iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Komen For The Cure Halts Grants To Planned Parenthood

DAVID CRARY   01/31/12 06:59 PM ET  AP

NEW YORK — The nation's leading breast-cancer charity, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, is halting its partnerships with Planned Parenthood affiliates – creating a bitter rift, linked to the abortion debate, between two iconic organizations that have assisted millions of women.

The change will mean a cutoff of hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants, mainly for breast exams.

Planned Parenthood says the move results from Komen bowing to pressure from anti-abortion activists. Komen says the key reason is that Planned Parenthood is under investigation in Congress – a probe launched by a conservative Republican who was urged to act by anti-abortion groups.

The rupture, which has not been publicly announced as it unfolded, is wrenching for some of those who've learned about it and admire both organizations.

"We're kind of reeling," said Patrick Hurd, who is CEO of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Virginia – recipient of a 2010 grant from Komen – and whose wife, Betsi, is a veteran of several Komen fundraising races and is currently battling breast cancer.

"It sounds almost trite, going through this with Betsi, but cancer doesn't care if you're pro-choice, anti-choice, progressive, conservative," Hurd said. "Victims of cancer could care less about people's politics."

Planned Parenthood said the Komen grants totaled roughly $680,000 last year and $580,000 the year before, going to at least 19 of its affiliates for breast-cancer screening and other breast-health services.

Komen spokeswoman Leslie Aun said the cutoff results from the charity's newly adopted criteria barring grants to organizations that are under investigation by local, state or federal authorities. According to Komen, this applies to Planned Parenthood because it's the focus of an inquiry launched by Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., seeking to determine whether public money was improperly spent on abortions.

Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, has depicted Stearns' probe as politically motivated and said she was dismayed that it had contributed to Komen's decision to halt the grants to PPFA affiliates.

"It's hard to understand how an organization with whom we share a mission of saving women's lives could have bowed to this kind of bullying," Richards told The Associated Press. "It's really hurtful."

Reaction to the news was swift and passionate. On Twitter, it was one of the most discussed topics Tuesday evening, with some tweets praising Komen's decision and others angrily vowing never to give to it again.

Two Democrats in Congress – Sen. Patty Murray of Washington and Rep. Michael Honda of California – issued statements denouncing Komen's action.

"I am stunned and saddened," said Honda, whose longtime chief of staff, Jennifer VanderHeide, had breast cancer last year. "I call on Komen to reconsider this decision, stand strong in the face of political pressure and do the right thing for the health of millions of women everywhere."

Anti-abortion groups, in contrast, welcomed the news. The Alliance Defense Fund praised Komen "for seeing the contradiction between its lifesaving work and its relationship with an abortionist that has ended millions of lives."

A statement issued Tuesday evening by Komen made no reference to the vehement reactions, instead citing its new grant-making criteria and pledging to ensure there were no gaps in service to women.

"While it is regrettable when changes in priorities and policies affect any of our grantees, such as a long-standing partner like Planned Parenthood, we must continue to evolve to best meet the needs of the women we serve and most fully advance our mission," the statement said.

Planned Parenthood has been a perennial target of protests, boycotts and funding cutoffs because of its role as the largest provider of abortions in the United States. Its nearly 800 health centers nationwide provide an array of other services, including birth control, testing for sexually transmitted diseases, and cancer screening.

According to Planned Parenthood, its centers performed more than 4 million breast exams over the past five years, including nearly 170,000 as a result of Komen grants.

Komen, founded in 1982, has invested more than $1.9 billion since then in breast-cancer research, health services and advocacy. Its Race for the Cure fundraising events have become a global phenomenon.

For all its mainstream popularity, however, Komen has been a target of anti-abortion groups since it began its partnerships with Planned Parenthood in 2005.

Life Decisions International includes Komen on its "boycott list" of companies and organizations that support or collaborate with Planned Parenthood. In December, Lifeway Christian Resources, the publishing division of the Southern Baptist Convention announced a recall of pink Bibles it had sold because some of the money generated for Komen was being routed to Planned Parenthood.

Aun, the Komen spokeswoman, said such pressure tactics were not the reason for the funding cutoff and cited Stearns' House investigation as a key factor.

That investigation, which has no set timetable, was launched in September when Stearns asked Planned Parenthood for more than a decade's worth of documents.

Stearns, in a statement emailed to the AP on Monday, said he is still working with Planned Parenthood on getting the requested documents. He said he is looking into possible violations of state and local reporting requirements, as well as allegations of financial abuse, and would consider holding a hearing depending on what he learns.

Many of the allegations were outlined in a report presented to Stearns last year by Americans United for Life, a national anti-abortion group, which urged him to investigate.

Democrats and Planned Parenthood supporters have assailed the probe as an unwarranted political ploy.

Komen, while not publicly announcing its decision to halt the grants, has conveyed the news to its 100-plus U.S. affiliates. Richards said she was informed via a phone call from Komen's president, Elizabeth Thompson, in December.

"It was incredibly surprising," Richards said. "It wasn't even a conversation – it was an announcement."

Richards subsequently sent a letter to Komen's top leaders – CEO Nancy Brinker and board chairman Dr. LaSalle D. Leffall, Jr. – requesting a meeting with the board and asserting that Komen had misrepresented Planned Parenthood's funding-eligibility status in some states.

According to Planned Parenthood, the Komen leaders replied to Richards with a brief letter ignoring the request for a meeting, defending the new grant criteria, and adding, "We understand the disappointment of any organization that is affected by these policy and strategy updates."

Aun, in a telephone interview, said Komen was not accusing Planned Parenthood of any wrongdoing.

"We want to maintain a positive relationship with them," she said. "We're not making any judgment."

Richards said Planned Parenthood is intent on raising funds quickly to replace the lost grants so that women in need do not go without breast-screening services. Already, the family foundation of Dallas oilman/philanthropist Lee Fikes and his wife, Amy, has donated $250,000 for this purpose, Planned Parenthood said.

The Komen decision was perplexing to Dottie Lamm, a Denver newspaper columnist and breast cancer survivor. She has done fundraising for Planned Parenthood, participated in several Races for the Cure, and serves on an honorary advisory council for the local Komen affiliate.

"It really makes me sad," said Lamm, wife of former Colorado Gov. Richard Lamm. "I kind of suspect there's a political agenda that got to Komen ... I hope it can be worked out."

Stephanie Kight, a vice president with Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties, said her affiliate in Southern California received a Komen grant for 2011 and was able to obtain an additional grant of $120,000 for 2012 by signing the deal with its local Komen counterpart just before Komen's new criteria took effect. Under the criteria, no further grants will be allowed unless the pending House inquiry is resolved in Planned Parenthood's favor.

Kight said her conversations with local Komen leaders indicated there was a shared sense of frustration over the national Komen decision.

"One of the things these organizations share is the trust of women across the United States," Kight said. "That's what we're concerned about – not losing the trust of these women, who turn to both of us at their most difficult moments."

___

Online:

Susan G. Komen for the Cure: http://ww5.komen.org/

Planned Parenthood: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/

___

David Crary can be followed on Twitter at http://twitter.com/CraryAP

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
NEW YORK — The nation's leading breast-cancer charity, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, is halting its partnerships with Planned Parenthood affiliates – creating a bitter rift, linked to the a...
NEW YORK — The nation's leading breast-cancer charity, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, is halting its partnerships with Planned Parenthood affiliates – creating a bitter rift, linked to the a...
Filed by Melissa Jeltsen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,846
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (83 total)
07:43 AM on 02/03/2012
I am deeply saddened that the money will not be in place for early detection. They are taking a chance that persons who use the benefits of Planned Parenthood for reasons beyond abortion will be denied care.
Bad call Komen foundation. I will donate my money directly to Planned Parenthood from now on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iamone3
03:02 PM on 02/02/2012
This is out of PPs own mouth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq0kBkUZbvQ&feature=player_embedded
faithva
my income is micro
07:27 AM on 02/03/2012
This video has been proven to be radically edited and created with the sole purpose of causing problems for PP. The creator of liveaction media is a woman named Lila Rose who previously created a flimflam video promoting the idea that PP is tied into sex trafficking. She has been thoroughly debunked by every legitimate media group in existance. This woman and her cohort, James O'Keefe, have a profound belief that they are entitled to use false premises to bring down any organization that they don't like. It is only a matter of time before they are sued for defamation and slander, and any person who choses to promote this fake video had best take caution in proclaiming it as "real". I know for a fact that PP does not provide mammograms in every one of its clinics. However, I know it is a fact that there are clinics in Portland Or, Dallas Tx, California, Pittsburg, and Connecticut, among others, that do.
photo
mskittykat1326
Keeping an open mind, one post at a time...
03:00 PM on 02/02/2012
How utterly absurd.....as a foundation, the vast majority of what planned parenthood stands for is what YOU stand for. How can you do such a thing?
12:34 PM on 02/02/2012
Democracy Now! had a great segment on this today discussing the people who will be most impacted by this controversy. Patrick Hurd, the CEO of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Virginia, his wife, Betsi Hurd, and Jodi Jacobson, the Editor-in-Chief of RH Reality Check were all interviewed on the show. Check it out at democracynow.org
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
freili
11:39 AM on 02/02/2012
Komen's new vice president, Karen Handel, had run for governor of Georgia in 2010 on an aggressively anti-abortion and anti-Planned Parenthood platform and was endorsed by Sarah Palin because of her opposition to reproductive choice

what a surprise.
photo
me again
I'm not wrong....
08:05 AM on 02/02/2012
The boil down is this. A major donor told them if they severed their ties with Planned Parenthood, he would give them a land grant donation. So rather than taking the high road, they got on their knees and said thank you, we will obey.
09:50 AM on 02/02/2012
Do you have evidence of this?
photo
me again
I'm not wrong....
10:07 AM on 02/02/2012
Yes, but cannot share at this time.
10:18 AM on 02/02/2012
A number of Koch business entities are on their corporate partners list. Makes you wonder...
photo
me again
I'm not wrong....
10:29 AM on 02/02/2012
You are very warm.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ElleKaye
Beware the Zealots.
12:44 AM on 02/02/2012
Trust? They're worried about our Trust? Wayyyy too late for that. Komen, Koch and Kompany now better worry about the wrath. Cancer has nothing to do with abortions. PP low cost health services for women have nothing to do with abortions. But this decision is ONLY about abortions. Too bad, Pink. You're Yesterday's Tweets!
Women of the U.S.:
Run for another organization.
Donate directly to Planned Parenthood
Don't contribute to your own demise.
Keep up the fight . . . but don't ever, ever wear pink!
photo
mskittykat1326
Keeping an open mind, one post at a time...
03:04 PM on 02/02/2012
"Run for another organizati­on.
Donate directly to Planned Parenthood"
--------------------
F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jamaicalover1
"I'm a warrior for the middle class" Barack Obama
11:37 PM on 02/01/2012
Women's breast care comes to down to politics.

Karen Handel, senior vice president of the Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, has close links to the conservative, anti-abortion movement. She ran for governor of Georgia in 2010, vowing to end funding for Planned Parenthood and earned endorsements from Mitt Romney and Sarah Palin.

Komen founder and CEO Nancy Goodman Brinker has donated thousands of dollars to the Republican Party since 1990. She also served as an ambassador under George W. Bush's Administration.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yahooserious
Texas....Just keep on keepin' on...
10:41 PM on 02/01/2012
Please support Save The TaTas......http://www.savethetatas.com/
08:09 PM on 02/01/2012
Why all the backlash against the Komen Foundation? It's a simple matter. It's their choice to direct their funding where they deem appropriate. I have no problem with their decision in this matter, as I would personally rather see more funding directed toward research. For those of you that disagree, then just bite your lip and throw your support elsewhere. In my opinion, The Komen Foundation will ultimately not suffer and I, for one, will continue to rally behind them. As one who has lost their only sister to breast cancer, it was her wish that any donations in her memory be made to fight this insidious disease and I will continue to do that. In this regard, Planned Parenthood is not on my list of donees, and that is my personal choice.

And as far as the Liberals and/or Democrats posting comments about wishing cancer on Republicans in response to this article, I am disgusted. And the rest of you should be, also.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iamone3
10:14 PM on 02/01/2012
Amen
01:25 AM on 02/02/2012
BS. For those who support Komen and actually gave them money to help the uninsured get mammograms, it is a big deal and the backlash will be huge. And while your sister might have passed on Breast Cancer-So have the sisters of countless others who have died due to late diagnosis like my grandmother. They won't get a penny from me and I will make sure any other supporter I know guide their money elsewhere as well. .
07:59 PM on 02/01/2012
So, do we oppose the Taliban because we don't like the competition?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Reasongal
06:57 PM on 02/01/2012
Komen is feeling the pain, losing support and even lost its Connecticut affiliate. Also, "Planned Parenthood has seen a huge influx of financial donations in the 24 hours since Komen broke ties. While the organization has not officially released the new donation numbers yet, a source close to the issue said they've raised "hundreds of thousands" of dollars in individual donations during that period. That, combined with a donation of $250,000 from Texas oil executive Lee Fikes and his wife Amy for a "Breast Health Emergency Fund," could put the family planning provider on track to match or surpass the roughly $680,000 it received from Komen in 2011. "
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/01/susan-g-komen_n_1247262.html
08:55 PM on 02/01/2012
Assuming PP is reporting accurately. After all, what do you expect them to say, WOE IS US?

C'mon
01:26 AM on 02/02/2012
You have evidence otherwise?
photo
mskittykat1326
Keeping an open mind, one post at a time...
03:07 PM on 02/02/2012
Why would they do so otherwise? They have nothing to gain by falsely inflating donations. If anything one would think they WOULD take the "woe is me" approach.
05:49 PM on 02/01/2012
We are deeply conflicted in this society.

We are afraid of that which is Other - that which is not the same as _us_ - if we're wealthy, then we fear the poor, if we are ___________ ethnicity, then we fear those not of the same ethnicity. If we are male, we fear that which is female; if we are female, we fear that which is male.

We are greatly conflicted about sexuality - our own individual sexuality, and the sexuality of others.

I have been uncomfortable regarding the Susan G. Komen organization because of certain tactics used against smaller breast cancer groups.

I am not in favor of abortion, believing that a fetus is a human being (if you stop at the blastocele, you never get to the further stages of development). That being said, I live in a _representative republic_, not a theocratic state, with others who do _not_ share my weltanschauung (worldview). There are women who decide upon abortion, and the laws of this country afford them that right. I may state my opposition, in the marketplace of ideas, but I nor anyone else have the right to compel another's decision by force.

The Susan G. Komen decision is unprincipled and dishonest - if they truly felt uncomfortable with Planned Parenthood, then they should be honest and not oleaginous about it.
05:45 PM on 02/01/2012
There seems to be so many verbal attacks on this post. I think most of us care greatly esp with the issue of breast cancer and cancer in general. There comes a point where one must take two steps back and agree to disagree. There are obviously other very sensitive issues here and it appears no common ground is going to be reached today. Don't let the presentation of news of this caliber rob us of our humanity.
05:38 PM on 02/01/2012
Planned Parenthood does not offer breast cancer screenings!! However, abortion does heighten the risk of breast cancer ,so there is that!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Reasongal
06:51 PM on 02/01/2012
You are wrong on both counts - stop spreading the lies that the anti-abortion propaganda machine has repeated ad nauseum for years. Women undergo spontaneous abortions (miscarriages) every day, some for up to three or more pregnancies - no one warns them to have their breasts removed to prevent breast cancer, because there is no correlation! Fear tactics are unjust, and all women need ACCURATE information about their reproductive health, not lies. For the non-cancer connection, see http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/abortion-miscarriage
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jamaicalover1
"I'm a warrior for the middle class" Barack Obama
11:41 PM on 02/01/2012
Here are the facts.

747,607 breast exams in 2010.