iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Alien Planet 'Super-Earth' Called Best Candidate To Support Life (VIDEO)

First Posted: 02/ 2/2012 1:59 pm Updated: 02/ 3/2012 12:52 pm

By: Denise Chow
Published: 02/02/2012 10:16 AM EST on SPACE.com

A potentially habitable alien planet — one that scientists say is the best candidate yet to harbor water, and possibly even life, on its surface — has been found around a nearby star.

The planet is located in the habitable zone of its host star, which is a narrow circumstellar region where temperatures are neither too hot nor too cold for liquid water to exist on the planet's surface.

"It's the Holy Grail of exoplanet research to find a planet around a star orbiting at the right distance so it's not too close where it would lose all its water and boil away, and not too far where it would all freeze," Steven Vogt, an astronomer at the University of California, Santa Cruz, told SPACE.com. "It's right smack in the habitable zone — there's no question or discussion about it. It's not on the edge, it's right in there."

Vogt is one of the authors of the new study, which was led by Guillem Anglada-Escudé and Paul Butler of the Carnegie Institution for Science, a private, nonprofit research organization based in Washington, D.C.

"This planet is the new best candidate to support liquid water and, perhaps, life as we know it," Anglada-Escudé said in a statement.

An alien super-Earth

The researchers estimate that the planet, called GJ 667Cc, is at least 4.5 times as massive as Earth, which makes it a so-called super-Earth. It takes roughly 28 days to make one orbital lap around its parent star, which is located a mere 22 light-years away from Earth, in the constellation Scorpius (the Scorpion).

"This is basically our next-door neighbor," Vogt said. "It's very nearby. There are only about 100 stars closer to us than this one."

Interestingly enough, the host star, GJ 667C, is a member of a triple-star system. GJ 667C is an M-class dwarf star that is about a third of the mass of the sun, and while it is faint, it can be seen by ground-based telescopes, Vogt said. [Gallery: The Strangest Alien Planets]

"The planet is around one star in a triple-star system," Vogt explained. "The other stars are pretty far away, but they would look pretty nice in the sky."

The discovery of a planet around GJ 667C came as a surprise to the astronomers, because the entire star system has a different chemical makeup than our sun. The system has much lower abundances of heavy elements (elements heavier than hydrogen and helium), such as iron, carbon and silicon.

"It's pretty deficient in metals," Vogt said. "These are the materials out of which planets form — the grains of stuff that coalesce to eventually make up planets — so we shouldn't have really expected this star to be a likely case for harboring planets."

The fortuitous discovery could mean that potentially habitable alien worlds  could exist in a greater variety of environments than was previously thought possible, the researchers said.

"Statistics tell us we shouldn't have found something this quickly this soon unless there's a lot of them out there," Vogt said. "This tells us there must be an awful lot of these planets out there. It was almost too easy to find, and it happened too quickly."

The detailed findings of the study will be published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.

An intriguing star system

Another super-Earth that orbits much closer to GJ 667C was previously detected in 2010, but the finding was never published, Vogt added. This planet, called GJ 667Cb, takes 7.2 days to circle the star but its location makes it far too hot to sustain liquid water on its surface.

"It's basically glowing cinders, or a well-lit charcoal," Vogt said. "We know about a lot of these, but they're thousands of degrees and not places where you could live."

But, the newly detected GJ 667Cc planet is a much more intriguing candidate, he said.

"When a planet gets bigger than about 10 times the size of the Earth, there's a runaway process that happens, where it begins to eat up all the gas and ice in the disk that it's forming out of and swells quickly into something like Uranus, Jupiter or Saturn," Vogt explained. "When you have a surface and the right temperature, if there's water around, there's a good chance that it could be in liquid form. This planet is right in that sweet spot in the habitable zone, so we've got the right temperature and the right mass range."

Preliminary observations also suggest that more planets could exist in this system, including a gas giant planet and another super-Earth that takes about 75 days to circle the star. More research will be needed to confirm these planetary candidates, as well as to glean additional details about the potentially habitable super-Earth, the scientists said.

Finding nearby alien planets

To make their discovery, the researchers used public data from the European Southern Observatory combined with observations from the W.M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii and the new Carnegie Planet Finder Spectrograph at the Magellan II Telescope in Chile.

Follow-up analyses were also made using a planet-hunting technique that measures the small dips, or wobbles, in a star's motion caused by the gravitational tug of a planet.

"With the advent of a new generation of instruments, researchers will be able to survey many M dwarf stars for similar planets and eventually look for spectroscopic signatures of life in one of these worlds," Anglada-Escudé said in a statement. Anglada-Escudé was with the Carnegie Institution for Science when he conducted the research, but has since moved on to the University of Gottingen in Germany.

With the GJ 667C system being relatively nearby, it also opens exciting possibilities for probing potentially habitable alien worlds in the future, Vogt said, which can't easily be done with the planets that are being found by NASA's prolific Kepler spacecraft.

"The planets coming out of Kepler are typically thousands of light-years away and we could never send a space probe out there," Vogt said. "We've been explicitly focusing on very nearby stars, because with today's technology, we could send a robotic probe out there, and within a few hundred years, it could be sending back picture postcards."

You can follow SPACE.com staff writer Denise Chow on Twitter @denisechow. Follow SPACE.com for the latest in space science and exploration news on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

Copyright 2012 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

By: Denise Chow Published: 02/02/2012 10:16 AM EST on SPACE.com A potentially habitable alien planet — one that scientists say is the best candidate yet to harbor water, and possibly even lif...
By: Denise Chow Published: 02/02/2012 10:16 AM EST on SPACE.com A potentially habitable alien planet — one that scientists say is the best candidate yet to harbor water, and possibly even lif...
Filed by David Freeman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,753
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (48 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CarlIII
Liberal Virginian living in Remlap Alabama
09:40 AM on 04/15/2012
I love the quote "It's practically our next door neighbor". The planet is orbiting a star 22 light years away. For astronomers that is next door. But that distance is 132 trillion miles away. If you could travel at 1/4th the speed of light (that's millions of times faster than our current technology) it would still take over 170 years to travel there round trip. I believe the "Drake equation" is a good formula. If you do the math then you will see that there should be at least 5000 inhabited planets in our Galaxy capable of at least radio communications. That makes sense to me. However the distances between stars is so vast (especially out here in the Galactic boondocks) that the chance of "contact" is about zero. If we did pick up a radio greeting from the "New Planet" it would have been sent to us 22 years ago. It would take our reply 22 years to get back. I hope we pick up the ultra faint radio signal from an inhabited world in my lifetime it would be the biggest Scientific discovery in history. However half the people won't believe it (especially evangelical Christians) when it happens (I know people that don't believe we landed on the moon). Here's a link to a site that explains the "Drake equation" and even lets you try it yourself.
www.activemind.com/Mysterious/Topics/seti/drake_equation.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wesdfs
a guy with different point of veiw
12:25 AM on 03/24/2012
the last time I went there they had good food and music
09:34 PM on 02/16/2012
man is so full of itself it makes me laugh man thinks we are lord and master of the entire universe are so smart that we know for a fact we are the only ones in this never ending universe
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark B Robertson
07:16 AM on 02/12/2012
Awesome.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
getpeace
Get Courage, Have Fun...
11:57 PM on 02/06/2012
This is an intriguing discovery; I like to see us exploring outer space.
When I was a child, I saw a UFO go by quite low in the sky.....It looked like a long "string" of different colored lights. I told my mother and she disbelieved me. The next morning it was in the headlines.
03:07 PM on 02/17/2012
i especially liked the blue ones!
Canaris
It's the nexus of the crisis...
10:42 PM on 02/06/2012
Good Lord, they've found Majipoor.
04:01 PM on 02/06/2012
It could be the planet of the ancient astronauts or who knows?
photo
Former Icon
Card Carrying Union Member
11:17 AM on 02/06/2012
Maybe that's Mitt Romney's ρlanet................
08:48 AM on 02/06/2012
I really hope that humans never gets the ability to go to another planet. It's bad enough that we're ruining the one that we have, we shouldn't have the chance to destroy yet another one.
03:08 PM on 02/17/2012
as before, the planet will recover
photo
BannedInBoston
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
10:52 PM on 02/23/2012
Sure we should. Anything in the quest for unobtanium!...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wutrup
We are here to Evolve
04:56 PM on 02/05/2012
Why should we care about ET life on another world. There is plenty around planet earth. They have come and go for eons. New Mexico is one of the main hot spots. I mentioned a personal experience earlier, but it was never posted. I wonder why?
08:32 PM on 02/05/2012
You talked to them? What did they look like? Did they tell you the recipe to enhance the human mind thousandfold? So why didn't it work?

:-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wutrup
We are here to Evolve
08:56 PM on 02/05/2012
It was my first 'confrontation", in 06 an orb showed up on a mining site 35 miles NE of Albuq., about noon one day. Don't know if it was a camoflauge pattern in front of a large ship or what, definitely had intellengence. Produced a very mesmerizing effect. Emmitted telepathically, I nothing ... don't pay attention to me. This went on for about 15 minutes.
Of the two others I was with, one was going nuts about it, couldn't hardly take his eyes off it, had seen other strange stuff before. The other guy didn't see it at all, because I believe he didn't believe stuff like this existed. Knowing what I know now I would have liked to have tried to get it answer a few questions. Not that it would have.
I would liked to have know where it was from, at least in light years. etc. After a bit it met up with another one about 20-30 miles down the mountain range then disappeared.
12:49 PM on 02/05/2012
Im ready to move, who is with me $$$$.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
njdavenj
Trust No One ! "The X-Files"
03:16 AM on 02/05/2012
The information included in this news story about this "Super Sized Earth" was very sketchy at best. 22 light years away from where we currently exist. Is way beyond any and all technologies that we have currently invented, in order to arrive there in a timely manner. Nothing was stated about the actual specifics regarding this "new" planets atmosphere. Whether or not it is genuinely habitable for the ability to sustain the life of human beings and other Earth like, life forms. Most importantly, How does this group of scientist's know. Whether or not this "Super Earth" is currently inhabited with other forms of life? Life, similar to our own type of life on planet Earth. As opposed to the kind of life that would possibly perceive, us human beings as one perfect new source of food for their current residents? There are way too many unknown's. We do not have any ability to travel there now! The article stated that we are close to 150 years from arriving there. Based on conjectured expectation on future technology. 150 years from now. All human beings currently alive upon the face of our Earth will be physically dead. That is a known fact. What's to get so excited about for us?
03:44 AM on 02/05/2012
Well we will find that out in the near future, obviously you missed that this is a newly discovered planet and the research has not had a chance to go that far yet, rest assured they will be working on it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
njdavenj
Trust No One ! "The X-Files"
03:56 AM on 02/05/2012
If you re-read my post, I had stated that: "The informatio­n included in this news story about this "Super Sized Earth" was very sketchy at best". That declarative comment was based on the fact that the information is insufficient to come to any realistic conclusions! If you have a great need to disect any and all given post's. Please apply
the same exact standard to your own posting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darren J Cohen
I'm semi-awesome!
12:45 PM on 02/05/2012
They don't know. And they don't claim to know. They are only saying what they do know - that it's size and distance from the star make it possible that there's life. They are really only saying that they don't have any information about the planet that would exclude the possibility of life. Every time they learn about a new planet, they take what they know about it, and if they don't know of anything that would preclude the possibility of life, they put it in the 'possible' category. No one is claiming that life is there.

If you want to know how they know things like size, distance from star, and chemical make-up, well, that's where critical thinking comes in. That's where you have to research it yourself. All the answers are at your fingertips.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wiseuppeople
can I post on here or not ?
01:28 AM on 02/05/2012
I don't think you realize the gravity of the situation , Captain
photo
BannedInBoston
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
08:20 PM on 02/04/2012
This is exciting stuff, especially with the mention of interstellar probes. It the new planet is the same density as Earth, that would make it roughly 12-13 thousand miles in diameter with a surface gravity about 1-1/2 times Earth's. However, if the star system is metal poor, that might mean no iron core like Earth's and therefore no magnetosphere to keep out lethal stellar radiation. It would also be less dense than earth, so the surface gravity might not be much greater than ours. Life might develop at the bottom of deep oceans that would protect against the radiation but it's unlikely intelligent life would develop there.

We want fusion-powered star probes and we want them NOW!...
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
09:11 PM on 02/04/2012
Since 200,000 tonnes of space dust fall upon our Earth each year, one would think that NASA could invent a fusion engine that could use space dust as both fuel and propellant. There's also hydrogen, oxygen, and helium atoms within every cubic foot of interstellar space as well as dark matter. A space ship would eat this stuff as it moves along going faster and faster to the next star. Interstellar dust clouds would be rich in nuclear fusion fuel. The faster we go, the more fuel we'll encounter.
10:16 PM on 02/04/2012
You need either Deuterium or Helium 3 for Fusion. Space dust is mostly Iron and Iridium. Plus, why rely on 'space dust'. The ocean is a HUGE resevoir of Deuterium.
photo
BannedInBoston
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
11:37 PM on 02/04/2012
Robert Bussard explored one of these possibilities with his interstellar ramjet. The design has a huge scoop forward of the spacecraft that scoops up interstellar hydrogen and funnels it into the fusion drive. Conventional methods would propel the spacecraft to the neccesary speeds for the ram to work. (Larry Niven popularized rhe "Bussard ramjet" in his sci fi stories....)
10:18 PM on 02/04/2012
First Fusion Reactor that generates more energy than is put into it in 2017 (the ITER project). Frankly I'd like to see antimatter driven propulsion systems.
07:42 PM on 02/04/2012
What a total hunk of garbage to even ponder. Life as we know it cannot travel to even the nearest star, so why waste the money even looking. We need to spend that money here at home to help our people that we know exist.
photo
BannedInBoston
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
08:26 PM on 02/04/2012
The future of the human species lies in space. If we do no expand our living area beyond this one world, we will eventually stagnate and devolve. It is not an either/or choice. Cut the bloated Defense budget of this country by 75% and we will have the money for BOTH space exploration and social programs....
11:19 PM on 02/04/2012
It is a shame to spend so much on military actions. However, you might want to do some math on how man is going to escape this planet to another solar system. The obstacle is distance, velocity, and time - not rocket force. Even if successful, it would be an escape for a few with the other 7 to 9 billion doomed, according to your expectations.
photo
Ferrariqx
Who's NEXT?
09:03 PM on 02/04/2012
Just remember that the NASA expenditure is just a tiny fraction of the Federal budget. If NASA was eliminated and the money spent on social programs instead, it would only register a tiny blip. It would be like you standing on a scale and then a paper clip given to you to increase the weight.

NEXT!
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
10:15 PM on 02/04/2012
I bet that we spend much more on Twinkies and coffee. Twinkies went out of business cuz some bankers said that making them was a waste of money and time.
photo
BannedInBoston
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
12:08 AM on 02/05/2012
The place to cut is the _bloated Defense budget. We could safely _cut it by half and probably by 75%. The money could be used for BOTH space exploration and badly needed social programs. (I don't see why some people here seem to feel this is an either/or proposition. It's not....)