iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

CFDA Health Guidelines For Models Released, Focus On Age & Eating Disorders

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 01/27/2012 8:19 am Updated: 02/08/2012 3:31 pm

It's no secret that runway models are getting younger and skinnier by the day. But Diane Von Furstenberg, president of the Council of Fashion Designers of America (CFDA), has also made it no secret that rules and regulations will be established to combat the dangerous trend.

On Thursday the CFDA released an updated set of guidelines to ensure the health of models walking New York Fashion Week. One particular rule, previously announced in August, requires that no model under the age of sixteen is permitted to walk the runway shows. To enforce the age limit, checking IDs is encouraged.

Healthy eating is the other major concern addressed in the new guidelines. As von Furstenberg and Dr. David Herzog, director of the Harris Center, wrote in an op-ed posted by the CFDA, the issues of age and body image are intricately connected:

Designers generally produce only one sample size for the runway, and in the last decade there has been a dramatic downward shift in the sample size of some of the top design houses. As a result, models are under increasing pressure to be thinner and thinner, and younger and younger. The industry’s hiring of prepubescent-appearing teenage girls as models of adult clothing sets an unrealistic standard; hips and breasts, the curves that define the female figure, are absent. Some models have difficulty maintaining the body ideal as they move into adulthood and run the risk of engaging in unhealthy eating behaviors that lead to eating disorders.

While outspoken criticism of the problem, plus the occasional use of plus-size models in runway shows and fashion editorials, highlights the issue for the public, such gestures do little to create practical solutions.

Thus the CFDA has handed down a new set of clearly articulated guidelines, including the following:

* Educate the industry to identify the early warning signs in an individual at risk of developing an eating disorder.

* Encourage models who may have an eating disorder to seek professional help in order to continue modeling. And models who are receiving professional help for an eating disorder should not continue modeling without that professional’s approval.

* Support the well-being of younger individuals by not hiring models under the age of sixteen for runway shows; not allowing models under the age of eighteen to work past midnight at fittings or shoots; checking IDs to ensure that models are the appropriate age; providing regular breaks and rest. Consult the applicable labor laws found at www.labor.state.ny.us when working with models under sixteen.

* Supply healthy meals, snacks, and water backstage and at shoots and provide nutrition and fitness education.

Additional suggestions regarding education on drugs and cigarettes, as well as workshops on eating disorders, are also spelled out, all of which can be found on CFDA's website.

It's a promising step in the right direction, going beyond op-eds and symbolic gestures to real change. But it is worth noting that the guidelines only apply directly to runway models, leaving magazine shoots, advertisements and other fashion media untouched. Can the fight for healthier models be won if only fought on one front?

See the guidelines and read Diane von Furstenberg's op-ed at CFDA.com.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST STYLE

 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:53 AM on 02/18/2013
I agree with Isreae's law - prohibiting models with BMI of < 18.5 from working. Footballs players aren't alowed to play if they're injured, athletes aren't allowed to use steroids. How can not letting an UNHEALTHY person work infringe of "freedom of expression"? GIVE ME A BREAK!
JWoode
yes.. my micro bio is meaningless
12:08 AM on 01/30/2012
The audience was puzzled by the annoying sounds as five little bone racks paraded down the runway, clicking their heals. Then they realized that none of them wore shoes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RoughCollie
Destination: A new way of seeing things.
08:59 PM on 01/29/2012
Education for eating disorders is admirable and a step in the right direction but unless there is backlash levied against the designers who "generally produce only one sample size for the runway" which in turn creates the very problem of anorexia, all that wonderful education is simply toilet paper waiting for the inevitable flush.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IvyRedhead Hoffart
enjoying life in a messed-up world
07:34 PM on 01/28/2012
As good as these measures are, I agree with Cynth and say that they need to be policies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jill in NYC
The cat ate my micro-bio.
02:48 AM on 01/28/2012
It's about time. Some of those models are scary-skinny. The clothes would photograph better on a clothes hanger.
12:25 AM on 01/28/2012
Age limit isn't enough. CFDA should come up with a standard sample size chart for all designers so the designers couldn't keep shrinking the sample size. If a model is too thin to fit in the sample size, she wouldn't look good and wouldn't be casted for the runway show. This way, models will have an incentive to keep a healthy weight. If it's left to designers' discretion, the sample size would keep shrinking. This isn't exactly rocket science.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rybalaw
12:40 PM on 01/27/2012
Models should look like Barbie. Not like 12 year olds or heroin addicts.
01:33 PM on 01/27/2012
Saying models should look like Barbie is just as impossible and absurd as expecting them to look like 12 year olds or heroine addicts.
Here's a novel idea: maybe models should look like real women, with muscles and curves and as a whole, represent a variety of body types... so that 12 year old girls can grow up free of eating disorders and appreciate their female bodies.... and the rest of us, no longer 12 years old, are not constantly expected to look like them in order to feel sexy.
Barbie does not exist in nature! If she did, she'd have to crawl around on her hands and bendable knees because her waspy little waist couldn't possibly support the weight of her upper body, much less contain actual internal organs. And her feet! Imagine being seven feet tall and wear a woman's size 5 shoe... that's what you'd wear if you had the same proportions as Barbie.
Yeah, that's really attractive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RoughCollie
Destination: A new way of seeing things.
09:05 PM on 01/29/2012
You've got to take the Barbie metaphor with a grain of salt. rybalaw probably meant that Barbie has curves and models don't. Most people don't have a clue that Barbie has unrealistic dimensions, they actually remember her as a curvy and voluptuous young woman doll (ok, maybe with a boob job and a tummy tuck ;-)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Cynth
[Your ad here.]
11:11 AM on 01/27/2012
This can only be good and kudos to Von Furstenberg and CFDA for coming this far; however, this isn't sufficient. First , these are only guidelines, not policies, which carry more weight. Second, I would like to see fashion editors pledge a concrete, meaningful, and active role in this effort. The runway is only one aspect of the modeling world and the top magazines have more influence in perceptions than designers. I hope these guidelines are effective for regulating the runway. If not, I hope the CDFA will have the wisdom and courage to strengthen its measures.