More

Asian-American Claims Harvard, Princeton Denied Admission Based On Race

Harvard Discrimination

First Posted: 02/ 2/2012 7:15 pm Updated: 02/ 6/2012 11:22 am

The U.S. Education Department's Office of Civil Rights is investigating Harvard and Princeton after receiving a complaint from an Indian-American student last August claiming that both Ivy League universities discriminated against him during the college admissions process because he was Asian, according to a report published on Bloomberg's website.

A spokesman for the Office of Civil Rights told the Washington Post the complaint was "accepted for investigation" on Jan. 11 under allegations of "discrimination against Asian-Americans on the basis of race/national origin with respect to the university's admissions process."

The student, whose named has not been released, filed complaints against Harvard and Princeton after being rejected by both universities last year, according to Bloomberg. His father told the paper that his son was among the top students in his California high school's graduating class.

The same student also filed a complaint against Yale, but later withdrew the allegation.

Jeff Neal, a spokesman for Harvard, told Bloomberg the school could not comment on pending investigations but that the school "does not discriminate against Asian-American applicants."

For the 2010-2011 academic year, 16 percent of Harvard undergraduates were Asian, according to Harvard's website.

A spokesman for Princeton, where Asian students comprise nearly 18 percent of the undergraduate student body, also denied the allegations.

It's not the first time Ivy League universities have been the subject of discrimination complaints filed by Asian-American students.

Both Bloomberg and the Washington Post noted a high-profile case from 2006 in which Jian Li, a Chinese American student who has perfect scores on the SAT and a number of AP subject tests, filed a complaint against Princeton University alleging the school rejected him because of his race.

Despite schools' claims that they do not discriminate applicants on the basis of race, a number of studies have suggested that Asian students do in fact face harsher standards for college admission than peers of different races.

For their 1997 book "No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life," Princeton sociologists Thomas Espenshade and Alexandria Walton Radford reviewed admissions data from 10 elite colleges and found that, on average, Asian applicants needed to score 140 points higher on standardized test than white students to compete for the same spot.

Admissions counselors at elite colleges have also confirmed that Asians face a tougher time during college admissions. Writing for the Boston Globe, Kara Miller shared her experience working as a reader for Yale's Office of Undergraduate Admissions:

...It became immediately clear to me that Asians - who constitute 5 percent of the US population - faced an uphill slog. They tended to get excellent scores, take advantage of AP offerings, and shine in extracurricular activities. Frequently, they also had hard-knock stories: families that had immigrated to America under difficult circumstances, parents working as kitchen assistants and store clerks, and households in which no English was spoken. But would Yale be willing to make 50 percent of its freshman class Asian? Probably not.

As a result, many Asian students applying to elite universities are choosing not to identify their race on college applications, according to the Associated Press.

"As someone who was applying with relatively strong scores, I didn't want to be grouped into that stereotype," Amalia Halikias, a Yale Freshman whose mother is Asian, told the AP. "I didn't want to be written off as one of the 1.4 billion Asians that were applying."

Not surprisingly, there is a much higher percentage of Asians students at schools that can't consider race in admissions, like public California universities, which are legally prohibited from considering race in admissions. At the University of California Berkeley, for example, 40 percent of undergraduate students are Asian, according to the AP.

"[Top colleges] could fill their entire freshman class twice over with qualified Asian students or white students or valedictorians," Rosita Fernandez-Rojo, a former college admissions officer who is now director of college counseling at Rye Country Day School outside of New York City, told the AP.

Photo by Flickr user artfulgourmetnyc.

CORRECTION: A previous version of this article incorrectly stated the title of Thomas Espenshade and Alexandria Walton Radford's book as "Not Yet Separate, But Equal" and excluded Radford as author. The title of the book is in fact "No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life" by Thomas J. Espenshade & Alexandria Walton Radford.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

Filed by Jocelyn Richard  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 829
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moravecglobal
07:36 PM on 04/22/2012
UC Berkeley rejects instate applicants, including asian americans, for foreign affluent applicants. In spite of eligibility University of California Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau ($450.000 salary), Provost Breslauer ($306,000 salary) shed thousands of instate applicants. Qualified instate applicants to public Cal. are replaced by a $50,600 payment from born abroad affluent foreign and affluent out of state students. And, Birgeneau subsidizes affluent foreign and affluent out of state tuition in the guise of diversity while he doubles instate tuition/fees.

UC Berkeley fall admit rate for Californians drops to record low 18%. Birgeneau/Breslauer accept affluent $50,600 foreign students and displace qualified instate Californians (When depreciation of tax funded assets are included (as they should be), out of state and foreign tuition is more than $100,000 and does NOT subsidize instate tuition). Going to Cal. is now more expensive than Harvard, Yale.

A shocking picture of inept UC Berkeley senior management. With the recommendations of Cal. Chancellor Birgeneau ($450,000 salary), Provost George Breslauer ($306,000 salary) allowed campus police to use excessive force - rammed baton jabs - on students protesting Birgeneau‘s doubling of instate tuition. Resignation of Birgeneau is necessary, but not sufficient, fire Breslauer.

Forcefully send a message that this simply isn’t acceptable; UC Board of Regents marsha.kelman@ucop.edu
06:32 PM on 02/09/2012
Asian immigrants think that their more authoritarian way of raising kids is best where they make sure that their kids make all "A's" to get into top colleges. They feel that they are giving their kids the tools to succeed in life. They think the typical American way of raising kids is lazy and they are the ones who are sacrificing. Native born Americans-especially European American think their way is best-they are nurturing a child to become who they are meant to be. This kind of parenting when reasonably done well takes an incredible amount of effort as well. The kids turn out differently. Harvard and Princeton want interesting kids who are passionately committed to their interests not just outstanding students not matter how they are raised. There is no guarantees when it comes to top tier private school college admissions in the United States. Parents need to realize that plus they need to realize that they don't have a monopoly on good parenting. Asians and other Americans should learn from each other instead.
07:08 PM on 02/09/2012
These hidden quotas are affecting Asian Americans not immigrants who pay foreigners' fees. The former are still Americans and brought up with a lot of the extra-curricula activities as their peers. In fact, some of them have to overcome hardships themselves working in their parents small shops after school hours or caring for younger siblings.
The problem is, that for all other admissions criteria being equal, Asian Americans seem to require much higher grades on average than other ethnic groups to get into these Ivies and now even some public universities such as UCAL and Texas. In Canada, across the border, have a lot of very good universities and there is non of this diversity nonsense. Students are accepted on merit. The Canadian economy and people don't seem to be doing too badly compared to south of the border.
AllegroTroppo
Appeaser feeds crocodile hopes to be eaten last
12:34 AM on 02/09/2012
Great universities must say NO to mercy admissions,"diversity" and "legacy" admissions.
Criteria such as "overcoming adversity," essays and volunteering are nothing but a sneaky way to justify ethnicity quotas and mercy ( aka affirmative action) admissions.

Great universities should thrive to be meritocracies jealously maintaining and advancing the great cultural artistic and scientific legacy of the United States. Leave social engineering to community colleges and state universities.
05:08 PM on 02/09/2012
In other English speaking countries those that don't cut it for university or can't afford it can go to trade school or join the services such as police, coast guard, military, etc where they can get training. The problem with social engineering is that it is often controlled by people with wacky agendas which results in promoting the second-rate at the expense of the deserving. There are stories that some admissions in state universities have to the spend the first year and sometimes the second to bring some of the students up to speed. That is doing the other students a disservice if the pace of the class and learning is determined by the former.
02:39 PM on 04/22/2012
If top schools only accepted students based on academic merit, they wouldn't be top schools. Overcoming adversity isn't a sneaky way to justify ethnicity quotas, rather, it is an opportunity for students to show what they've got besides academics. I'm a freshman at Stanford and I'm positive that 50% of the applicants for my class had better grades, test scores, and educations than I had in high school. Stanford didn't want me for ridiculously great academics, they wanted me because I was involved in things I cared about and showed dedication in more than just academics. Places like Harvard and Princeton turn down kids like the one described in this post because they see more potential in other students from different backgrounds, they don't specifically look to ethnicities. I'm sure the student had great grades, but he probably lacked (relatively at least) in other aspects.

Making great universities based on a meritocracy is a waste. What exams can accurately depict someones intellectual promise? The SAT? Bullshit. If you can pay for a tutor and a few practice exams, you can easily score above a 2200 on that test. Focus entirely on the students grades? Well everyone goes to a different school, with different districts, and different teachers. I guess it sucks for the students with bad districts then, huh?

If the US wants to maintain this "great cultural artistic and scientific legacy" it shouldn't focus on a student's merits, as there is much more to a student than merits.
06:16 PM on 02/08/2012
If there is a blind admissions process for the Ivies and other universities then the merits of applicants can be judged objectively. That is not just academic performance but the other "well-rounded" factors such as: triumph over adversity, social standing, contribution to society, sports powess,and every admission criteria save for legacy or money. That way we can see if there is any alteration of the demographics for student admissions. Theorectically, it shouldn't make a difference as those who say the current system is fine and objective. But if there are changes then an injustice will have been rectified.
03:08 PM on 02/08/2012
I'm glad this kid is suing, i hope he wins!! Most Asians kids excel because they study more and perform better.....they worked hard to earn those spots at top universities.....there is absolutely a quota at the IVY level which limits Asian admissions....imagine the public outcry if there was the same quota limiting Jewish students!?!??
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FiredUpRTG
Don't start no stuff; won't be no stuff…
03:57 PM on 02/08/2012
Actually, that used to happen at Harvard, and the number allowed was much, much, much less than 30% of the student population.
06:43 PM on 02/08/2012
Well there you go now, as the Ivies seem to have no problem with having 30% Jewish student body then they shouldn't mind, everything else being equal with the applicants qualifications and standing, a 30% or more Asian American student body. Or are the universities just more afraid of the various Jewish lobbies that would pressure politicians and the government to withdraw grants and support to those universities.
AllegroTroppo
Appeaser feeds crocodile hopes to be eaten last
01:49 PM on 02/08/2012
It is no secret that most of American higher education institutions practice ethnicity-based quotas and utterly reject the concept of meritocracy.
Of course, they don't call it that. They call it "diversity," " fostering inclusive student campus experiences " and any number of other PCisms.
But this doesn't change the fact that many U. choose to accept a 3.5 GPA and average SAT and reject a perfect SAT --- solely based on ethnicity factor.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FiredUpRTG
Don't start no stuff; won't be no stuff…
04:00 PM on 02/08/2012
3.5GPA and average SAT of well-rounded student with many interests, trumps the perfect SAT of a kid whose only claim to fame is they studied to take a test.
06:39 PM on 02/08/2012
Again you're making the assumption that the Asian American student with a perfect SAT is not well-rounded and that his/her ethnic group had nothing to do with being rejected. The whole idea of this lawsuit is to find out if that is the case or not and perhaps with the added benefit that the whole application process can be looked into and be judged fair or not. Transparency is good, honesty even better.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FiredUpRTG
Don't start no stuff; won't be no stuff…
10:53 AM on 02/08/2012
Ultimately, only 10% will be admitted to these schools. It makes more sense for all who had the same grades as that guy did to have a class action lawsuit. They all qualify as much as he does, don't they?

If I were a university president, I wouldn't want someone quick-to-sue as part of my student body. What would he sue for next? And only 18? He's going keep a lot of lawyers' careers going for decades.
01:56 PM on 02/08/2012
Well, someone has to stand up to this political correct nonsense. There's been an informal ceiling on Asian American admittance in the Ivies and it's about time someone took them to task. I'm glad the kid is suing. Hope he wins.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FiredUpRTG
Don't start no stuff; won't be no stuff…
02:58 PM on 02/08/2012
Well, it's sad that Harvard and Princeton didn't have 20,000 slots that they could fill with one group. People need to stop fixating on these schools HP puts in its slide shows.
05:36 PM on 02/07/2012
When will we stop being Irish-American, Asian-American, etc.? Stop making us check boxes and stop grouping people. Let us who are legal be Legal-American and anyone not legal be Illegal. Period. I'm sick of quotas and oh, you are a girl or you are a boy or you are Hispanic or you are this. We are all people. Stop it. Just stop it.
08:13 PM on 02/07/2012
Agreed. Other English speaking countries may take demograhic and social data on the university application forms. While disavantaged students may have reserved slots at some universities, race is not a determining factor.
In the USA there are many universities where you have people in charge who want to push a social engineering agenda. That is also the case at public universities such as the University of California, University of Texas, etc.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FiredUpRTG
Don't start no stuff; won't be no stuff…
10:55 AM on 02/08/2012
I like hearing about people's different cultures, learning a few bad words, and eating food. If all of us were "nothing but" American, it'd be a boring country. We should embrace where we came from but not at the expense or ridicule of degradation of others.
06:50 PM on 02/08/2012
You're the one that's saying that Asian Americans are just swots and are not well-rounded, a sweeping generalization if any.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FiredUpRTG
Don't start no stuff; won't be no stuff…
10:57 AM on 02/07/2012
I'd not admit him for being an egotistical ---hole. To assume he's better than all in the application pile. They take into account more than grades; what did he do afterschool, in the summers? Was that activity interesting, constructive, make an impact? Bet he wasn't as well-rounded as the others. These schools are trying to be well-rounded; they take only so-many New Englanders, other demographics too.
03:35 PM on 02/07/2012
You don't know the litigant and yet you libel him??? How do you know if he's well-rounded or not?
The problem for him and other Asian Americans is that the criteria for acceptance at the Ivies seem to be different for them compared to other ethnic groups. The lack of openly defined criteria and a non-transparent process leads to suspicions that the game is rigged. The lawsuit serves a purpose in that, if it goes to court, these two Ivy colleges will have to go on the record and list their criteria, and in the litigant's case justify why he was rejected based on the stated criteria. WIth that the litigant will have done a service for all non-legacies and non-donors.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FiredUpRTG
Don't start no stuff; won't be no stuff…
05:14 PM on 02/07/2012
Not libeling him. It really doesn't matter if he thinks he should have been admitted; there were 100s of others who were better than him, no matter his color. There are always others better than him. If he collected for the coat drive, someone else ran a soup kitchen. If he was 2nd clarinet, someone else was 1st clarinet, and composed a piece for their school orchestra.

How presumptuous of him, to assume he should've gotten in? I hope for his sake he had more than good grades and test scores going for him, otherwise he is wasting taxpayer dollars taking this to court.
11:47 AM on 02/09/2012
Studies show that with all things being equal, Asian Americans still have much lower admittance rates. That's a fact.
10:20 AM on 02/07/2012
Why is this article not more prominent in this site?
03:39 PM on 02/07/2012
Agreed. This has been common knowledge amonst the Asian American community for a decade or more but now some of the better public universities like the University of California and the University of Texas are starting to use vague criteria in their application process to keep the number of local Asian Americans down. See:
http://www­.bloomberg­.com/news/­2012-02-02­/harvard-t­argeted-in­-u-s-asian­-american-­discrimina­tion-probe­.html
03:43 AM on 02/07/2012
I am asian and this is WELL known in the asian-american community. I sorely misunderstood the unwritten 'quotas' , 'hooks', and applicant pools that elite private universities have when shaping their admissions class 10 years ago; 8 years later I made sure my younger sibling did not make the same mistake and now is at a top 3 private university and having a much better undergrad experience than I ever did (even though by almost all counts I was a better student in HS).
10:56 PM on 02/06/2012
Schools are attempting to create a an environmental stew with a variety of ingredients. Simultaneously, they are attempting to recruit students who will do great things with their experience and ultimately give back to the university. Future Presidents, Nobel Laureates, and billionaires are what it is all about.
10:13 AM on 02/07/2012
BS to justify quotas is what you are saying!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FiredUpRTG
Don't start no stuff; won't be no stuff…
11:01 AM on 02/08/2012
No, some schools provide an education and exposure to the world; others just provide an education. The former school will want a cross section of students and one year there may be more boys, just because more applied. The next year may be the year more members of an ethnic group are admitted and that's because other groups didn't accept the offer that year.

So no, there aren't set-quotas.
08:56 PM on 02/06/2012
The big issue here isn't whether this student didn't get the university place he wanted but why Asian American students applying for certain universities havd to have much higher marks in the SAT compared to other ethnic groups to be considered. Related to this are the vague criteria for acceptance into the university and it's non-transparent process. If all the universities, public and private, were to have blind initial admissions, and publish their criteria for acceptance relating to those students who are not legacies or those who can contribute large amounts of money then that would alleviate any suspicion of bias.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inkhosi
10:59 AM on 02/06/2012
Extremely misleading. We have the whole concept of affirmative action quotas completely wrong.
10:54 AM on 02/06/2012
Harvard and Yale are not looking for robots, thank goodness they recognize that it's not all about SAT scores. I've known people who started preparing specifically for it since age nine (and eventually got perfect or near perfect scores) but could not change a light bulb at college age. These institutions know they cannot serve society well with one dimensional people.
03:52 PM on 02/06/2012
Well an awful lot of those US IVY graduates in financial positions have got the USA and Europe into a fine mess with "clever" products that led to the GFC. Also when is the last time that the Ivies produced a good class of politicians when.compared to those of Germany or even Australia??? Look at the current primaries and the poor debating skills.
10:14 AM on 02/07/2012
So Asians are robots is that it?