More

Speed Camera Bill Unpopular Among Voters: Governor's Office Feedback Overwhelmingly Negative (POLL)

Speed Camera Bill

First Posted: 01/30/2012 9:50 am Updated: 01/30/2012 9:55 am

Governor Pat Quinn is expected to make a decision soon on a bill pushed by Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel that would allow the city to put speed cameras near many Chicago intersections. Though the bill was passed by the House and Senate last year, the public is overwhelmingly opposed to the measure -- and Quinn's office says the governor is "carefully" reviewing the plan.

In October, Emanuel announced his support for llinois Senate Bill 965, which would use red-light cameras to identify, and automatically ticket, motorists recorded traveling above the speed limit in "safety zones." The fines could top $100 per infraction, and the "safety zones" would reportedly cover 66 percent of the city.

The Expired Meter reached out to the Governor's office to find out how close Quinn is to signing the measure -- and how the public feels about it. This is what they discovered:

The Governor’s office released a report via a Freedom of Information request by The Expired Meter, that shows the Governor’s office has received a total of 224 phone calls, emails or letters from constituents regarding SB965, of which just 19 were in support of the bill. The other 205–over 91%–were opposed to the bill and urged the Governor to veto it.

In total the Governor’s office received 15 letters (11 opposed, 4 in support), 36 phone calls (35 opposed, 1 in support) and 173 email comments via the Governor’s website (159 opposed, 14 in support).

Emanuel said the cameras would deter people from speeding in school zones, but has been accused of downplaying the revenue-generating power of the speed cameras, which a joint investigation in November by CBS2 and The Expired Meter blog suggests could far exceed red-light camera yields.

The Chicago Department of Transportation did a two-month study of seven intersections that would be impacted by the cameras, monitoring vehicle speeds from 6 a.m. to 11 a.m. and noon until 4 p.m. on weekdays. During those nine hours per day, over 43 days, 1,418,797 vehicles were recorded, 131,034 of which would have been issued tickets under the proposed system. That sample group alone would have generated $13.1 million in fines.

“People know speed cameras are not about safety, but about revenue," Cook County Campaign For Liberty’s Scott Davis told the Expired Meter. “If he (Quinn) raises taxes on the poor and middle class by passing this bill, and gives tax breaks to companies like Sears, it’s not going to sit well with voters."

Transportation Commissioner Gabe Klein has supported the legislation, saying it is about changing behavior by enforcing the law.

Quinn's office told WBEZ that the governor might make a decision on the cameras by the end of January.

“I can tell you that the Governor is reviewing this legislation very carefully,” Annie Thompson, spokesperson for the Governor’s office, told the Expired Meter. “Public response is one of those (factors involved in the decision) and the Governor always wants to do what’s in the best interest of the people of Illinois.”

Quick Poll

Do you think the city should be allowed to install speed cameras?

VOTE


Related on HuffPost:

Mayor Emanuel Pushes, Clarifies Plan for Speed Cameras in School Zones: MyFoxCHICAGO.com

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

Governor Pat Quinn is expected to make a decision soon on a bill pushed by Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel that would allow the city to put speed cameras near many Chicago intersections. Though the bill wa...
Governor Pat Quinn is expected to make a decision soon on a bill pushed by Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel that would allow the city to put speed cameras near many Chicago intersections. Though the bill wa...
Filed by Jen Sabella  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 125
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
takethetime
time to speak up
03:17 PM on 02/15/2012
the camera bill is very unpopular but yet he still signed it and gave it his ok. There they just people another reason not to come into Chicago. I think Chicago will have the most out of all the cities when they finally finish installing them all.
09:45 AM on 02/01/2012
i do not see the problem, as an example in Nassau County, NY studies show red light cameras have reduced speeding, running red lights and car crashes. The argument against was an increase in bumper crashes for cars that stop short due to the light. The result of the studies show this not to be so. Nassau County is a suburban county outside NYC with a population of over 1 million.

Yes there is a revenue factor to consider, but who cares if you follow the law and do not speed in safety zones you will not be ticketed.
04:00 PM on 01/31/2012
If governor Quin sign this nonsense, all he be is Ram little Bi*&%,we do not need cameras we need better goverment, not a machine that all it wants is money.
11:42 AM on 01/31/2012
It will just keep more people out of Chicago and harm the people that live there.
photo
Romano54
honor does not have a price
08:40 AM on 01/31/2012
Perhaps they could close the budget gap by not taking the salary increases they are voting for themselves. So much for spreading the pain around.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
G757
10:56 PM on 01/30/2012
So Mr Mayor. How does it feel to be a republican??
10:49 PM on 01/30/2012
I don't have a car anymore. I can't afford to drive one. Too bad. I'm sure some dealership could have used the cashflow. Some assembly line worker could have used the job. The businesses I used to patronize that are now too far away to walk or conveniently bus to don't get my business anymore and since there aren't local alternatives, I've just learned to do without some things. Turns out you don't have to run out and get milk the very minute you run out, even though if you do go out and get more, you consume it more quickly, someone has to produce more, more quickly. There are red light cameras at almost every intersection now, and where they are installed, what soon follows is a sign that says "no turn on red" where it had always been permitted before. So the first 3 or 4 tickets I got were for turning right on red at intersections where it had been permitted for as long as I've been living here. So the state has made money off of me. But businesses haven't. And now neither does the state. That's some good economic policy.
10:07 PM on 01/30/2012
What if you are going five miles over the limit on a Sunday night at 11:30PM? Would you get a one hundred dollar ticket for that? If so, the punishment doesn't fit the crime. The majority of Chicagoans do not want this law. Quinn should kill it.
10:51 PM on 01/30/2012
You hit the nail on the head. It's not just being fined for these infractions that are so ingrained in us as habit that we can't keep from breaking the laws...and now getting caught...it's that the fines are so excessive.
06:45 PM on 01/30/2012
We the people need to learn a trick or 2 on how to take these cameras out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dana Marie Arnold
Decriminalize, legalize & tax
06:37 PM on 01/30/2012
If this state and it's cities cannot rein in spending DO NOT expect its residents to pick up the slack by income generating speed cameras. This is NOT about safety, it's about generating income for the corrupt government.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
geejai54
Moderation In Everything-No extremes
05:02 PM on 01/30/2012
I received one of these red light tickets . I was visiting Chicago last fall and about 2 months after I returned home I get a bill from the car rental agency. No information about where the violation took place , no picture, just send us $125 dollars.
10:08 PM on 01/30/2012
That is known as a City Hall X-Mas card.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anarchy4hire
Don't you love your guns, god, government?
04:17 PM on 01/30/2012
yeah...for safety......that's it. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$
03:45 PM on 01/30/2012
When has there been a danger posed to children by speeding in school zones, anyway? No one is speeds when kids are around or crossing the street. I agree with montemalone, too...where are the traffic cops? This is just the first step to policies that will put even greater restrictions on free will and is essentially a tax on your right to make an almost certainly harmless decision. It also evidence of a desperate administration with an inability to create policy that can get us out of the mess city hall and the governor's office created.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montemalone
oenophile, aquarist, francophone, radical moderate
03:27 PM on 01/30/2012
If there is concern for speeding in school zones, how about some actual traffic cops in school zones?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:23 PM on 01/30/2012
will this help pay the bills?....its all about the money....its the liberal way
03:40 PM on 01/30/2012
HAHAHAHAHAHAHa!

Rahm ain't no liberal!!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cyke101
#sixseasonsandamovie
04:16 AM on 01/31/2012
And yet 91% are against this bill -- that's going to include a heck of a lot of liberals disapproving it.