More

HuffPost Social Reading

John Boehner Wants Obama To Reconsider Birth Control Mandate

Birth Control Order

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR   02/ 2/12 04:16 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration scrambled Thursday to contain a growing election-year outcry over its decision that church-affiliated employers must cover birth control regardless of their religious principles.

House Speaker John Boehner, a Catholic, called the requirement unconstitutional while White House spokesman Jay Carney said it is part of a reasoned policy to promote women's health and does not encourage abortion.

Under President Barack Obama's health care overhaul law, most employers and insurance plans will have to cover birth control free of charge as preventive care for women. Churches and houses of worship do not have to follow that requirement, but administration officials recently announced that many religious-affiliated institutions such as hospitals, colleges and charities must comply after a year's phase-in period.

The wave of protest that followed has clearly taken the White House by surprise. Catholic and Protestant evangelical leaders criticized the decision as infringing on freedom of religion. Some religious liberals have called it politically risky for Obama in a close election year.

"I think this mandate violates our Constitution," Boehner, R-Ohio, said Thursday. "I think it violates the rights of these religious organizations. And I would hope that the administration would back up and take another look at this."

White House spokesman Carney said the decision will stand.

That's unlikely to silence critics. Also joining in disapproval was a group that includes Democratic lawmakers who helped engineer final passage of the health care law. The group, Democrats for Life of America, represents anti-abortion lawmakers who provided the margin of victory in Congress.

"Forcing religious institutions to provide insurance coverage for services that are directly in opposition to their moral beliefs is very clearly wrong," said Kristen Day, its executive director.

The White House defended the decision. Spokesman Carney said the president has no intention of trespassing on religious liberty.

"There was extensive and careful consideration as this policy was developed and a decision was made. And the issue here is we want to be sure women, all women, have access to good health care," he said.

Asked if there's a debate within the administration about reconsidering, Carney responded:

"No, there's not a debate ... the decision has been made, and it was made after careful consideration."

At issue is a provision of the health care law that requires insurance plans to cover preventive care for women free of charge to the employee. Last year, an advisory panel from the respected Institute of Medicine recommended including birth control on the list, partly because it promotes maternal and child health by allowing women to space their pregnancies.

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius agreed, issuing a new federal regulation last summer.

That rule, however, exempted houses of worship and their employees, as well as other institutions whose primary purpose is to promote religious belief. Churches, synagogues, mosques and other places would not be required to cover contraceptives, it specified. Neither would religious organizations whose purpose is to promote belief, and that primarily employ and serve people of the same creed.

It was a different story for religious-affiliated hospitals, colleges and social agencies that serve the public broadly.

Although many of those employers had not traditionally covered birth control, the new regulation will require them to do so.

For religious-affiliated employers, the requirement will take effect August 1, 2013, and their workers in most cases will have access to coverage starting January 1, 2014.

Women working for secular enterprises from profit-making companies to government will have access to the new coverage starting January 1, 2013, in most cases.

Workplace health plans will have to cover all forms of contraception approved by the Food and Drug Administration, ranging from the pill to implantable devices to sterilization. Also covered is the morning-after pill, which can prevent pregnancy after unprotected sex and is considered as tantamount to an abortion drug by some religious conservatives.

There is no mandate, however, to cover abortions.

Last Sunday, Catholic bishops in more than 140 dioceses issued statements denouncing the decision that were read at each weekend Mass.

The head of the Catholic Health Association, a hospital trade group that supported Obama's health care law, said she was "stunned" by the administration's decision.

"It's not the issue of contraception, but religious freedom," said Sister Carol Keehan. "It's not about preventing women from buying anything themselves, but telling the church what it has to buy, and the potential for that to go further."

An AP-GfK poll from December found that Catholics supported Obama by 49 percent to 45 percent in a matchup with Republican front runner Mitch Romney. But among Catholics who attend Mass weekly, Romney had the edge by 45 percent to 52 percent.

____

Associated Press writers Laurie Kellman, Rachel Zoll, Jennifer Agiesta and Erica Werner contributed to this report.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration scrambled Thursday to contain a growing election-year outcry over its decision that church-affiliated employers must cover birth control regardless of their...
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration scrambled Thursday to contain a growing election-year outcry over its decision that church-affiliated employers must cover birth control regardless of their...
Filed by Leigh Owens  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YouDontWantMeHere
thinks my cover is BLOWN!
08:06 PM on 02/08/2012
so does the line item veto
BUT...
03:07 PM on 02/05/2012
If the Catholic hospitals and clinics accept subsidies and or other taxpayer funded monies, then they are responsible to ALL American taxpayers......and that includes both birth control and abortion. If they want to exclude certain legal medical procedures, then they must refuse taxpayer subsidies and fund their institutions by private means.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SamBaby
Life is Sweet!
12:59 PM on 02/04/2012
No Pending Comments?? Mine is missing!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SamBaby
Life is Sweet!
12:54 PM on 02/04/2012
Church and State are kept separate in the United States as dictated by our Constitution. Maintain that thought and it is very simple.
The State requires health care plans provide free birth control to women. This is a State issue.
The Catholic Church does not want to provide birth control to women patients in their hospitals.This is a Church issue.
As long as a Catholic hospital get funds from the State, they must abide by the State's rules. Medicare and Medicaid are State funds.
The Catholic Church has a simple choice: Self-finance their hospitals or sell them to non-Catholic entities.
11:24 PM on 02/02/2012
If the Catholic Church doesnt want to follow the Federal rules, then they are free to not take Federal dollars. Why is that so hard for them to understand?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robin Ferruggia
Life - for its own sake
05:05 PM on 02/02/2012
I'm a Catholic too and I know that Jesus always told people to care for the poor, so I have to wonder where Boehner gets his attitude about cutting crucial programs like Social Security, Medicare, food stamps, affordable housing programs and the like. I do not believe in birth control by artificial means and I do not believe in abortion, but I also do not believe that my religious beliefs have anything to do with how the country is run or what the federal government pays for. If the government thinks paying for abortions is a good idea there may be reasons for it that have nothing to do with religious beliefs, not the least of which that women and teens who want an abortion are going to find a way to get it regardless, and likely to end up going to butchers who will kill them instead of clean safe medical clinics. There are a lot of things that need considering when laws are passed, and the religious beliefs of any group of people should not be controlling a secular government. We have separation of church and state in this country, and there are good reasons for it.
photo
JohnHopwood2
Why do I feel like I'm in a hand basket?
05:31 PM on 02/02/2012
Because he needs more slaves to do the grunt work!
10:13 PM on 02/02/2012
I totally agree. And may I add that just because birth control is covered doesn't mean that it is forced on women. Those who don't want birth control don't need to get it! ...And those who want a little breather from having kids (or, like in my friend's case, relief from debilitating migraines) can rest assured that they won't have to pay full cost. For those hit hard by the recession I'm sure women of all faiths are relieved by this. ...if even in secret!
04:22 PM on 02/02/2012
Was it constitutional what they did to Josh Fox yesterday.
11:45 PM on 02/02/2012
Josh Fox is a for profit documentary producer employed by HBO. He could have been there as a private citizen or a journalist if he wanted.

There were going to be other journalist there that had the ability to document (video) the event. It wasn't being blacked out. He simply wasn't allowed to bring his HD/Film quality cameras in and produce a for profit movie.

He said himself that getting his special equipment in was a priority.
03:47 PM on 02/02/2012
Here is a deal.

If Boehner wants this mandate ended, then all faith based initiative money must be cut. No exceptions.
02:53 PM on 02/02/2012
Have your cake or eat it. Take government money and SHUT YOUR SORRY MOUTHS, or turn it down and do what you want. You want a penny from the American tax-payer Pope Brown Shirt? Play ball and do as you're told. You want to stand on 'principle', now that you can't torture and kill your enemies? Then do it on your own dime.
02:43 PM on 02/02/2012
Where was the constitutional outrage over the 'Faith Based Initiative'? It couldn't be any clearer that the government giving money to religious organizations is unconstitutional, so let's kill two birds with one stone: Catholic hospitals, you aren't required to cover the evil birth control, and you get zero government money, including Medicaire and Medicaid payments. Deal?
JDSept
too much of everything is just enough
03:37 PM on 02/02/2012
Since services for medicare and medicaid are not fully covered in payments to hospitals and the difference is made up by people with insurance, Catholic hospitals might not feel bad not covering medicaid and medicare patients. Let us not forget already many doctors will not take medicare patients because they don't don't get enough money for them and with medicare patients growing in numbers elderly are having a hard time finding doctors when their doctors retire. My mother's doctor (my mother was on medicare) had a big sign, "No New Medicare Patients,"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:32 PM on 02/02/2012
"Last Sunday, Catholic bishops in more than 140 dioceses issued statements denouncing the decision that were read at each weekend Mass."

Sounds like some people need to get their tax exempt status revoked.
04:43 PM on 02/02/2012
As a Catholic who attends Mass each week no matter where I may be, I was stunned to hear the letter written by our bishop read aloud prior to the homily (sermon). This was the very first time in my sixty plus years of attendance at Mass that I've ever heard anything political other than a biblical passage being read as part of the Gospel.
I have always wondered how many other Christian denominations made political matters a more common topic without anyone questioning their tax exempt status.
However, I am not in favor of removing tax exempt status.
Religions of all types do good charitable work often times doing what the government will not do. Much of that charitable work is done with little fan-fare just as Jesus instructed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:12 PM on 02/02/2012
We need to really get religion out of our government it's destroying our country.
photo
JohnHopwood2
Why do I feel like I'm in a hand basket?
05:34 PM on 02/02/2012
Yes, Yes and Yes!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Weissman
Hooah!
02:02 PM on 02/02/2012
Can anyone say pandering to the religious right, if you take federal money you have to adhear to federal regulations. If you don't want to guess what don't take federal money (very simple) . If you don't want it I am sure there are a lot of orgnizations that would love to have it...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TyneCrescent
A Word To The Wise Is Sufficient
01:59 PM on 02/02/2012
Boehner and the GOPTer's act has grown really tiresome. Everything the President or Democrats propose is somehow unconstitutional in their eyes. That's their unending line of commenting on something. They even claim things that they've previously agreed with unconstitutional when the President brings it up. That reveals more about their heinous and dangerous agenda than anything.

Their first defense is to hide behind the constitutionality of something, anything, when there's obviously more behind their comments than that. They boast about how much they love and abide by Constitution, when it doesn't seem they know a single thing about applying it. They trot that out there, it sounds good to their base, who know even less, so we'll just push that along. His actions, and his cohorts actions, continue to reach new lows each and every day.
photo
JohnHopwood2
Why do I feel like I'm in a hand basket?
05:35 PM on 02/02/2012
So true