iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Phelim McAleer, Controversial Filmmaker, Launches Grassroots Campaign For Pro-Fracking Film

Phelim Mcaleer And Ann Mcelhinney

First Posted: 02/ 7/2012 2:36 pm Updated: 02/ 9/2012 5:40 pm

WASHINGTON -- Phelim McAleer, the Irish filmmaker who attacked Al Gore over global warming issues, has turned his sights on fracking. Working with his wife, Ann McElhinney, McAleer has launched an effort to produce a new documentary, titled "FrackNation."

The couple will explore the implications of fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, the controversial process that involves the high-pressure injection of undisclosed chemicals into rocks containing oil or natural gas. They argue that media portrayals of the issue have been largely "exaggerated hyperbole" that ignore the millions of people whose lives have been "positively transformed" by the industry.

The film, expected to debut in a few months' time, will feature interviews with farmers and local landowners in New York and Pennsylvania, as well as residents in Warsaw, Poland, a nod to the international scope of the issue.

"There are a lot of allegations made by a lot of emotional people," McAleer told HuffPost in an interview on Tuesday. "But when you strip away the emotions and the hyperbole, the answer seems to be that we need to investigate further."

That the film is being funded by Kickstarter.com, known for hosting left-leaning projects from indie films to solar energy technology, is sure to raise some eyebrows. But McAleer welcomes the opportunity to defy political expectations, saying he felt it was important that the documentary be funded by grassroots supporters.

"This is a documentary funded by the people, for the people, and those people are going to be represented," he said. "Fracking seems to be a conversation between the urban upper and middle classes. The working class seems not to be invited to the conversation, so I thought I would invite them in and see what they have to say."

McAleer intends for his film also to investigate the backgrounds and motives of the environmentalists who contend the process contaminates groundwater and destroys ecosystems.

The Environmental Protection Agency recently conducted a study showing that fracking was responsible for polluted groundwater at an aquifer that supplied public drinking water to people in Pavillion, Wyoming. The agency has since been tasked with formulating rules on emissions from natural gas operations around the country, as part of a broader move by the Obama administration to address safety concerns around fracking.

In his recent interview with HuffPost, McAleer singled out one particular claim made in the Academy Award-nominated "Gasland" documentary as representative of critics' "scaremongering." In one segment, Fox shows that after controversial fracking procedures were enacted in Colorado, residents found their tap water was so polluted with methane, it could be set on fire.

McAleer noted that there have long been so-called "burning springs" documented in various parts of the country, where there was so much natural gas bubbling up through natural springs that the water would burn when lit.

Fox said such springs had no bearing on his documentary. "The citizens reported that they could not light their water on fire before the drilling," Fox said, "and after the drilling, they could light their water on fire."

McAleer has taped the exchange, which he claims Fox has continued to ignore. "I'm Irish, and it really got me going," McAleer explained.

"FrackNation" comes on the heels Fox's "Gasland" sequel, "Gasland II," which has received $750,000 in funding from HBO. The filmmakers are looking to raise $150,000 on Kickstarter and have garnered $10,000 so far.

"I have to say it made me laugh when Josh Fox cried censorship after his arrest recently," McAleer added in an email, referring to Fox's arrest at the request of House Republicans during a fracking hearing last week. "I was the victim of his censorship just a short time ago."

Fox was not immediately available for comment.

WATCH McAleer's exchange with Fox, reposted by McAleer on his website:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON -- Phelim McAleer, the Irish filmmaker who attacked Al Gore over global warming issues, has turned his sights on fracking. Working with his wife, Ann McElhinney, McAleer has launched an eff...
WASHINGTON -- Phelim McAleer, the Irish filmmaker who attacked Al Gore over global warming issues, has turned his sights on fracking. Working with his wife, Ann McElhinney, McAleer has launched an eff...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 218
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
05:06 PM on 04/23/2012
well, you continue to prove that gas drilling and fracking are good and beneficial for us and make sure you live in the middle of gas fields and see if you like breathing the air of gas land and like drinking the water if it changes after drilling. Just please live where you say it is good for us to live.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Load
Politicians: What you see is never what you get.
03:15 PM on 02/10/2012
Well in the interest of being "Fair and Balanced" I hope the film maker includes this information from the U.S. Geological Survey:

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/faq/?faqID=356
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:39 PM on 02/10/2012
Wrong! Put up the right link!!!!!!! Here is an inconvenient truth for you: Fracking and wastewater disposal are completely different. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/faq/?faqID=357
09:46 AM on 01/04/2013
From USGS site: Fracking causes small earthquakes, but they are almost always too small to be a safety concern. In addition to natural gas, fracking fluids and formation waters are returned to the surface. These wastewaters are frequently disposed of by injection into deep wells. The injection of wastewater into the subsurface can cause earthquakes that are large enough to be felt and may cause damage.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Finne
Into Full Frontal Nerdity
10:53 AM on 02/10/2012
They really needed to make Haynesville the documentary again because the first was so successful?

They traced the funding for that one right back to the gas company because they were so arrogant they thought no one would check to see the address for the film company and the gas company were the same.

Now they have the brilliant idea to launder the production money through Kickstarter so they can claim its crowd sourced so it must be grass roots.

Too bad they didn't tell everyone at Chesapeake to not send in their company donations all at once! Everyone knows these poor grassroots folks were just waiting around for such a project to money bomb.

Who do they think they are fooling?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:10 PM on 02/09/2012
We need to tag all wells so we can trace any contamination.

We need to charge them for contaminating ground and surface water. Enough to clean it up.

We need to tax and cap heavy metal production from fossil and nukes.

We need to stop the half a billion per year per reactor breaks, the large breaks for coal the war for oil, and the breaks and exemption from pollution laws for gas.

We need to plow all that money and the breaks into rooftop solar, offshore wind, efficiency and waste bio char biofuels. These green tech can provide all the energy and fuels the world needs, cheaper than nukes, clean safe, forever, 24/7 and carbon negative.
photo
GirlOutWest
I hope to be the person my dog thinks I am.
07:47 PM on 02/09/2012
Maybe they'll do some fracking next to his home. He'd be cool with that right?
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
02:51 PM on 02/09/2012
Chemicals in Natural Gas Operations

http://www.endocrinedisruption.com/chemicals.introduction.php
05:36 AM on 02/09/2012
Fossil fuels pollute our air, land and water. Renewable sources of energy do not. Hydrogen is one of the most abundant sources of energy on earth. As with any technology including natural gas, oil and coal there are drawbacks. However, the most important one, preserving clean land, air and water is not a problem with the use of hydrogen. Yes, the Hindenburg burned. The hydrogen burned high in the air because it is lighter than air. It was the diesel fuel fire that remained near the ground as it is heavier than air. Gasoline is also. Ways are being developed to use water in place while deriving. the hydrogen from the oxygen. Aside from the lubricants needed for moving parts, there would be no fossil fuel usage. If a fraction of the funds foolishly fostering fracking were furnished, hydrogen fuel would flourish.
02:01 PM on 02/09/2012
Its extremely difficult to get hydrogen, it bounds with everything. It takes a lot of energy to separate it; that is what it is not used as a practical power source.
02:34 PM on 02/09/2012
It is extremely difficult to get hydrogen, I agree. But it's also extremely difficult to get natural gas from fracking and oil from deep under the surface of the earth. Since they can monopolize these sources, they overcome. I read that in England they got a certain bacteria to produce it while ingesting waste from a chocolate factory. Where there is a will there will be a way. One hundred years ago, even twenty years ago, we never thought we could be communicating our opinions instantaneously across so many miles either. Thank you for responding to me without any insults.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Living ECO
11:11 PM on 02/08/2012
If you want to find out how safe the natural gas industry lobbyists like the ones constantly trolling this site for their corporate pay masters really thinks hydraulic fracturing is, ask them to comply with the Safe Drinking Water Act and have the 'Halliburton Loophole' revoked.

http://www.earthworksaction.org/halliburton.cfm.
"The oil and gas industry is the only industry in America that is allowed by EPA to inject known hazardous materials -- unchecked -- directly into or adjacent to underground drinking water supplies."

Then sit back and watch them pile on lie after excuse after lie after excuse about why they shouldn't have to. But why? If hydraulic fracturing is so safe, it should be EASY for them to comply with the Safe Drinking Water Act, right? LOL!!
02:02 PM on 02/09/2012
Are you so afraid of over view points that a documentary against what you believe scares you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Load
Politicians: What you see is never what you get.
03:18 PM on 02/10/2012
What scares me is we've been told there's no issue with earth movement, but then I find this:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/faq/?faqID=356
06:10 PM on 02/08/2012
I always find it sad when people don't wont information that goes against the pop culture narrative. If you are SOOO confident in what you believe, what are you afraid of?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
watershedbaby
01:17 PM on 02/08/2012
The difference being Gasland is a documentary, and FrackNation is an infomercial.
06:18 PM on 02/08/2012
Have you seen FrackNation? Or Gasland for that matter?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
11:35 PM on 02/09/2012
Have YOU seen Gasland....?
01:11 PM on 02/08/2012
Wtf does it matter how many lives benefited, from fracking. If entire towns are suffering from a loss of drinking water, then it shouldnt be legal.

Benefits that cause harm arent benefits at all, its just parasitism.
06:18 PM on 02/08/2012
Also, there's an alternative to fracking. It might be a different story if there was absolutely no alternative to fracking and the number of lives saved far exceeded those it destroyed, but that's simply not the case. There IS an alternative and that alternative is FAR better. It's called renewable energy. The idea that we need fossil fuels to survive is the biggest fraud in the history of mankind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vexed weasel
09:52 PM on 02/09/2012
Those towns are , in the vernacular, "sacrifice zones".
photo
Fnordpocalypse
THEY LIVE - WE SLEEP
12:51 PM on 02/08/2012
No amount of money is worth endangering the clean water supply.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Load
Politicians: What you see is never what you get.
11:00 AM on 02/08/2012
While I support skepticism and critical thinking, I have to agree with Fox, what McAleer badgered him on isn't relevant to what he was portraying in his documentary.

As an aside, I'd also question the bias (or lack thereof) of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. Do they receive tax moneys directly or indirectly from companies involved in frakking?

As long as frakking fluid remains a "secret sauce" unavailable for scrutiny the questions of groundwater pollution will remain on the table. The industry just needs to come clean to put that bugaboo to rest.
05:58 PM on 02/08/2012
Hopefully you are also questioning the bias of the Sierra Club, as it was discovered that they have taken $25 million from the natural gas industry over the past 4 years, approx. 12.5% of their budget over that time. Of course the COGCC receives tax dollars from oil & gas companies, they are a division of the state government, state governments' only source of revenue is taxing the public.

Coca Cola's recipe is also a "secret sauce," there are trade secrets involved in everything. You can find out exactly what chemicals are mixed with the 99.5% water, just not the blend.

People, read and figure things out for yourself, there is no "unbiased source" of ANYTHING. Each and every side has an agenda, just because it aligns with your beliefs doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Try reading another source sometimes, you might learn something and be able to figure out the spin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Load
Politicians: What you see is never what you get.
12:59 PM on 02/09/2012
Interesting that you felt it necessary to inject the statement about the Sierra Club before going on to state that "state government­s' only source of revenue is taxing the public", which is not entirely true. They can also receive revenue from investments, charitable contributions, sales of land or resources among other things.

You also conveniently ignored that States and municipalities frequently give tax breaks, abeyances, moratoriums and other concessions to businesses to induce them to come to their locations under the premise that they will still reap revenue from citizens employed by same.

However, the question I posed was, did CO receive "tax moneys directly or indirectly from companies" involved in exploration or extraction, as this would be a possible indication of conflict of interest, which could lead to skewed reporting on the State's part.

Also, equating "frakking fluid" with Coke is a specious argument, as you would have no qualms about drinking a glass of cola. Can you say the same about "frakking fluid"?

In closing I will say that I agree with you that people need to do their own research, but unfortunately critical thinking isn't being taught in public schools anymore. A particular test and mandate from the last century being more important.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Finne
Into Full Frontal Nerdity
11:44 AM on 02/10/2012
"Coca Cola's recipe is also a "secret sauce," there are trade secrets involved in everything­."

Is it really a secret or is it just a marketing gimmick that's served them well for many years?

I also don't remember a single case where a water well was suspected of having Coca Cola in it much less hundreds or possibly thousands of wells in areas where millions of gallons of Coca Cola was being injected into the ground.

There are half a dozen or so stimulation companies in the US that the producers contract with and they use them on what appears to be a "who's available" basis. Examination of production records reveals that no stimulation company is known for producing more gas with their formula or longer production times per well. There is simply no credible evidence that one formula is better than another.

Arguing for a "trade secret" exemption in disclosure is arguing against public safety in the interest of corporate profits.
09:52 PM on 02/08/2012
Fox' use of the natural occurring methane gas as the "evidence" in his GASLAND mockumentary is akin to the "drowning polar bears" of algores Inconvienent truth. Legislation has already been passed requiring companies to disclose the materials they use.
10:36 PM on 02/08/2012
If hydraulic fracturing is so safe, then you should have absolutely no problem with revoking the 'Halliburton Loophole' which makes natural gas companies exempt from the Clean Drinking Water Act. Would you lobby congress to force the natural gas industry comply with the Safe Drinking Water Act? If not, why not. You claim it's safe, all we're asking you to do is to prove it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Load
Politicians: What you see is never what you get.
01:10 PM on 02/09/2012
Rules on fracking fluid disclosure have passed in 2 states out of 50, or 4% of the nation, with uneven implementation (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/13/colorado-fracking-chemica_n_1146384.html). While that's a start, wouldn't it have been better to be upfront from the get-go? Why all the secrecy?

Oh, and by the way, Spinal Tap is a mockumentary, Gasland is not. In case you're confused, you can learn the difference here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mockumentary
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
10:29 AM on 02/08/2012
Follow the money.........

You'll probably find that the same group of funders also funded the Atlas Shrugged film and such.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
personal beliefs
Things never go according to plan, so plan accordi
11:56 AM on 02/08/2012
and who funded Gasland?
06:21 PM on 02/08/2012
and I'm sure you don't keep any of the money YOU make, being a person of higher moral standing..... You live a humble life of poverty I'm sure.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:14 AM on 02/08/2012
As long as this document is completely unbias and honest, unlike all of Michael Moore's documentaries, I think it is a great idea.