iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Amy Zvovushe, Pregnant Woman, Asked To Resign Instead Of Take Maternity Leave

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/ 7/2012 6:00 pm Updated: 02/ 8/2012 6:19 pm

Amy Zvovushe, 31, had a new job (as a senior program manager at a marketing company in Connecticut) and a new baby on the way. But instead of colleagues sending congratulatory cards and putting stork decorations on her desk, Zvovushe says that when she announced her pregnancy at work, she was asked to resign. The company didn't offer her maternity leave. The federal Family Medical Leave Act says employees must work for a full year to be eligible, and she'd only been their employee for four months.

Unfortunately, Zvovushe is only one of many pregnant women forced out of a job. In the U.S., thousands of women are fired while pregnant, Dina Bakst, a lawyer and founder/president of A Better Balance: The Work and Family Legal Center wrote in a recent Op-ed for the NY Times. She blames the gap between discrimination laws and disability laws for the injustice.

Federal and state laws ban discrimination against pregnant women in the workplace. And amendments to the Americans With Disabilities Act require employers to provide reasonable accommodations to disabled employees (including most employees with medical complications arising from pregnancies) who need them to do their jobs. But because pregnancy itself is not considered a disability, employers are not obligated to accommodate most pregnant workers in any way.

Considering three-quarters of the women who enter the work force will become pregnant, Bakst calls for action. She highlights New York State Senator Liz Krueger and Assemblywoman Aileen Gunther of Sullivan County who have introduced legislation that "would require employers to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnant women whose health care providers say they need them."

Some states have made significant progress. According to Bakst's piece in the NY Times, "as of 2010, seven states, including California, had passed laws requiring private employers to provide at least some accommodations." And many companies -- including those on Working Mother Magazine's list of top 100 companies for mothers -- work to create flexible, supportive environments for pregnant women, even if the law doesn't require them to.

Jeannette Cox, a law professor at the University of Dayton, is also fighting for pregnant women's rights in the workplace. She argues that pregnancy should be considered a disability. Though pregnant woman are covered under the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act, some protections under the ADA don't apply to pregnant women and Cox says it's time for a change.

As for Zvovushe, her story had a somewhat happy ending. After she was told she'd lose her job if she took time off, she had a later conversation with human resources. ABC News reports that she recorded this discussion without telling them, and caught several alarming statements on tape. For example, the executive said:

"You don't receive protection under FMLA so technically if you don't come to work ... it doesn't matter whether you're having your appendix out or you're having a baby or you're dealing with a sick person you didn't show up for work on Monday."

Zvovushe's attorney, Jack Tuckner, then contacted the company, and (likely because Zvovushe had the HR rep's harsh words on tape) they agreed to grant her leave to care for her baby.

"Because they were able to fix it, they say no harm, no foul," her attorney said to ABC. And, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is scheduled to host a hearing about pregnancy discrimination this month.

SLIDESHOW: Stories Of Pregnant Women Who Were Discriminated Against At Work
Jiongqui Ye "Caused An Inconvenience"
1  of  7
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
In July 2009, Jiongqui Ye, 36, told her boss, Xio Yu Zhang at the Wongtas printing company in Sydney that she was pregnant and planned to work until Christmas, then take maternity leave. According to the Sydney Morning Herald, Zhang told Ye that should would not be paid while she was gone and her position as a clerical worker might not be available upon her return.

Ye then suffered complications during pregnancy and had to take sick leave early. Sadly, she lost her baby. When she returned to work, she was allegedly told she "caused a lot of inconvenience" and was given a new job performing manual labor for less money.

She complained to the Fairwork Ombudsman, and then was fired from her job.

On February 2nd, Justice Dennis Cowdroy found the directors of the company "guilty of grossly breaching its obligations and fined [them] more than $20,000."
RATE IT!   |  
VOTE
CURRENT TOP 5 PICK YOUR OWN TOP 5
USERS WHO VOTED
NEW! CREATE YOUR OWN SLIDESHOW
FOLLOW HUFFPOST PARENTS

Amy Zvovushe, 31, had a new job (as a senior program manager at a marketing company in Connecticut) and a new baby on the way. But instead of colleagues sending congratulatory cards and putting stork ...
Amy Zvovushe, 31, had a new job (as a senior program manager at a marketing company in Connecticut) and a new baby on the way. But instead of colleagues sending congratulatory cards and putting stork ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,092
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
03:14 PM on 02/24/2013
Women really need to stop getting pregnant on the job, as it makes the serious, hard working women who plan on never breeding look bad.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladyblujay
Judith Parks-Stevens
12:30 PM on 08/25/2012
I just had a great idea. It would be wonderful to see a story about employers who are the most friendly to pregnancy and breast feeding. There must be some, adn they deserve a pat on the back. So much negative happens and gets reported. I think everyone would like to see some stories about employers that are doing it right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shanda Smalls
~June 12, 1967 - Loving vs Virginia ~ Equality
11:34 AM on 08/25/2012
Now call me crazy but why would anyone PLAN to have a child before they were on the job for a year. FMLA doesn't give you pay and working some where for such a short period of time you wouldn't have much annual or sick leave build up. Plus, if you leave for a big chunk of time before you even learn your job well...don't know just seems like poor planning at best and stupid at worst. Even as a young college co-ed I always thought I needed to be on the job a minimum of a year before having a child...I mean most jobs you are on probation anyway...would suck to be pregnant and loose your job for whatever reason...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Catalina hime
Humor and Pocky is how I get by.
03:38 AM on 08/25/2012
This happened to me when I was working at a non profit organization in California. I was fired 2 and a half months before my due date. The organization ended up closing down seven months after the fired me (karma maybe). I never got reimbursed for expenses the company was supposed to pay which added up to around $450.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BUTCHER99
06:39 PM on 02/26/2012
AMERICA WAKE UP. You realize that in maternity leave with all the countries in the world you are DEAD LAST! Why do you let corporations rule your lives like this. No other country in the world has such deplorable standards.
The nation to the north of you has a year off covered by unemployment insurance, which can be split between the husband and the wife. Switzerland has 375 days I believe. Mexico 12 weeks. The US? some states have some but not much. Even the fact that you can get fired for getting pregnant should be enough to wake you up..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Catalina hime
Humor and Pocky is how I get by.
03:34 AM on 08/25/2012
Sad but true, even the "third world countries" have better maternity leave than the US.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeeRose
Politics= Constant Headache
02:00 AM on 02/25/2012
That company should be ashamed of themselves. I wish I knew the name so I could avoid buying anything associated with them
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ashok Hegde
12:47 PM on 02/25/2012
Why? This woman only worked 4 months...she did not have FMLA rights. Why shouldn't the firm hire someone else who can fulfill the duties of the position?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BUTCHER99
06:40 PM on 02/26/2012
In Canada it is 12 weeks required then 50 weeks off which can be shared with the husband.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
irishkiss274
Let your dreaming be your guide...
07:00 PM on 02/23/2012
Can someone, anyone, correct me if I'm wrong. I thought maternity leave was for when the mother is about to give birth, is on bed rest, or has just given birth? Not for the whole nine months of pregnancy or whatever? My mother went to work every day until she went into labor, and even then she worked her full shift at the office and then went to the hospital to have me... Then she received the benefit of maternity leave to recover for 6 weeks.
04:35 PM on 02/22/2012
At my company, I pay into disability every pay period. Thus when I go on maternity leave, I'm getting some of the money I personally paid in. That will only supplement my income so I will be taking paid time off as well, with part of the time being unpaid. Just b/c you are on FMLA doesn't mean you are being paid and many companies require employees to pay into disability- thus the taxpayers aren't on the hook so to speak. FMLA simply allows you 12 weeks off every calendar year for various reasons, one of which is child birth/maternity leave.

As for this particular woman, maybe she had been trying to get pregnant for years via IVF or other fertility treatments. Many pregnancies cannot be "timed" to coincide with a new job. Trust me, people undergoing fertility treatments are at the beck and call of their cycles. Moreover, perhaps she was laid off from her old job and that's why she took this new one....too many facts are unknown.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:55 AM on 02/22/2012
I wrote a comment on here yesterday but apparently it was not cleared for approval. I think it’s wrong what happened, and I'm a Hiring manager and former HR staffer. I do understand that it is not exactly a great start, but there are other solutions and alternatives. That company was malicious in how they went about it- completely disrespecting the pregnant employee by underestimating her intelligence. Funny how they had a change of heart once Amy Zvovushe's attorney played back that HR woman's words. That recording came back to haunt her, as anything like that recorded normally does. This world is a game of chess- play or be played...nobody cares and everyone has an opinion. What if you were diagnosed with some kind of illness like cancer or something, then what? Would it be fair to ask the sick person to resign because, "well you've only worked here about 4 months, that’s unacceptable we have to collect your resignation now".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ashley Charron
08:16 PM on 02/21/2012
I have to agree with the company here. The rule on the books says employees must have been in work for one year before receiving maternity leave/benefits, so they followed suit. Also, it's not like she fell ill. Most women become pregnant by choice. Wanted to start a family is fine, but she shouldn't expect the taxpayers to pay for her leave after only 4 moths of work just because she decided to have a baby. I agree with many of the commenters on here: if you don't want to become pregnant, use birth control. And don't blindly expect everyone else in society to treat you like royalty because you choose to breed. It's pure madness.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Betty C
Proud and Feisty Democrat
10:40 PM on 02/21/2012
No that was not what the article said. It said because she had not worked there a year she was not eligible for the protections under the Family Medical Leave Act. No where in the article did it mention what that company's policy was reguarding materity leave or other illnesses. Also it didn't say she wanted to start her maternity leave whenshe had only worked there 4 months. Thats when she announced she was pregnant. Before you go after this woman get your facts straight.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ashley Charron
12:21 AM on 02/22/2012
"The federal Family Medical Leave Act says employees must work for a full year to be eligible, and she'd only been their employee for four months. "

I do believe that means she had only been working there for four months. So, I think I had that part right. Perhaps the company was too harsh in firing her, but she still wasn't eligible for maternity leave then. And I still hold fast to my belief that women really should consider their life situations before getting pregnant. Many years ago it wouldn't have been as big an issue because less women were working then, but things have changed now. Many more women are taking on bigger and better work positions, so they really should think before getting pregnant.
09:54 AM on 02/22/2012
Not much more for me to say here, however, just wanted to say here you are correct and handled this very well and with sinsitivity. When I read the first post, I took it as really harsh on the woman as if she was trying to get over on the company. I didn't notice that at all in the article. Well done.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alicia Zarycki
01:04 AM on 11/16/2012
Actually most women don't become pregnant by choice. Over 50% of women have unplanned pregnancies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
randinoel
God is the only way to ever-lasting life.
06:51 PM on 02/21/2012
so what? im a single mom, i cant just be home. that is lazy to just sit home. American women are so spoiled! Who takes care of their benefits as they want more and nmore time off? Us taxpayers!
Being a parent is a job, a wonderful one, but lets face it, once you are pregnant, changes need to be made. Daycare, or some kind of care, etc. Why does it have to be automatic that you are hom with ur baby for 3 months while I foot the bill, or anyone else? There is workers who CANNOT receive benefits to be with their kids...think before u get pregnant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
randinoel
God is the only way to ever-lasting life.
06:47 PM on 02/21/2012
the rulebook says one year..... so follow suit with that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
knmrourkdz
06:00 PM on 02/21/2012
women get pregnant, not men, so thats definitly discrimination .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:59 PM on 02/21/2012
Come to think of it they probably fired the HR woman.. or will.
05:21 PM on 02/21/2012
If I didn't need someone to fill the position, I wouldn't have hired someone to fill it. It is very hard for small business to even survive. Wouldn't it be wonderful if no one had to worry about survival and overhead. Not getting paid because you barely can even make payroll. Using your personal credit cards to stay up during a bad month. If someone wants to have a family that is wonderful but why should I have to take up the slack for that persons choices. Wake up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Snow Horton
06:01 PM on 02/21/2012
That was extremely well said. I am sick of women taking time off to have a baby. I don't get three months off from my job to travel the world. That would be frivolous. But breeding is acceptable as a reason to leave work. This woman makes me ashamed to be a woman. She was only there for 4 months and wanted time off already? No. She should have had a baby and used it as an excuse to leave her last job before getting a new one. Those of us who can manage to use birth control are sick of hearing the whining of people who don't do anything more extradordinary than what my dog can accomplish.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hiitsjoan
07:22 PM on 02/21/2012
I have to agree. I'd be mortified to start a new job and *four months* later find out I was pregnant. I sure wouldn't expect maternity leave and everyone supposed to be just peachy with that - the boss just hired you, wasted time training you, you're finally in a position to start being an asset to the company...and you need to out for 6 weeks. AND your unlucky collegues get to pick up your slack while you're gone. Very self-centered!

I will say it's different if you'be been working there for a while, long enough to have actually generated some income for your boss. Then you've *earned* the right to some time off.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:33 PM on 02/21/2012
Couldnt agree more! Unfortunately the feminist movement has led all women to believe they can "have it all" by working and having children, but when you do "have it all" something or someone always gets neglected.