More

George VI Ice Shelf Antarctic Lakes Move Up To 5 Feet Per Day

George Vi Ice Shelf Lakes

Posted: 02/ 1/2012 12:17 pm

By OurAmazingPlanet's Andrea Mustain:

Researchers recently uncovered a startling phenomenon -- a set of teardrop-shaped lakes in Antarctica that mysteriously move, jogging along at a pace as fast as 5 feet (1.5 meters) per day.

The lakes sit atop the George VI ice shelf -- a massive floating plain of ice larger than Vermont, composed of the mingled fronts of glaciers that flow off the edge of the continent and rest on the ocean.

Glaciologist Doug MacAyeal at the University of Chicago, and student researcher C.H. LaBarbera, noticed the traveling bodies of water while studying satellite images of 11 ice shelf lakes captured between 2001 and 2010.

"We compiled 10 images for the last 10 years and literally made a movie," MacAyeal told OurAmazingPlanet, "and as we looked at the loop, the lakes moved up the coast."

The discovery was something of shock, he said. "We walked into our research with an expectation that has been completely defied by what we observed."

MacAyeal said he had expected the lakes to move over time, but only because the ice shelf underneath them also moves, as ice flows from the interior of the continent out to sea.

Instead, "we found a subset of lakes that defied this in a spectacularly curious and interesting way, by moving parallel to a coastline of the George VI ice shelf," MacAyeal said.


Syrupy maneuvers

It turns out the mechanism at work is something that nearly everyone would recognize from TV or the breakfast table -- that gooey, back-and-forth folding action often shown in ads for chocolate or maple syrup, and known in scientific parlance as viscous buckling.

But in this case, the chocolate or maple syrup is the ice shelf, and it's "pouring" horizontally and smashing into and oozing around nearby Alexander Island, enfolding the large island in an icy embrace. As the ice scrunches around the island, it propels the lakes along. It's a geographical arrangement that makes the George VI ("Yes, the one from 'The King's Speech,'" MacAyeal said) an oddity among its ice shelf neighbors, which typically flow unimpeded out into the open ocean.

In recent years, these floating ice plateaus have become the subject of a flurry of research because of their apparent link to climate change and rising seas. Scientists have discovered that ice shelves function as massive doorstops for glaciers; when ice shelves weaken or collapse, they allow glaciers to slide into the ocean more quickly, which, in turn, raises global sea levels.

Bad breakups

In the last decade, increasingly sharp-eyed satellites have captured several catastrophic ice shelf collapses in grim detail. Nearly all of these collapses have occurred along the Antarctic Peninsula, home to the George VI ice shelf and one of the most swiftly warming places on the planet.

Changes in wind patterns have raised temperatures on the peninsula by 4 or 4.5 degrees Fahrenheit ( 2 or 2.5 degrees Celsius) in the last 50 years, and the warming trend appears to be striding ever southward, consuming more and more of the region.

And although the George VI ice shelf isn't in imminent danger, "it's kind of next in line, if you like," said Tom Holt, a glaciology lecturer at Aberystwyth University in Wales, who studies the George VI ice shelf.


Holt said that data show the ice shelf is thinning and fracturing somewhat along its southern front, but, according to MacAyeal, it appears that the ice shelf's cozy relationship with Alexander Island is keeping it healthier than some of its neighbors, insulating it from the more extreme effects of climate change. (The island likely acts as a buffer against warming ocean water, and also acts as a sawhorse, propping up the edge of the ice shelf.)

And because its lakes are the result of strange weather patterns created by mountains on Alexander Island (instead of global warming), the ice shelf gives scientists a natural petri dish to study how ice shelf lakes alter the structure of ice shelves in general.

"We're interested in surface lakes on ice shelves because they're the precursor of ice shelf collapse," MacAyeal said. "This ice shelf gives us longstanding lakes for reasons other than climate change, and with consequences that aren't going to kill the beast we're studying, so can we look at these lakes to see what's going on."

Yet even with its island protector, it could be that the George VI ice shelf won't be entirely immune to the effects of warming. "It's in that region where we're expecting to see changes over the next 10 or 20 years," Holt said.

In the meantime, MacAyeal said, the ice shelf could offer clues to the physics behind the plight of more vulnerable ice shelves. "We expect that to be a harder problem," he said, "but we'll get closer to the real ultimate goal, which is to understand why lakes and ice shelf instability are correlated."


Reach Andrea Mustain at amustain@techmedianetwork.com. Follow her on Twitter @AndreaMustain. Follow OurAmazingPlanet for the latest in Earth science and exploration news on Twitter @OAPlanet and on Facebook.

Copyright 2012 OurAmazingPlanet, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

By OurAmazingPlanet's Andrea Mustain: Researchers recently uncovered a startling phenomenon -- a set of teardrop-shaped lakes in Antarctica that mysteriously move, jogging along at a pace as fast a...
By OurAmazingPlanet's Andrea Mustain: Researchers recently uncovered a startling phenomenon -- a set of teardrop-shaped lakes in Antarctica that mysteriously move, jogging along at a pace as fast a...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,733
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
08:42 AM on 02/09/2012
Several "money lines" in this story - the first "..George VI ice shelf and one of the most swiftly warming places on the planet."

Gotta hand it to these scientists. Taking a course in PR and fund raising is a pre-requisite for their major.

Numerous stories out in the last week by prominent scientists disassociating themselves from CAGW. This is just the beginning.
photo
Publicola
Facts are stubborn things
11:38 AM on 02/09/2012
sunsetter: "Several "money lines" in this story - the first '..George VI ice shelf and one of the most swiftly warming places on the planet.' "

Yeah, how dare anyone state scientific facts.

Here's that quote in larger context again:

"In the last decade, increasingly sharp-eyed satellites have captured several catastrophic ice shelf collapses in grim detail. Nearly all of these collapses have occurred along the Antarctic Peninsula, home to the George VI ice shelf and one of the most swiftly warming places on the planet."

Shame, shame on that author for saying what is factually known to be true: the Antarctic Peninsula -- a massive peninsula with a mountain range running through it that roughly as long as the West Coast of the U.S. -- is one of the fastest warming places on the planet.

The author of this article obviously stated that scientific fact for reasons of pure greed, just as everyone who states scientific facts do. Why don't these reporters of scientific facts and also scientific researchers go into a far lower paying job that doesn't involve greed, like say Wall Street banking.
photo
Publicola
Facts are stubborn things
11:42 AM on 02/09/2012
sunsetter: "CAGW"

"CAGW" = denier-speak for "catastrophic" AGW.

The 4 Stages of Global Warming Denial:
---------------------------------------------------------------

1) GW deniers: "There is no global warming!"

GW deniers + acknowledgment that the globe is warming =

2) AGW deniers: "Of course there is global warming - we skeptics have never said otherwise. But humans aren't causing it!"

AGW deniers + acknowledgment that humans are causing global warming =

3) "CAGW" deniers: "Ok, sure, humans cause global warming. But AGW can't cause a catastrophe!"

"CAGW" deniers + irrefutably AGW-related catastrophe =

4) "GWC" deniers (Global Warning Catastrophe deniers):

"Why didn't you warn us?"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dumasjohnj
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
06:13 PM on 02/05/2012
according to your plot, we should be cooling about now. That also matches what studies of Earth's natural temperature also say. Why are we warming instead, if its natural?
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
02:30 PM on 02/06/2012
Sorry, but we'll go with NASA et al rather than your partisan amateur blog.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dragonlady620
My karma will run over your dogma
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dragonlady620
My karma will run over your dogma
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
williamabn
I Doubt , Therefore I might be
07:44 PM on 02/02/2012
And the antarctic is experiencing much colder record temperatures . Also No mention that the back side of the ice shelf is still building . Oh , And if researchers found nothing wrong ... No funding next year . Cry wolf and get that money !
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
08:31 PM on 02/02/2012
Wouldn't researchers get more money from the fossil fuel industry to do their research if they found proof that AGW was not a problem? Also look at all those contributions give to political campaigns and how that would make the government fund anti AGW researchers. Billions of oil company dollars are also given to universities who do AGW research. Something's amiss here? Why bite the hand that feeds them by telling a lie when all they need to do is tell the truth.
06:12 AM on 02/03/2012
"Wouldn't researcher­s get more money from the fossil fuel industry to do their research if they found proof that AGW was not a problem?"

The answer to your rhetorical question is right there. Case proven. Why more research?

"Billions of oil company dollars are also given to universiti­es." Think you have a scale factor problem here. I am sure the universities would like that amount.

And finally

"to universiti­es who do AGW research" If you put the "A" there is it science or research? Haven't you just said case closed the science is proven.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
Inconceivable!
08:42 PM on 02/02/2012
"And if researcher­s found nothing wrong ... No funding next year"

Only if there's absolutely nothing else to study. You're saying that if there's no global warming, all the scientists are working at Burger King because there's ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ELSE TO STUDY.

And you don't even know just how ludicrous that is, do you? You guys just accept whatever ridiculous conspiracy theory you're fed without ever thinking, don't you?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
midnight toker
06:16 PM on 02/02/2012
i think we're at the mercy..

of runaway natural variability!
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
06:31 PM on 02/02/2012
What about all that heat added to our atmosphere that's produced by nuclear power plants and the burning of fossil fuels. Wouldn't this cause GW? Also if the Sun is producing strange sub atomic particles that increase the fission of natural uranium deep within the Earth wouldn't that cause more heat to come to the surface. We don't know everything. Can we measure the changes in neutron flux caused by the fission of uranium deep within the earth?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
midnight toker
07:35 PM on 02/02/2012
more and more..

we're heating less and less..

due to CO2's effect being logarithmic
08:47 AM on 02/09/2012
Tin foil hats will protect you. Heat from nuclear power plants? Really? THat is too funny.
photo
Publicola
Facts are stubborn things
10:46 PM on 02/02/2012
lol..

hey FUMES..

speaking of your relentless science denial..

when are you going to stop denying basic science..

such as for example your repeated, patently absurd denial that downward infrared radiation exists?

Your assertion that E = 2mc is amusing too

you'll never understand even basic climate science..

until you stop denying science!
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
06:08 PM on 02/02/2012
If a spherical mass that's spinning in space around the Sun has a sudden shift in its center of gravity cuz heavy ice top and bottom melts, will its axis reach a tipping point whereby this mass jumps to another position. If the Earth did this, would its oceans flood over the land? Could this be what killed the dinosaurs? We won't know till it happens! Is this the real reason why Al Gore has a large boat filled with animals?
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
09:17 PM on 02/02/2012
This is just nonsense.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
11:25 PM on 02/02/2012
I hope so! We don't wanna Great Flood as in the days of Noah.
photo
Publicola
Facts are stubborn things
10:52 PM on 02/02/2012
You been midnight tokin' with Fumes?
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
11:23 PM on 02/02/2012
I hope such an outcome is impossible, but we still don't know everything about the Earth, or how energy and mass flow deep within. Atomic reactions within the Earth in relation to cosmic rays from deep space would have unpredictable consequences as we circle the center of our galaxy. Certain catastrophic events might be repeating from time to time.
photo
atx888
micro-bio empty bcuz my brain need the space
05:10 PM on 02/02/2012
The only person who makes sense:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eScDfYzMEEw
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
09:16 PM on 02/02/2012
What is it about atx?
photo
Publicola
Facts are stubborn things
01:42 PM on 02/02/2012
DoubleNaughtSeven: "Remember, all of these "climate scientists­" are paid very well by the same government­s and climate alarm interest groups to come to certain conclusion­s...and guess what?....t­hey do."

If by "paid very well" you mean they are being paid middle-class salaries, and if by "certain conclusion­s" you mean the conclusions they are paid to arrive at are those that supported by the scientific evidence, then I agree with you.

----------------------

Wait… you aren't seriously trying to imply that climate scientists worldwide as a group are getting rich like oil company executives - are you?

And you aren't seriously trying to suggest that the vast majority of those climate scientists are a part of a Great Global Global Warming Conspiracy that is directed and paid for by some shadowy organization(s) that secretly control the world's governments and all of world's prestigious scientific institutions that have climate science expertise to propagate "the greatest hoax ever" on mankind to gain even more power than said shadowy organization(s) could ever realistically have had already - are you?

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt here, DoubleNaught, and assume that you are not. After all, one would a have to be REALLY, REALLY deluded to ever even seriously consider an evidence-free conspiracy theory that is as patently ridiculous as that one.
11:49 AM on 02/02/2012
Remember, all of these "climate scientists" are paid very well by the same governments and climate alarm interest groups to come to certain conclusions...and guess what?....they do. This does not make them credible or correct....it keeps them employed and living high off the hog.
photo
qwert1234
haha, charade you are
11:57 AM on 02/02/2012
can you provide any evidence whatsoever that they only get funding if they come to a certain conclusion? any evidence at all?

and do you really think climate scientists became climate scientists to get rich? do you really think that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GhostOfFDR
You're on the slippery slope to socialism
12:22 PM on 02/02/2012
The big money is being spent by the oil companies. They pay the right wing media to pretend that climate change is a fraud. They pay bloggers to make up fake reasons why climate change cant be happening. And they pay people to go on HuffPost and make disparaging comments about how scientists get rich from trying to mitigate global warming. But those posters never mention how much money Shell, BP, and Exxon/Mobil make by causing it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverwolf13
I know that I do not know.
09:23 PM on 02/02/2012
Note that the energy companies do pay some scientists to produce results favorable to them, which they do.
photo
Publicola
Facts are stubborn things
10:53 AM on 02/02/2012
National Academy of Sciences, 2010:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

There is a strong, credible body of evidence, based on multiple lines of research, documenting that Earth is warming. Strong evidence also indicates that recent warming is largely caused by human activities, especially the release of greenhouse gases through the burning of fossil fuels.

Global warming is closely associated with other climate changes and impacts, including rising sea levels, increases in intense rainfall events, decreases in snow cover and sea ice, more frequent and intense heat waves, increases in wildfires, longer growing seasons, and ocean acidification. Individually and collectively, these changes pose risks for a wide range of human and environmental systems. While much remains to be learned, the core phenomenon, scientific questions, and hypotheses have been examined thoroughly and have stood firm in the face of serious scientific debate and careful evaluation of alternative explanations.

http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/reports-in-brief/Science-Report-Brief-final.pdf
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnderTheHedgeWeGo
Show me some evidence.
10:25 AM on 02/02/2012
My head hurts. I hurts because I live in a county where large numbers of people believe that somewhat evil and self-serving scientist the world over have joined in a massive conspiracy, driven by their lust for the money to maintain their rock star life styles, to defraud all humanity of the means of transportation and the fuel to warm there homes. Fortunately, there is the wise and benevolent petrochemical industry, the little engine-that -could, selflessly defending truth, justice and “the American way” against the avarice of these greedy “scientists”. The petrochemical industry, to whom money is unimportant and our well being is their only concern, will help us to see the unvarnished truth.

How do we know this is all true? Well, Al Gore is a liberal isn’t he? There you go.
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
01:38 PM on 02/02/2012
The top 5 American oil companies returned a cool one trillion dollars in profit to their owners in the last decade. Yeah, no. No one is gonna derail THAT party. That pays for a lot of character assassination.
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
09:05 PM on 02/03/2012
Fan 793
09:37 AM on 02/02/2012
I am glad that the science that carbon emitted by humans is causing the globe to warm is completely settled. We are headed into a solar minimum that will cause a mini ice age. This will cause a much shorter growing season and lead to worldwide famine and despair by compromising food production. Fortunately climate scientists have proven that if we begin pumping 2 to 3 three times the carbon we are now emitting we can avoid this coming disaster.....Thank you Al Gore and the IPCC for all of your hard work....you may actually save the world after all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
Inconceivable!
10:09 AM on 02/02/2012
Is this supposed to be a serious comment?
10:14 AM on 02/02/2012
Are you saying that the science behind man made global warming is wrong?.....Why do you hate science?
photo
Publicola
Facts are stubborn things
10:49 AM on 02/02/2012
DoubleNaughtSeven: "We are headed into a solar minimum that will cause a mini ice age."

Wrong.

Ridiculously wrong, tabloid "reporting" that would have you believe otherwis notwithstanding.

http://metofficenews.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/met-office-in-the-media-29-january-2012/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim NLN
Obama 2012 and beyond!
09:03 AM on 02/02/2012
It's melting...........
08:48 AM on 02/02/2012
It is interesting to me that all of climate science is predicated upon a static world. People seem to want to believe that everything should remain the same, or "normal". Coming out of the little ice age, all of the glaciers have been retreating, there is nothing new about this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roshi98
Honey badger don't care!
08:56 AM on 02/02/2012
Completely false. Climate science is predicated on identifying trends within a very dynamic world. And the trend is warming because of our emissions.

Please point to what natural mechanism(s) can cause the planet to spontaneously warm at consistent, measurable rate.
10:54 AM on 02/02/2012
Let's see, after temperatures have risen, CO2 lags.

We have had ice ages followed by warming without SUVs and Power Plants.
11:47 AM on 02/02/2012
Solar activity, volcanic activity, El Nino and Oceanic trends to name a few.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
Inconceivable!
10:04 AM on 02/02/2012
"It is interestin­g to me that all of climate science is predicated upon a static world"

Not true at all. No one thinks climate change doesn't occur naturally, or that there's anything we can (or should) do about natural changes.

What science says is that we are CAUSING the climate to change, and we should stop doing that.
06:02 PM on 02/02/2012
You might want to come up to speed with what is happening. The temperatures have leveled off and are beginning to drop. The sun is heading into a grand minimum - It's tme to question "authority".

January 2012 UAH drops below the 30 year average.