iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Unemployment: The Bad Things That Can Happen When You Lose Your Job


First Posted: 01/27/2012 10:27 am Updated: 01/27/2012 12:38 pm

Lianne Valenti lost her job as manager for a company that makes portable power generators last July.

Valenti, who is 46 and lives in Long Beach, Calif., started drawing unemployment benefits and looking for a new job. She couldn't find one.

"I worked my whole life," she said. "This was the first time it was like hitting a brick wall."

She downsized her life to fit an income a quarter of its former size, moving in with her boyfriend and selling her car. "All these contracts, all these financial commitments you've made are suddenly really major." And she eventually lowered her sights from jobs that paid her former salary, applying instead for any kind of clerical position she could find.

In October, she started having mild chest pains. Her health insurance had stopped; she could have continued her former employer's policy, but she said she couldn't afford the $600-plus premiums on a monthly income of $1,600 in unemployment insurance. She figured she'd have no luck finding a better deal on the notorious individual market (though it is possible a better deal was available -- there is no way to know now). She looked up her symptoms online instead of visiting a doctor.

"I was trying to fix it myself," she said. At first, she thought it was anxiety. Then she settled on gallstones, since many health websites list gallstones as a possible cause of chest pain. "And since they are not life-threatening unless certain symptoms appear," she said in an email, "I decided to just deal with the pain."

The health care reform law is supposed to make insurance coverage affordable for everyone, but not until 2014. In the meantime, people like Valenti can be stuck with not enough money for private insurance, and yet too much money to qualify for publicly subsidized insurance. It's an increasingly common scenario as the number of people with employer group coverage dwindles.

By mid-December, Valenti's spasms came more frequently, lasted longer, and were "paralyzingly painful." But the pain would stop abruptly, and she'd feel better. She looked up herbal cleanses and reflexology.

She spent the holidays with her sister in Utah, trying to put the pain out of her mind, hoping an herbal remedy she'd ordered online would fix her up when it finally arrived. Still, the feeling was hard to ignore when it radiated up from her diaphragm and across her shoulder. "A lot of times it would wake me up in the middle of the night," she said. "I spent so much time sweating, thinking it was just pain, I just need to breathe. And when it passed, it would pass immediately."

Back home one night in early January, it didn't pass as quickly as usual. "I was sitting here in my chair and it lasted for two hours. It was all I could do to breathe. I couldn't open my eyes."

A little after 5 a.m., Valenti called her sister in nearby Lakewood and asked for a ride to the emergency room. Once there, she described her symptoms to a doctor and said she thought she was having a gallstone attack. The doctor checked her out with an electrocardiogram and told her she'd suffered a heart attack. They immediately did an angioplasty and inserted stents to keep her arteries open.

The doctor said she'd nearly died. Valenti was shocked. "In my family history there are heart problems, but I'm healthy. I have low cholesterol." She said the doctor told her it was stress and smoking that caused the attack. "You had a stressful job, when you lost it that stress had nowhere to go," Valenti said she was told.

Numerous studies have shown the unemployed suffer more health problems than people who have jobs. In Valenti's case, it's not hard to see why.

"If I had had my insurance I would have gone to the doctor in October," she said. "The pain was unbearable. I've never had pain like that, and I've had three children."

Valenti said she's had to quit smoking cold turkey and is now scrambling for a way to cope with an onslaught of bills for her treatment and pills. Already the hospital sent her a $79,000 tab for her visit, she said, which she's hoping they'll be willing to forgive or reduce.

Once she's been uninsured for six months, she will be eligible for a health care reform program called the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan, which for a Los Angeles resident Valenti's age costs $306 a month with a $2,500 limit on annual out-of-pocket costs. Even that, she said, would be a stretch -- what she's really hoping for is a job. She said she's had several promising interviews.

"I'm in this position now where I can't just look online. I can't even take herbal stuff without talking to the doctor," she said. "I'm dependent on the medical system now and I have no way of paying for it."

Arthur Delaney is the author of "A People's History of the Great Recession," HuffPost's first e-book.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,395
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
TeraWatt60 10:37 AM on 01/28/2012
This woman is emblematic of the problem of private health insurance today...too expensive because they pad premiums to include their "profit" but lobby and purchase politicians to continue their place in the system...insurance companies are an unnecessary and costly component of health care that we should replace with single payer public funded healthcare. The overhead wasted on stock dividends, "bonuses",  Read More...
01:35 PM on 01/31/2012
From what I understand, her doctor told her that it was stress from her employer and smoking that caused her problem. She should go back to her doctor and find out if the stress from her job was warrented stress or unwarrented. If the stress was unwarrented from her job, then she should sue her employer for such.
08:56 AM on 01/29/2012
She probably qualified for free care .LOW income.
She should have gone in right away.
She has no assets
Is in fact broke.
photo
Arthur Delaney
Staff reporter for HuffPost since 2009.
06:01 PM on 01/30/2012
She doesn't qualify for Medicaid or other programs for low-income people because her children are grown and she earns to much in unemployment insurance.
04:25 PM on 06/22/2012
Exactly. I went to a City of Chicago clinic when I was unemployed, which uses a sliding scale. Unfortunately, my unemployment insurance was "too high" so I may as well have gone to my normal doctor. Of course my unemployment was barely enough to pay my rent....but still, I did not qualify for any healthcare assistance.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrcontinental
Expat Extraordinaire.
06:26 AM on 01/29/2012
In America you are always one illness or accident away from bankruptcy and financial ruin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
03:03 AM on 01/31/2012
Unless you are Romney.
09:56 AM on 01/31/2012
So very true!
06:00 AM on 01/29/2012
I do have compassion for this unfortunate person, but it mentions that she gave up smoking which is at least a fifty dollar a week habit, one that translates into at least 200 dollars a month and with that she could have obtained insurance with a high dedutable, but at least it would have covered her inpatient treatment. And who knows if she didn't smoke perhaps she would not have become ill. I have no problem with a one party payer but in return I think that if the government is paying for your care the government should have the right to demand that you stop smoking, maintain a proper weight, not indulge in risky behavior , etc. And remember if a right to lifer gets into office forget about abortion. However, I think what American want is the freedom to do whatever they want with the government there to rescue them from the consequences of there own folly. Of couse this is not freedom; it is childhood.
photo
JWerner
Beware Macduff; beware the thane of Fife!
07:31 AM on 01/29/2012
Screw you and your condescending second-guessing. You are part of the problem plaguing this country.
10:36 AM on 01/29/2012
Condescending? It's the truth. People should be responsible for maintaining their health, and before someone else pays for it, that someone else has the right to demand that the person make at least the minimal effort to keep themselves healthy. If you want the life of a child whereby you take risks but go crying to mamma and papa when thing go wrong then so be it. It's like the folks who bought a house, used the equity as a piggy bank to finance destination wedding, expensive cars, boats, home theatres and such, and who now feel that the banks should absorb the losses from their profligate spending, The same is true of those who took student loans, drifted through college partying, got some useless degree, now want the taxpayer to absorb their loan obligations. Yes, there are those who did everything right and were conned into taking a mortgage that they could not afford or converting a mortgage they could afford. And there are those who applied themselves and still come out of college with no job waiting. But to assume that everyone who has come to grief was a victim of circumsstance and not their own folly is to deny reality. Both Wall Street and Main Street were greedy.
08:08 AM on 01/29/2012
Agreed.
JWoode
yes.. my micro bio is meaningless
12:22 AM on 01/29/2012
So.. basically.. the point is that unemployment is bad for you..
07:29 PM on 01/28/2012
America is the greatest country in the world! Believe it or die!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
09:22 PM on 01/28/2012
Not quite so bad as that. How about, "Believe it or face reality"?
04:26 PM on 06/22/2012
It's the best country....only if you can afford it!
07:23 PM on 01/28/2012
Jobless "jive"....Duh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ringmaster
I know I spelled it wrong.
03:38 PM on 01/28/2012
Last month, I on a carnival industry web site, I said that carnivals were still one of the best jobs of last resort fort for families in trouble.
I was taken to task, none to nicely, by several show owners who said they no longer hired the unemployed. They are too much trouble to do the background checks on that most fairs require now.
Contract workers form the Caribbean and Mexico are more cost efficient.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
03:00 AM on 01/31/2012
Huh? Why would it cost more to do a background check on someone who is unemployed vs. someone who is already employed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ringmaster
I know I spelled it wrong.
10:03 AM on 01/31/2012
The labor brokers supposedly do background checks in Mexico. It's all BS anyway.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:27 PM on 02/01/2012
Foreign workers on temporary visas won't complain about much of anything.

Carnival work is low paying and the constant moving around doesn't suit adults with families.

That the owners don't want to hire Americans is understandable. Too bad that they can decide to hire foreign workers without giving Americans a chance. That is not right and should not be legal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ringmaster
I know I spelled it wrong.
09:23 AM on 02/03/2012
Thank you. Carnival workers have traveled with their families for generations, as have circus families for centuries.
03:29 PM on 01/28/2012
Getting you own health care is not that expensive. You just can't be lazy you actually have to look around ans soend time. I live in NJ and pay $162.93 a month with a $20 deductable. You liberals blow things out of preportions. Not everything can be handed to you on a golden platter
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisalawless
Ph.D. Sexual Health / CEO Holistic Wisdom, Inc.
03:40 PM on 01/28/2012
So many people that have had the good fortune of not getting seriously ill and have insurance are under the same delusion. Good luck trying to get a medium to large claim actually paid when you find out that the doctor you saw is not covered, the condition you have is not covered, that what you have is considered a pre-existing condition which is excluded from coverage. Just because you have insurance does not mean that you can use it. There are many things they can do to keep you from actually using the insurance you have been paying for and think you have a right to use.
11:34 AM on 01/29/2012
Oh bull. If you have a pre-existing condition you almost always know it. Besides, if we cover pre-existing conditions here's what will happen: People will not sign up for insurance until they're seriously sick. Can you figure out what the problem with that is?
09:58 AM on 01/31/2012
I agree with you lisalawless.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hunter West
03:43 PM on 01/28/2012
you have to buy health care from your own state. and $162.00/month is a lot if you're unemployed. People keep saying... look around, you're lazy if you can't find a job and afford health care or pay for all your bills... i'm sorry, but there are only 24 hours in a day. for the victims of mass layoffs, that's not enough time to do everything you need to do to get back on your feet while still caring for your family. Employees have suffered enough in the wake of this recession while their employers have reaped the benefits of bailouts and record profits. It's time for them to start sacrificing equally.
07:25 PM on 01/28/2012
Yeah...I quess a 40 hr work week would be a little tuff, too.
11:35 AM on 01/29/2012
So making your neighbors support you is a good idea?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lorili Lee
03:28 PM on 01/28/2012
Too bad she's not an illegal immigrant. She would have gotten the same care without the $79K bill.
11:37 AM on 01/29/2012
Bang. Or she could claim some sort of disability. I have a neighbor who has never worked on the books in his life. Got cancer at 49. Somehow qualified for disability for having been a heroin addict 20 years ago.
And Medicaid paid for all his cancer treatments.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hunter West
03:26 PM on 01/28/2012
It amazes me how so many "compassionate conservatives" on this comment stream applaud someone getting sick and suffering from it.

There is one silver lining though.... Their ain't no medicine that can cure what ails the GOP. This woman man live or die, but the fate of republicans is sealed. May you not rest in peace.
11:48 AM on 01/29/2012
You only think of the poor victim. We also think of the poor sucker who is having their earnings confiscated to support the endless list of victims.
Illegal immigrants who get EITC (yes, illegals DO file tax returns). College students who want their college loans paid off by us. Civil servants who expect to retire at 55 with pensions for another 30 years...
And on and on.
photo
graffitijoe
snowballs chance n SoCal
02:56 PM on 01/28/2012
You should have stopped smoking BEFORE the heart attack, lady.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
09:24 PM on 01/28/2012
How do you get through hard times? Some of us need things that are not good for us merely to keep going.
11:49 AM on 01/29/2012
And you're okay with confiscating money from your neighbors to support those things that are not good for you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
02:09 AM on 01/29/2012
It's too bad that she isn't as perfect as you.. right?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DDay52
An Independent mind with Progressive ideas
02:13 PM on 01/28/2012
What is all this crap I keep hearing from neo-thugs about the "bad habits" of others costing them money in health care premiums? It is like that in every aspect of our life. We pay for fire stations, but some people's houses burn because of bad habits. Our schools need special ed teachers because some kids can't keep up. We fund police stations with tax dollars because some people break the law. WE HAVE SOCIALISM NOW. We have always realized the need for the collective body to fund things that only a few of us may need. The same should be for healthcare--it is the moral and ethical things to do. It's what makes us a civilized nation.
photo
dailyfiber
The Truth: So Funny...It Hurts!
01:57 PM on 01/28/2012
Unfortunately Republicans rigidly stick to their principles even if it means being wrong. Because you can't be wrong when you're right. Single payer health care. I rest my case.
photo
GWNumber1
FREEDOM!
02:01 PM on 01/28/2012
We would have single payer now but Democrats didn't want it...they preferred Obamacare instead.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martha Fair
Professional RepubliBilly Factchecker
02:16 PM on 01/28/2012
No ..you Republicans did not want it. You did everything in your power to make people believe your better red than dead lies. Be careful what you wish for because you soon will have your wish., You will be dead soon under your own RepubliBilly healthcare agenda that you yourself chose.
photo
patient i am
i've run out of patience
02:34 PM on 01/28/2012
you don't pay much attention do you?
photo
GWNumber1
FREEDOM!
01:48 PM on 01/28/2012
She ordered an "herbal remedy" online....not the sharpest pencil in the drawer.....
01:53 PM on 01/28/2012
we need to quit intervening in dawinism
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Renifer
Tea-Partiers are really Neo-Birchers
02:10 PM on 01/28/2012
"we need to quit intervenin­g in dawinism "

You need to stop misquoting Darwin and Spencer.
This has nothing to do with reproduction or genetic survival.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survival_of_the_fittest

"Survival of the fittest" is a phrase originating in evolutionary theory, as an alternative description of Natural selection. The phrase is today commonly used in contexts that are incompatible with the original meaning as intended by its first two proponents: British polymath philosopher Herbert Spencer (who coined the term) and Charles Darwin...

Darwin meant [the phrase] as a metaphor for "better adapted for immediate, local environment", not the common inference of "in the best physical shape".[4] Hence, it is not a scientific description.[5]

The phrase "survival of the fittest" is not generally used by modern biologists as the term does not accurately convey the meaning of natural selection, the term biologists use and prefer. Natural selection refers to differential reproduction as a function of traits that have a genetic basis. "Survival of the fittest" is inaccurate for two important reasons. First, survival is merely a normal prerequisite to reproduction. Second, fitness has specialized meaning in biology different from how the word is used in popular culture. In population genetics, fitness refers to differential reproduction. "Fitness" does not refer to whether an individual is "physically fit" – bigger, faster or stronger – or "better" in any subjective sense. It refers to a difference in reproductive rate from one generation to the next.[6]
photo
patient i am
i've run out of patience
02:36 PM on 01/28/2012
if you believe that then it stands to reason when rich people get sick they should not be allowed to use their money to 'intervene'.
photo
rww549
Yellow Dog Democrat
07:17 PM on 01/28/2012
She was broke. What did you expect her to do? The lack of compassion or understanding from the right is disgusting.