More

Facebook Investors: Who's Making Mint Off Facebook IPO

Facebook Ipo

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/ 1/2012 10:09 pm Updated: 02/ 1/2012 10:10 pm

On Wednesday, Facebook submitted its S-1 filing to the SEC in preparation for going public, which according to Business Insider is a move that will create over 1000 new millionaires. Here's a rundown of a few of the people who are getting rich off the hours you spend looking at pictures of your minor acquaintances.

According to S-1 documents, Facebook's co-founder and CEO, the 27-year-old Mark Zuckerberg, took home $1.49 million in total compensation in 2011. Zuck spent almost $800,000 on airplane travel for himself and his friends and family, and invested $90,850 into estate and financial planning, reports Mashable.

Among Facebook's many investors, Zuckerberg owns a the largest voting stake in the company at 28.2 percent (more than 533 million shares). Writes AllThingsD, "Facebook’s filing said he will sell some shares in the IPO, although it doesn’t specify how many. However, it noted that most of the proceeds from the sale will go toward paying taxes on his purchase of 120 million options of Class B common stock he also has." If Facebook is valued at $100 billion, Zuckerberg could reap as much as $28 billion after a successful IPO.

Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook's COO, was the most compensated employee in 2011. Sandberg took home $382,000 in salary and bonuses and $30.5 million in stock, bringing her total compensation for 2011 to just under $30.9 million. Even with almost 2 million shares, Sandberg owns less than one percent of the company, which would come to under $1 billion if Facebook is valued at $100 billion.

Facebook's first angel investor Peter Thiel, who invested $500,000 in 2004, owns over 44 million shares, which translates to a 2.5 percent stake in the company and may be worth $2.5 billion if the company IPOs at a valuation of $100 billion.

Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz owns 7.6 percent of the company. In March 2011, Forbes named Moskovitz "world's youngest billionaire," a title he won by being eight days younger than Zuckerberg. At the time Moskovitz had a net worth of $2.7 billion. If Facebook's achieves a valuation of $100 billion when it starts trading publicly, Moskovitz's stake in the company could be worth $7.6 billion.

Venture capital in firm Accel Partners owns over 200 million shares (an 11 percent stake), which could yield $11 billion if Facebook's valuation reaches $100 billion.

Russian investment firm DST Global Limited, with 94 million shares worth a 5 percent stake, stands to make $5 billion off a potential $100 billion valuation. Goldman Sachs with 66 million Class A shares worth a little over 56 percent of those shares. Maryland-based investment firm T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. with 12 million shares, worth 0.7 percent of equity.

Other Facebook employees who are making mint include Facebook CFO David Ebersman, a Brown University alum who started at Facebook in 2009, made $382,000 in salary and bonuses and $18.3 million in stock awards last year. Mike Schroepfer, Facebook's vice president of engineering, took home $24.4 million in stock and $334,000 in salary and bonuses. Netflix CEO and Facebook board member Reed Hastings, owns 20,000 restricted stock units.

Check out the slideshow (below) to see 9 huge risks that could threaten Facebook's success, as outlined in Facebook's S-1 filing. Read on to find out some of the coolest facts Facebook just revealed about its massive size.

Mark Zuckerberg Controlling Too Much
1  of  10
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Perhaps the most eye-popping risk listed in the S-1 is the idea that Mark Zuckerberg's bad decision-making could lead to a decline in company value. Along with "users fleeing" and "decline in advertising revenue," the following was listed as a major risk factor:

Our CEO has control over key decision making as a result of his control of a majority of our voting stock.


Zuckerberg owns 58 percent of Facebook stock, which means that he "has the ability to control the outcome of matters" that come before stockholders. Furthermore:

As a stockholder, even a controlling stockholder, Mr. Zuckerberg is entitled to vote his shares, and shares over which he has voting control as a result of voting agreements, in his own interests, which may not always be in the interests of our stockholders generally.


Should stockholders fear the man who controls the company they hold stock in?

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

On Wednesday, Facebook submitted its S-1 filing to the SEC in preparation for going public, which according to Business Insider is a move that will create over 1000 new millionaires. Here's a rundown ...
On Wednesday, Facebook submitted its S-1 filing to the SEC in preparation for going public, which according to Business Insider is a move that will create over 1000 new millionaires. Here's a rundown ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:09 PM on 02/02/2012
ZUCKERBERG is TOO controlling!!!! He needs and should have some of his fortune taken away from him and i'd like to see that happen before too long because there's no sense in him or anyone his age being so damned rich. but i think he's a hypocrite just as much, he;s no genius!!..i hope fb falters while i'm still around i really do. I've always said that "computers and the internet" are a BIG MISTAKE and an "even bigger THREAT" to all of us and has always worried me.. Go Figure. you'll understand why i say that someday,i know you probably don't get it at this point but over time, people will begin to understand why i believe this to be true.. I just do, it's hard to explain.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bassx101
UMAD!?
10:09 PM on 02/02/2012
WOW Hate much?...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pkafin
03:26 AM on 02/06/2012
I've always said that "computers and the internet" are a BIG MISTAKE

They're not a mistake. They are a technological advancement that both comprises of and enables a multitude of choices. Any one of those choices could turn out to be a mistake, but you can't really declare a whole area of human advancement as a mistake. At least you can't and make sense while doing so.
03:59 PM on 02/02/2012
In contrast to any serious technology Facebook is a trivial program that a couple of good programmers can put together from scratch. The real cost of the development is 0.001% of the company valuation. Also, that is why many countries have their own Facebook equivalents supported by tiny teams of smart guys.
The whole business model is just about how much free hardware/maintenance you can give for free in exchange for advertising. It it is free and you do not care about anything else why bother to change to a competitor. But that can be easily changed.
09:40 AM on 02/02/2012
Some will get rich off of this, but I can pretty much guarantee you that this has a half-life of about 5 years. As people realize that they "are the product" and their not profiting from it beyond being spied on by outside information aggregators with nefarious intent, it'll crash back to earth...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:29 AM on 02/02/2012
Bad investment. People are already moving away from Mugbook to other forms of less intrusive (sinister) social networking infrastructure. Only people who will walk away laughing all the way to the bank will be the insiders and then wait for the dead cat bounce. Splat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Acebass
Progressive Liberal any questions?
11:49 PM on 02/01/2012
Facebook is getting too big...do we really need what they provide? Maybe we should start doing face time with each other instead of playing farmville...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bassx101
UMAD!?
10:11 PM on 02/02/2012
and you have a twitter acount,,,, lol fest
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Acebass
Progressive Liberal any questions?
12:20 AM on 02/03/2012
whats the matter can't you make any friends?
photo
Wmof2011
Vote,KickOutGOPs/TPs,Vote,LookUpHomeVoteDay,Vote
11:28 PM on 02/01/2012
He controls too much? If not him, then who, the evil Goldman Sachs? Me thinks GS is backstabbing with this propaganda.
photo
DerAmi
I could not stay awake during micro-bio class.
08:56 AM on 02/02/2012
Maybe he likes having a reason to sell more of his stock. Hmmmm
05:11 PM on 02/02/2012
re:DerAmi...who knows and who cares.i hope facebook falters before the next, say.....7 years..it sucks.