of the House are held-----LOW
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jetncat
02:06 PM on 01/27/2012
Guess we can elect another 4 years of total failure huge national debts and no jobs. A 9% unemployment rate high gas and a debt that out paced the GDP in 3 years. Yea I 'll take 4 more years of total failure and will it get worse?
gted1954
The right seldom is...
02:52 PM on 01/27/2012
How did you handle 8 years of abject failure and lies under Bush, Cheney?