More

HuffPost Social Reading

AFL-CIO Super PAC, Workers' Voice, Raises Almost Four Million Dollars

Aflcio Super Pac

First Posted: 01/31/2012 1:28 pm Updated: 04/12/2012 2:47 pm

WASHINGTON -- A super PAC affiliated with the labor federation AFL-CIO will announce on Tuesday that it has raised $3.7 million. It currently has $3 million of that amount on hand.

The funds raised by the group, Workers' Voice, falls short of the massive amounts of money that have been accumulated (and spent) by super PACs allied with the presidential candidates. But for the purposes originally outlined by the 11-million strong union federation, it will serve an important function.

This past summer, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka began outfitting his political operation with a super PAC for the purposes of funding a multi-cycle, issue advocacy and get-out-the-vote effort.

"What we are now focused on is doing a couple of things differently," Trumka told The Huffington Post in late August. "In the past, we would build our structure six to eight months before the election. Now we're not going to do that. We're going to focus our resources on building a structure that has total fidelity towards America's working people, both union and non-union working people. We'll do it 12 months a year, so they'll be able to transition from electoral politics, to advocacy, to accountability with no effort. And it will continue to build greater strength for workers after the election and in between elections."

Coming so shortly after Democrats bemoaned the quick rise of anonymous spending by third-party groups in the 2010 elections, the launch of the AFL-CIO's super PAC drew jeers from conservative critics. But Trumka, like others in the progressive community, saw it as a clear necessity in the new, less regulated world of campaign finance laws.

Like other super PACs, the ALF-CIO's Workers' Voice can raise unlimited funds from corporations, individuals and other unions. Unlike other Democratic-leaning groups, however, it is spending nothing on television advertisements, meaning that its operating costs are dramatically lower.

"The Super PAC is a key component of the AFL-CIO’s move toward mobilizing working people in communities year round around jobs and other issues, candidates, and holding elected leaders accountable," said Alison Omens, a spokesperson for Workers' Voice. "As part of our grassroots program, it will empower working people to talk to their friends, neighbors, and coworkers about the direction of our country and taking action to restore balance to our economy. While others use Super PACs for shadow spending and endless television ads, the AFL-CIO’s Workers' Voice is about having real conversations in neighborhoods across the country, not 30 second spots on TV."

Three million dollars can, of course, be spent quickly during the course of a presidential campaign. But the expectation is that donors will start writing more checks once the Republican primary ends, congressional elections pick up, and November 2012 approaches.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,378
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (33 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Hillbilly49 05:44 PM on 01/31/2012
Unions do make all of the difference in the world!



In 1950 labor unions, in America, represented about 30% of all workers employed. When American unions were strong working people received a minimum wage, the 40-hour week, weekends off, paid vacations, health insurance, pensions, dignity and respect. 



This was when America built the  Read More...


Right wing corporate media in America has been propagandizing, for years, that Americans will be better off when unions have been destroyed, wages kept low and workers receive little or no benefits.  One has to wonder where Americans will get the money to pay for the “stuff” corporations make.  
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
redwolf813
08:29 PM on 02/01/2012
I'll go so far as to tell you what. IF you or a loved one fought in the armed forces, the ones a few years back when we were AGAINST communism and not coddling it, you wouldn't give this guy a nickel. Socialism is communism lite. It gets the "masses" used to what the grand design of Marx and Lennin is all about. Only difference now it the socialists have come out of the closet.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
redwolf813
08:04 PM on 02/01/2012
I didn't bother to read most of this hogwash. Trumka the socialist, hey, he admits it, the guy who wants to bury capitalism and have a worldwide union so he can collect all of those dues from billions of people, has a PAC? What a hoot. Only the ignorant and indoctrinated listen to this stuff. Hey unions have a place, granted, but working against our way of life so we can become EUROPE?? Don't make me laugh
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ghkusa
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
11:17 AM on 02/01/2012
So now, suddenly! -- super PACs are great -- "it will serve an important function."

After "Democrats bemoaned" and HP & Co. told us, relentlessly, how horrific was the Citizens United decision, and how dreadful were those resulting fat-cat, right-wing, Rove-type, Koch-type super PACs were, now we miraculously see the birth of a lovely "important function" super PAC. Now, free speech is OK!

What's the difference? Can't be that this is a Lefty-union entity, could it?
.
03:50 PM on 02/01/2012
Ask Newt how he likes it .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ghkusa
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
12:42 PM on 02/02/2012
"Ask Newt how he likes it ."

Surely, Loneran..., you must be kidding -- or I misunderstood your cryptic, ambiguous comment. (Perhaps HP charges you by the word for posing comments here. :)

If it weren't for super PACs, Newt would have been almost defenseless and MAY have lost in SC, despite debates. Sure, Mitt has friendly super PACs, but...

"Adelson to give pro-Newt super PAC another $5 million [for a total of $10 MILLION!!!]"
http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/01/adelson-to-give-pronewt-super-pac-another-million-111965.html

So, you think Newt opposes or dislikes Newt-friendly super PACs or super PACs in general?
09:52 AM on 02/01/2012
this is just why unions should not exist.. I have a union. It supports democrats and gives no financial money to the other party. In return, the dem gets elected and we state workers get nice packages.. even though I like the perks it's wrong. The money collected by the union should be divided by all paries
10:43 AM on 02/01/2012
"I shall cut off my thumb to spite my hand" {:-D
Why would a union collect money and give it to back a candidate that would think Walmart and temp service jobs are family sustaining income?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
redwolf813
08:20 PM on 02/01/2012
By the same token, why would a union collect dues and give them to an PAC that admittedly want's to institute European socialism here in out country?, At least that's Trumka's message. I mean socialism is such a howling success in Europe. The ONLY country with it's head above water in Europe is Sweden. THEY have their own currency NOT THE EURO. Hello
03:52 PM on 02/01/2012
You live in America if Unions so bad Change your job but please stop Moaning about how you got a great wage pension an health ins. Wise UP'
09:51 AM on 02/01/2012
Is it not strange that the unions cannot survive without forced membership? Just think of how much money the common worker could put back into his pocket with the dues he is now forced to contribute. On top of that, he is paying a premium for the products that other union shops are producing at inflated rates. The union worker in turn, then buys products from foreign sources to save the money he was forced to pay the union. Then the money is given to fund candidates that the union leaders support--not necessarily the worker becasue they get shafted when the candidate loses. But then they get exemmpted from Obama Care and force the costs up for everyone else. We have OSHA for safety..the original purpose of unions. All in all, the worker is not getting much for the millions they are forced to spend for candidates many do not support!
09:58 AM on 02/01/2012
Yeah, and those CEO's and multi-billion dollar companies will be glad to pay a decent living wage and insurance benefits rather than stuffing the money into their own over-inflated wallets and shipping all the jobs overseas to get penny-labor without organized support watch dogging them....sssssuuuurrrrreee they will....
03:55 PM on 02/01/2012
Forced membership ? We live in America if you do not like what your Union is doing leave . Find another job that is your Prerogative . But no-one is forced into anything except the American worker is forced into paying the tax tab of Corporations like GE' 14 billion in profits an NO tax paid . Wake up no force just a want of a better live .
04:41 PM on 02/01/2012
Impecable logic...I am glad to see that in the same vein you support those states that are voting to become right-to-work states..those that do not like it can leave. I will agree with you on that logic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cmaj71625
09:09 AM on 02/01/2012
One of the comments below said that if you don't like the Union get out. Well, that's not as easily done as said and in many cases it is a closed shop meaning you must be a union member to work there. This administration and the NLRB prevented Boeing from building and opening a plant in South Carolina for that very reason, South Carolina is a right to work state. Unions did indeed serve a purpose at one time but they have become a power hungry, influence peddling entity just like the politicians they are trying to buy and in many cases, particularly democrats, have already bought. Unions, like some religious organizations enjoy tax exempt status, this should be revoked when any organization wants to participate in the political process. Once you send funds to a politician or organization supporting a particular politician or ideology you forfeit that exempt status. Union members should be allowed to designate if they want a portion of their dues to go to politicians, they may not agree with the unions choice.
09:05 AM on 02/01/2012
All the money in the world can't save this sorry excuse for a president...BANISH OBANMA 2012
09:03 AM on 02/01/2012
You who gloat and point out declining union membership can learn the facts...when union membership started declining so started the HUGE gap between the income of the people and the 1%. It is completely amazing that so many are fine that so few can make billions and billions and hoard money, cut jobs, ship jobs overseas for penny labor while we watch middle class disappear. You hear whining that unions collectively contribute a few million to a cause of a candidate who will back the people instead of CEO's and (oversea) Job creators, but yet when one individual such as a Koch Brother dumps tens of millions into a candidate for the sole purpose of pushing his personal agenda you're fine with that. Unbelievable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mac88
The sense of it is not common!
09:21 AM on 02/01/2012
That appears to be pretty accurate over all perspective of what is happening but I don't think the majority of us are fine with the Koch brothers!
08:55 AM on 02/01/2012
Question, if Unions are so good for the Economy, why is there memebership declining, or remaining the same? How much of their members union dues got to finance a canidate? Unions have done alot to change the working conditions in America, but the days of sweat shops, poor wages are behind us, look up what a Union worker gets at the Auto companies. Just wonder if all that money they give were given to their memebership, wouldn't that help their membership?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lowrodiay65
08:57 AM on 02/01/2012
Because jobs are being shipped to china so the CEOS can get a few more million as bonuses .
09:58 AM on 02/01/2012
One shoudl read the Finanical Times or the Wall Street Journal, or just look at the piece on ABC news of three bridges being build in the US(2 in Calf. and one in Oregon), by Chinese companies and Chinese workers, no a word from Obama or Trumka. But the union member in Oregon are protesting. The answer given to ABC was that the Chinese companies were cheaper, so I guess is OK to buy cheaper?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:07 AM on 02/01/2012
They earn it. Without them there are NO jobs.
09:09 AM on 02/01/2012
You sir or mam should look and see how wages have gotten worse over the last three decades,not because of unions but because of no unions.All these so called laws you think you have to protect your rights can and are being taken away day by day,there is nothing written in stone.
10:14 AM on 02/01/2012
Unions have nothing to do with the wages in the US. Companies have to be more competitive in todays market, due to regulations that force companies to ship manufacturing overseas to meet the prices demanded by the market, and the manipulation of currency's by China and other nations. We gave billions of dollars to Brazil to drill for oil, and said we'd be their best customer, how many jobs did that create here? I was a retired CEO, only to be brought back, 2 months after I left. I'm here on the west coast, trying to figure out whether to close an operation here, and move it, the mess in California make it almost impossible to continue operations. Unions have tried to unionize in my company several times, and never once coming close to doing so. We in the US have the highest corporate taxes in the world, and the most regulations, but we are asked to compete under those conditions. We have by doing it with less workers, fix the tax code, fix the regulations, make business feel the are not the bad guys as said many times by Mr. Obama, maybe, just maybe we'd start to hire?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Witchhunter
helping those in need of reality.
08:50 AM on 02/01/2012
My dues, my dues, why don't I have any say in where they go. I need Right to Work!
04:00 PM on 02/01/2012
You do not like the Union find another Job you live in America .
rogergoldkin
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance
08:46 AM on 02/01/2012
Without unions, we would live in a third world country. This countervailing power is necessary to prevent a complete take over of this nation by a few special corporate and right wing interests.
09:07 AM on 02/01/2012
Unions have ruined this country's economy
08:33 AM on 02/01/2012
O My , workers organizing to be heard ? Now the republicans will start screaming , communism, socialism, end of demoracy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
invmartyc
Greedy Old People SUPER PAC
08:24 AM on 02/01/2012
Unions select candidates because the support the goals and objectives of that union. They cannot keep all their members happy with their selections but instead they have to keep the interest of the whole group in mind.

Don't like that? Get out of the union!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mac88
The sense of it is not common!
08:30 AM on 02/01/2012
I would be inclined to believe that that portion of the story is correct!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:09 AM on 02/01/2012
How do you "get out"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
invmartyc
Greedy Old People SUPER PAC
11:36 AM on 02/01/2012
I dunno, quit? I did in Florida but then Unions are not cr*p here!
photo
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
08:20 AM on 02/01/2012
Did Dick Trumka ask his members how they felt about him using their money? In what way is a union PAC morally superior to a corporate or special interest PAC? In no way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lowrodiay65
08:58 AM on 02/01/2012
Who said it was?
photo
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
09:23 AM on 02/01/2012
Mr. Obama, Mr. Trumka and scores of other union supporters here on the Huff.
04:07 PM on 02/01/2012
Trumka == a great man a wonderful Voice for the working man an. If being in a Union bothers you Leave you live in America .
photo
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
04:26 PM on 02/01/2012
Sorry Ace, that's not it works here. When we see a fat crook stealing money from hard working Americans to push a political agenda that keeps him fat and happy we have a right to point it out. If that freedom bothers you, too damn bad. Have a rainbow day...
08:16 AM on 02/01/2012
If the unions have that much money to throw around they don't need anymore raises for a while.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mac88
The sense of it is not common!
08:33 AM on 02/01/2012
If a corporation has that much money to throw around they could pay more! It is an investment for both!