iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Saliva HIV Test As Effective As Blood Test: Study

Saliva Hiv Test

First Posted: 01/30/2012 2:12 pm Updated: 01/30/2012 2:58 pm

Despite advances in the treatment of HIV, one huge challenge still lingers in the medical community: getting people tested in the first place.

The stigma associated with being tested and potentially exposed in a public clinic has prompted scientists at the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre to evaluate the efficacy of an oral HIV self-test, a method they believe can serve as an effective but much more private alternative to clinical testing.

Compared to a traditional blood screening, the saliva test OraQuick HIV1/2, the only oral fluid test approved for use in a health-care setting by the Food and Drug Administration, was 99 percent accurate in detecting HIV antibodies in high-risk populations and about 97 percent in low-risk populations, according to study findings published in the journal The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

To evaluate this saliva test's potential for worldwide use, researchers analyzed real-life field research data from five global databases. High-risk groups include injection drug users, men who have sex with men, and people who have unprotected sex.

Much like home pregnancy tests, researchers believe that oral HIV self-tests can serve as an effective preliminary method of diagnosis.

"Getting people to show up for HIV testing at public clinics has been difficult because of visibility, stigma, lack of privacy and discrimination," the study’s lead author, Dr. Nitika Pant Pai, said in a release announcing the study findings. "A confidential testing option such as self-testing could bring an end to the stigmatization associated with HIV testing."

Earlier this month, another innovative HIV testing program called Testing Together was unveiled, allowing couples to hear their HIV status together, within minutes of receiving a blood test.

Quick Poll

Do you think home screening is an effective way to get more people tested for HIV?

VOTE

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GAY VOICES

Despite advances in the treatment of HIV, one huge challenge still lingers in the medical community: getting people tested in the first place. The stigma associated with being tested and potentiall...
Despite advances in the treatment of HIV, one huge challenge still lingers in the medical community: getting people tested in the first place. The stigma associated with being tested and potentiall...
Filed by Jessica Cumberbatch Anderson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:25 AM on 02/01/2012
And what is this test testing for, exactly? Given the numerous different dƩfinitions of seropositivity (they differ by country), which one is this test following? What's more, classical HIV testing implies running two differents tests to eliminate false-positives, the Western Blot and the ELISA tests. They are complex and expensive. How do you condense these into a single cheap saliva test? Somebody has got to be having us on somewhere.
12:50 PM on 01/31/2012
The home test for HIV is not new. This particular article deals with the issue of getting people to be tested in the first place but the question up until now has been, 'what happens after the test'? In a clinic, people who test positive can immediately get help. When an individual is found to have contracted the virus, they are pulled aside and given support. At home, scared and confronted with a life changing illness, some people may be unable to deal with the impact on their own.
11:12 AM on 01/31/2012
I'm volunteering at a local Aids charity and I'm going to meet my people in a few hours. I'll tell you what they will say when they hear about the test.
I think that nobody should do the testing alone at home. People need support if the result turns out positive. There is still so much lack of knowledge when it comes to HIV and I fear for the people getting a positive result all alone by themselves. Sorry for my English.
10:27 AM on 01/31/2012
Why waste billions trying to convince people to use condoms or know their status, when we can just force everyone to get tested? Yes, there will be alot of objections, but atleast we would eradicate HIV.
11:38 AM on 01/31/2012
Sorry, but you can't eradicate HIV just by testing. The antibodies are tested and it takes 8 to 12 weeks until the test will become positive. Education still is paramount.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
10:22 PM on 01/31/2012
How does testing equal eradication?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastsc
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhe
09:04 AM on 01/31/2012
The money saved by people being tested of their status to prevent further contagion would be enormous. There should be tax credits and money for people who get tested. Most people are responsible enough to prevent others from getting infected once they know of their status.
01:07 AM on 01/31/2012
Way cool. With self-testing in private folks are much more likely to find out early enough to hopefully keep HIV in remission so it can be prevented from becoming full blown AIDS, and also early enough that they could have a far better chance of preventing it from spreading. As long as it has high accuracy and tends to err on the side of caution, this is a boon to humanity. I hope they start a policy of "buy one, one gets donated to third world health programs, too". It might just help stop the global AIDS epidemic that is taking out so many innocent women & children who've been infected through others' promiscuity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:20 PM on 01/30/2012
As a person who now can say he was a part of this study to test the effectiveness. Good work! Just hope it has better packaging then the test box had! Screamed EPT and Femine hygiene product.
09:29 PM on 01/30/2012
It's about time!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atwill
Christian puppets scare me
08:52 PM on 01/30/2012
I have never heard of it, but if it works, good
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrld20
06:41 PM on 01/30/2012
Great to hear... The first time I got an oral test I got a false positive and I vowed to only to the blood test from then on out...

This proves my previous views wrong...
06:38 PM on 01/30/2012
What took so long?
photo
gaydood
♄ Always Wins !!!
08:40 PM on 01/30/2012
there was one b4 but they said it didnt work
03:37 PM on 01/30/2012
The strategy... BEFORE sex get tested TOGETHER for A VARIETY of STDs then make an INFORMED decision
http://notb4weknow.blogspot.com
http://continuedat.blogspot.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr Anonymous
Mumpsimus, I am not entertained!
12:13 AM on 01/31/2012
So then the next time I'm at the bar I'll just whip out one of these and a blood test kit as opposed to a condom.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
meeks
Perfectly my flawed self at all times
07:52 AM on 01/31/2012
Both a condom and this test. I am in a new relationship and it is quickly moving towards us becoming intimate. I know him well enough to feel comfortable to ask him to get tested and I know he will not object. He is kinda great that way. But this... will make that conversation so much easier. In my past, asking a guy to get tested before we proceed has not always gone well.