More

HuffPost Social Reading

EU Carbon Tax: China Bars Its Airlines From Paying Up

China Flouts Carbon Tax

By JOE McDONALD   02/ 6/12 11:49 AM ET  AP

BEIJING -- China announced Monday it will prohibit its airlines from paying European Union charges on carbon emissions, ratcheting up a global dispute over the cost of combatting climate change.

The charges are aimed at curbing emissions of climate-changing gases but governments including China, the United States and Russia oppose them. The ratings agency Fitch warned in December the conflict could spiral into a global trade dispute.

The Chinese air regulator said China's carriers are barred from paying the charges or other fees without government permission, the official Xinhua News Agency reported. It said Beijing will consider unspecified measures in response to protect Chinese companies.

There was no indication there would be any immediate impact on flights between China and Europe or penalties for Chinese airlines. The charges took effect in January but money will not be collected until next year.

The dispute highlights Beijing's complicated status in global climate efforts.

China is the biggest source of climate-changing gases but as a developing country is exempt from Kyoto Protocol emission limits. Owners of Chinese power plants and factories have received billions of dollars from a European system that pays developing countries to curb emissions but Beijing has resisted binding limits.

Under the European system, airlines flying to or from Europe must obtain certificates for carbon dioxide emissions. They will get free credits to cover most flights this year but must buy or trade for credits to cover the rest.

"China objects to the EU's decision to impose the scheme on non-EU airlines," Xinhua quoted a statement by the Civil Aviation Administration of China as saying.

The European Union ambassador to Beijing, Markus Ederer, defended the charges as consistent with Europe's efforts to be a "green leader" in curbing climate change and said they treat European and foreign carriers equally.

Ederer said it was too early to consider questions such as whether Chinese carriers might be compelled to pay. He said EU regulations include a provision to exempt carriers from countries with "equivalent measures" to curb carbon emissions.

"We are ready to engage in a discussion on recognizing the equivalent measures which would then exempt those airlines of those countries from the necessary dues that would have to be paid," he said at a previously scheduled news conference on EU relations with China.

Ederer said that with free credits taken into account, the added cost per passenger on a flight from Beijing to Brussels, the EU capital, would be 17.50 yuan or 1.90 euros ($2.70).

"I leave it to you to make a judgment on whether this is too much for saving the Earth, combating climate change and making headway together," he said.

In Brussels, spokesman for the EU's climate agency, Isaac Valero-Ladron, said he was confident Chinese airlines would eventually comply and said the agency remained opened to talks with Chinese officials over their concerns.

"We are telling them that this is our environmental legislation. It applies in Europe. If you want to do business in Europe you have to respect the law," Valero-Ladron said.

Environmentalists welcomed the European program, one of the most far-reaching measures adopted by any government to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Although only 3 percent of total human-caused carbon emissions come from aircraft, aviation is the fastest-growing source of carbon pollution.

U.S. airlines, supported by governments including China and India, filed a legal challenge to the charges but the EU's highest court upheld them in December.

Beijing could have unusually strong leverage in a possible dispute because its state-owned airlines carry large numbers of Chinese and other Asian tourists to Europe. Any disruption would hurt Europe's travel industry when the continent is struggling with a debt crisis and high unemployment.

The International Air Transport Association has criticized the charges as "market distorting." It says the EU should negotiate through the International Civil Aviation Organization to reach a global agreement.

IATA, which represents about 240 airlines that carry 84 percent of global air traffic, estimates the new rules will cost airlines up to 900 million euros ($1.2 billion) this year and rise to 2.8 billion euros in 2020.

Ederer said the EU was open to discussing the issue through ICAO.

___

Associated Press writer Raf Casert in Brussels contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TRAVEL

BEIJING -- China announced Monday it will prohibit its airlines from paying European Union charges on carbon emissions, ratcheting up a global dispute over the cost of combatting climate change. The ...
BEIJING -- China announced Monday it will prohibit its airlines from paying European Union charges on carbon emissions, ratcheting up a global dispute over the cost of combatting climate change. The ...
Filed by Rebecca Dolan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:22 AM on 02/08/2012
"US Checked Baggage Fees: US Govt Bars Its Citizens From Paying Up"

Now that's the headline I want to see.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:41 AM on 02/08/2012
Good for China.
photo
yeti7
not bigfoot
05:24 PM on 02/07/2012
Oh MG--- what now?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Why does this generation ask for a sign?
12:52 PM on 02/07/2012
"China announced Monday it will prohibit its airlines from paying European Union charges on carbon emissions"

The EU was hoping for some easy tax revenue.
12:50 PM on 02/07/2012
Here is an idea. Put the carbon tax on the fuel. That way everyone pays in proportion to the amount of CO2 they emit. Of course that would screw up Europes plans to leverage climate change for their own benefit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Milks
Ecologist
06:19 AM on 02/07/2012
'The International Air Transport Association has criticized the charges as "market distorting."'

The IATA would obviously prefer that emissions remain as externalities. Externalities, by definition, distort markets. The attempt by the EU to correct for one such externality isn't market distorting. It's correcting an already distorted market so that the price reflects the full cost of providing airline service.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
01:56 AM on 02/07/2012
No problem about them charging for carbon emissions over EU territory. However very arrogant to charge for carbon emissions over airspace en route to the eu.

Just start charging European airlines the same when them come to China and use the money to pay the EU
photo
yeti7
not bigfoot
05:26 PM on 02/07/2012
why even encourage the ridiculousness idea in the first place, it does nothing to stop CO2.
Stop flying so much might help with that.
06:42 PM on 02/06/2012
We'll just have to add a surcharge on any and all flights going to and from that country, put the dough in escrow and show them the bookeeping. At the end of the year, do an escrow dump into the proper enviornmental accounts and start the process all over again. China gets away with murder. If you don't stand up to them, they'll walk all over you.
photo
yeti7
not bigfoot
05:29 PM on 02/07/2012
what are you talking about? either put on the fuel as a tax because that is all they are doing is looking for revenue. It does nothing to actual stop C02 emissions.
Why don't the Europeans just quit flying all over the place?
04:15 PM on 02/06/2012
Airports and airlines may not like Europe’s attempts to cut emissions, but the ETS is here to stay. So instead of embarking of futile attempts to stop the EU in the courts, they should work towards developing new partnerships and best practise to support more sustainable cities.

Whilst airlines may not be the biggest emitter of greenhouse gases (2-4%), this figure will rise significantly if action is not taken. Global urbanisation means we now have more than 400 cities with populations over 1m, in a system already served by 1700 active airlines across 44,000 airports. These airports are increasingly important hubs and the burgeoning size and interconnectivity of cities, especially in Africa, China and India, can only worsen the damage caused by airlines.
But this growth also represents vast commercial potential for the aviation industry and serves to strengthen its opposition to change. Sector-based interest organisations (in this case airlines) and national government representatives are almost always the biggest threat to attempts to solve the issue of climate change. The stronghold of lobbyists in Washington (a total of about 25,000) ensures that commercial interests influence decision makers in both Congress and Senate, drastically curbing the impact of environmental concerns.

Read more at http://bit.ly/xbM4Xe
photo
yeti7
not bigfoot
05:31 PM on 02/07/2012
again limit the number of flights charging a "fee" does nothing.
05:52 PM on 02/07/2012
It is not the only solution. But an important principle - Polluter Pay Principle. For me this action from the US and China likely is a lobbyist paid by the airlines action.... It is time to find other tools involving cities and build network like the Clinton Foundation is doing. Hillery Clinton should talk with her husband..... Read more http://bit­.ly/xbM4Xe
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hsspringman
We can cure fundamentalist.
03:23 PM on 02/06/2012
The three least reasonable nations of the developed world do have a hard time being 'personally' responsible, go figure. The lack of willingness to take carbon admissions and climate change will come at a very high cost...and already is. From Island Nations being lost to sea level rise to Norfolk, VA and others soon to be unlivable.
06:21 PM on 02/06/2012
Well, there is no PROOF that these taxes or reducing carbon emission will do anything other than generate cash for gub'mints and their bloated ranks.

AGW is nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hsspringman
We can cure fundamentalist.
02:48 AM on 02/07/2012
Hey it worked for acid rain but you sound too young to remember that. Your ilk is just to dumn.
photo
yeti7
not bigfoot
05:33 PM on 02/07/2012
a tax or fee reduces co2 emissions? is that some kind of new physics?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Why does this generation ask for a sign?
12:58 PM on 02/07/2012
Galveston was proactive about it. Over a century ago, they jacked their ground 8 feet. They are good for another few centuries.

http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=46995

Imaging what we could do today.
03:17 PM on 02/06/2012
"In Brussels, spokesman for the EU's climate agency, Isaac Valero-Ladron, said he was confident Chinese airlines would eventually comply and said the agency remained opened to talks with Chinese officials over their concerns." Brussels needs to ask the US how the Korean War negotians are going...If the chinese negotiate the way the North Koreans do...they'll be waiting over 50 years before they see any money...LOL
photo
yeti7
not bigfoot
05:34 PM on 02/07/2012
right next year or so there won't even be an "EU"
03:04 PM on 02/06/2012
Honestly, is ANYONE surprised by this? The global warming chicken little's have to realize that NOTHING will be effective in cutting pollution until EVERYONE is on board, we make a minuscule difference when China , India, and the former Soviet Union states are only concerned with their OWN growing economies and we stifle our own with environmental regulations that cause our energy prices to soar... It is laughable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hsspringman
We can cure fundamentalist.
03:30 PM on 02/06/2012
No it is a goal, of which you seem to oppose? I suppose in favor of losing nearly ever coastal population and other low lying bit of land for miles and more inland. Am I surprised that humans are trying bring about a positive change while at the same time another group of humans are just being selfish, greedy, reckless and just plain stupid? Nope, not surprised one bit.
03:39 PM on 02/06/2012
What did you say? The sky is falling? Is that it Chicken Little?
06:22 PM on 02/06/2012
Wow. You should put down the science fiction novel and join reality.
dumocraps
My Screenname gets right to the point
02:40 PM on 02/06/2012
ROTFLMFAO
06:22 PM on 02/06/2012
It is DAMN funny F&F!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:44 PM on 02/06/2012
LOL LOL !! So the biggest polluter in the world just told them to shove it. Good for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hsspringman
We can cure fundamentalist.
03:33 PM on 02/06/2012
I think that you and following poster, dumascrap, need to buy a house in Norfolk.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:03 PM on 02/06/2012
And why is that my friend? Because several hundred years from now the water level may actually be up enough for us to notice?? How much are sea levels up in Norfolk?? 2 " in the last 150 years? See my friend i`m still waiting for Florida to be under water like Gore told us it would in his wonderful doc. He is only missing his estimates by a couple of thousand years.