More

Lance Armstrong Doping Investigation Dropped: Prosecutors Close Inquiry, No Charges Filed

Lance Armstrong

GREG RISLING   02/ 3/12 11:58 PM ET  AP

LOS ANGELES — The case against Lance Armstrong is closed. His legacy as a seven-time Tour de France champion endures.

Federal prosecutors dropped their investigation of Armstrong on Friday, ending a nearly two-year effort aimed at determining whether the world's most famous cyclist and his teammates joined in a doping program during his greatest years.

Armstrong steadfastly has denied he doped during his unparalleled career, but the possibility of criminal charges threatened to stain not only his accomplishments, but his cancer charity work as well. Instead, another attempt to prove a star athlete used performance-enhancing drugs has fallen short, despite years of evidence gathering across two continents.

"I am gratified to learn that the U.S. Attorney's Office is closing its investigation," Armstrong said in a statement. "It is the right decision and I commend them for reaching it. I look forward to continuing my life as a father, a competitor, and an advocate in the fight against cancer without this distraction."

The probe, anchored in Los Angeles where a grand jury was presented evidence by federal prosecutors and heard testimony from Armstrong's former teammates and associates, began with a separate investigation of Rock Racing, a cycling team owned by fashion entrepreneur Michael Ball.

U.S. Attorney Andre Birotte Jr. announced in a press release that his office "is closing an investigation into allegations of federal criminal conduct by members and associates of a professional bicycle racing team owned in part by Lance Armstrong."

He didn't disclose the reason for the decision, though Birotte has used discretion in pursing high-profile criminal cases before. Last February, his office closed an investigation of mortgage giant Countrywide Financial Corp.

The pronouncement comes after a pair of less-than-successful cases against top sports figures accused of doping. Home run king Barry Bonds was found guilty of obstruction of justice and sentenced in December to 30 days' home detention – a conviction he's appealing – but prosecutors were unable to convince a jury he lied about using steroids. Roger Clemens' steroid trial is slated for April 17 after a judge declared a mistrial last summer when prosecutors showed jurors inadmissible evidence.

Investigators looked at whether a doping program was established for Armstrong's team while, at least part of the time, it received government sponsorship from the U.S. Postal Service. Authorities also examined whether Armstrong encouraged or facilitated doping on the team. He won the Tour de France every year from 1999-2005.

The hurdle for prosecutors wasn't so much to prove whether any particular cyclist used drugs, but to determine if Armstrong and other team members violated federal conspiracy, fraud or racketeering charges. Unlike Bonds and Clemens, who testified before a federal grand jury and Congress, respectively, and were accused of lying under oath, Armstrong was not questioned in front of the grand jury.

Betsy Andreu, who with her husband and former Armstrong teammate, Frank, accused the cycling champion of doping, said she was shocked by Birotte's decision.

"Our legal system failed us," she said. "This is what happens when you have a lot of money and you can buy attorneys who have people in high places in the Department of Justice."

Led by federal agent Jeff Novitzky, who also investigated Bonds and Clemens, U.S. authorities sought assistance overseas, requesting urine samples of U.S. Postal riders from France's anti-doping agency and also meeting with officials from Belgium, Spain and Italy.

Prosecutors also subpoenaed Armstrong supporters and ex-teammates to testify in Los Angeles. Among them were Ukrainian cyclist Yaroslav Popovych, who rode on three Armstrong teams dating back to 2005; Allen Lim, an exercise physiologist for Team Radioshack; and longtime Armstrong friend Stephanie McIlvain.

The investigation began after Novitzky was told about a cache of PEDs found by a landlord in the vacated apartment of Kyle Leogrande, a cyclist who rode for Rock Racing and had a doping ban, according to several people familiar with the case.

The case also was spurred by disgraced cyclist Floyd Landis, who claims Armstrong had a long-running doping system in place while they were teammates. Landis, who was stripped of the 2006 Tour de France title for drug use, acknowledged in 2010 he used performance-enhancing drugs after years of denying he cheated.

One of the most serious accusations came during a "60 Minutes" interview last May when former teammate Tyler Hamilton said he saw Armstrong use EPO during the 1999 Tour de France and in preparation for the 2000 and 2001 tours.

The report also said Armstrong loyalist George Hincapie, another ex-teammate, told federal authorities that he and Armstrong supplied each other with PEDs and discussed them. Hincapie released a statement after the segment aired, saying he did not speak with the show and didn't know where it got its information.

U.S. anti-doping officials said Friday they will not be dissuaded by the government's decision to close the Armstrong probe.

"Unlike the U.S. Attorney, USADA's job is to protect clean sport rather than enforce specific criminal laws," said Travis Tygart, chief executive officer of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency. "Our investigation into doping in the sport of cycling is continuing and we look forward to obtaining the information developed during the federal investigation."

As the investigation progressed, Armstrong assembled a legal team, hired a spokesman and briefly created a website to address any of the allegations reported by the media.

Frustrated by a slew of news articles about the investigation, Armstrong's attorneys filed a motion in July, asking a judge to order federal agents to testify about their contacts with reporters.

Armstrong consciously maintained a high profile throughout the investigation, raising money for his cancer charity, Livestrong, and racing in events such as off-road triathlons. He had no reason to hide, he said.

A spokeswoman for Livestrong, Katherine McLane, said the group was "very glad to hear this news." She called Armstrong an inspiration to millions of cancer survivors.

That could have played a role in prosecutors' decision, one expert said.

"The government always has a tremendous amount of prosecutorial discretion regarding whether or not to bring an indictment. In this case it appears that they have acted judiciously and likely considered all of the good works of Lance Armstrong and his foundation," said Mathew Rosengart, a former federal prosecutor who is not involved in the case.

___

Associated Press writers Pete Yost in Washington, Anthony McCartney in Los Angeles and Eddie Pells in Las Vegas contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SPORTS

LOS ANGELES — The case against Lance Armstrong is closed. His legacy as a seven-time Tour de France champion endures. Federal prosecutors dropped their investigation of Armstrong on Friday, end...
LOS ANGELES — The case against Lance Armstrong is closed. His legacy as a seven-time Tour de France champion endures. Federal prosecutors dropped their investigation of Armstrong on Friday, end...
Filed by Michael Klopman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,118
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
12:03 PM on 02/06/2012
Cheating certainly has no place in sport but perhaps federal prosecutors can spend two years and those reasources going after Wall Street criminals who committed fraud in the billions of dollars instead?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SocialD7
"truth, justis and...all of that stuf"
08:42 AM on 02/06/2012
Breaking news, looks like Alberto Contador is going to have to take two years off for doping and will loose his 2010 tour title, a little FYI. More BS in the sport, It shouldn't take a year and a half to have made this decision. I'm sure Andy isn't happy about obtaining the title this way.
photo
jeremyemilio
My micro-bio is NOT empty
11:31 AM on 02/06/2012
Pretty sure Andy was doping, too... so he's probably not too, too upset about it.
04:04 PM on 02/06/2012
Credit given for "time served", though he loses his wins during that period. He's cleared to race on August 6 of this year.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mmike1969
06:31 PM on 02/05/2012
Kind of tells me they had no proof in the first place.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:22 PM on 02/04/2012
If we did not put so much importance on athletic ability, the whole investigation would not have happened and we could have saved money for more important issue such as education but unfortunately we value sport achievement above intellectual accomplishment. The whole cycling or any other athletic event is an entertainment including baseball. Drug use is not an important issue in the whole scheme of things.
08:20 PM on 02/04/2012
Couldn’t agree more about the importance placed on sports. However, performance enhancing drug use flows downhill. To stay on the pro team drugs are used, to make the college team for a chance at the pros, drugs are used, to get the college scholarship...
There are always idiots who use and unfortunately raise the “performance bar” for everyone. I don’t want the student athletes at my kid’s high school feeling they need performance enhancers to compete. That’s why the pros need to be stopped.
photo
MISTERUNCONVENTIONAL
The only attitude I've ever had is a bad one.
07:12 PM on 02/04/2012
The rumor goes:

When Armstrong was diagnosed with cancer he spilled the beans to his MD's about what kinds of dope he'd been using, dosages, etc.

Bound by patient confidentiality, however, they will NEVER confirm or deny that report. To do so might cost them THEIR license.
photo
MISTERUNCONVENTIONAL
The only attitude I've ever had is a bad one.
07:47 PM on 02/04/2012
I'm not saying I subscribe to it, I'm merely pointing out it's perfect as far as a rumor goes because A) It's plausible, and B) there will never be ANYONE willing to confirm OR deny it.
08:06 PM on 02/04/2012
Rumors are carried by haters, spread by fools, and accepted by idiots.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChazAtlas
06:59 PM on 02/04/2012
I guess Barry Bonds should have done more charity work for cancer.
07:27 PM on 02/04/2012
Bonds tested positive and lied to a grand jury, Armstrong did neither.
photo
SolarArray
Republican = Trash America, Any Cost
08:28 PM on 02/04/2012
That's a lie, he did test positive and there's lots of info on that. He's a cheater, a liar, an egomaniac, a criminal. Can't stand the guy.
12:50 PM on 02/07/2012
You are incorrect. Armstong HAS tested positive: he tested positive in the 1999 Tour de France (cleared with a backdated TUE) and again in the 2001 Tour de Suisse (covered up by a $100,000 "donation" to the UCI).
Apparently, the GJ were going to charge him and others http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/concerns-over-closure-of-federal-investigation-into-armstrong-and-us-postal
06:45 PM on 02/04/2012
he doped no doubt about it.....
12:04 PM on 02/06/2012
And you would definitely know without a doubt ...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just walkin the dog here
So, just where is this micro-bio? This it?
06:27 PM on 02/04/2012
At any given time in whatever sport or activity, someone is the best. And being the best, do we always have to assume that they are juicing? Can't they just be the best. especially when they show it isn't a fluke, and as a result get tested even more closely?

Come on, the people that do the testing aren't incompetent. They have the best tools and they did their job.
photo
jeremyemilio
My micro-bio is NOT empty
11:36 AM on 02/06/2012
Depends upon the sport. Bodybuilding and cycling? Yup. The winner is doping... along with at least the top 20 or so.

How do we know? Because doping provides SUCH a HUGE advantage in these sports that it's impossible for someone who is not doping to keep up. (Unlike football, baseball, basketball, etc., which have a lot of intangeable factors that make doping somewhat less significant.)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
illegalneocon
05:38 PM on 02/04/2012
At the highest level of any sport, you MUST dope. The difference is the better training, dedication and mental strength.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Scott
Goat in the Thicket -- UR 2600 b.c.
09:39 PM on 02/04/2012
precisely.
it's naive to believe with all that's at stake, that sufficient screening methods and cycling schedules allow for enhancers to be on-board or substantially wrung out of their gains before tapering and testing.....

so what? if they're all doping, it's the same contest, requiring full DAYS on the bike, at high performance, training at levels that would break people's will just to contemplate it......nothing can change the need for the training, so why kid ourselves that it's anything a merely higher platform of performance, raised by medicines in this last century and now, and is the harbringer of athletics to come...if you look at youths, blown-up to preposterous sizes in the 'farm leagues,' I mean, of course, the colleges athletic systems.
photo
jeremyemilio
My micro-bio is NOT empty
11:38 AM on 02/06/2012
Well... then there's the lying and pretending you're a saint and all that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ron ray
mad as heck moderate who won't take it much longer
01:16 AM on 02/05/2012
and you know this from being at the highest level of what sport? you're saying Tiger, Tom Brady, Lyndsay Vonn and I don't know who else must be on dope?

does it make you feel better to believe this?
photo
CatHead
My micro-bio does not meet the guidelines...
05:26 PM on 02/04/2012
Within cycling, Lance is well known as a prickly, abrasive, and ultra competitive rider who talks trash and rubs even his team members the wrong way.

In other words, he was the King of Arseholes in a world full of arseholes. That is one reason he was able to climb to the top and stay there.

Nice guys finish second...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Scott
Goat in the Thicket -- UR 2600 b.c.
09:44 PM on 02/04/2012
I have heard similar accounts...wondering of course if it wasn't competitor's sour grapes, but then, you don't win that race seven times without an astonishing will-power and drive which I suppose amounts to super-human, extra-human, and therefore not normal human, in your activities and self-regard, but definitely not boring either, not by far.
cha-ching!

and why not.
the guy's a superhuman and has our country's flag on his jersey and even though he supported Bush I must forgive him his sheltered youth (the big C is a real soft cushy beginning...) and realize that he evolves and will in time, un-twist his political reasoning.
05:23 PM on 02/04/2012
The system is truly aimed at the Middle and Lower class. If you are wealthy and can afford a PR firm, then no questions need to be asked. Case closed. Warcriminals are free.
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
05:15 PM on 02/04/2012
I started following the Tour of France when Greg LeMond arrived on the scene and he was great to watch. In fact, he was brilliant...seemed super human. I continued following the Tour when Lance arrived on the scene too. Like Greg, Lance was always brilliant. But the brilliance lasted for seven years. I never questioned either rider's ability, they were just special and worked extremely hard for their success, while surrounded with excellent support.

Then, watching Lance make his come back after several years layoff...then place third was incredible...I couldn't believe he could pull it off. So, I'll never question whether Lance didn't earn his victories. As far as I'm concerned, Lance is the greatest bicycle riding Champion ever...

And for those who choose to deny reality or denigrate him in anyway: People always fear what they know most about themselves and that's no reflection on Lance in anyway, shape or form.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dadoorsron
06:51 PM on 02/04/2012
Lance by far is the greatest Tour de France rider ever. Eddy Merckx is the greatest cyclist ever.
12:07 PM on 02/06/2012
Exactly, and thanks for pointing it out. Most Americans don't know cycling history at all and don't understand Lance was fairly one-dimensional in that he trained every year to win one race, where Merckx won everything. You could even make an arguement that merckx was a better Tour de France rider because he also won every jersey, including the green jersey but Armstrong probably gets the nod with 7 wins.
04:59 PM on 02/04/2012
They are ending the investigation just because there is no evidence? GO LANCE.
Linda from Deerfield
Paying attention
04:36 PM on 02/04/2012
I don't have an opinion about Lance Armstrong in all of this doping stuff, but I must say that I found the cancer related reporting at his Livestrong web site to be much more complete and useful than what I found at the Susan G. Komen site. Well done -- thanks, Lance.
04:30 PM on 02/04/2012
It doesn't matter what anyone says or does, what the actual truth is, there will always be those who think Lance cheated. It's the same symptom as the birthers. No amount of evidence would be convincing. There will always be doubt about anyone who competes in the Tour de France. No matter how clean they race.
photo
jeremyemilio
My micro-bio is NOT empty
11:42 AM on 02/06/2012
To say there are clean Tour de France winners in modern cycling is as naive as suggesting there are clean Mr Olympia winners in modern bodybuilding.

Do a bit of research into the type of doping cyclists do and you will realise that the advantage gained by dopers is far too much for clean cyclists to overcome.

It ain't baseball.