iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

No-Zero Grading Policy In Lowndes County Schools Require Retesting Opportunities For Failing Students (UPDATED)

No Zero Policy

First Posted: 02/ 3/2012 5:16 pm Updated: 02/ 5/2012 11:36 am

Lowndes County Schools students in Georgia can relax a little -- 3rd through 8th graders can no longer receive zeros on assignments.

Under a new policy, report cards and progress reports will reflect a 60 out of 100 as the lowest grade, and teachers must offer students opportunities to retake tests and redo assignments until a passing grade is earned. The highest grade earned will be recorded, and teachers cannot record zeros, but can give an "incomplete" for work not turned in after insisting that the assignment be completed.

UPDATE 2/5/2012 11:00 A.M.: Lowndes County Schools Superintendent E. Steven Smith issued a statement Saturday. Read more below. The district has also posted the full text of the new guidelines online. See end of story to read the full guide.

The grading guide states that teachers should not be satisfied with issuing grades below a student's potential. According to The Valdosta Daily Times:

Essentially, even though a child has the potential to make an A, but doesn’t do the work and makes an F, that F should not count because the child is ostensibly smart enough to make the A.

"Assigning a grade of zero is equivalent to giving up on a child," Assistant Superintendent of Lowndes County Schools Troy Davis told The Valdosta Daily Times. "In education, the goal is to truly learn the material rather than simply earn a grade."

The Atlanta Journal Constitution has an excerpt from the new grade guide:

All children will be given the opportunity to learn and redo assignments, especially if a child makes a failing grade. Daily grades and test grades are included. If your child scores below 70 percent, the teacher is to re-teach the standard using a variety of resources, including technology. After the intervention/reteaching, the teacher is to reassess, and your child will receive the higher grade attained -- not an average of the two assessments or assignments. Reassessment is required once for all children scoring below 70 percent on assignments used for grading purposes. We want all children to improve. Even, a child scoring above 70 percent should be afforded an opportunity to improve as well. Additional reassessments for all children are at the discretion of the teacher and/or school administration.

Zeros are unacceptable. Teachers are to give your child an I (Incomplete) for work not turned in and are to insist that the assignment is completed. Zeros will not be used. If your child consistently scores below 70 percent, the teacher is to contact you and arrange for a conference. Teachers should seek help in determining what other resources are available to help your child, including -- but not limited to -- academic coaches, team leaders, grade chairs, counselors, administration, or the Response to Intervention process (i.e., classroom modifications, student support team, special education). Teachers are required to communicate often and well with you, and grades are expected to be posted to the Parent Portal grade book no less than once per week.

The debate around no-zero policies goes various ways. Supporters say it forces teachers to coach students through material until mastery, versus ending a lesson with a test, which a student may fail but not have an opportunity to thoroughly learn it at his own pace. Critics frustrated with these policies argue that it allows students to skirt responsibility and when a student simply refuses to commit to learning or complete assignments, there's little a teacher can do.

"How else do adolescents learn that there are consequences for failure to comply with assignments?" AJC's Maureen Downey writes. "In the classroom, it is a zero. In the workplace, it is termination."

In a statement issued Saturday, Lowndes County Schools Superintendent E. Steven Smith said much of the controversy surrounding the new grading guidelines stems from miscommunication and misunderstanding.

"Unfortunately, some persons have read into the guidelines concepts that do not exist," Smith said. "Students will not be given passing grades -- they must earn passing scores. Students will not be excused from doing assignments or taking tests. Students will be provided opportunities to improve. We understand that students learn at different rates, and our goal is for all students to master course content. In a school system that aspires to excellence every day, failure is not acceptable."

Smith notes in his statement that district officials could have presented the information more clearly to parents and gathered more community feedback before implementing the policy. The district will continue to assess and evaluate the new grading methods over the next year and a half.

A number of districts across the country have toyed with similar policies and have seen mixed results. Schools in Virginia have adopted variations of no-zero policies or guidelines in an effort to curb failure rates -- and increase student chances of graduation. Those in Tennessee are targeting lagging students, offering them more time and attention to make sure they don't receive zeros on assignments.

When school districts in Texas tried to adopt a no-zero policy, however, a judge ruled that schools are required to give students truthful grades under a 2009 state law. School officials fought back, arguing that prohibiting teachers from issuing low grades can help curb student discouragement and dropouts.

Lowndes County's new guidelines come as President Barack Obama called for a policy during his State of the Union address last week that requires students to stay in school until they graduate or turn 18.

But such a policy can be expensive and difficult to implement, especially for recession-addled states.

"The inattention to dropouts in a lot of states is shocking," Andy Rotherham, an education consultant and former Clinton education advisor told HuffPost last week.

Still, the question remains: Can a no-zero policy accurately, fairly and effectively improve learning and keep students in school?

Lowndes County Grading Information - Parent Guide to Grading (2)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

Lowndes County Schools students in Georgia can relax a little -- 3rd through 8th graders can no longer receive zeros on assignments. Under a new policy, report cards and progress reports will refle...
Lowndes County Schools students in Georgia can relax a little -- 3rd through 8th graders can no longer receive zeros on assignments. Under a new policy, report cards and progress reports will refle...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 478
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:45 PM on 02/23/2012
Yeah, zeros really screw up the curve!!!!
11:18 PM on 02/10/2012
This school is doing these students an injustice by letting this happen. I am a teacher in a school district that has this type of grading at the Middle School and then regular "accountability" grading at the High School. What we see year in an year out are students that are simple apathetic towards their grades, work, and overall performance. By creating an accountable, responsible student at the lower grade levels you are preparing these students to succeed later on in life. They won't be so suprised when they face adversity and not have to rely on a "do over" (as if that would happen) with their job.
10:47 AM on 02/08/2012
Way to prepare students for real life! If you don't turn in reports or other projects at work, they are not going to keep giving you second chances. Eventually, you will get fired. If you do you reports or other projects in a way that is unacceptable they are not going to keep giving them back to you to redo them. Eventually, you will get fired. These types of policies are not teaching students that they are responsible for their own success in life.
09:16 AM on 02/08/2012
Way to dumb down the schools...OBAMA
11:23 PM on 02/10/2012
Obviously you are not smart enough to realize that he has nothing to do with this. For most schools, this policy is driven by the schools principal and their philosophy on grading. Not Obama's issue or problem. But by all means, make this political when it's not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ty LaRue
Don't push me cause I'm close to the edge
06:04 PM on 03/08/2012
What does President Obama have to do with this?
08:45 AM on 02/08/2012
I can't believe this is even a debate. The people that are for this must be educators in name only. Anyone that has ever dealt with students that doesn't realize this is just a free pass for them to do what they want when they want should not be in education at all. School isn't just about learning that 2+2=4. School is also about learning priorities, time management, and initiative.

I also find it hilarious that the people that support this type of thinking say things like "you're cheating the student by teaching for a grade and not for them to learn the material". Are you not cheating the students out of learning the value of time management by removing all responsibility for keeping up with the class from their shoulders?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
benji85
02:56 PM on 02/07/2012
This is basically teaching kids it's okay to fail.
12:23 PM on 02/07/2012
The first school I taught in had this policy. In theory, the idea that kids should have the chance to redo things until they've learned the material and not doing the work is not acceptable is a good one ... until the paperwork nightmare begins.

At the end of the school year, I still had students with an I from the first grading period. I was the one jumping through hoops, making copy after copy, calling parents, arranging before and after school times even weekend times to sit down with students to get the missing assignments finished, etc. I was left with two choices: either come up with "easy" or no assignments and lower my expectations or burn myself out.

Assignment wise, some of the kids quicly figured out how to work the system. After the assignments were returned, they got together and basically copied the correct answers and shared with those who didn't complete the assignment. Worked well for them since the maximum we were allowed to deduct was 10% after one week late. I could pretty much predict whose assignements would be late based on if there was a basketball game that night or if it was ballet night or if American Idol was on.

... more ...
12:25 PM on 02/07/2012
... continued ...

Parents loved this system because their child's grades were high, kids loved it because there was very little pressure on them to manange their time or even learn from assignments and the adminstration loved it because parents and students were happy and had one less thing to complain about and bother them. Teachers on the other hand found very little to like. The teacher turn over rate was incredibly high for a school serving an upper middle and middle class area. I felt like my students learned less academically because of this attitude toward punctuality. I sometimes had no idea if they understood the material or not until test time because so many assignments had either not been turned in or had been copied later. I tried giving more frequent quizzes to gauge learning, but with the re-do policy, that meant more work for me as well.

As an aside, I moved to teaching at a different school and felt my students were better served. I was able to put my time and efforts into helping kids learn vs helping kids get better grades.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:29 AM on 02/07/2012
What a joke! If the assignments deserve a zero, then it is a zero. They are not helping students by ignoring a poor assignment. They then become adults who cannot handle a failure and do not have the mechanisms to pick themselves up, plow through and improve.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LearningCommunity
Finding Solutions that work
08:42 AM on 02/07/2012
Interesting story and predictable posts.

For me one key statement in the article is, "In education, the goal is to truly learn the material rather than simply earn a grade."

Grading is always an adventure. Often times I think grading has more to do with my students ability to give me what I want, rather than any learning on the students part.

I am always interested in finding better ways to achieve student learning. I would not dismiss this approach out of hand. I would like to see the results first.
08:23 AM on 02/07/2012
Just to make my point down page more succinct let me rephrase.

The problem is the focus on the teachers. Kids aren't doing well, so teachers have to change what they do. Kids don't score well--time to change those zero's to 60's and have the teachers reteach.

This was all started as way to fund failing private schools (religious) with public tax dollars. The blind allegiance of the NEA and AFT to the Democrats then made teachers bigger targets. So, bills like NCLB come along, and they are insidious.

These bills are very subtle how they use people's good intentions about education in order to make teachers look bad. They say things like , "look at the students," they're failing, so teaching has to change. It kind of sounds reasonable until you think about it.

The problem is that this entire mindset frees students of responsibilities and places inevitable failures of students as a problem teachers are responsible for fixing.

Try this: let individual teachers do what they feel is best and then protect their sovereignty in the classroom. Teachers need to be shielded from the public because it's not their job to make the parents happy.

Sadly, admin gets dumped on by parents every day because parents have been appeased previously.

It's surprising to how many educators don't understand what's happening. As tenure erodes, do you the teaching will improve? Nope, but the grades sure will.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:02 PM on 02/07/2012
oh, bless you. would that anyone were interested in reality.
01:03 AM on 02/07/2012
After rereading the beginning of the article, the minimum grade of 60 does sort of make sense. I grade with a 50% F. What that means in the lowest grade a student can receive in my class for work completed is 50%. When you think about it, a student with a 70% (C) only has to increase their grade by 10 points to raise it to a B, so why should a struggling student (keep in mind that I teach special ed) who perhaps has a 40% in a class would have to raise their grade by 20 points to get a passing grade of an F. The 50% F levels the playing field for many special needs students who have been forced into general ed classes because of inclusion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:38 AM on 02/07/2012
Because if the curriculum is not suitable, then wouldn't a slew of faling grades perhaps make that obvious? If the children have been "forced" where they should not be, why gloss over that they have been inappropriately placed with passing, or even inflated failing grade?
08:45 AM on 02/07/2012
The curriculum I teach is not suitable. I work with children who are academically at a 2nd-3rd grade level but I am required to teach them 7th grade materials because that is what they are "tested on". If I had my choice I would skill be teaching them remedial skills, but I am required to get them "ready" for pre-algebra next year since our district has decided to get rid of all remedial classes.
09:36 AM on 02/24/2012
Inclusion is mostly about saving money.
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
08:05 AM on 02/07/2012
Part of education, particularly relative to one's ability to contribute as an adult, is the initiative to be educated and contribute. This proposal essentially continues to lower the bar in our children's development and abilities.

Lowering the "acceptability" threshold within a district, or state, or even our nation, says nothing about the children's ability to contribute/compete on a scale outside localized relative "standards"

I think this is pathetic. Our universities are being flooded with foreign students who have not only far better basic skills, but have the initiative to learn and exceed. While lowering our standards in K-12, other countries are raising theirs.
10:41 AM on 02/07/2012
So, a 0 out of 100 would be better? 'No hope of ever getting an A or B, and having to work like crazy to earn a C' would motivate kids to take more initiative? Giving students a 0 out of a 100 for anything, is a gross misuse of the 100 point scale. It puts students in an inescapable hole. 0 out of 4 would be slightly less egregious - however, are they really a 0? In most cases, I doubt it. In most of these cases they simply haven't turned in enough evidence, or shown enough information on assessments, to be given an accurate grade...in that case, give that grade...Not Enough Evidence.

Lowering the "acceptability" threshold has NOTHING to do with this discussion. NOTHING. Let me repeat - NOTHING. If implemented properly, this is completely about giving more accurate, fair and useful information to students and parents.

If you can't see that (or, more likely, refuse to see it) you need to study the situation further. Turn off your emotional gut reaction for a minute & watch the Standards Based Grading videos by Wormeli on You Tube - you'll get it... eventually. I hope.
12:56 AM on 02/07/2012
My school's policy is that a student can redo a test or assignment as many times as they want, but only for the educational "growth" derived from doing so. They cannot retest for a higher grade.
08:59 PM on 02/06/2012
So, you're the teacher and you have 150 little Johnny's and little Jill's. Some of them are just not into school (we force them to attend, is it really that surprising). If you fail Johnny or Jill you'll be held responsible and have to reteach/regrade, call home, email admin, etc..

Some teachers will probably burn themselves out trying to make this work, the vast majority will take the hint and just pass little Johnny and little Jill.

The problem, it seems to me, with so much reform is that it takes so much responsibility away from the students.
08:47 AM on 02/07/2012
What? The 'students' have responsibility here? Personal responsibility you say?!?! I thought when little Johnny or Jill fail, their parents just BLAME the school AND their teachers for NOT educating the kiddies. This is besides the point that the PARENTS aren't helping them at home (parental responsibility) because THEY were just 'Passed Along' in public schools in the past themselves. THEY can't grasp the requisite subject matter to be of ANY assistance to their children. Some wicked vicious cycle, eh?!
08:48 PM on 02/06/2012
This is so idiotic. I was a math teacher for 8 years and I gave a handful of zeroes out and I never enjoyed it and would get extraordinarily upset. I don't think people realize it's almost as difficult to get a zero as it is to get 100% and it's not as though teachers aren't willing to work with kids to help them improve. I gave my kids time to work on things in class, ask questions, was available before and after school so there were plenty of opportunities. A 0 indicates the student did not understand any of the material and you don't deserve anything higher if you showed no understanding of the material. High School does not get kids ready for the adult world and it's not the fault of teachers, we talk about it and we would like to get them better prepared but when you have idiotic policies like this it's impossible to prepare them adequately.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
10YearTeacher
08:47 PM on 02/06/2012
Complete nonsense. So a student who just does not turn something in still gets a D-. Not that that is a good grade, but some students have to actually work to get the grades they receive.
10:47 AM on 02/07/2012
Nope - wrong. They should get an 'incomplete', 'not enough evidence' or 'missing assignment/assessment.' Don't read something in to the story that isn't there! If done correctly, they should not pass any level until they have demonstrated their ability. The story NEVER says they get a passing grade - you've assumed that. It just says they don't get a 0 or an F.