More

HuffPost Social Reading

Rick Santorum Wins Confirm Mitt Romney Weakness: Read The Polls

First Posted: 02/ 8/2012 5:22 pm Updated: 02/16/2012 1:25 pm

WASHINGTON -- The news accounts have been consistent: Rick Santorum's stunning triple victory on Tuesday in caucuses in Colorado and Minnesota and a nonbinding primary in Missouri have "upended" the Republican presidential race and "raised fresh questions" about Mitt Romney's "stubborn weakness," his relatively limp support from the conservative GOP base.

While the television networks did not conduct exit polls for Tuesday's contests, survey data from previous primaries and caucuses generally confirm the same troubles for Romney that Santorum's wins spotlit. Less clear is whether those weaknesses clear a path for Santorum to defeat the former Massachusetts governor and win the Republican nomination.

The results in the eight contests so far demonstrate two continuing difficulties for Romney.

The first is his apparent problem with very-low-turnout caucus states. Romney has lost in three of the four caucus states to date, but has won two of the three primaries that did apportion delegates. The caucus states produced turnouts ranging from 1.2 percent of eligible adults in Minnesota to 5.4 percent in Iowa. The primary turnouts have been much higher, varying from 12.8 percent in Florida to 24.9 percent in New Hampshire. The nonbinding primary in Missouri, which Santorum won by a wide margin, produced a turnout (5.7 percent) almost as low as the Iowa caucuses.

2012-02-08-Blumenthal-turnoutexitpolltable.png




Although we have network entrance or exit polls to examine from only five states, those polls support the notion that the caucus states draw more conservative electorates. The percentage of very conservative voters was much greater in the Iowa (47 percent) and Nevada (49 percent) caucuses than in the first three primaries (21 to 36 percent).

The exit polls also confirm that Romney has a persistent problem with the most conservative Republicans. As the chart below shows, his support in the first five voting states was consistently lower among those who described themselves as very conservative than among those who said they are somewhat conservative, moderate or liberal.

2012-02-08-Blumenthal-Romneybyideology.png




Unfortunately, without entrance or exit polls for Tuesday's contests in Colorado, Minnesota and Missouri, we lack comparable data about the ideological composition of those electorates.

After one great night, the bad news for Santorum is that not many states hold Republican caucuses. Only 12 of the 50 states will choose GOP convention delegates with a caucus system, accounting for just 17 percent of the total delegates.

The second difficulty for Romney revealed by the early contests involves voters who describe themselves in exit polls as born-again or evangelical Christian. As the following chart shows, Romney received consistently less support from white, evangelical Christians than from all other voters. The gaps ranged from a low of 9 percentage points in New Hampshire (Romney won the support of 31 percent of evangelical Christians and 40 percent of all other voters) to a high of 24 points in Iowa (Romney won just 14 percent of evangelical voters compared to 38 percent of other voters).

2012-02-16-Blumenthal-Romneybyevangelical.png




More important is what Guardian blogger Harry Enten noticed: a strong correlation in the first five contests between the percentage of evangelical Christians and the size of Romney's vote. The higher the share of evangelical Christians in the entrance or exit polls, the lower the percentage of the vote that Romney received.

2012-02-08-Blumenthal-Entenchart.png




Of course, as Enten pointed out, this pattern is suggestive but not necessarily predictive, since the number of cases is very small and, again, we lack exit poll data to test whether this pattern extended to Colorado, Minnesota and Missouri. (That said, the evangelical percentage in Missouri was likely quite high; in 2008, 55 percent of the state's Republican primary voters identified as evangelical Christians.)

However, RealClearPolitics blogger Sean Trende found a similar, statistically significant relationship between Romney's share of the vote so far and the estimated evangelical percentage of the population at the county level (based on vote returns in 113 counties in the first four contests).

Whether or not Romney's problem with white evangelical Christians persists, the bad news for Santorum is that upcoming contests with large evangelical populations tend to be Southern states where Newt Gingrich continues to run well in pre-election surveys. The following table shows exit poll data from 2008 for most of the primaries coming in late February and March. The percentage of evangelicals was highest in Alabama (68 percent), Tennessee (66 percent), Oklahoma (65 percent), Mississippi (63 percent), Georgia (56 percent) and Louisiana (50 percent).

2012-02-08-Blumenthal-Evangelicalsouthernstates.png




Gallup's national daily tracking poll found that in interviews conducted among Republicans in Southern states from Jan. 30 to Feb 5, Santorum received just 14 percent of the vote, ahead of Ron Paul (10 percent) but still well behind both Gingrich (29 percent) and Romney (33 percent). Similarly, a just released American Research Group poll of Oklahoma, conducted Feb. 6 to 7, finds Gingrich narrowly leading Romney (34 to 31 percent) with Santorum running far behind (16 percent).

Ultimately, Romney could lose a series of Southern primaries and other caucus states and still win a majority of the convention delegates. Should Santorum emerge (or Gingrich re-emerge) as a strong challenger, the outcome will likely be determined by delegate-rich contests in states like Ohio, Illinois, Pennsylvania and, if necessary, California, many of which are winner-take-all either statewide or within individual congressional districts. And with Gingrich and Santorum remaining in the race, both will struggle to build the base of support necessary to overtake Romney in those key battleground races.

Rick Santorum shook up the Republican race with his victories on Tuesday, but barring a total collapse of support for Gingrich, it is hard to see Santorum's path to the nomination.

CORRECTION:The table in an earlier version of this story misstated Mitt Romney's percentage of the vote in Missouri as 35 percent. Romney won 25 percent of the Missouri vote.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The news accounts have been consistent: Rick Santorum's stunning triple victory on Tuesday in caucuses in Colorado and Minnesota and a nonbinding primary in Missouri have "upended" the R...
WASHINGTON -- The news accounts have been consistent: Rick Santorum's stunning triple victory on Tuesday in caucuses in Colorado and Minnesota and a nonbinding primary in Missouri have "upended" the R...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 945
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Yank in France 08:10 AM on 02/09/2012
Hi folks, I have been out of the country for a couple decades, but I dunno if I like all this criticism of our beloved Mitt Romney. OK, I don't know what his positions are today, but I am sure, I mean weally, weally sure, that such a man of deep conviction and principle would never, evah, back down from his long-held support for abortion and women's rights!! Right? I mean you "librolls" just don't seem to  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Not all liberals are silly.
01:14 PM on 02/11/2012
What kind of screwball party has all these "non-binding" contests or ones that just set things up for some cabal months later to pick their own slate of delegates?
12:10 PM on 02/11/2012
Rick Santorum can WIN presidential 2012. He is honest, trustworthy, he worries for all Americans, and most important of all he stands up and protects for ALL American people .

I'm Kris , I am only 10 years old. I like Mr.Santorum to be president because he protects babies from abortion.
09:51 AM on 02/15/2012
Oh, brother!
05:51 AM on 02/10/2012
Can someone direct me to the republican chat room These dem comments are scary
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Chernesky
17 Year Old Little Gay Monster on HuffPost
03:08 PM on 02/10/2012
It's called Faux News.

And I'm sorry that the truth scares you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
12:54 AM on 02/10/2012
Please, oh please let each of them win as many primaries as possible. The more the better.

O-2012.
11:00 PM on 02/09/2012
Bachmann OUT checked
Cain OUT checked
Perry OUT checked

We'll see who will go out next!

One thing that we can guarrantee is that Obama will stay IN the White House another 4 years!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Judie Vc
rMONEY OUTSPENDS SICKY 6:1 ON Mi = UNELECTABLE!!!!
01:24 AM on 02/10/2012
True but now we need to get him a Dem congress majority to combat the shameless crazy obstructionists.
photo
Almondo
Agnostic Realist Tradevknaught
09:25 PM on 02/09/2012
The "I really can't decide which of these guys is worse" competition keeps rolling along.
10:37 PM on 02/09/2012
Neither can anyone!

That's why no matter who gets nominated is NOT going to win in Nov.

O B A M A 2012 !!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Xylem44
...TO THE LEFTTO THE LEFT
10:40 PM on 02/09/2012
Its a tallest dwarf contest!
photo
Almondo
Agnostic Realist Tradevknaught
10:42 PM on 02/09/2012
And they are all coming up really short.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wolfsvssarah
Ugga Ugga Boo, Ugga Boo Boo Ugga!
03:13 PM on 02/09/2012
The GOP is pulling out all the stops. Catholic Church is suing Obama because they say that when birth control should be offered at no co-pay to all, it's an attack on morals? How, please? If a Catholic follows the dictates of their faith then they should not be using it anyway.

Now we are hearing about a 50 year ago love affair between a long dead president and one of his staffers. Why do we care?

The GOP is just desperate, they need to bring up whatever the can because no matter who of the what, 4 or 5 left gets the nod, they will never beat Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
01:40 PM on 02/09/2012
Peter Joseph for president 2012!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oregonian76
Just a guy from the PacNW
11:17 AM on 02/09/2012
How is the "best candidate to represent his/her constituents" chosen when less than 2.0% of all eligible adults/voters bother to show up at a primary/caucus? This is the kind of thing that exposes all that is wrong with our voting system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TerryDArc
The heart is the real Fountain of Youth
12:44 PM on 02/09/2012
Whenever was the "best candidate" chosen by the R's? They seem to thrive on religious zealots and bigots of all stripes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oregonian76
Just a guy from the PacNW
05:06 PM on 02/09/2012
Well, "best" is always a subjective viewpoint in politics. Even though we disagree with them, they believe they are choosing the "best possible candidate". And regardless of how we look at the terminology of it, 2.0% or less voting is ludicrous.
11:01 AM on 02/09/2012
I think these poll numbers say something far broader...Republican enthusiasm as a whole is leaning toward...'don't rock the boat baby'...that's why they can't decide. They are like a dysfunctional family...they cannot tell each other their inner or true feelings...that sometimes they think of President Obama with respect. But they must lie to each other so that they aren't cast out, they must try to out denounce him among themselves. I feel that a fair number will go into the booth in Nov. and pull down the Obama 2012 lever when the curtain is drawn. There are still a fair number of Republicans that might be anti-Obama but that are also not completely insane.

Don't rock the means four more years of President Obama, still the only adult in the room.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SmileDocMiami
If you're against gay marriage, don't marry a gay.
11:24 AM on 02/09/2012
I so hope you're right, but all the barking on their side makes me wonder, and the fact that so much of the electorate is gullible enough to believe the nonsense being spewed out there makes me nervous. Add to that the influence super PACs are going to have and the new laws restricting voters' rights make for a much more unpredictable election. That being said, there must be some Repubs who see past the BS, and the Democratic base will get fired up as soon as the GOP candidate is finalized. Crossing fingers, lol. Have a great day.
10:46 AM on 02/09/2012
I sure hope that Santorum gets the nomination. If he does it will be a major precursor to the biggest national GOP housecleaning in many decades and maybe bring at least a little sanity back to modern Republican Party philosophy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Xylem44
...TO THE LEFTTO THE LEFT
10:43 PM on 02/09/2012
Nah... I think Santorum would just be a sign that they've arrived at the destination they set out for in 1980. They'll be in the wilderness for many years more *she types gleefully*
photo
addcat
Everything you know is wrong...
10:45 AM on 02/09/2012
TRANSLATION - Republicans in the forms of far right wingers and moderates HATE HATE HATE their inevitable nominee...the zero charasmatic mannequin named Willard who says stupid things and has a very heavy RomneyCare burden on his shoulders!

Debates will be hilarious watching Romney get all defensive, screw up his pre-memorized talking points, not be able to say a damned thing about Obama's track record on protecting this nation, and fail miserable when attempting to paint the economy as worse now than it was in 2008. All of that while watching Obama as cool as a cucumber, trying not to crack up as Romney sweats it out (like Nixon debating JFK in 1960).

OBAMA 2012!!
photo
Left of Right
Want to default your country? Default your job!
05:51 PM on 02/09/2012
addcat,

Tried to fan you and it's not working. Write me back so I can find you later when it's fixed!

And yes: "OBAMA 2012!!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Xylem44
...TO THE LEFTTO THE LEFT
10:47 PM on 02/09/2012
Love the visual of that... Followed by Barack saying with a smile: "Well, I care deeply about poor people"
10:44 AM on 02/09/2012
Santorum's wins on Tuesday are not only bad news for Mitt. They're bad news for the country. The likely nominee of a major party in the U.S, just lost three races to a former Senator who was once voted "the dumbest man in Congress."
http://open.salon.com/blog/addisonpg/2012/01/04/opeds_former_dumbest_member_of_congress_scorches_romney
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
surfcityart
Soylent Green is dead people!
10:36 AM on 02/09/2012
“MALEFACTORS OF GREAT WEALTH.â€
By President Theodore Roosevelt

Too much cannot be said against the men of wealth who
sacrifice everything to getting wealth. There is not in
the world a more ignoble character than the mere
money-getting American, insensible to every duty,
regardless of every principle, bent only on amassing a
fortune, and putting his fortune only to the basest
uses —whether these uses be to speculate in stocks and
wreck railroads himself, or to allow his son to lead a
life of foolish and expensive idleness and gross
debauchery, or to purchase some scoundrel of high
social position, foreign or native, for his daughter.

Such a man is only the more dangerous if he occasionally does some deed like founding a college or endowing a church, which makes those good people who are also foolish forget his real iniquity. These men are equally careless of the working men, whom they oppress, and of the State, whose existence they imperil. There are not very many of them, but there is a very great number of men who approach more or less closely to the type, and, just in so far as they do so approach, they are curses to the country. (Forum, February 1895.) Mem.Ed. XV, 10; Nat. Ed. XIII, 9
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PensacolaTiger
11:19 AM on 02/09/2012
Now there's a Republican to admire, unlike the current crop of poltroons.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wolfsvssarah
Ugga Ugga Boo, Ugga Boo Boo Ugga!
03:18 PM on 02/09/2012
Yes, and that is true, there was a time when Republicans cared about this country. Now it is all about what they can do for themselves and their rich backers.

OBAMA/BIDEN DEMOCRATIC SUPER MAJORITY IN BOTH HOUSES 2012

CONGRESS HIT A NEW LOW TODAY. 10% APPROVAL RATING. ANYONE WANT TO GUESS WHEN IT DROPS TO A SINGLE DIGIT?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Xylem44
...TO THE LEFTTO THE LEFT
10:54 PM on 02/09/2012
Thats awesome and makes me think of those Koch brothers with their 100 million dollar Obama hate booty.
almedoz
Shh! Don't tell my Dad I'm here...
10:30 AM on 02/09/2012
Santorum's just the current flavor that satisfies the requirements for the "not Romney" position that the GOP is desperate to fill. They've already tried on and rejected Bachmann, Perry, Cain, and Gingrich, since Mittens can't seem to light a fire under the base.

It's very entertaining to watch them rip each other apart and spend all their money.