More

Taliban Prisoners: Guantanamo Bay Detainees May Be Released

By ANNE GEARAN and KIMBERLY DOZIER 01/31/12 09:30 PM ET AP

Taliban Prisoners
This image reviewed by the US military shows the flag and barbed wire within the 'Camp Six' detention facility of the Joint Detention Group at the US Naval Station in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, January 19, 2012. (JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON -- U.S. intelligence officials acknowledged Tuesday that the United States may release several Afghan Taliban prisoners from the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as an incentive to bring the Taliban to peace talks.

Meanwhile, Afghan officials told The Associated Press that a plan to give Afghanistan a form of legal custody over the men if they are released satisfied their earlier objection to sending the prisoners to a third country.

Director of National Intelligence Jim Clapper told Congress Tuesday that no decision had been made on whether to trade the five Taliban prisoners, now held at Guantanamo Bay as part of nascent peace talks with the Taliban. He and CIA Director David Petraeus did not dispute that the Obama administration is considering transferring the five to a third country.

U.S. officials and others had previously spoken only vaguely, and usually anonymously, about the proposal to send the prisoners to Qatar, a Persian Gulf country that has asserted a central role in framing talks that might end the 10-year war in Afghanistan. The lead U.S. negotiator trying to coax the Taliban into talks had also publicly acknowledged the possibility of a release, but said there was no final decision.

The prisoners proposed for transfer include some of the detainees brought to Guantanamo during the initial days and weeks of the U.S. invasion that toppled the Taliban government in Afghanistan in 2001. At least one has been accused in the massacre of thousands of Shiite Muslims in Afghanistan, according to U.S. and other assessments, but none are accused of directly killing Americans.

"I don't think anybody harbors any illusions about it, but I think the position is to at least explore the potential for negotiating with them as a part of this overall resolution of the situation in Afghanistan," Clapper said during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing.

The Obama administration has recently embraced the possibility of negotiation with the Taliban much more openly, saying that although they remain cautious they are also encouraged that the militants may be ready to bargain. Peace talks, if they come to pass, would include the elected Afghan government and, at least at the outset, representatives of the U.S. government. With nearly 100,000 troops in Afghanistan and a war and development budget in the billions of dollars, the U.S. remains the largest power broker in Afghanistan.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai supports a prisoner release as a means to build confidence among the Taliban militants that talks are worthwhile, but he had balked at the U.S.-backed plan to send them to Qatar instead of home to Afghanistan. That plan appeared to undercut his authority and offend Afghan sovereignty, Afghan officials said. Karzai yanked his ambassador from Qatar, saying Qatar had not kept him properly informed.

But recent discussions between Karzai and U.S. negotiators found a way around the Afghan objections, a senior Afghan diplomat and another official said. Speaking on condition of anonymity because the arrangement is still under discussion, the officials said Afghanistan could assume a sort of legal custody over the prisoners and then, with the prisoners' own consent, agree to consign them to house arrest in Qatar.

An Afghan delegation would prepare the way for that arrangement by visiting the prisoners at Guantanamo and signing off on the transfer plan, one official said.

The Obama administration does not want to send the prisoners to Afghanistan, in part for fear they might be released. The men are considered "enemy combatants" who were, at least until recently, considered too dangerous to release.

Afghan custody of the men, even if only on paper, could provide sufficient political cover for Karzai against criticism at home that the arrangement is a snub. Karzai has already reluctantly publicly endorsed Qatar as the site for a militant political office that would serve as a headquarters for talks.

U.S. officials would not confirm the possible solution but did not dispute it.

Separately, Afghan officials said their government plans to explore talks with militants under the auspices of Saudi Arabia or others. Those talks would complement talks in Qatar, not undermine them, and carry at least an implicit stamp of approval from U.S. negotiators, the officials said.

The White House National Security Council had no comment on either issue.

The AP previously reported a proposal to release two or three of the Taliban prisoners as an initial goodwill gesture, to be followed by the others. All would go into custody in Qatar, under conditions that are likely to be less secure and less restrictive than at Guantanamo.

Several members of Congress oppose any release, and Congress has erected several legal hurdles that military and other officials acknowledge would slow and complicate the process.

Several GOP lawmakers who object to the transfer are pushing the White House to keep the detainees in Guantanamo "until the end of hostilities," according to a U.S. official with knowledge of the negotiations.

If the Taliban wants to end hostilities through negotiations, "then we could transfer their fighters," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss conversations with the White House.

Of particular concern is Mullah Norullah Nori, described in U.S. military documents as one of the most significant former Taliban officials held at Guantanamo. He was a senior Taliban commander in Mazar-e-Sharif when the Taliban fought U.S. forces in late 2001. He previously was a Taliban governor in two provinces Northern Afghanistan, where he has been accused of ordering the massacre of thousands of Shiite Muslims.

Petraeus also acknowledged discussions about the five Taliban prisoners, and told Congress that the U.S. government has assessed the risk that the men might still be dangerous.

"This proposed so-called trade has actually not been decided yet," Clapper said, speaking at an annual hearing on worldwide threats. Republicans were openly skeptical, saying recidivism among former Guantanamo detainees is high and the gambit is of questionable value in promoting peace.

Petraeus said his analysts had assessed various scenarios under which the prisoners could be released to countries other than Afghanistan and Pakistan. The analysts sought to determine which countries would be best able to monitor the freed men, and keep them from returning to militancy.

Clapper's office reported in December 2010 that 13.5 percent of released Guantanamo detainees are "confirmed" and 11.5 percent "are suspected" of reengaging in terrorist or insurgent activities after being transferred.

Clapper said in the case of the Taliban prisoners, U.S. negotiators would first have to determine where the prisoners would be released, and how best to make sure they did not return to the fight. The defense spending bill signed by President Barack Obama in December also requires that the Pentagon certify that any release is safe.

"Part and parcel of such a decision, if it were finally made, would be the actual determination of where these detainees might go and the conditions in which they would be controlled or surveilled," Clapper said.

But Clapper said the prisoner release could be a confidence-building measure that helps move negotiations forward.

The intelligence agencies' annual threat assessment said the Taliban was less able to intimidate the Afghan population that last year, especially in areas where NATO forces are concentrated, but that its leaders continue to direct the insurgency from their safe haven in Pakistan.

U.S. officials have pledged to consult with Congress about any release, which was not enough to persuade Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga.

"I want to state publicly as strong as I can that we should not transfer these detainees from Guantanamo," Chambliss told the intelligence agency heads.

_ Associated Press writer Ben Fox contributed to this report from San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Anne Gearan can be followed on Twitter at (at)agearan.; Kimberly Dozier can be followed on Twitter (at)kimberlydozier;

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 63
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:20 PM on 02/01/2012
Considering that as many as 1/3 of all detainees who were released went back to fight against us, this idea is insane.
10:58 AM on 02/01/2012
If you believe in the rule of law then rendition was kidnapping and harsh interrogation techniques are torture... clearly all inmates should be released or brought to trial. The suspected recidivism includes attending meetings to protest about GITMO or helping to make the movie "The Road to Guantanamo" - I don't think these are figures to be trusted. UK charity Reprieve say that not one of the UK inmates they represented has as much as picked up a parking ticket since release.
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
10:24 AM on 02/01/2012
And in no time, they will be back to murdering little girls for the crime of going to school.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
11:07 AM on 02/01/2012
Nobody is stopping you from going to Afghanistan and fixing the problem.
photo
badwolf62
wolve's are nicer than people
08:08 AM on 02/01/2012
they're going to make room for the the new inmates in november . The republican party!
photo
TAIsabel
Suffer no fools.
08:05 AM on 02/01/2012
"Tanto nadar para ahogarse en la orilla"...."To swim so far only to drown at the shore".

Trillions of dollars spent, thousands of lives lost, the hollowing out of our country, the destruction of theirs, the loss of the world's respect only to finally realize that no "government in a box" or jack in the box puppet US leader will be accepted by the people of Afghanistan.
This war will go down in history as the ultimate March of Folly.

Mission Accomplished indeed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
07:52 AM on 02/01/2012
I'm no fan of the Taliban, but their only crime seems to have been fighting for their country.
11:52 AM on 02/01/2012
I recall, when the U.S. entered Afghanistan, a woman waving at the coalition soldiers. Again, waving was her only crime. She was promptly taken to the Sports stadium, where they committed MANY of their atrocities, and without even so much as a trial or ONE SINGLE WORD, she was shot in the back of the head. You should not make any comments until you at least have the TINYEST, SLIGHTEST idea of what you are speaking of. Saying the Taliban was ONLY fighting for their country is like saying the people that condemned and executed 6 million Jews in the death camps of WW II were only fighting for their country. Your remark is not only VERY ignorant, it is insutling!!
07:44 AM on 02/01/2012
We should "drop" them into Afghanistan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marinemomof3
Bring them home NOW!
09:04 AM on 02/01/2012
Enlist, walk the walk......talk is cheap !
10:25 AM on 02/01/2012
OOH_RAH!!!
07:44 AM on 02/01/2012
The street has it that this move was necessary to make room for some Republicans.
photo
GWNumber1
FREEDOM!
06:31 AM on 02/01/2012
What? Gitmo is still open?

Didn't Obama promise to close it within one year of his inauguration?
07:48 AM on 02/01/2012
Obama promised allot of things while running for office and after elected, like most all politicians. The problem was that he got little or no help from the "Sour Grapes" Republicans. The GOP will say that for his first two years he had a Democratic Congress, but if you look at exactly what was happening there was not a true majority in the Senate. Obma was lucky he got what he did on health care. It would be allot better America if the Republicans would have played ball.
11:57 AM on 02/01/2012
That's because it became very obvious, very quickly that Obama is coo coo for Cocoa Puffs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
07:56 AM on 02/01/2012
To me, the biggest disappointment and biggest cave-in to the lunatic right of Obama's presidency. No doubt some, probably few, of the detainees are guilty of some crime, but isn't that what trials are supposed to determine. Not innuendo. Not some arbitrary law of convenience dreamed up on the fly.
photo
SonOfUgh
Your micro-bio is empty
05:16 AM on 02/01/2012
Cue the hysterical neo-cons screaming about Obama being weak on defense.
photo
F4U Corsair
redpurpleblue.com
08:02 AM on 02/01/2012
Obama: "If you let us surrender to your theocracy in Afghanistan, we will let your terrorists out of Gitmo and I might close it permanently."
photo
SonOfUgh
Your micro-bio is empty
12:39 PM on 02/01/2012
Might as well surrender to the theocracy in Afghanistan. History has shown that armies great and small get broken in Afghanistan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:16 AM on 02/01/2012
you mean the obso-cons?
photo
SonOfUgh
Your micro-bio is empty
12:40 PM on 02/01/2012
Calling cons obsolete is like calling slapstick comedy obsolete. I think it would be better to refer to slapstick as quaint, old-fashioned, and something to be taken in very small doses.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ginger42
Just the facts, ma'am--Sgt Friday
05:03 AM on 02/01/2012
About time. Close the place down
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sallybutt45
To thine own self be true.
05:01 AM on 02/01/2012
GOP legislators say " No, let's keep them until forever."
12:00 PM on 02/01/2012
If some fool attempted to assassinate Obama you would want him jailed "until forever." What is wrong with keeping someone that wants to destroy America "until forever."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sallybutt45
To thine own self be true.
02:00 AM on 02/02/2012
How many prisoners have been released from Gitmo, do you know the number? How many of them were there for how many years w/o charges? Many were caught up in nets for no reason, and were guilty of..........being in the wrong place at the wrong time! Mo Davis, the Chief Prosecutor resigned in protest of what was happening there. HE wants the place shut down. Now, why would a General in our military, who probably knows mre about this than you or I, be so disgusted, that he would resign as the Chief Prosecutor? If a person is guilty, they are guilty, if a person isn't guilty, should they languish in captivity forever, in a strange land thousands of miles from home? Let's ask Morris Davis.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
sviolette
Cops Pepper Spraying the Constitution!!!
04:44 AM on 02/01/2012
We should release every prisoner in Gitmo. Either charge them or release them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
07:12 AM on 02/01/2012
That would entail making a (the HORROR!) decision. Can't have that.
photo
F4U Corsair
redpurpleblue.com
08:04 AM on 02/01/2012
We charged them. Just like Herman Cain and the Duke Lacrosse rape case, "someone" saw them embrace terrorism.

Isn't that enough in liberal America?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
sviolette
Cops Pepper Spraying the Constitution!!!
02:11 PM on 02/01/2012
They haven't been charged.
04:40 AM on 02/01/2012
Don't want them released? Perhaps we could give them a trial instead? How would you like that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cccoyote
Welcome to Citizens United, formerly the USA
04:32 AM on 02/01/2012
Making room for the government's/politicians' newest threat - Occupy Movement.

So many reasons - NDAA, PATRIOT Act, Homeland Security....
So little detaining space.