iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Chrysler Super Bowl Ad Raises Questions About Underlying Political Message

Chrysler Superbowl

First Posted: 02/ 7/2012 6:35 pm Updated: 02/ 9/2012 11:15 am

On Monday, responding to a barrage of criticism from conservative pundits and some football fans, Chrysler chief executive Sergio Marchionne denied there had been any political message in the company's Super Bowl aired during Sunday's night's halftime show.

"It had zero political content," Marchionne told a Detroit radio station. "It was not meant to be any type of a political overture on our part; we are as apolitical as you can make us."

The two-minute commercial starring Clint Eastwood compared Detroit's comeback to the ongoing recovery of the American economy. Many viewers came away from Sunday's ad thinking the two-minute spot was a pro-Obama ad; others did not.

Yet at the Detroit auto show last month, it was clear that Marchionne felt indebted to the president for Chrysler's very survival. "I owe the president a lot," Marchionne said then. "The reason we are here is because he gave us the [bailout] money, right?" Marchionne was talking with a small group of reporters about Chrysler's bid for $3.5 billion in loans from the Department of Energy, as part of a program created by Congress in 2007 to help automakers retool old plants to make fuel-efficient vehicles. The loans still hadn't come through, despite consistent negotiating between Chrysler and the government. Marchionne said he hoped the process wasn't being delayed for political reasons. His comment about the president, though, came in response to a reporter's question, "Doesn't Obama owe you one?"

Nonetheless, knowing how carefully automakers ponder, weigh and debate official communications, it's hard to imagine Chrysler's top brass did not consider that its Super Bowl ad could be interpreted as a pro-Obama spot. Typically auto executives are very careful to not pick sides in political battles, for fear of alienating customers on any given side. Although they often have their own political agendas, such battles are waged with lobbyists and campaign donations, not overtly in political ads.

A spokesman for Chrysler declined to comment further on the company's commercial or Marchionne's earlier comments.

"The ad pretty clearly invokes the comeback due to the bailout, without mentioning those controversial words," said Ted Brader, a University of Michigan political science professor. "And given that message -- we made the most of the bailout and it was a success -- I did think, Huh, one could read that as a tribute to Obama's decision to bail out GM and Chrysler."

Brader said Chrysler's commercial is vaguely similar to a 1984 political ad for Ronald Reagan, "It's Morning Again in America." This year's Chrysler ad, which aired just moments after Madonna finished her halftime show, started with Eastwood's telling the audience that it's halftime and the football teams are in their locker rooms figuring out how they can win.

"It's halftime in America, too," Eastwood said, as an image showed the sun rising over a misty mountain range. The commercial continued with scenes of people waking up, getting ready for the day. "People are out of work, and they're hurting, and they're all wondering what they're going to do to make a comeback."

The people of Detroit, he said, have already faced that fear. They almost lost everything. But the country pulled together and "after those trials, we all rallied around what was right and acted as one," he said. And now Detroit is back, Eastwood said.

Reagan's earlier ad also started with a sunrise, except the opening scene included a boat in a bay. Various vignettes depicted people commuting to work, moving into new homes and getting married, while a narrator talked about how much better life was in 1984 compared with in 1980, before Reagan took office. "Under the leadership of President Reagan, our country is prouder, and stronger, and better," the narrator said. "Why would we ever want to return to where we were?"

The wounds of the automakers' collapse and subsequent bailout are still fresh in Detroit, where bewildered citizens looked on as the rest of the nation debated whether it was worthwhile to help save the industry. Michigan slipped into a recession four months before the rest of the country and suffered the hardest. Unemployment there was the highest in the nation for all of 2009, and people left the state looking for jobs. Michigan was the only state to shrink in population size from 2000 to 2010, losing 54,000 people, according to Census counts.

But now things are starting to turn around. Ford and Chrysler both posted profits for 2011, and GM is expected to do the same.

That's the message Eastwood said he was hoping to tap into with the commercial, in a bipartisan fashion: "I think " all politicians will agree with it," he told Fox News. "I thought the spirit was OK."

The commercial was vague enough to give Chrysler "plausible deniability about any political implication of the ad," Brader said. Eastwood was a good choice (although, according to the Wall Street Journal, he may have been the second choice; Al Pacino also shot a version of the ad) because people connect him with hardscrabble Westerns and tough, flawed heroes. Eastwood's background as a Republican who opposed the bailout (but favors gay marriage) makes the message even less clear.

"So, all in all, the whole thing is rather nicely ambiguous," Brader said.

Watch Sunday's Chrysler ad and the 1984 Reagan ad below:



FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
On Monday, responding to a barrage of criticism from conservative pundits and some football fans, Chrysler chief executive Sergio Marchionne denied there had been any political message in the company'...
On Monday, responding to a barrage of criticism from conservative pundits and some football fans, Chrysler chief executive Sergio Marchionne denied there had been any political message in the company'...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 159
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
12:43 PM on 02/09/2012
I can't be the only one who picked up on "it's halftime" meaning only half way through President Obama's time in office. I think Clinton is a decent Republican, who believes in conservative values and can cheer for successful policies, even when he initially opposed them. He's got conservative values but opposes a ban on gay marriage. He's not Republican in order to make things better for himself; his beliefs are grounded in what he feels are right. Right on, man. We may not share the same political beliefs, but we share the same passion for what is right for the people of America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gail Robinson
11:21 AM on 02/09/2012
The GOP is upset that they didn't come up with message. They wanted the industry to fail. If I'm not mistaken the Ronlad Reagon Admin. made a advertisment as well. How come you don't want America to succeed?
08:55 AM on 02/09/2012
First of all, there are a lot of folks out there surprised to find out about the Republican Clint Eastwood. Given this fact, the Conservative (whatever it means today) outrage by this brilliant video is understandable. Yes, the so called bailout has been saving a big part of American auto industry - that is just a fact. Let me point out another aspect of the 'government fix' nobody talks about - the loaned money will come back to the lender, with a profit, not mentioning the re-creation of jobs.
But the highest-ranking consultant and advisor of the Bush & Cheney Demolition Crew, Karl Rove feels insulted by the half-time commercial. the man who helped tremendously to destroy the economy by de-regulations is offended. Here's the message Mr. Rove: Who gives a damn?!
It was proved that capitalism by Rove's and Bush's terms needs government oversight, a watchdog oversight, because the government shall not serve the corporations but is elected to serve its people. And if the government doesn't do its job? It's called corporate anarchy.
Here comes the aforementioned question about being Conservative today: It means, lately, to destroy, insult and block, to lie about everything Mr. Obama does. That is America today.
So, it's half time America. For those insulted by Mr. Eastwood's video... how about NOT think about it as Republican, Conservative or pro-Obama message? How about American Message.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skydivernyc
06:37 AM on 02/09/2012
Reptuglican First America Second!!!!! Rooting for Americas' Demise for political gain, is a losing bet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
02:39 AM on 02/09/2012
30 years ago another president bailed out a car company under economic conditions that were not nearly as dire, yet it paid dividends, saved jobs and preserved an industry. The company was Chrysler and the the president was Reagan.

It's funny how things that the right does the consider good and essential and everything that the left does they view as suspicious, unnecessary and even harmful.

In both cases the assistance was rendered not to benefit the left, but to benefit America.
photo
MichaelMcKLA
I'm moving to Pandora.
02:27 AM on 02/09/2012
The right wingers will get frantic about anything that could be interpreted as pro-Obama. In part, this is a ploy to keep their anger in front of you, in hopes you can be persuaded to do something really dumb at voting time...such as voting for them.

Their endless rants get really boring and ludicrous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jody Dobis
12:02 AM on 02/09/2012
As someone that has a family history of steel makers, I saw nothing political in th add. If anything, it was a lesson on second chances. News Flash: The world is not run by politicians. It is run by the everyday worker that gets up early, puts in his or her best efforts and hopes their children will have a better life than themselves. The add was great in that it made many middle class worker feel some pride in the accomplishment they deserve to be recognized for and usually don't. Here is to the average Joe and Jane that asks very little in return.
10:03 PM on 02/08/2012
This is ridiculous beyond words. I liked the ad. Most eveyone I know liked it. Most Americans liked it. It was non-partisan. Move on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janzee12000
You're all individuals!
08:56 PM on 02/08/2012
You know, when I saw this ad during the SB when Eastwood said the, "it's halfime" line it did not dawn on me AT ALL the political inference. It was all about the football game. It wasn't until everyone started to use it as such that changed its meaning and the media sucked it up. Let it go everyone...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Shepard
08:31 PM on 02/08/2012
Says so much about the GOP that they would see it as positive statement about Obama. They can't see it a a positive statement about themselves. Is that because they have done absolutely nothing to improve the economy for the last 11 years?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
wedgie
MegaSAHD is where its @
07:52 PM on 02/08/2012
Why is everyone in America so god**mned ready to take offense? Grow up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EHenry
Author of the new book - How We Got Swindled by Wa
05:23 PM on 02/08/2012
There is nothing to defend. A car mfg. was saved by Democrats who cared about American Auto Mfg jobs and might when all the Repubs united against what made so much sense. And Chrysler was thankful for the support and proud of it American ablility to rebound.

Certainly it was a positive message, and a symbol of hope for Americans to have faith in what Americans can overcome and accomplish.

If those who were against Detroit's American ability to face adversity and succeed feel guilt from being so callous about the lives of millions of workers and the crucial need for their country to maintain some manufacturing might (remember all the tanks and equipment made in Detroit for the defense of our country) then to argue the commercial was political - when it was about a good government decision that protected the public and the common good for a welcome change - then they should all go straight to the hell they have created for the 99%.

The commercial made me and people i know - proud to be an American. Just like i was when i went to USNAVOCS in 1964.

to understand all the complexities made simple: www.howwegotswindled.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jody Dobis
12:15 AM on 02/09/2012
Great comment. Couldn't agree more. As a former steel worker, it wasn't long ago when everyone was ready to let our steel plants fade out of existence. I knew then that it wouldn't be long before a sell out of other industries. It's time for labor to push back and show that without labor, the system eventually will fail for the 99%. From an employment point of view, did Wall Street or Auto's improve employment? The average American knows it was auto's. Given the choice betwwen banks and manufacturing, the public is smart enough to know who holds their best interest in the long run and it IS NOT banks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
baileywick
04:50 PM on 02/08/2012
Was there ever an Exxon/Mobile ad during the Iraq War?
Unocal?
Chevron?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnarchyOfTaste
Belgian Beer and Austrian Economics
04:59 PM on 02/08/2012
The "THEY DID IT TOO!!!" defense is entirely too prevalent around here. Some of the critics of the auto bailout were also critics of the previous administration and its policies.

Our government is now in the business of picking winners and losers in what is supposed to be a free market. As a result, these politically connected corporations can no longer spend a dime without justified public scrutiny.
10:12 PM on 02/08/2012
"Our government is now..." - Baloney. Read a history book. "Our" country - and nearly every other free-enterprise economy in the world, has been "picking winners and losers" for centuries. It's not new or 'now'. Go read about the building of the transcontinental railroad 150 years ago and then come back here and tell us what you learned about free-economies and picking winners and losers. While you're at it, tell your story to Airbus and all those other companies that are being 'picked' by their governments. You clearly have no real insight about how complex economies actually operate.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skydivernyc
06:42 AM on 02/09/2012
Smart Government is not about winners or losers, it is just smart. The bail out of the financial sector has no supply chain to prop up, but the car industry has a huge supply chain that would of left us in a hole in our economy for many many years. It is also a national security issue. Detroit was retrofitted to help build tanks in World War II. I agree, time to get educated, speak less and read more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rda1911a1
God Bless John Browning
04:47 PM on 02/08/2012
This commercial just more of the reason I bought my first non UAW built automobile in 30 years last month. Was torn between my usual GM purchase and buying from a non bailout company. Got a Subaru and my wife loves it. guess after owning 11 chevy trucks my next one will be a Ford or toyota
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnarchyOfTaste
Belgian Beer and Austrian Economics
04:38 PM on 02/08/2012
As a Libertarian, it is very amusing to watch Democrats defend corporatism from Republican attacks. And when the republicans are back in power, the script will be flipped once again.
bonatay
It will be hard. Be bold. Be courageous.
07:17 PM on 02/08/2012
NOT!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bop54jen
12:23 AM on 02/09/2012
So Libertarians support nothing?