Andrew Lloyd Webber On 'Love Never Dies,' 'The Phantom Of The Opera' Sequel 20 Years In The Making

Posted: 02/ 6/2012 8:36 am

Andrew Lloyd Webber has been working on a sequel to his iconic show, "The Phantom of the Opera," for more than 20 years. But the process has not been without its challenges.

Early work on the production, which imagined the Phantom in a Manhattan penthouse, fell apart in the 1990s. After seeing a documentary about Coney Island, Webber decided to move the Phantom there, picking up the project again in 2006. In 2007, production was delayed further when Lloyd Webber's kitten Otto climbed onto his digital piano and deleted the score.

The show finally opened in London in March 2010, and closed just 18 months later -- a disappointing run, considering the long-term success of "The Phantom of the Opera," Broadway's longest-running show. "Phantom" has been performed more than 9,900 times since its opening. With lush, romantic music and a plot to match, the story of the mysterious musical genius living underneath the Paris Opera House and his love for a young soprano has captivated audiences since 1986.

So what happens when you take the Phantom out of Paris? Set in 1907, ten years after the end of the original, "Love Never Dies" brings Christine, Raoul, and their young son Gustave to New York. Once there, they're brought into Phantasma, the Phantom's new theater featuring carnival freaks and variety shows starring Meg Giry (Christine's friend from the old days).

Fans protective of the original mythology might disapprove: Raoul, once an aristocratic hero, has devolved into a dissolute gambler. But when Christine and the Phantom meet again, it becomes clear that theirs is the love story we are meant to root for. It's even revealed that the two had a passionate night before the Phantom fled Paris -- resulting in a son, Gustave. Song, dance, and chaos ensue.

Though the show was expected to open on Broadway this spring, these plans were put on hold following unfavorable fan reception. Instead, a production filmed in Melbourne in 2011 will be released to the big screens in America for two nights on Februrary 28th and March 7th. The Melbourne production features stage pyrotechnics even more baroque than the original, with one key scene set amidst the dancing bodies of Coney Island's freaks.

We sat down with Lloyd Webber to discuss the process behind "Love Never Dies," and his hopes for the show.

Why is "Love Never Dies" being released on film before it comes to stages in the U.S.?
What I think is very exciting is that the skill and the technology now exists to the degree you can film a stage show in that way. You can add a completely new dimension to all musical theater with the ability to get up so close to the performers.

What compelled you to write a sequel to the original?
I'm obviously very fond of the principal characters, of Christine and the Phantom. Without giving anything away, in a sense, I was wanting to develop the relationship and close it. It closes a chapter in my musical life, which I wanted to complete.

Why Coney Island?
If the Phantom had gone anywhere he would have gone somewhere he would not have been noticed. Coney Island was extremely well known for its freaks. You read things about it you can't dream of seeing today that would be his home, because he would not be noticed. A man in a mask would not be conspicuous.

"Love Never Dies" combines motifs from the original show, which has a European setting, with new music that draws on American song traditions, like vaudeville. How did you come up with this music?
I wrote what I thought was right from the story. That's the inspiration for any show -- the story inspires you. I'm very story driven. You could have a really great song in the wrong show in the wrong place.

Raoul is almost a villain in "Love Never Dies." Why did the love story become exclusively the Phantom and Christine's?
Raoul could never offer her the music, everything that makes a performer tick. That was aways going to be a problem. The development of the relationship between Phantom and Christine is what interests me, the moment where they actually see each other again for the first time in ten years.

And the Phantom and Christine spent a night together once?
It happens after the end of the old Phantom, it's always clear. "The Phantom of the Opera" is about love, it's as simple as that. It's a piece of high romance, and that's what I originally wanted to write 25 years ago and that's what the piece is --love never dies -- it's about precisely that. The one thing you do of course know is that in her heart of hearts she's overjoyed to see him again. I think we've all had that experience.

WATCH: Sierra Boggess and Andrew Lloyd Webber perform title song, "Love Never Dies":



FOLLOW HUFFPOST CULTURE

Andrew Lloyd Webber has been working on a sequel to his iconic show, "The Phantom of the Opera," for more than 20 years. But the process has not been without its challenges. Early work on the prod...
Andrew Lloyd Webber has been working on a sequel to his iconic show, "The Phantom of the Opera," for more than 20 years. But the process has not been without its challenges. Early work on the prod...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:09 AM on 04/08/2013
Im happy that Christine and Phantom ended up together. :) I have always love the movie Phantom of the Opera and now liking Love Never Dies.
04:13 PM on 04/02/2012
@Kathy: The whole Erik/Christine/child plot is alluded to in the original book, which is how it came to be part of the sequel. While Sir Webber did creatively re-write the whole Phantom tale, he kept bits integral to the original story. The original book was laughable in many respects, implausible in others, and had a terrible issue with timelines (ironically, so did ALW, but so do soap operas ;p). However, as a Phan, one should give the original book a whirl. Don't let plot holes disillusion you...theatre is riddled with them...theatre is about the senses, never the plot. :)))
01:52 PM on 02/09/2012
First I got chills, then I read the part where Christine had the phantoms' baby and reality set in. That plot twist is so Hollywood I'm afraid that this project isn't about the beauty of the story, characters or music but maybe motivated by money. Sh*t. I want to be wrong about this.
photo
EmilyRose 85
A green city on a blue lake.
10:26 PM on 02/08/2012
I thought "Til I Hear You Sing" was beautiful but I wasn't crazy about the soundtrack. Maybe watching it staged will improve it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
NYC07
Ceci n'est pas un micro-bio
11:12 AM on 02/08/2012
In 2007, production was delayed further when Lloyd Webber's kitten Otto climbed onto his digital piano and deleted the score.

Give that Kitten a hand !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We were saved for awhile.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Analog Synthesizer
Music is what makes the world go 'round
05:54 PM on 02/07/2012
I saw Phantom of the Opera in Toronto with Colm Wilkinson and Rebecca Caine. It was so incredibly beautiful.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Just My Thoughts 2011
Life's but a walking shadow
11:38 AM on 02/07/2012
I am skeptical, but will want to see it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pandag
A false tale often betrays itself. Aesop 620 BC
10:33 PM on 02/06/2012
WTF! This follows Michael Crawford, and all the other fabulous talents.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cameron d
Good Guys Win
07:50 PM on 02/06/2012
I can't think about Andrew Lloyd Webber without thinking about Paul F. Tompkins impression of him. Oh, and roller skates. That's all I've got.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
manelady
Being Progressive means moving forward
07:33 PM on 02/06/2012
These things never work out. When you have a beloved piece, why mess with the memory.
01:36 PM on 02/07/2012
That's what Phantom fans have been saying since the book this is based on came out (Phantom of Manhattan)
03:21 PM on 02/06/2012
Doesnt the song sound very similar to You Must Love Me, from Evita? Its like ALW just keeps using the same tones over and over
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keith w oliver
a dingo ate my micro-bio!!! >:O
09:31 PM on 02/13/2012
i've never had an issue with webber doing that, but evita is my favourite of his, and you are right, it is so similar, that it begs the question: is he just trying to force it, at this point?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madcityy
03:12 PM on 02/06/2012
good
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rutroGeorge
Silence is Golden, unless I have something to bark
12:34 PM on 02/06/2012
This tune sounds very close to the song sung at the end of the Phantom of the Opera Movie DVD during credits, like a variation on a theme.
01:39 PM on 02/07/2012
There are parts of Love Never Dies which were originally written for the Phantom movie. The part that I know off the top of the head is the journey to the graveyard where Christine is going to the graveyard to see her father, being driven by the Phantom, and Raoul is going after her on a white horse.

There are Phantom themes within Love Never Dies, as well, ALW trying to tie the pieces together. (but fails dismally IMHO)
11:42 AM on 02/06/2012
Well I for one am excited. I always considered Raul the villian in The Original Phantom. I think this is the romantic ending we always wanted! I can't wait!
01:41 PM on 02/07/2012
How can Raoul be the villain when Christine loves him and leaves with him on her own?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keith w oliver
a dingo ate my micro-bio!!! >:O
09:36 PM on 02/13/2012
my (ex-, now) girlfriend at the time that i saw it in n.y. ('03) thought the same thing mommahurley did -- based on the fact that she viewed it as a triangle, and wished for the phantom to win.
which.....
kinda gives you insight as to why she's my *ex-*girlfriend
guilatty
Something has got to make sense eventually
11:18 AM on 02/06/2012
A bad idea. Even the best art can only hope to capture one moment in time. A sequel is not art, it is business.
11:45 AM on 02/06/2012
I'm excited! Phantom of the Opera was a great book and I absolutely loved Webber's movie. I've also read the sequel book "Phantom of Manhattan" and loved it. Have been waiting and hoping Webber would make the sequel...judging by what I read, he is staying close to the book. I would like to see the return of the cast from his "Phantom of the Opera" movie though.
01:48 PM on 02/07/2012
At least the Phantom never wears a clown suit as he does in PoM.

But, it really isn't clear whether the Phantom is the father or not. I know in PoM Raoul is impotent so it's clear there, but in the musical they never say one way or the other.

IMHO, LND makes a better sequel to Schumacher's movie than it does to the musical, although many Phantom Phans seem to disagree with me on this...

SPOLIER!
They make Meg Giry the bad guy. She is the one who kills Christine, not the Phantom's assistant.

Oh, the night of passion happens after POTO takes place, not right before the Final Lair scene as it does in PoM

But having said all that, I find myself intrigued by this, and will see it. I'll probably count it among my guilty pleasures.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Booshin
Progressive=Moving Forward.
11:53 AM on 02/06/2012
Not always. Sometimes a sequel is an intellegant continuation of the story. See Episodes V and VI in Star Wars, most of the final Harry Potter books, and the LotR, which is essentially a sequel to "The Hobbit."

Of course, sometimes it is just business. Episodes I-III come to mind...