iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

California Park Ranger Uses Taser On Man Walking Dogs Off-leash

Taser

SUDHIN THANAWALA   01/31/12 08:11 PM ET  AP

MONTARA, Calif. — A man walking his dogs in a federal park was hit with a stun gun and arrested by a park ranger who accused him of not putting a leash on the animals and giving a false name, astonishing passers-by who say the reaction was excessive.

The ranger deployed the Taser stun gun on Gary Hesterberg on Sunday after he ignored the ranger's orders and tried to walk away, the National Park Service said. Hesterberg was allegedly walking his dogs without leashes in violation of the rules of Rancho Corral de Tierra, which was incorporated into the Golden Gate National Recreation Area in December.

"It appears the incident began as one of several educational contacts that day about the NPS rules on dog-walking," said Howard Levitt, the recreation area's communications director. "But this one developed into a more serious law enforcement situation when the person being contacted provided false information."

Hesterberg allegedly refused to provide the ranger with printed identification, and she realized he had told her a false name when she called dispatchers to verify, Levitt said. While she was on the telephone, "the man failed to heed repeated orders to remain at the scene" and the ranger used her Taser, he said.

The encounter is being reviewed just like any other use of force by a law enforcement officer, Levitt said. The ranger, whom he would not identify, remains on the job, he said.

"Any law enforcement officer has a variety of means by which to insure compliance in a law enforcement situation, so the standard is they exercise reasonable judgment to ensure compliance in any situation they find themselves in," Levitt said.

A witness, Michelle Babcock, told the San Francisco Chronicle () the ranger never gave Hesterberg an explanation as to why he was being detained and then hit him with the stun gun in the back. http://bit.ly/y9rHph

"He just tried to walk away," Babcock said. "She never gave him a reason. ... It didn't make any sense."

Calls to a telephone listing for Hesterberg were not immediately returned Tuesday. No one answered the door at Hesterberg's home in Montara, a coastal community in San Mateo County with about 3,000 residents.

A neighbor, Judith Rosenberg, said she heard about the incident from a woman who claimed to have witnessed it. Rosenberg, who was walking her own dog when she found out, said she complained in an email to federal park officials.

"I was very concerned they are tasering people just for not having their dogs on a leash," said the 55-year-old. "It just seems really excessive."

Rosenberg said the chief ranger for the recreational area replied with some details of the incident. In the response, which she shared with The Associated Press, Kevin Cochary said Hesterberg was "not compliant, tried to run away and lied to the investigating ranger about his name."

"We will look into this matter in depth," Cochary wrote.

Hesterberg was arrested on suspicion of failing to obey a lawful order, having dogs off-leash and knowingly providing false information, Levitt said.

Rancho Corral de Tierra was privately owned until it became part of the recreation area in December. Residents were accustomed to letting their dogs roam there both on and off leashes, Levitt said.

The recreation area has proposed tougher rules for dog walkers, including requiring leashes in open spaces where dogs currently roam untethered and closing some popular dog-walking areas to canines. The ranger was trying to educate residents about the leash requirement, Levitt said.

Park service officials and environmentalists said they want to protect some 1,200 native plant and animal species, including the Snowy Plover, a federally endangered shorebird.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CRIME

MONTARA, Calif. — A man walking his dogs in a federal park was hit with a stun gun and arrested by a park ranger who accused him of not putting a leash on the animals and giving a false name, as...
MONTARA, Calif. — A man walking his dogs in a federal park was hit with a stun gun and arrested by a park ranger who accused him of not putting a leash on the animals and giving a false name, as...
Filed by Andy Campbell  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,247
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (23 total)
11:11 PM on 02/25/2012
This is ridiculous. Shooting a dog's owner is a great way to get yourself attacked by a dog. I used to walk my lab (now passed away) off-leash all the time. What would Cesar Millan say about this?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabinetmaniac
Think for yourself. Question authority.
01:13 PM on 02/18/2012
What's with the ridiculous picture?

Are there no stock photos of a female ranger with a Taser?

Or at least a female ranger?

☮
07:46 PM on 02/07/2012
Just a dog off leash contact. follow the link

http://www.odmp.org/officer/15332-park-ranger-steve-renard-makuakane-jarrell
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hypocrites are Watching
If I agreed with you we’d both be wrong.
10:20 PM on 02/06/2012
Violence should be a last resort. Violence must be the last resort.This story is not a subject for laughter...however you should read the testosterone fueled Judge Dredd posts from those in favour of tazing non violent people who are guilty of a misdemeanor.
photo
wolflover3825
Hungry Like the Wolf.
08:09 PM on 02/03/2012
I will predict that they will say the ranger acted properly. That this wasn't exessive force for threatenly walking away.
07:25 PM on 02/03/2012
Why was he walking away? Was he walking away to get his dog, or just to ignore a ranger?
I always thought that a gun or a taser were to be used to PROTECT the officer or other people from harm? Could he harm the officer when he was walking away? That doesn't sound to threatening to me.
How did she know that he had given her false ID?
The area was made into a park recently and maybe some people didn't know that it was now a park?
It seems that like many stories with Huffpost are missing the details that should be published .
12:47 AM on 02/04/2012
She had already run his name and found out it was a false ID. Secondly, when a cop tells you to stop where you are, you don't just keep walking. The cop has the legal authority to enforce compliance with his or her order.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hypocrites are Watching
If I agreed with you we’d both be wrong.
09:05 AM on 02/07/2012
part 1 of 2
Hey Mr. Peace officer I have a scenario for ya.
Neighbours call the cops because they hear a woman screaming coming from a house on the block. The police arrive and also hear the same noise. The house is gated and the police have to pry the gate open. The house is in total darkness. The police have determined that they need to enter the house for the safety of the woman screaming. The officers find that the only entry is by breaking in the door. The officers enter the house and they determine that its coming from upstairs. As the police leave the hallway to enter the stairway a gun fires and kills an officer. As the second officer takes cover it is discovered that the shooter is the owner of the house who thought the officers were intruders as they broke into his house after getting past the fence and gate. The screaming was the owners new girlfriend who loves s&m and screams a lot. He didn’t hear cops as he was VERY busy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hypocrites are Watching
If I agreed with you we’d both be wrong.
09:08 AM on 02/07/2012
part 2 of 2
Or almost same scenario but the officers enter the house and determine that the screams are coming from the basement as they open the door to the basement there is a gunshot and the first officer is slain. Here the screaming is from a movie being played in the fully fitted cinema the homeowner constructed in his basement. He didn’t hear cops as he was engrossed in the film.
You want my point. Both had legally held weapons and were following the LETTER of the law. And now a cop is dead. And all over a misdemeanor I.E. Disturbing the peace. This is typically considered a misdemeanor or an infraction depending on the jurisdiction and is often punishable by either a fine or a brief term in jail. On other rare occasions it is considered an ordinance violation, the lowest level of offence.
These two possible situations are no less ridiculous that the man above being tazed because the cop can do it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:08 PM on 02/03/2012
Shocking. On the other hand, at least the dogs didn't get it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Dude67
Nobody told me there'd be days like these
06:54 PM on 02/03/2012
Okay, let's go gang - contest time.  I say the name he gave was Hugh Jorgan.  

Next.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hypocrites are Watching
If I agreed with you we’d both be wrong.
10:05 AM on 02/06/2012
Pat McGroin
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hypocrites are Watching
If I agreed with you we’d both be wrong.
10:06 AM on 02/06/2012
My Fav is Amanda Hugnkis
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ultrawiz
Holding the Middle Ground
03:32 PM on 02/03/2012
Thank God one of his dogs didn't relieve themselves, the 'officer' probably would have shot the guy in the back. WAY over the top for what should have been a VERY minor infraction. What's with all the cops suddenly thinking they're Rambo recently?
10:32 AM on 02/03/2012
Although the tasing isn't justified, I'm one of those people who can't stand it when people don't have their dogs on a leash.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Louise Aloft
no man is an island
10:46 AM on 02/06/2012
really it depends on the dog and the area where you're taking it. dogs deserve to have places were they can run around and follow a ball, humans are too slow to provide for that on a lead (though perhaps not a in national park whose intents are to protect native species of flora and fauna).
08:44 AM on 02/03/2012
Unfortunately, there is an increasing level of disrespect of Law Enforcement Officers in general and as I recall, one was recently shot and killed out west. How was she to know whether or not he was armed? wanted? He did give a false name and if he were armed could have just as easily turned around and shot and killed her. It's really easy to Monday morning quarter back when you are not in that situation. The guy should have been honest and respectful and this likely would not have happened. It's true this should not have happened, but I am not convinced it's a case of a LEO on a power trip.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rubbish379
12:32 PM on 02/03/2012
Well he WALKED away, didnt run or become violent. She tazed him in the back. She should have called for back up, and went from there.
11:44 PM on 02/02/2012
Sounds like someone was on a bit of a power trip to me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mackjaz
Please Tax Me More - I Want a Quality Government
10:26 AM on 02/03/2012
Sounds like you need to be educated. Contact your local police department and schedule a ride-along. Then your opinion will hold more weight.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rubbish379
12:29 PM on 02/03/2012
Considering she was a park ranger. The stress of giving lost hikers directions made her snap.
09:42 PM on 02/02/2012
Tasers are meant to be a non-lethal alternative to using a gun. Thus, when using a taser, that person would have used a gun had a taser not been available. Is walking your dog without a leash, and walking AWAY from the ranger, really justification for being shot?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mackjaz
Please Tax Me More - I Want a Quality Government
10:28 AM on 02/03/2012
Please reread the story. When you violate the law, even a small one, you are subject to some small amount of police scrutiny. I bet in this case, that would have amounted to a verbal warning.

If there was a story about a child bitten by a loose dog, you would probably be criticizing the ranger for not doing her job.
10:41 AM on 02/03/2012
No, even if a child had been bitten by a loose dog I wouldn't expect the ranger to taser (the non lethal alternative to using a firearm) on the owner.

Please reread my comment. Tasers are meant to be a non lethal alternative to using a firearm. Essentially, when using a taser, the police/enforcer/etc is saying "in this circumstance, I would use a pistol and live ammunition, however this non lethal alternative is available and I am using that instead".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabinetmaniac
Think for yourself. Question authority.
01:15 PM on 02/18/2012
What?

I disagree with your premise.

:-]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy l Payne
A Royal Pain in the...
12:01 PM on 02/02/2012
I do not know the actual events as they happened, as I was not there to witness the event. It sounds as though the man was outside the regulations when he walked his dogs off of a leash on fed lands. Does that really justify a taser?

With that caveat, I have noticed that the enforcer class is more often willing to immobilize (or neutralize) any level of confrontation with a taser before enforcing a infraction. I have reasoned that as the public becomes more frustrated with the economic events, more resistant and confrontational, the enforcers will more often justify the use of force as a means to maintain control of the situation.

I believe we will see more of this kind of action in the future as the citizenry becomes more frustrated and disenfranchised.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hypocrites are Watching
If I agreed with you we’d both be wrong.
01:35 PM on 02/07/2012
here here!
10:46 AM on 02/02/2012
So he told her he was Buzz Lightyear....no reason to taze him. The "authority" in this case is a punk who hides behind a badge. This kind of incident will become more common in the future because of all the laws and regulations that our government is forcing on the American people. We no longer live in a free country, we are now governed by czars and Gestapo police tactics.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
11:41 AM on 02/02/2012
Most people who lie to cops about their name are doing so to avoid an arrest on a warrant, are a parolee, or wanted for something. Since the guy left the scene after being informed he was being detained, the ranger had a right to use force to effect a lawful detention.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hypocrites are Watching
If I agreed with you we’d both be wrong.
02:54 PM on 02/02/2012
For dog walking without a leash?!?!!!!?!?!??!? Are you seriously telling us all that you are ok with this?!?!? What next waterboarding for unpaid parking tickets, capitol punishment for running a red light? It doesn’t matter if he was a parolee or buffalo bill what he did was not deserving of physical harm !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mackjaz
Please Tax Me More - I Want a Quality Government
10:30 AM on 02/03/2012
You are quick to criticize without knowing the facts, understanding the situation or even carefully reading the article.

If this were a story about a child being attacked by a loose dog, you would no doubt be criticizing this ranger for not doing her job.