More

HuffPost Social Reading

Iowa Lottery Mystery: Hot Lotto Ticket Claim Investigated

By RYAN J. FOLEY   01/27/12 04:42 PM ET  AP

IOWA CITY, Iowa -- Criminal investigators looking into the suspicious circumstances behind a now-withdrawn claim for a $14.3 million Iowa Lottery jackpot will have numerous layers of complexity to unravel, stretching from a wealthy New York suburb to Central America, observers said Friday.

The Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation said it was examining whether a crime was committed related to the purchase and presentation of the Hot Lotto ticket. But Dave Button, who leads the agency's gaming bureau, acknowledged investigators may have no way to compel the man who may have the answers – a 76-year-old New York lawyer – to give them up.

Crawford Shaw of Bedford, N.Y., withdrew his claim for the jackpot Thursday after refusing for weeks to tell the Lottery the identity of the person who bought the ticket and anyone else who possessed it before he did. He said he didn't know the ticket owner, who wished to remain anonymous. After the Lottery rejected his lawyers' last-minute offer to give the money away to charity, he withdrew the claim "to avoid further controversy."

Rather than end the story, the move marked the beginning of a criminal investigation led by DCI and the Iowa attorney general's office. It could take weeks, and they may never conclusively determine what happened.

"Good luck to whoever is trying to nail this down," said Tom Curran, a New York lawyer who represents Industrial Enterprises of America. The company is suing Shaw, who served as its CEO from 2004 to 2005, before it was looted and driven into bankruptcy. "I suspect the Iowa officials are encountering some of the same difficulties we've had in terms of Mr. Shaw being a many-layered person."

Shaw promised Thursday to explain his decision Friday – but didn't answer his phone or return messages, a pattern he's repeated in recent weeks. A Des Moines law firm representing Shaw declined additional comment Friday after issuing a brief statement Thursday.

His former company is seeking to recoup millions of dollars, including $2.3 million paid to Shaw for consulting work that Curran said never happened, with a lawsuit in bankruptcy court in Delaware that alleges systemic fraud by its prior management. Curran said the company would have tried to recover any Iowa Lottery proceeds that went to Shaw.

"If they have a legitimate entitlement to lottery winnings, who sits there and says, in response to that very rational request to give information, `Nevermind, keep the money.' Who does that? Who does that? No one," Curran said.

After the jackpot went unclaimed for a year, Shaw's lawyers shocked Lottery officials when they showed up two hours before the Dec. 29 deadline with the winning ticket in hand. Security checks showed the ticket was valid. Shaw signed it on behalf of Hexham Investments Trust (misspelling Hexham as Hexam), which listed its address as a post office box in Bedford, N.Y., a wealthy enclave where Shaw lives on the property of his daughter and son-in-law Gregory Fleming, the president of Morgan Stanley Investment Management.

Shaw told Lottery officials during a meeting earlier this month that all of the trust's proceeds would go to a corporation based in Belize, a Central American country that has a reputation as a tax haven. (The advantages of the money going there aren't entirely clear, as Lottery spokeswoman Mary Neubauer said the agency would have withheld 30 percent in federal taxes, instead of 25 percent, if a foreign corporation was ruled the winner).

Making matters more complex, Shaw's lawyers told the Lottery that Shaw was retained by an attorney who was representing the ticket purchaser – whose identity was unknown, even to Shaw. Shaw agreed to represent the purchaser's attorney on the condition that both of their identities and all discussions would remain secret because of attorney-client privilege, they said.

At the same time, Shaw's lawyers said in their Tuesday offer to give the money to charity that the person who legally bought the ticket, possessed it and transferred it to the trust approved the deal. They said Iowa law did not require the disclosure of the name and address of the buyer, but giving the money to charity would assure "that no prohibited player may benefit from the payment of the prize." Iowa law does not allow anyone under the age of 21 or employed by the Lottery to play.

Neubauer said Lottery officials rejected the offer because they weren't sure the claim was legal. She said Iowa law requires the release of the winner's information, which she said could potentially be a trust. She said the Lottery in the future will evaluate claims of winners who wish to keep their identities from the public for safety or other reasons on a case-by-case basis.

Neubauer said investigators might consider, at some point, releasing surveillance footage showing the person purchasing the winning ticket on Dec. 23, 2010, at a Kwik Trip gas station in Des Moines – an act that set in motion 13 months of intrigue and counting. Investigators have said the buyer appears to be of legal age, but they have withheld the tape because its release would compromise their case.

"It may be one of those situations where the questions ultimately go unanswered," Neubauer said. "But would it have been responsible to pay millions of dollars to a blind trust that benefits a corporation in Belize without any of the basic information we needed? No."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CRIME

IOWA CITY, Iowa -- Criminal investigators looking into the suspicious circumstances behind a now-withdrawn claim for a $14.3 million Iowa Lottery jackpot will have numerous layers of complexity to unr...
IOWA CITY, Iowa -- Criminal investigators looking into the suspicious circumstances behind a now-withdrawn claim for a $14.3 million Iowa Lottery jackpot will have numerous layers of complexity to unr...
Filed by Michael McLaughlin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,137
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (29 total)
08:43 PM on 02/04/2012
Maybe the person who purchased the ticket was illegal or wanted by the police. I can't see someone not claiming what belong to them.
01:58 AM on 02/01/2012
Wake up, and try to do what is best for our country not play political games with our childrens ( and the homeless children you claim to care about) future. PS: Huffpost Super User what city do you live in, that they have homeless children and toddlers running around? Or is that more republican rhetoric.
01:57 AM on 02/01/2012
Seems more plausible that it was the Republican front runner with the offshore bank accounts who instead of investing his money in America would rather seek tax havens. I am sure you will vote for Mitt; 250 Million and still so greedy he try to dodge taxes. Only dumb Republicans would vote for such an idiot who spends millions in negative ads against Newt, instead of laying out a plan to help Americans and America. Sounds like Mitt didn't want to collect another 14 million in the middle of the campaign unless he could deposit it offshore. It is so strange, there were almost no homelessness in this country until the Republicans robbed us blind starting with Reagan. Under Clinton we had a surplus, until the fiscally conservative Republicans came in and the country was running a deficit within two years. No wonder our country is going down the drain and people like me (who actually served in the military and defended my country) am sick of Redumblicans blaming everything THEY did on Obama. A house divided can not stand, it is time for us to unite as a country and solve our problems. If you are sick of seeing homelessness go to the source, Republican policies. While you are at it, listen to the tapes of Nixon saying he didn't understand how for profit health insurance companies were going to make a profit. Answer, by denying treatment, to which Nixon said oh, I see, and was in total agreement)
09:42 PM on 01/30/2012
This whole story stinks from the get go. on one hand what difference should it make who the winner is? unless it's a lottery employee! as long as the gov. gets the taxes, whats the hub bub? and it's not like they would'nt be able to follow the money trail , so why not pay it and let the 48 hrs mystrey begin?
09:57 PM on 01/30/2012
What if the ticket was stolen from the original owner?

The advantage of the current situation is the money goes back into the jackpot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bare Bones
06:52 PM on 01/30/2012
this could mean many different things. Maybe the purchaser owes a huge amount of money, maybe a terrorist, maybe someone in prison, a public figure, someone in the witness protection program, a paranoid person who happens to have a lot of enemies, a theft of the ticket from the rightful purchaser, or someone that actually works for the lottery. There are opportunities as a programmer or random number generator expert to swing the odds. I love a good mystery and hope we find out the real reason.
pcs5141
cut the crap
06:47 PM on 01/30/2012
I was led to belive who ever fills out the back of the ticket and presents it gets the money.Its like having a 100 dollar bill,who ever presents it to the bank to get change has the money
07:06 PM on 01/30/2012
The Government has their hand(s) in it .taxes & info
06:17 PM on 01/30/2012
I suspect the original purchaser of the ticket is wanted for some very serious crime and doesn't want to claim the money for fear of spending a very long time behind bars.
01:26 PM on 01/30/2012
This is rich....someone literally worked into the State's treasury office and handed a check for $14.3 million to the State and the State turns around and what to spend some of those money to investigate the motive behind that person's action?

I will understand if Shaw's creditors goes after him and force him to claim the price, so that they can get paid or lay claim to the prize but for the State to investigate him for an abandoned money is rich!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
critterzdad2
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
10:54 AM on 01/30/2012
Thanks to all my years of watching tv cop and lawyer shows I seem to recall if the state files a charge of criminal conspiracy to commit fraud against the shyster then they can compel him to reveal his clients name. And isn't this a federal case? For once I say pile on, boys! IThe lawyer is just a mouthpiece for a crime.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:38 AM on 01/30/2012
ok i admit it i bought the ticket send the money to me.
10:26 AM on 01/30/2012
No, no, it's mine! I bought the ticket!
10:50 AM on 01/30/2012
just for the record...I did NOT purchase the ticket.
07:10 AM on 01/30/2012
So what happens now? Is the pay-out date over or can they still collect? It would be so nice for the author to FINISH the story....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr MOTO
Three Strikes And You're Not Out!
08:48 AM on 01/30/2012
They fe the claim 3 hours before the deadline so no one can collect on it now that their claim has been withdrawn. The news here in iowa says that the money will go into a "general fund" for "use in future drawings". Rigghht. Also, the state double their prices to $2
10:27 AM on 01/30/2012
They do put the money back into the Lottery. And Genius, the price has been $2 for a very long time...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mh430
CHUCK my great dane, stands by all my comments
01:05 AM on 01/30/2012
Yes money is the root of all evil, but what's wrong with a little devious behavior. I'm ready, give me the money.
photo
sydneymoon
Dismiss what insults your own soul
05:34 AM on 01/30/2012
The exact quote is: "The love of money is the root of all evil".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mh430
CHUCK my great dane, stands by all my comments
05:58 AM on 01/30/2012
Thank you, I was just quoting someone, but I didn't know that. I really do appreciate the information
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ILoveGreatDanes
When the going gets tough, the tough take a nap.
08:27 AM on 01/30/2012
Who doesn't love money? Anyone who says they don't is either lying or in denial.
12:13 AM on 01/30/2012
Who cares....I'm still working my butt off to try to pay my bills. This doesn't matter one bit to me.
08:31 PM on 01/29/2012
I wouldn't put much stock in any promise to "give the money to charity", since it's easy enough to set up a charity that benefits, say, diuretic Catholic monkeys in Greenland (hint, there aren't any such things). And who will be the officers of this charity, and what will the expenses be? Uh huh.

Setting up charities is a classic way of avoiding taxes and laundering profits while making one's company look good. Not to say there aren't legit charities; there are lots of them. There are, however, many that aren't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
critterzdad2
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
10:57 AM on 01/30/2012
Yeah- I read somewhere that Nancy Reagan has a couple of those "money for ME" charities to play with as well.
01:35 PM on 01/30/2012
"diuretic Catholic monkeys in Greenland" ahhh....but in Iceland they are prolific.... and they need your support.
07:49 PM on 01/29/2012
I loved the theory of the stolen ticket and the usesless sales assistant. Very plausible. Here's my theory. The true ticket owner must be connected with illegality or a sham of some kind, and is probably being leaned on and possibly bribed into silence because an already very rich and powerful person with whom they can be connected does not want to come under the intense jounalistic scrutiny involved in becoming a lottery winner. Someone knows that a superficial tabloid investigation would immediately flag up suspicion about something big, possibly a high-profile affair, for example by someone wishing to be elected on a family values ticket.

Otherwise, a stand-in would not suddenly have been hired at the last minute. Maybe the winner just broke and couldn't resist the money anymore, and thought that he or she could simply disappear with it. Have money, will travel.

I don't understand though. In Britain, you get to tick a box saying 'no publicity'. Is that not the case in the US?

Is this a plausible theory? If there is a possibility of the covering up of crime, which compromises public safety, is that not enough to for a court to require a copy of the surveillance tape?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
critterzdad2
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
10:59 AM on 01/30/2012
Conspiracy! Conspiracy! Conspiracy! There were two shooters, err- shysters. One held the ticket and the other one held the client down till he or she agreed not to collect it. I love a good mystery- and even more so a conspiracy!
04:44 PM on 01/30/2012
Apart from the comments on here, this article is all I have read on this story, and it is unclear and muddled. The author states that 'even Shaw' does not know the identity of the purchaser, and therefore the winner. This is misleading, especially when he cites client-lawyer privilege, which is not a two way street. Obviously the attorney knows the person's identity, which he cannot reveal. He then hires Shaw as an agent representing him (the lawyer) and therefore his client. Lawyer-client privilege is a red herring, because Shaw doesn't know the person's identity anyway.

I'm going nuts with this. My boyfriend's theory is that someone obtained the ticket by illegal means, even if, as someone suggested, theft by finding.
So, what if the sales person simply stole it? If the purchaser was a senior, maybe with ailing eyesight, or appearing unaware that he or she had won, or someone who was drunk, the assistant may have pocketed the ticket, saying, 'Sorry, not this time...' It wouldn't have been difficult to give the customer another ticket back, or the assistant could have retrieved the winning ticket from a bin. But then why didn't she come forward sooner? Obviously a last-minute win would generate much more scrutiny.