iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Palestinian Hamas, Fatah Reach Deal On Unity Government

Palestinian Hamas Fatah Deal

KARIN LAUB and IBRAHIM BARZAK   02/ 6/12 09:33 PM ET  AP

RAMALLAH, West Bank — After months of wavering, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas took a decisive step Monday toward reconciliation with the Islamic militant group Hamas, a move Israel promptly warned would close the door to any future peace talks.

In a deal brokered by Qatar, Abbas will head an interim unity government to prepare for general elections in the Palestinian territories in the coming months. The agreement appeared to bring reconciliation – key to any statehood ambitions – within reach for the first time since the two sides set up rival Palestinian governments in the West Bank and Gaza in 2007.

Monday's deal, signed in the Qatari capital of Doha by Abbas and Hamas chief Khaled Mashaal, put an end to recent efforts by the international community to revive long-stalled negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians on the terms of Palestinian statehood. Abbas appears to have concluded that he has a better chance of repairing relations with Hamas, shunned by the West as a terror group, than reaching an agreement with Israel's hardline prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.

Netanyahu quickly condemned the Doha deal. "It's either peace with Hamas or peace with Israel. You can't have them both," he said in a warning to Abbas, who has enjoyed broad international support.

In moving closer to Hamas, Abbas risks losing some of that backing and hundreds of millions of dollars a year in aid.

Qatar, awash with cash from vast oil and gas reserves, assured the Palestinians that it would help limit any political and financial damages, according to Palestinian officials close to the talks.

Whether the Palestinian Authority loses any of the roughly $1 billion in foreign aid it received each year may partly depend on the interim government's political platform and Hamas' willingness to stay in the background.

The new government is to be made up of politically independent experts, according to the Doha agreement. If headed by Abbas, devoid of Hamas members and run according to his political principles, it could try to make a case to be accepted by the West. Abbas aides said they were optimistic they could win international recognition.

The Quartet of international Mideast mediators – the U.S., the U.N., the European Union and Russia – has said it would deal with any Palestinian government that renounces violence, recognizes Israel and supports a negotiated peace deal. Abbas has embraced these principles, while Hamas rejects them.

Top Abbas aides Nabil Shaath and Azzam al-Ahmed said they are confident the new government will be based on the Quartet principles. In any case, they said, the interim government's focus will be to prepare for presidential and parliamentary elections, not to negotiate with Israel. Such elections won't be held in May, as initially envisioned, they said, but could take place several months later.

In Washington, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said the U.S. was seeking more information about what was agreed, and that reconciliation was an internal matter for Palestinians.

"What matters to us are the principles that guide a Palestinian government going forward, in order for them to be able to play a constructive role for peace and building an independent state," Nuland said.

"Any Palestinian government must unambiguously and explicitly commit to nonviolence," she said. "It must recognize the state of Israel. And it must accept the previous agreements and obligations between the parties, including the road map. So those are our expectations."

Nuland declined to say if the Fatah-Hamas arrangement would advance or hurt peace talks with Israel. She also appeared hesitant to address Netanyahu's warning to Abbas that the Palestinians can have "peace with Hamas or peace with Israel."

"We maintain that both of these parties ought to stay committed to this process," Nuland told reporters.

The European Union offered qualified support Monday, saying it considers Palestinian reconciliation and elections as important steps toward Mideast peace. The EU, a major financial backer of Abbas' Palestinian Authority, "looks forward to continuing its support," provided the new government meets the Quartet demands, said Michael Mann, a spokesman for EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton.

Last year, Abbas and Mashaal struck a reconciliation deal that later became bogged down in disagreement over who would head an interim government. Hamas strongly opposed Abbas' initial choice of Salam Fayyad, the head of his Palestinian Authority.

Fayyad, an economist who is widely respected in the West, said Monday he welcomed the new deal even though it would cost him a job he has held since 2007.

The breakthrough came after two days of meetings between Abbas and Mashaal, hosted by Qatar's emir, Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani. After the signing, Abbas said that "we promise our people to implement this agreement as soon as possible."

Mashaal also said he was serious "about healing the wounds ... to reunite our people on the foundation of a political partnership, in order to devote our effort to resisting the (Israeli) occupation."

Abbas and Hamas have had bitter ideological differences, with Abbas pursuing a deal with Israel and the violently anti-Israel Hamas dismissing such talks as a waste of time. The rift deepened with Hamas' 2007 takeover of Gaza, which left Abbas with only the West Bank.

However, some of those differences seem to have narrowed in recent months.

Abbas has lost faith in reaching a deal, at least with Netanyahu. Low-level Israeli-Palestinian border talks last month – an attempt by the international community to revive formal negotiations after more than three years of paralysis – only highlighted the vast gaps.

The Palestinians want the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem, with minor border adjustments, for their state. Israel's outline of a border deal, presented last month, meant it wants to keep east Jerusalem and large chunks of the West Bank, not enough concessions to keep Abbas engaged.

Mashaal, meanwhile, has been prodding Hamas toward a more pragmatic stance that is closer to that of the group's parent movement, the pan-Arab Muslim Brotherhood. The Brotherhood scored election victories in Egypt and Tunisia in the wake of the pro-democracy protests of the Arab Spring, and has urged Hamas to moderate and reconcile with Abbas.

However, Mashaal represents Hamas in exile and appears to have had differences with the movement's more hardline leadership in Gaza, which stands to lose influence and jobs in a reconciliation deal. Some of the Gaza leaders have resisted Mashaal's push for unity and moving closer to the Brotherhood, Hamas officials have said privately.

It remains unclear how much resistance Mashaal will now face from the Gaza leaders of the movement. One of the biggest challenges of reconciliation – how to blend the two sides' separate security forces – remains unresolved.

Ismail Haniyeh, the Hamas prime minister of Gaza, said he welcomed the agreement. Initial reports that a Hamas delegation from Gaza went to Doha were incorrect. The delegation headed to Cairo.

The agreement calls for rebuilding Gaza, which has been largely cut off from the world as part of an Israeli-Egyptian border blockade imposed after the Hamas takeover. The blockade was eased in the past year, but not enough to revive the Gaza economy, including the vital construction industry, and many large-scale projects remain on hold.

Qatar is willing to spend as much as $10 billion to help repair the damage of the rift, including settling mutual grievances by supporters of Hamas and Abbas' Fatah movement who at the height of tensions fought bloody street battles, the Palestinian officials said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the closed-door meetings with reporters. The figure could not be confirmed independently.

Al-Ahmed and Shaath, the Abbas aides, said they expect the composition of the new government to be announced during a Feb. 18 meeting of Palestinian political factions in Cairo.

They said Abbas would set an election date 90 days after the Central Elections Commissions has updated voter records in Gaza, a process that could take several weeks. The initial reconciliation pact envisioned elections in May, but this is no longer realistic, the aides said. Shaath said he believes the voting could take place by July.

___

Barzak reported from Gaza City, Gaza Strip. AP writers Bradley Klapper in Washington, Raf Casert in Brussels and Brian Murphy in Dubai also contributed.

(This version CORRECTS that a Hamas delegation from Gaza did not go to Doha)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

RAMALLAH, West Bank — After months of wavering, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas took a decisive step Monday toward reconciliation with the Islamic militant group Hamas, a move Israel promptl...
RAMALLAH, West Bank — After months of wavering, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas took a decisive step Monday toward reconciliation with the Islamic militant group Hamas, a move Israel promptl...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 377
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
SaneUSA
American, Jew, Zionist.
01:20 PM on 02/09/2012
A terrorist wedding, how neat...the bride and groom are pretty ugly though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tasies
04:04 PM on 02/09/2012
Just taking up from an old Zionist tradition.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robertstone1robert
My micro bio is too big.
06:25 AM on 02/08/2012
This is what it was all along. The PLO ambassador to India said so that Fatah and Hamas speak with one voice in regard to Israel. Israel negotiating with Abbas was a waste of time. It was like negotiating with Hamas. Only the blind media, which tries to see something where there is nothing, trumpeted Abbas as a moderate. He was nothing of the sort. Holding on to the territories is required. There is genuinely nobody on the other side to talk to. The Arabs do their best to instigate, to inculcate hate into their young (just look at their textbooks).
01:25 PM on 02/10/2012
What this agreement in fact shows is that the Palestinians are through wasting their time: negotiating with Israel is a waste of time, expecting the US to be a "neutral arbiter" is a waste of time. The future of Palestine will be decided by the world at large, and Israel and the US will be on the sidelines when it happens.
04:26 AM on 03/14/2012
Alas, you could have a point. Abbas trying to deal with the Netanyahu cabinet has proven pointless.

In fact, the message is exactly the opposite. Hamas got what it wanted by capturing an Israeli soldier and pushing for strong demands. That got Netanyhau's attention.
photo
Sam Adamson
Stands for what's right
11:54 PM on 02/07/2012
Terrorists in government. I am confident that would advance peace in the region promptly...
01:26 PM on 02/10/2012
Are you speaking of Menachem Begin?
photo
Sam Adamson
Stands for what's right
01:02 AM on 02/25/2012
Nice try, but the usual Palasbara talking point does not work. Begin was a terrorist. Unlike the Palestinians he and his colleagues were banned by 99% of the Palestinian Jews. The organized Yishuv hunted them, jailed them, and even gave them to the British. For decades after they no longer were terrorists they were still a political minority and were condemned for their past. Only 30 years of political activity brought them into the mainstream,

30 years from now, after there is peace and terrorism stops, I will have no problem with ex-terrorists being Palestinian politicians, but today the terrorist enjoy great support among the Palestinians and such is this case.

Your comparison is false.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:23 AM on 02/07/2012
interesting balance of comments as polarized as they all are. the reality for the pals is they have to be unified for when iran retaliates against israel for attacking them. at this point all bets will be off and israel will likely attack pals in a reactionary frenzy.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Json
Cynical dreamer, sarcastic idealist...
09:03 AM on 02/08/2012
Amid the "interesting balance" of polarizing comments, that is one of the silliest things I've heard.
Israel will attack Iran and Iran will retaliate, so Israel would attack Palestinians in a "reactionary frenzy"?? Ridiculous. If Iran attacked Israel, Palestinians would be extremely low on the priority list at that point.
And why on earth would it matter if they were unified at that point? You think the combined military might of Fatah and Hamas could even slow down the IDF if they were actually in a 'reactionary frenzy'?
You are reaching bad conclusions based on faulty premises.
photo
AJ Raalte
Israel forever - warts and all.
11:01 AM on 02/08/2012
IMO, what would happen if/when Iran attacks Israel, most of the "Palestinians" would run away to Jordan and/or Egypt as fast as they can.

Of course, if Israel survives the Iranian onslought, they'll be screaming for the next 60 years that they've been ethnically cleansed by big, bad Israel. Been there, done that.
09:37 AM on 02/07/2012
zionism must be stopped, at all cost..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gui Montag
Former Palestinian Supporter
10:00 AM on 02/07/2012
The "peaceful" Palestinian supporter in action.
01:26 PM on 02/10/2012
No justice, no peace....
photo
Sam Adamson
Stands for what's right
11:52 PM on 02/07/2012
The Nazi's failed once, there will not be a second chance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tasies
10:12 PM on 02/08/2012
Now the Nazis wrap themselves around a white and light blue flag.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Naor
08:56 AM on 02/07/2012
I guess it is just too much to ask for Israel's "peace" partner not to consist of an organization that calls for its total destruction and spews antisemitic propaganda daily. Only the Jewish state would be expected to entrust its citizens safety to a government composed of an internationally recognized terrorist organization. Why don't we give a state to Al-Shabaab and Lashkar-e-Taiba while were at it.
08:40 AM on 02/07/2012
The truth is that the 'Palestinians' don't want peace, aren't ready for peace and have never taken even the first step to prepare their people for peace. The 'peace process' has been a complete and utter failure because all it has done is to sell Israelis on an illusion of peace, while failing to even start to suggest to the 'Palestinians' that peace requires compromises on their part as well.
01:29 PM on 02/10/2012
It has been an "utter and complete failure" because up to this point Israel has not been forced to give up the land it has stolen. But from this point on the fate of the occupied territories will be up to the UN, the EU, Russia and China, and the Israelis and their shill the US will be relegated to bystanders.
12:27 PM on 02/11/2012
The UN, EU, Russia and China are too busy worrying and working to find a solution to the murder and mayhem going on in Syria and Iran. UNSCR 242 calls for Israel to withdraw from some of the land that it took over in 1967 but not all so I fail to see what the UN, EU, Russia and China can say when it is the Palestinians who refuse to sit down and negotiate the borders of a new Palestinian state and the state of Israel.
04:31 AM on 03/14/2012
When was the last time a rocket was fired from the West Bank?
Rosin the Bow
Palestine doesn't want peace. Meshaal said so
08:24 AM on 02/07/2012
Fatah has embraced Hamas, illustrating their complete disinterest in peace. It was less than two months ago when Hamas made the following statement at a rally in Gaza:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/14/hamas-celebrates-anniversary_n_1148085.html

"Addressing the crowd, Haniyeh called for continued armed struggle against Israel.

"We affirm that armed resistance is our strategic option and the only way to liberate our land, from the sea to the river," he said. "God willing, Hamas will lead the people ... to the uprising until we liberate Palestine, all of Palestine.""
04:32 AM on 03/14/2012
I wish someone would prove him wrong, but the Israeli authorities have repeatedly refused Hamas' calls for a truce so we don't know.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:13 AM on 02/07/2012
A Palestinian unity government is, in my opinion, a long overdue step toward a peaceful settlement and coexistence between Palestinians and Jews. A people can't successfully negotiate with a second party if they are divided against themselves.
05:42 AM on 02/07/2012
I suspect the HAMAS chaps will soon be throwing their Fatah colleagues off roofs again....
Rosin the Bow
Palestine doesn't want peace. Meshaal said so
08:17 AM on 02/07/2012
I suspect you are right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bunty4321r
war veteran
03:04 AM on 02/07/2012
Well, who can be sure that small adjustment here and there would not turn the table to a good path of great change to a solution even at the edge of unimaginable obstruction from Israel. As everything good or evil things have a limit so to the Mid-East did and the day is approaching fast enough for it long last well deserved end with honor and dignity. The aggressor will have to bend down to earth th Gos Almighty's will. No obstinacy and audacity can ever prevail.too long God has has tolerated such impertinence any more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GZLives
11:07 AM on 02/07/2012
There is no "adjustment" possible with a gang that believes and indoctrinates all that Jews are descended from pigs and apes .... until Muslims stand up and condemn this vile racist supremacy still being promoted throughout the Islamic world. NO peace will ever be possible.

Apes and pigs

http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/3221.htm

http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/3146.htm

http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/3136.htm

http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/3136.htm

http://vimeo.com/35139757
10:00 PM on 02/07/2012
I'm not down with the pig part... but all humans, including Jews and Muslims, are descendend from apes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:42 AM on 02/07/2012
Mahmoud Abbas, heading the Fatah, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), and the PLO's Palestinian Authority has just made his latest in a series of steps, all of which are, clearly, designed, to avoid a sustainable peace treaty with Israel and are actually in line with the essence of the Charter of the PLO and the thrust of this organization since its establishment in 1964..., three years prior to Israel capturing the now disputed territories!!

It is high time to simply follow international law in resolving the Arab Israeli conflict:

Act along and apply the San Remo Conference decisions of 1920; the League of Nations decisions of 1922, and United Nations Charter, Article 80, 1945.

And all of the above can and should be done within the framework of UN Security Council Resolution, 242, of 1967 in which there isn't a call of an additional state between the River and the Sea, and the "Palestinians" concept is not even mentioned!!

P.S. Reports from the region this morning indicate that Hamas is already expressing discontent with the "deal"!!
03:25 AM on 02/07/2012
So Israel expands to cover ALL of Palestine. Would everyone living there now get the vote?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:46 AM on 02/07/2012
"All of 'Palestine'".

"Palestine", all of it, has been a territory, not a nationality or a state, mind you!! Back in 1921 and 1922 "Palestine" was partitioned, legally. 77% of "Palestine" was handed over to the Arabs who, subsequently, renamed their part Jordan, since "Palestine" is not an Arab concept.

In 1922, the rest, 23% of "Palestine", legally, was assigned to the Jews who, subsequently, renamed their part of "Palestine" Israel, since "Palestine" is not a Jewish concept either.

The Arab part of "Palestine", all 77% of the territory, stretches from the Jordan River eastward. The Jewish part of "Palestine", all 23% of the territory, stretches from the Jordan River to the Med. Sea.

This is part of international law, and even part of the United Nations Charter, Article 80, 1945.

Shouldn't we know this information...??
02:32 AM on 02/07/2012
Peace between the Palestinian people and the Israelis is impossible at this stage of the occupation.
Until Palestinians are able to effectively defend themselves against the IDF Israel will not give back the stolen land.
The radical religious nuts in the Knesset and the "pay back settlers" have destroyed a two state solution. They will be rewarded with one state and a Palestinian majority.
uk progressive
He took a face from the ancient gallery
04:09 AM on 02/07/2012
exactly right nothing lasts forever, with the US heavily in debt to the tune of 15 trillion dollars and rising, military defeat in 2 muslim countries and their puppet kings and tyrants falling one by one the political landscape in the middle east is rapidly changing, for the better.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Son of Sensi
To be or not to be, is that seriously a question?
10:03 AM on 02/07/2012
military defeat in 2 Muslim countries? which countries are those?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gui Montag
Former Palestinian Supporter
09:31 AM on 02/07/2012
More demands and excuses from the "peaceful" Palestinian supporters.
10:06 PM on 02/07/2012
A truthful observation and guess about the future is neither a demand or an excuse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Taxim
12:26 AM on 02/07/2012
If the Israeli rabid right retains power in the up-coming elections this is simply a waste of time. And with Netanyahu attempting to sound the bomb Iran war drums they just might. It's time to dissolve the PA and demand the vote.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:49 AM on 02/07/2012
"Rabid right".

The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) rejected the following peace offers made by Israel since the peace process commenced in 1991:

Rabin's contour for peace, October 1995, rejected (Rabin, the former "leftist" prime minister and one dubbed worldwide "the prince of peace").

Barak's Camp David peace offer, Summer 2000, rejected (Barak, the former "leftist" prime minister).

Sharon's peace gesture, 2005, rejected (Sharon, the "centrist" former prime minister who set up the centrist Kadima party).

Olmert's peace offer, October 2008, rejected (Olmert, the "centrist" prime minister).

Netanjahu's offer to negotiate an accommodation of peaceful coexistence between with Israel, 2009 to present, rejected (Natanjahu, the present prime minister of the Likud: National Liberal Party of Israel.

So, where are the "rabid rightists" with whom the Muslim-Arabs refuse to achieve peace...??!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cyrus Trance
America is not a theocracy.
06:24 PM on 02/08/2012
Don't forget the Palestinians also rejected resolution 181 and opted for war.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
erehwon2
09:21 AM on 02/07/2012
If you look at words and action, "rabid" quite clearly applies much more aptly to Hamas and their ilk, not to Israel.
10:08 PM on 02/07/2012
HAven't been keeping up on the 'Price Tag' movement that Likud is so beholden to for its political power, I see.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tasies
11:37 PM on 02/06/2012
Israel: rolling out every cliche in the colonialist cook book. The divide and conquer little scheme didn´t quite work this time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cyrus Trance
America is not a theocracy.
12:24 AM on 02/07/2012
Obviously you have no idea what you are talking about. If you did you would understand the PA just lost any chance for a negotiated sovereign state.
01:09 AM on 02/07/2012
They have never had a chance of a negotiated sovereign state. All Israel has ever done is stall. And we have always been complicit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tasies
01:25 PM on 02/08/2012
Obviously, you are clueless, the Zio-righties have been on a path of stalling in order to prolongue the land grab, which is a strident and "devil-may-care" breach of international law. Everything else is pure poseurism and obfuscation. PA is not going to negotiate over left-overs and swiss cheese. Your guys know what they're doing, it's been done by opressors and colonizers for eons.
photo
Sam Adamson
Stands for what's right
11:56 PM on 02/07/2012
Funny, and I thought that the differentiation between terrorists and peace-seeking Palestinians is something Palestinians will embrace. Apparently, their supporters here don't agree any difference exist...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tasies
01:13 PM on 02/08/2012
Yep, Likud has meant nothing but theft and terror to the Palestinians, yet if Likud seizes their breaching of international law with regards to settlements, the Palestinians are more than willing to negotiate with such terrorists.