More

Google Privacy Policy Changes Spark Microsoft Print Ad Campaign

Google Privacy Policy

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/ 1/2012 3:50 pm Updated: 02/ 1/2012 4:10 pm

With a new print ad campaign titled "Putting People First," Microsoft is hoping to capitalize on the backlash against Google's privacy changes by using the controversy to entice users to its portfolio of internet services.

The ads, announced in a Microsoft blog post titled "Gone Google? Got Concerns? We Have Alternatives," will run for three days in USA Today, The Wall Street Journal and New York Times, reports Bloomberg Businessweek.

The ad, which can be found online here, reads in part:

Google is in the process of making some unpopular changes to some of their most popular products. Those changes, cloaked in language like "transparency," "simplicity," and "consistency," are really about one thing: making it easier for Google to connect the dots between everything you search, send, say while using one of their services.

The ad goes on to lay out Microsoft's alternatives to Google's cadre of services, which include Bing, Office 365 and Internet Explorer. In a direct swipe at Google's planned privacy policy changes, Microsoft touts the privacy benefits of Hotmail email service, a competitor of Google's Gmail product. "Join the hundreds of millions of people who enjoy not worrying about the content of their private e-mails being used to serve ads," the ad says.

On January 24, Google announced via blog post that, on March 1, it will introduce a new mandatory privacy policy that will merge policies that currently exist across 60 of the company's numerous web products. This also means that the company will consolidate user data attached to these products.

In the post, Google claimed to be making these changes in order to create one cohesive privacy policy from the more than 70 that are currently in use. While a few had to be left out "for legal and other reasons," the search giant said that the new policy will allow users to enjoy a "simpler, more intuitive Google experience."

According to The Huffington Post's Bianca Bosker, combining information about a user's preferences and activity from multiple services also makes Google users much more valuable to advertisers, since this mass of information will allow them to target ads with more precision.

Privacy advocates have found cause for concern in these changes, especially due to users' inability to opt-out. Common Sense Media CEO James Steyer wrote in a statement that these mandatory changes are "frustrating and a little frightening," especially for kids and teenagers.

But Google's also standing up for itself. According to PaidContent.org, Google has taken out its own ads defending its privacy practices. One such ad, featured on the Washington Post website reads, "We're changing our Privacy Policy. Not your privacy controls." It then directs users to Google's policies page for more information.

The ads are reportedly part of Google's "Good To Know" campaign, which aims to dispel Google users' concerns about how their personal information is used. According to Ad Age, the simple advertisements emphasize that the more user information Google has, the easier, quicker and better people's searches will be. Ad Age calls this a "value exchange." Time will tell whether users think it's worth the price.

At the request of concerned U.S. Congressmen, Google public policy director Pablo Chavez sent penned a letter earlier this week explaining the company's privacy changes. "[T]he updated privacy policy does not allow us to collect any new or additional types of information about users," Chavez wrote, per Reuters. Congressmen Ed Markey and Joe Barton had previously recommended that Google's new policy be subjected to a probe by the Federal Trade Commission.

Indeed, Google has come under increased scrutiny from users, competitors and lawmakers since January 10, when the company unveiled Search Plus Your World, a search feature that pulls public posts and data from users' Google+ networks into regular Google web searches.

Almost immediately the internet cried foul, with the Electronic Privacy Information Center sending a letter of complaint to the FTC on January 12. The letter, which quotes an article on Search Engine Land, reads in part:

[A]lthough the data from a user's Google+ contacts is not displayed publicly, Google's changes make the personal data of users more accessible. Users might, for example, 'com[e] across an unexpected photo or post from a friend, [and] might reshare it to the world' or '[t]hings that people may have forgotten sharing with others will begin to show up serendipitously through ordinary Google searches.'

On January 13, unnamed sources told Bloomberg that the Federal Trade Commission, which is already investigating claims that Google favored its own properties in search results, may have expanded its investigation to include the Search Plus Your World feature.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

With a new print ad campaign titled "Putting People First," Microsoft is hoping to capitalize on the backlash against Google's privacy changes by using the controversy to entice users to its portfolio...
With a new print ad campaign titled "Putting People First," Microsoft is hoping to capitalize on the backlash against Google's privacy changes by using the controversy to entice users to its portfolio...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
durant
Editor & publisher of Europeforvisitors.com
06:59 PM on 02/02/2012
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! We all know that Microsoft began downloading the contents of users' hard drives to its own servers when it became Internet-savvy in 1995. (How do we know that? It was all over Usenet at the time.)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ManwithaParachute
Not Seeking Your Approval
04:01 PM on 02/02/2012
Google Search used to be great and now it BLOWS Google Bugle. Now you have to wade through the advert results....

DUCK DUCK GO is what Google used to be.
nancynancy
Atheist.
03:09 PM on 02/06/2012
I just switched over to Duck Duck Go and urge anyone who's concerned about privacy to do the same. Google can go jump in the lake.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ManwithaParachute
Not Seeking Your Approval
04:31 PM on 02/06/2012
Google is the lake ....of fire.
02:18 PM on 02/02/2012
Can you just focus on making a new OS that doesn't remove the functionality that the old one had? While Windows 7 is a nice step up from XP, there is a lot left to be desired... mostly XP.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Equinator
Shovels manure daily
01:51 PM on 02/02/2012
At least google did not sell me vista crap and then tell me it smells like roses. There is a reason for anger directed at M$.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ManwithaParachute
Not Seeking Your Approval
04:05 PM on 02/02/2012
M$ definitely has had bad management decisions in the products.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Equinator
Shovels manure daily
01:48 PM on 02/02/2012
It is the season for negative half true political ads. MS is sounding desperate.
01:25 PM on 02/02/2012
While Microsoft has its own set of security issues to answer for, overall their basic point IS correct -- especially when talking about Google and the behemoth it's become.

Let's be honest here. The explosion of social media and a zillion people flooding on to the Net to become absolute narcissists, feeling a need to share every moment of their life (Update!: going to the bathroom! Update: just washed my hands!)...COUPLED WITH the business model of using Net tools to secretly track everyone's online footprints, so that companies (like Google) could then make money off specialized advertising...was ALWAYS going to result in a collision of people wanting to have mindless fun versus true concerns about privacy.

Personally, I think there needs to be a MAJOR revision of the way these companies operate -- yes, even if it means passing more consumer protectionist laws. At the very least, more Net companies need to become alot better with regards to "how" the average consumer sets up their services -- giving people CRYSTAL CLEAR instructions or big ol' buttons to click on ("Click green for Yes, Red for No") -- so that people know EXACTLY what they're getting into.

For example, the way Google collects data through Chrome -- relative to other browsers -- is the #1 reason I'll never touch it. Well, that and the fact Chrome has lame extensions and, even from an artistic design viewpoint, is butt ugly to look at!
12:34 PM on 02/02/2012
Hating on MS is a tired old meme. They may not provide the best browser, but they do a reasonably good job of rolling with the changes and providing an OS that 80% of planet earth uses daily. MS has laurels to rest on. Give credit where it's due, or continue to be ignorant about the history of personal computing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Hn
Defender against liberal insanity
10:54 AM on 02/02/2012
Microsoft has lost the battle to Google long time ago. It should regain its position by technology, not by rhetoric.
09:53 AM on 02/02/2012
Google went to great lengths to consolidate and rewrite it's TOS to make it understandable, that's all. Nothing in it changed. Maybe if MS spent more time making a secure browser and OS they might be taken seriously.
12:18 PM on 02/02/2012
Seriously by who? The 8% of mac users? How about the 1% of linux users. (am I rounding up?)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:41 AM on 02/02/2012
From practically every commercial web site I visit, my browser is attacked by Google cookies - analytics, click tracking, geo locating, et al.. I avoid Google and yet it attempts to sneak into my system as so many other unwanted, unsolicited interests. Then there are the 'other' web services who maybe offer a single cookie associated with only their domain and no others. Certainly this is only one version of privacy/security intrusion. I look forward to an internet split whereby the commercial net will be walled off from the original internet that offers freedom of information exchange without the harrasmment.
07:39 AM on 02/02/2012
I promise 99% will not opt out simply because they do not feel threaten at all buy Goggle changes.

This is a free service and people are not going to panic and runaround screaming the sky is falling.

When Goggle crosses a line that does upset users they will know about it fast and adjust because of user feedback of course the internet!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:04 AM on 02/02/2012
Microsoft is sounding like Newt and Mitt, they talk more about how bad the other side is but don't want to talk about the details of why what they offer is much better.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OldCowboy
Against stupidity the Gods contend in vain.
01:27 AM on 02/02/2012
Micro who??? Are we talking about the company that Bill Gates formed that is no longer relevant??
photo
Dahveed1
Rational discussion is the basis of a democracy.
01:11 AM on 02/02/2012
"We at Microsoft are too big and disorganized to ever use your information in a connected way. Trust us with your information, we're not smart enough to use it!"
JWoode
yes.. my micro bio is empty
01:10 AM on 02/02/2012
Microsoft has a portfolio of internet services... huh.. that's right.. forgot about that.. I might check it out except.. oh right.. don't need it.