iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Outlines Mortgage Refinancing Plan

JIM KUHNHENN and BEN FELLER   02/ 1/12 09:31 PM ET  AP

FALLS CHURCH, Va. — Conceding his earlier housing programs have fallen short, President Barack Obama on Wednesday proposed a vast expansion of government assistance to homeowners, aiming to make lower lending rates a possibility for millions of borrowers who have not been able to get out from under burdensome mortgages.

The president's proposal is laden with election-year politics and faces a difficult path in Congress. Obama wants to pay for the estimated $5 billion to $10 billion cost with a fee on the nation's largest banks, a proposal that has failed to win support even when Democrats controlled both the House and Senate.

In addition, its potential impact could be limited by the fact that it would not apply to borrowers who are behind on their home loan payments, those most threatened by foreclosure.

The housing issue, while national in scope, particularly resonates in election battlegrounds such as Nevada and Florida that have faced record foreclosures. Obama himself drew attention to the politics surrounding the issue with a jab at former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, now the front-runner in the Republican presidential contest. Romney in October suggested the foreclosure process should be allowed to "run its course and hit the bottom."

Without naming Romney, Obama said: "It is wrong for anyone to suggest that the only option for struggling, responsible homeowners is to sit and wait for the housing market to hit bottom. I refuse to accept that, and so do the American people."

Obama is asking Congress to pass legislation that would make it easier for more borrowers to refinance their loans, creating a new program through the Federal Housing Administration that would have the government assume the risk for the new mortgages.

Obama cast the effort as not only a needed step to spur the economy but as a necessary boost to America's sense of identity.

"This housing crisis struck right at the heart of what it means to be middle class in America: our homes, the place where we invest our nest egg, place where we raise our family, the place where we plant roots in a community, the place where we build memories," Obama said. He spoke at a community center in northern Virginia, outside Washington.

Obama's proposal is the latest administration effort to help homeowners in the face of a massive number of foreclosures and plunging house values that have left millions owing more than their homes are worth. About 11 million Americans – roughly 1 in 4 with mortgages – are underwater, according to CoreLogic, a real estate data firm. Half of all U.S. mortgages – about 30 million home loans – are owned by nongovernment lenders.

Despite historic low interest rates, however, banks have been reluctant to refinance loans of such "underwater" homeowners. Under Obama's plan, an eligible homeowner would be able to refinance a loan through the FHA, which would guarantee the new loan, assuming the risk if the borrower should default. The fee on large banks that Obama is proposing would finance the FHA's insurance fund.

The plan faces long odds in Congress. Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said the refinancing plan proposes "to get out of the hole we're in by digging deeper."

"He wants lenders to make more of the same risky loans without documentation of income or ability to repay that got us into this mess in the first place," Bachus said.

Seeking to reassure such skeptics, Obama emphasized that the program would apply only borrowers who have been current on their payments for at least six months and not missed more than one payment in the six months preceding that. Their loans would have to fall within the mortgage limits set by the FHA in their home counties – a range from $271,050 in lowest cost areas to $729,750 in the highest cost areas.

The plan, Obama said, would "not help the neighbors down the street who bought a house they couldn't afford and then walked away and left a foreclosed home behind."

The administration estimates that 3.5 million borrowers with privately held mortgages have high enough interest rates that they would have incentive to refinance their mortgages through the FHA.

That's in addition to 11 million borrowers who have loans guaranteed by the government-affiliated mortgage giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, who could be eligible for refinancing under the administration's proposed changes.

Still, economists say that without reducing the burden on homeowners who are late on their payments, any new housing program will achieve little.

"Anyone who is already behind on their mortgage payments, and is therefore much closer to actually losing their home, won't benefit," said Paul Dales, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics. "As such, the policy won't do anything to reduce the mountain of 3 million homes that are still at risk of foreclosure."

Bankers oppose Obama's proposal to impose a fee on large banks to pay for the program and Obama has been unable to win support for such a fee in Congress.

Frank Keating, president and CEO of the American Bankers Association, said such a fee would "directly reduce lending capacity." And Brian Gardner, a senior vice president at Keefe, Bruyette and Woods, a Washington investment bank, called the proposed bank tax a "poison pill" for the legislation.

Administration officials said Obama was open to other means of paying for the program if the bank fee becomes too much of an obstacle.

Past administration initiatives have fallen short of expectations. For instance, an earlier plan, the Home Affordable Refinance Program, which allows borrowers with loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to refinance at lower rates, has helped about 1 million homeowners, well short of the 4 million to 5 million the administration had expected.

"I'll be honest, the programs we've put forward didn't work at the scale we'd hoped," Obama said. "Not as many people have taken advantage of it as we wanted."

Obama also announced new industry standards for mortgage servicers, a sort of "bill of rights" for borrowers that would protect them in their transactions. During his remarks, Obama brandished a simpler, three-page loan document to illustrate the new standards.

Separately, the Agriculture Department launched a pilot program in 19 states that could help rural homeowners refinance loans that were made or guaranteed by the department's loan program, USDA Rural Development. The department estimates 235,000 homeowners would be eligible for refinancing.

The administration will also undertake a program that would allow the sale of foreclosed homes by Fannie Mae to investors who would then offer the properties for rental.

"As we know and a lot of families know," Obama said, "that empty house or `for sale' sign down the block can bring down the price of homes across the neighborhood."

___

AP Economics Writer Derek Kravitz contributed to this report:

Online:

Administration's sample loan document: http://www.consumerfinance.gov/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Jan2012_Estimate_Honeylocust.pdf

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
FALLS CHURCH, Va. — Conceding his earlier housing programs have fallen short, President Barack Obama on Wednesday proposed a vast expansion of government assistance to homeowners, aiming to make...
FALLS CHURCH, Va. — Conceding his earlier housing programs have fallen short, President Barack Obama on Wednesday proposed a vast expansion of government assistance to homeowners, aiming to make...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,001
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
06:34 PM on 03/07/2012
Just another reason to vote for this guy. . .
03:34 PM on 02/13/2012
What is quite ridiculous is that anyone who has a FHA loan who is 0-30 days past due is currently eligible to modify their mortgage to 4.25%. It helps if you do not have a problem affording your current loan, you actually have the best chance of modifying your mortgage. So for all those who have a FHA loan who can easily make your payment, contact your lender because they are handing out 4.25% fixed modifications like candy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
05:42 PM on 02/03/2012
While this proposal may not address those most at risk of losing their homes, the initial mistake Obama made was trying to implement a huge one-size fit's all program that did not target where assistance was needed most, was too mired in bureaucracy, nor did funding actually get to homeowners (NACA has largely been a disaster.) This current proposal does not come close to addressing all of the problems. In many ways the government shouldn't address all the problems. But the government does have a role and they need to play it.

I don't fault Obama for proposals that may not have all been successful. In a crisis some things will fail. I would have faulted him more for doing nothing at all. In that regard, I absolutely blame congress for their lack of courage and effectiveness in this situation.
11:12 AM on 02/09/2012
Of course you don't blame Obama. Should we expect any thing less.
It is most definitely Obama's fault since he is the one IN CHARGE. He is absolutely horrible when it comes to working with a split congress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
01:57 AM on 02/10/2012
That is patently false and totally ridiculous. But please continue to think like that and be sure to vote your conscience because most independents agree with liberals here, and that's precisely why you will lose. Let's be sure to have another discussion in November to update.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olerealist
retired trial attorney; former member of VA abd Wa
09:50 AM on 02/03/2012
President’s mortgage relief proposal.

There is both good and bad in this proposal.
The bad part results from the fact that the Administration has not appreciated the concept that the housing crisis is the very crux of the need to reinvigorate the entire economy. As FDR would have been quick to emphasize, a huge part of any serious recession is psychological.

The American home owning public, about 85% of us, have lost trillions in home equity. This undermines the willingness of the public to spend money in the “retail” market, appliances, autos, and new homes. Lack of such “demand” underlies the unemployment crisis.

Accordingly, what was needed was not just a half measure but a whole one. Among the 11 million homeowners who are “underwater” on their mortgage loans, only those who are well off to be only on the margin of negative equity will benefit by the President’s refinance program. For example, if my home has a current market value of $300,000. and my mortgage has a principal balance of say $400,000. I would find it hard to justify paying off that loan during the next 20 or 30 years even if I could save 3 or 4 hundred dollars per month by reduced interest rates.

I fear that the majority of the “underwater” home owners need help with the PRINCIPAL as well as with interest. Most of these lenders deserve a “haircut”.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VPerry24
Carpe Diem!
05:27 AM on 02/03/2012
The neediest will always be ignored, no matter what party. People think they will never slide into that slot but times are different now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tquin
11:41 PM on 02/02/2012
Do not worry, this will be another failed program. Just another failure on a long list.
10:06 PM on 02/02/2012
If the government is going to use the public's money to bailout homeowners and banks

they should in all fairness give non-homeowners a $1,000 dollar tax rebate or credit in 2012
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olerealist
retired trial attorney; former member of VA abd Wa
10:08 AM on 02/03/2012
DEAR 1anonymous

I must disagree that the "banks" are getting a "bailout". The banks and lenders will take a significant loss, at least on paper, insofar as they will suffer as much as a 50% loss ofinterest income compared to their postion if full payments were made on the original contract.

But this is not enough of a "haircut". These lenders, many unscrupulous, should be forced to lower the PRINCIPAL of the loan to an amount consistient with the current market value of the property. The latter, in practical terms, would not really be a loss. These lenders are blighted by a tendency to put ideology over fiscal reality. In the vast majortiy of these cases they will never be able to collect anything anywere neaer the existing principal balance..Oabama's plan would, in reality, be for the lender's own good.
10:58 AM on 02/03/2012
Hello!!! My properties are paid for, maybe the Government can just send me a check to cover my loss to the value of my holdings. Doesn't that sound fair?
10:52 AM on 02/07/2012
Former White House budget director David Stockman said that's just a smokescreen for the real agenda.

"This is ultimately at the end of the day a bailout for JP Morgan and Wells Fargo," and other big underwriters of second mortgages and home equity lines, Stockman says. "Those [second liens] are in great jeopardy because of homeowners way under water on primary mortgages and are likely to default or throw in the keys at some point down the road."
shessomoney
Liberal Elite-Made In U.S.A.
09:14 PM on 02/02/2012
It would have been much cheaper and more effective to just give every homeowner in the country $100,000 than all the money we spent to bail out the financial industry. How many trillions of dollars did we need to print to get out of this mess? And not the bank is collecting interest on the money we lent them. What a farce.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VPerry24
Carpe Diem!
05:28 AM on 02/03/2012
Everyone knew that but we don't anyone to lobby for us. Besides, whoever hammered out this plan, and I am certain, the G8 Meetings had something to do with it, made it that way so they all could acquire a lot of money. This did not happen out of the clear blue sky, it was a laid out plan. Wondering what else they have in store for us while they promise us the sky again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olerealist
retired trial attorney; former member of VA abd Wa
10:14 AM on 02/03/2012
DEAR shessomoney: "give every homeowner in the country $100,000. "

Math is not my forte. But this is easy. The maximum amount the government would spend on each of these refinances would not exceed $3,000. The balance of the cost would ultimately fall on the bank in reduced interest rates.
09:02 PM on 02/02/2012
Yes, this is disappointing to liberals and those who wished for "change." No, there is no defending the Obama administration on this.

But what truly appalls me is the bigotry exhibited by the Right. They were always looking out for the interests of the rich, most notably the banksters. Boehner even said that the government should just abandon underwater homeowners. But now that Obama puts forth this indecisive action, in other words, letting the Republicans have their way, they are suddenly oh-so-caring for the poor? Suddenly they are so very disappointed that Obama didn't bring about the "change" he'd promised and they'd so desperately opposed? Simply disgusting.
shessomoney
Liberal Elite-Made In U.S.A.
08:58 PM on 02/02/2012
If you are underwater on your mortgage you should just walk away. Society tries to shame people who can't pay a mortgage, but big business does this every day. But because the economy crashed and they lost their jobs they need to exercise their rights within the contract that says you don't pay, the bank gets the house. Give the bank back their house. You will have to rent for seven years until the foreclosure is off of your credit score but that is better than paying for a house that your were scammed into overpaying for by the banks and their assessor and mortgage broker cohorts. Claim your dignity, see a lawyer and walk away. The American people feel your pain and know you did the best you could.
shessomoney
Liberal Elite-Made In U.S.A.
08:44 PM on 02/02/2012
If Congress would pass some of the infrastructure jobs bills many of these foreclosures would sort themselves out. People need jobs in their communities to allow them to pay their mortgage since they can't sell the houses. Get off your butts GOP and pass the jobs bill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olerealist
retired trial attorney; former member of VA abd Wa
10:25 AM on 02/03/2012
Hello shessomoney :" Get off your butts GOP and pass the jobs bill."

I agree with you but not totally. Its cause and effect. I place a lot of emphasis on the lack of consumer demand as in homeowners. If people can buy, jobs will be created ipso facto. A happy homeowner will become a buyer. .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
propofemandsyd
Mommy, is that Cheddar or American?
07:12 PM on 02/02/2012
Not enough. It has to help people who are also behind but want to work with the bank to catch up and stay in their homes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olerealist
retired trial attorney; former member of VA abd Wa
10:26 AM on 02/03/2012
ABOLUTELY CORRECT propofemandsyd
06:45 PM on 02/02/2012
Great plan, allowing people to brorrow 30% more than their house is worth. Ever heard of sub prime failure.
03:46 PM on 02/02/2012
Is he nuts? We don't want taxpayer money to go to people who can't pay their mortgages. There are people out there who just decided not to pay their mortgage because their house wasn't worth what they thought it should be, instead of waiting a few years for the market to turn around. We don't want to bail these people out!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olerealist
retired trial attorney; former member of VA abd Wa
02:49 PM on 02/08/2012
Please read above comments.

Except for the loss of trillions due to Bush tax cuts, this recession is primarily psychological.
Optimisim at this time is justifiable. It will get us out of this hole. It may begin with homeowners especially if the bad lenders were made to take a haircut.
01:29 PM on 02/02/2012
Ok, lets review! First the mortgage lenders, through predatory lending practices, offer sub-prime loans to bad credit risks. Then the mortgage servicer's bundle those bad loans into investment instruments called CDO's. Collateralized debt obligations, that are marketed/sold to investors. Along with that comes the CDS. Credit default swaps, which are a bet that the CDO's will fail. Goldman played this card to truly fantastic results.
I have asked this question before, if "helping" the underwater homeowner is good for the economy, why isn't it even better to help ALL homeowners adjust the principal on their mortgage? I mean, in this situation, if a little is good, isn't more better?
The real issue is not the underwater homeowner. The issue is JOBS. Put people back to work. Put people back to work in jobs that pay well. Pay workers a sustainable wage with health insurance benefits. Then, and only then, will those underwater mortgages be worth the paper they are written on.
Its the jobs, stupid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olerealist
retired trial attorney; former member of VA abd Wa
02:54 PM on 02/08/2012
This infers that a non-underwater home owner with a positive equity in his home and the wherewithall to refinance if his interest is high, will want to "walk away" from his home.

If you can figure out the sense of this infernence, your a better man than I Guga Din.