iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Rachel Weisz L'Oreal Ad Banned Following Complaint From Jo Swinson (PHOTOS)

The Huffington Post   Dina Rickman First Posted: 02/01/2012 11:59 am Updated: 04/01/2012 5:12 am

L'Oreal adverts for anti-wrinkle cream featuring actress Rachel Weisz have been banned following a complaint from Liberal Democrat MP Jo Swinson.

The advert, for revitalift repair, was judged by the Advertising Standards Authority to have "misleadingly exaggerated" the product after Weisz's skin was retouched.

The move was hailed by Swinson as a sign of progress: "Where advertisers cross the line it's important that they are held accountable more generally. It's not purely about women, there's big pressures on men as well," she told Huff Post UK. 

"With the volume of images that contain women as well as men, there is arguably a greater pressure on women but it's not purely a feminist issue. Along with this idealised images there is also a very pervasive message that what matters for women is how they look."

The Liberal Democrat MP said she was "sure" that extended to female MPs, adding: "Go through the [press] archives over the past few years, everything from Theresa May's shoes and Jacqui Smith's cleavage. I've seen MPs in the new intake suffer appalling sexist stuff, when they're trying to pursue an important issue it just gets lost in the coverage. It's a double whammy, not only is there all of this pressure to look this way but girls grow up thinking that's what important."

Previously, Swinson has successfully made complaints against a Lancome advert featuring Julia Roberts and a Maybelline advert featuring the supermodel Christy Turlington.

Swinson, who is chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Body Image, said she had no more outstanding complaints to make but "I've pulled some more out of magazines."

Below, see the L'Oreal ad as well as plenty more that have gotten the axe. Do you think it should've been banned?

PHOTO:


Loading Slideshow...
  • Ryanair

    The ASA <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/15/banned-ryanair-ad_n_1279529.html?1329336365" target="_hplink">banned these Ryanair ads in February 2012</a>, deeming them too "sexually suggestive" to run in newspapers.

  • Drop Dead clothing line

    Banned in November 2011 for<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/10/drop-dead-ads-banned-asa_n_1085903.html" target="_hplink"> showing an "underweight" model</a> and sending an "irresponsible" message.

  • Marc Jacobs Oh, Lola!

    Banned in November 2011 for <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/09/dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-marc-jacobs_n_1083535.html" target="_hplink">its potential to "sexualise a child."</a>

  • L'Oréal's Revitalift Repair 10

    Banned in February 2012, for "misleadingly exaggerated the performance of the product," i.e. smoothing over Rachel Weisz's skin with technology, not makeup.

  • Marks & Spencer lingerie

    Banned in November 2011 for <a href="http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/news-features/TMG8924873/Marks-and-Spencer-lingerie-advert-banned-for-being-too-sexy.html" target="_hplink">showing ''objectified women''</a> and images that are ''sexually suggestive'' and likely to be seen by children.

  • Lynx Deodorant

    Banned in November 2011 for being <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/26/banned-deodorant-ads-uk-lucy-pinder-lynx_n_1113958.html?1322660080" target="_hplink">"sexually suggestive, indecent, provocative."</a>

  • Miu Miu Fall 2011

    Banned in November 2011 for <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/23/hailee-steinfeld-miu-miu-ad-banned_n_1109948.html" target="_hplink">its setting, on a rail road track, being "irresponsible."</a>

  • Lancome

    Banned in July 2011 for <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/27/julia-roberts-loreal-ad-ban_n_910587.html" target="_hplink">"excessive retouching."</a>

  • Maybelline's The Eraser

    Banned in July 2011 for "excessive retouching."

  • Yves Saint Laurent's Belle D'Opium fragrance

    Banned in February 2011 for suggesting <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/02/ysl-belle-dopium-ad-banne_n_817455.html" target="_hplink">"the injection of opiates into the body."</a>

  • American Apparel Ads

    Some of American Apparel ads (including the one above) were banned by Britain's ASA for gratuitous nudity; a few more were deemed "exploitative" for sexualizing young women. (American Apparel photo)

  • Lara Stone for Calvin Klein

    In 2012, Lara Stone posed with a group of male models in this Calvin Klein ad. It was <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/21/calvin-klein-billboard-ba_n_771559.html" target="_blank">promptly banned by Australia's Advertising Standards Bureau</a> after they found it to be "suggestive of violence and rape."

  • Bulgari's Julianne Moore Ad

    This ad was pulled in Italy in 2011 after the mayor of Venice found it inappropriate.

  • Rimmel's Mascara Ad

    The British Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/26/why-was-this-georgia-may-_n_788605.html" target="_blank">banned this ad after they declared it misleading</a> because Georgia May Jagger is wearing false eyelashes -- even though there's a small disclaimer at the bottom that says, "show with lash inserts."

  • Brian Atwood's Madison Avenue Ads

    The <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/23/brian-atwood-ads-banned_n_1824162.html" target="_blank">video of this ad was banned from taxis and the print versions were banned</a> from the facade of Atwood's Madison Avenue store after being found to be too racy.

  • Natalie Portman for Dior

    The Advertising Standards Authority<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/23/natalie-portman-dior-ad-banned-mascara_n_2004837.html" target="_blank"> banned this ad </a>because they felt the ad used excessive "post-production retouching" in order to exaggerate the real effects of the mascara being advertised.

  • Tom Ford's Gucci Campaign

    In 2004, this Tom Ford Gucci ad campaign became controversial as women saw the girl's shaved pubic hair as degrading and wrong.

  • Rachel Weisz for L'Oreal Paris

    This ad was banned after a complaint from Liberal Democrat Jo Swinson who claimed the ad was "misleadingly exaggerated" in that is makes Weisz look far younger than she actually is and presents a bad image for women.

  • American Apparel Sock Ad

    Oh American Apparel, how you love to push the envelope. Here's another one that was banned because the ad is supposed to be promoting socks but it seems more to be exploiting the girl instead.

  • Taylor Swift for CoverGirl

    This Taylor Swift mascara ad was <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/20/covergirl-mascara-ad-banned_n_1159957.html" target="_blank">banned by the National Advertising Division of the COuncil of Better Business Bureaus Claims (NAD)</a> after they found the product depiction to be dishonest with it's claims that the mascara will make lashes have "2X more volume" and be "20 percent lighter."

  • American Apparel Models

    Again, American Apparel gets in hot water when they apparently use underage models (girls younger than 16) on their website. Britain's ASA <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/05/american-apparel-sexy-ads-asa-child-models_n_2243360.html#slide=1805970" target="_blank">accused the store of "sexualizing" underage models. </a>

FOLLOW HUFFPOST STYLE

 
 
  • Comments
  • 257
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treabeton
Gold dust at my feet, On the sunny side of the str
05:58 PM on 02/05/2012
If it can make a beautiful woman beautiful, imagine what it can do for you.
photo
Ivoire
African-European
12:56 PM on 02/03/2012
I'm ok with the ban. Show us real women. They are beautiful and don't need photoshop.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treabeton
Gold dust at my feet, On the sunny side of the str
05:59 PM on 02/05/2012
Let's stay with the beautiful.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
garylinn
Disabled USAF Veteran (God bless America)
06:25 PM on 02/02/2012
Liberals in England are very different than liberals in America.
08:17 PM on 02/02/2012
Our liberals here are conservatives in Europe.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:57 PM on 02/02/2012
Leave it to a dem. Can't she find something constructive to do?
04:14 PM on 02/02/2012
they are all retouched. everyone knows that.
06:45 PM on 02/03/2012
I know! And if a person can't tell that's lighting, then they're a lil off IMO. I have never seen or ever heard of ads that are not retouched/ altered
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Debbie338
What we manifest is before us
06:02 PM on 02/04/2012
But, wait a minute. This is an ad for a wrinkle cream, not just a fashion shoot. If you alter the results of the cream, then it's nothing more than fraud and false advertising.
02:56 PM on 02/02/2012
Wow. I complained to Disney corp once about advertising for The Secret Life of the American Teenager during the ABC Family Sunday afternnoon showing of Harry Potter #1. The ad was mentioning things like teen pregnancy and baby daddy during a family show time that lots of children under the age of 10 watch. The advertising continued and I never even got a response from Disney. I wish I had the clout of Jo Swinson.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
redhillsrd
02:25 AM on 02/03/2012
You are so right !

The ABC Family channel is probably the worst misrepresentation of channel - they were talking about french kissing and contraception and teenage pregnancy. Now I immediately boycott ALL shows on that channel ... I'm not sure what audience they are going for , but it's not me (and I'm on the good side of the tracks with spending income )
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:56 AM on 02/05/2012
I have to "screen" the shows before I can sit down and watch them with my 9 yr old and 5 year old grandsons ===

ads with teens making out / get pregnant etc etc isn't part of my idea of quality family time ---
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:52 AM on 02/05/2012
I agree - I am all for shows that enlighten age specific groups - but watching Harry Potter with 10 year olds - and seeing ads for sanitary napkins, teen pregancy drama, etc etc is out of place. Certain shows are for all age groups .......... and I, no, I really don't think its agreat way for a parent to be able to "talk with their kids" about important topics ............ I mean really now, while watching Harry Potter with my grandsons for the first time, I want to stop and help them understand why the girl is crying because she is pregant ? Or take that moment to explain what a period is / and how babies are 'made"

No - its family time - please !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wickedtwisted2
get a clue, get a life
02:15 PM on 02/02/2012
oh yes, PREMARIN....http://antiagingguide.com/prempro_horseurine.htm
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:57 AM on 02/05/2012
boycott this product - nothing but the most inhuman treatment of horses

and when they are not longer suitable for urine production they get sent to the slaughter house
photo
RemyC
Indian Point, not worth the risk!
01:12 PM on 02/02/2012
Banned? Yes, but from what and where? This article doesn't say. Who is banning these ads and from where? Is this organization powerful enough to dictate what Hearst or Conde Nast is going to splash on their pages? This doesn't make any sense!
08:19 PM on 02/02/2012
It says Jo Swinson, liberal Democrat MP, and in the UK. Read.
photo
mollynova
Oh, Toto! Where did our democracy go?
06:22 PM on 02/03/2012
thank you
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nosybear
Liar, damn liar, statistician and brewer
12:49 PM on 02/02/2012
The picture has been so photo-chopped it no longer even looks like her!
Greenblue
Whatever doesn't kill you, makes you stranger :P
03:52 PM on 02/02/2012
lol @ photo-chopped.. thx, made me laugh:D
11:45 AM on 02/02/2012
Swinson is getting paid to tell us something we already know?? Now we know why we have an economic crisis. We have elected useless politicians, that went to school in Europe instead of America, wasting taxpayer money on issues like this instead of what really matters. Who elected this person? What a joke!!!
photo
mygailbaby
Am Everywoman not Superwoman.
11:55 AM on 02/02/2012
O' dear, dear, dear! Your gripe is misplaced. "MP" inplies she is in UK, she may have schooled in Europe, and lives there because she serves as an MP there. Her outrage to L"OReal is for the people of the UK, NOT the US.

Relax. Liberals are not solely a product of the US , they exists around the world too. They espouse, "live and let live", sort of like "Love your neighbor as yourself".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
garylinn
Disabled USAF Veteran (God bless America)
06:24 PM on 02/02/2012
Did you READ this? Your post is so way off it's ridiculous
photo
HHGodd
We will move FORWARD without you!!!
11:36 AM on 02/02/2012
That doesn't even look like Rachel Weisz. Rachel Weisz is beautiful beyond measure and that ad looks like they chopped off parts of her face and tightened her skin. Ban it for just making a beautiful lady look like a mannequin.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
almasearch
my micro-bio is none of anyone's macro business
11:25 AM on 02/02/2012
If they wanted to use an older person for their Revitalift ad, they could have asked me! I'm pushing 50, and have great skin. Oh, but wait... I don't use their product (or anyone else's for that matter)... Face it (pun intended), a non-wrinkly appearance in an older person is either inherited or paid for at the plastic surgeon's office.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:10 AM on 02/02/2012
Truth in advertising -- what a concept. I wonder if you could impose such a restriction on political ads? I'm sure that would never happen in the USA though.
11:09 AM on 02/02/2012
I'm so sick of photoshop, it truly is ridiculous.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
daretotopme
11:07 AM on 02/02/2012
A handful of fresh moring urine, midstream, best thing you can put on your face. No soap, no cloth, just a splash of fresh morning urine, again midstream, and within 4-6 weeks you will see your complexion change, lines smooth out, blemishes disappear. If I could bottle it, I'd sell ya some!
Go to the cosmetic counter, local drugstore cosmetic aisle and you will see urea is an ingredient 99.9% of the time!
Fresh moring urine, midstream, mixed with some yellow corn meal applied as a facial! No airbrushing required!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robyn Singleton
screw you guys, Im going home
12:21 PM on 02/02/2012
Whew!! Those golden showers I have been getting can finally do some good.. Hate for it to go to waste
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
daretotopme
12:43 PM on 02/02/2012
I am really not that comfortable using my own! I always remebered a girl from High School who had beautiful skin and when I had a break out she told me to try that, it was how her parents taught her to wash her face. It worked as a teen and if I have a blemish or shave irritation I have applied it with great success. Sounds gross, but just saying it works for me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SammieIAmmie
Click.Read.Complain about clicking.
04:51 PM on 02/02/2012
I know, people just think, ew, it's gross. But healthy urine is STERILE and cleaner than stuff you take out of a jar or bottle. All my aunts swore by this when I was growing up and I never had a blemish or pimple while all my friends were breaking out like crazy!