More

HuffPost Social Reading

Roger Boisjoly, NASA Contractor Who Warned Of Challenger Disaster, Dies At 73

Roger Boisjoly

02/ 7/12 05:18 PM ET  AP

NEPHI, Utah -- Roger Boisjoly, a NASA contractor who repeatedly voiced concerns about the space shuttle Challenger before it exploded, has died. He was 73.

Boisjoly died of cancer on Jan. 6 in Nephi, about 40 miles south of Provo, his wife Roberta Boisjoly said.

The 1986 Challenger tragedy shocked the nation. Seven astronauts, including a schoolteacher, were killed when the shuttle disintegrated 73 seconds after liftoff from Cape Canaveral, Fla.

Boisjoly, an engineer at rocket-builder Morton Thiokol Inc., warned in 1985 that seals on the booster rocket joints could fail in freezing temperatures.

"The result would be a catastrophe of the highest order – loss of human life," he wrote in a memo.

On the eve of the ill-fated flight, Boisjoly and several colleagues reiterated their concerns and argued against launching because of predicted cold weather at the Kennedy Space Center. They were overruled by Morton Thiokol managers, who gave NASA the green light.

Slow-motion video of the launch showed a tongue of flame sprouting from one of the shuttle's solid rocket boosters, licking the main fuel tank.

After the accident, Boisjoly testified to a presidential commission investigating the Challenger accident. The group determined that hot gases leaked through a joint in one of the booster rockets shortly after blastoff that ended with the explosion of the shuttle's hydrogen fuel.

Boisjoly said he was shunned by colleagues and neighbors after emerging as a whistleblower. He took an extended leave of absence while Morton Thiokol worked on a redesign of the rocket joint.

"When I realized what was happening, it absolutely destroyed me," Boisjoly told The Associated Press in a 1988 telephone interview. "It destroyed my career, my life, everything else. I'm just now getting back to the point where I think I'll be able to work as an engineer again."

Boisjoly toured the country and spoke about his experience. He received awards from the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers for trying to halt the Challenger launch.

Roberta Boisjoly said her husband continued to receive emails from students and others about his role.

"I'm very proud of what he did. It took a lot of courage," she said. "That's who he was. He would do it again."

Roger Boisjoly was born on April 25, 1938, in Lowell, Mass. He received a degree in mechanical engineering from University of Lowell and was active in the Church of Jesus Christ of LatterDay Saints.

After 27 years as an aerospace engineer, Boisjoly launched his own business in forensic engineering and lectured at universities.

He is survived by his wife of 49 years, two daughters and eight grandchildren.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

NEPHI, Utah -- Roger Boisjoly, a NASA contractor who repeatedly voiced concerns about the space shuttle Challenger before it exploded, has died. He was 73. Boisjoly died of cancer on Jan. 6 in Nephi,...
NEPHI, Utah -- Roger Boisjoly, a NASA contractor who repeatedly voiced concerns about the space shuttle Challenger before it exploded, has died. He was 73. Boisjoly died of cancer on Jan. 6 in Nephi,...
Filed by Rebecca Searles  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ReasonIsMyReligion
Don't know much micro-bio-logy
10:45 AM on 05/01/2012
As an engineering manager myself, I had the honor of hearing Roger Boisjoly speak once circa 1988, and chatting with him afterwards. He gave me a 1-inch sample of the famous "O-ring" which I carried in my wallet for about 20 years (until I lost the wallet). I carry the memory -- and the lessons -- still.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:00 PM on 02/10/2012
So what happened to those who over-ruled Mr Boisjoly (the real hero)?
01:43 AM on 02/09/2012
There was a documentary about the disaster on TV a few years ago where some of the engineers thought the shuttle would explode on the launch pad. When the shuttle took off that morning, they thought a disaster had been avoided. Unfortunately, disaster struck 73 seconds after liftoff.

Christa McAuliffe's backup, Barbara Morgan, eventually went into space in August 2007 aboard the shuttle Endeavour. The Endeavour was Challenger's replacement.
08:30 PM on 02/08/2012
During the preliminary design phase of the Space Shuttle Program, NASA put the boosters out to bid, and they selected the proposal from Aerojet for large one-piece solid rocket boosters built in a factory on the eastern fringe of the Everglades and moved the short distance to Kennedy Space Center by barge.

The Nixon administration "encouraged" NASA to rebid the contract and reconsider Morton Thiokol. NASA initially resisted, but with the 1972 campaign season heating up and Nixon wavering on whether or not to support the Space Shuttle program in an attempt to win California, NASA eventually accepted the Thiokol proposal. The boosters would be built in Utah and delivered to Florida by rail -- in four segments which would be assembled at Kennedy Space Center.

Morton Thiokol, as it turns out, had close political ties to the Nixon admin. And that's why the solid rocket boosters were bolted together from segments sealed with O-rings.
05:17 AM on 02/09/2012
Yes rigth after erasing the tapes Nixon ordered the O rings. Give me a break - every major contract has political elements to it - the problem was NASA managment knowing there was a problem and ignoring it. Thiokol and others would have replaced it if it is was required. NASA is to blame and those who ignored the data not just the contractor.
01:13 PM on 02/09/2012
As others have pointed out on another feedback site that I review:

"...It might be worth noting that the conditions Challenger launched under were within the specifications the Space Shuttle was supposed to be able to operate in. The qualification tests of the boosters had NOT been done to fully verify the vehicle met the procurement specs, but senior NASA managers were not alerted to that detail. Senior contractor management may not have been aware of that fact, either. But when the contractors were SPECIFICALLY asked by NASA management in the pre-flight review whether the vehicle was good to go, they very clearly said yes. And for those looking to blame Reagan, he was NOT involved in that review. Did the government WANT to launch? Hell, yes! When you've paid as much as the government had paid for Shuttle development, you WANT it to be able to fly when it's supposed to be able to do so. Were the contractors worried that they would be penalized if they said the vehicle was NOT capable of flying when it supposedly should be? Yes. But please put the blame where it belongs. If you buy a car and ask the dealer if it is able to be driven when it is raining outside and he says "Yes", do you REALLY park it anyway any time it looks like it might rain?"
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ReasonIsMyReligion
Don't know much micro-bio-logy
10:47 AM on 05/01/2012
This was not a political failure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
salamanca1
They're good eatin', but you need a lot of 'em
07:21 PM on 02/08/2012
Truly a hero and one who was vindicated after the initial blowback from the people whose reputations he damaged with his professional evaluations and courageous truth telling.
07:09 PM on 02/08/2012
Colleague of his who experienced the same shunning and also testified before congree: Allan McDonald. Great ethics speaker, also has a wonderful book about it all, highly recommended. http://www.amazon.com/Truth-Lies-Rings-Challenger-Disaster/dp/0813033268/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top
05:27 PM on 02/08/2012
Rest in Peace, Roger. Your conscience is clear. You did the right thing.
05:25 PM on 02/08/2012
The ones to blame for this inexcusable disaster were President Reagan and his advisors who insisted it would be great publicity if the president would speak by phone with the first teacher in space, Christa Mcauliffe, during Reagan's upcoming State of the Union address.

No one had the good sense to listen to Roger Boysjoli and other Morton Thiokol engineers who warned that the "o" rings had never been tested at such low temperatures, and who tried to get the launch postponed - stating clearly that this launch could result in the loss of the lives of the Challenger crew.

I do not understand why some people were not prosecuted for this disaster which did not need to occur.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GhostOfFDR
You're on the slippery slope to socialism
05:35 PM on 02/08/2012
I think that yourself in the first sentence with the words "blame" and "President Reagan". There was no way to prosecute without it being clear where there pressure to launch was coming from.
07:39 PM on 02/08/2012
Mr Boisjoly put his career and reputation on the line when he attempted to stop the shuttle launch. He made his case and refused to back down. His name will live on while those who chose to ignore the facts that he presented have long been forgotten.

NASA's failure to listen to it's engineers also led to the Columbia disaster. Experts expressed concern early on that a piece of foam may have hit the shuttle wing but they too were overruled by bureaucrats who seemed to have no comprehension of the potential danger.
05:12 PM on 02/08/2012
a hero - it is NASA admin and GOPers who wanted status quo

that boisjoly and Obama wanted to shake up!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheTightwireGuy
Attempting to balance reason and passion
03:20 PM on 02/08/2012
This may be a completely useless piece of trivia but here goes:

I have know for quite some time about how an engineer at Morton Thiokol had warned NASA about the failure-prone O-rings on the Shuttle booster rockets, but it wasn't until I read his name, as shown in the headline, that... Are you ready for this? ... he and I are most likely not-so-distantly related. 

I won't bore you here with the details but I will share this: when I saw a picture of him, as shown here...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/science-obituaries/9067491/Roger-Boisjoly.html

... my reaction was "Holy [...]! That guy could be my [....]'s biological brother!!!"

He is not, mind you, but that impression, as well as some other details I found when researching his family's records has convinced me that he probably was a first- or second-cousin of my biological [...].

Very freaky! And quite interesting to have unexpectedly learned when reading an article about science.

The Tightwire Guy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheTightwireGuy
Attempting to balance reason and passion
03:31 PM on 02/08/2012
CORRECTION: ...when spurred on by reading an article about the TOTALLY PREVENTABLE Challenger disaster.

So, here's a salute to you likely-Cousin Roger. And it is my hope that your story will inspire our greater family of human beings -- especially those in positions of power IN OUR GOVERNMENT -- to heed the judicious warnings of knowledgable whistleblowers, as well as protect them from career sabotaging reprisals by unscrupulous supervisors.

The Ttightwire Guy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheTightwireGuy
Attempting to balance reason and passion
03:52 PM on 02/08/2012
Here is more that supports my impression regarding my likely not-so-distant-relation to the engineer in this article as I discuss above.

Read these two quotes from this recent article in the Lowell Sun:
http://www.lowellsun.com/local/ci_19902357
---
"He did exactly what my parents raised him to do," Ronald Boisjoly said about Roger's efforts to shed light on the truth during the investigation.

"He would not back down from what he believed in," said Ronald's wife, Claudette.
---

Which is what my [...] was taught by [...] father, and who, in turn, vigorously endeavored to instill in my siblings and me. Which is probably why, in part I, for so many years of trying and failing how best to honor one particular ideal, have had my own numerous career struggles with ideal-compromising colleagues and supervisors.

And probably why my closest relative, who know me very well, has used the EXACT few words to describe me as those quoted here regarding the enginner in the story above, again per the Lowell Sun article:
---
Ronald Boisjoly said if there is a word to describe his brother, it's integrity. He always tried to "live good and tell the truth"
---

And for whatever this could mean for you, I heartily invite you to compassionately challenge me to do likewise if you believe that I am wavering from doing so.

And I truly thank you, in advance, for doing so.

The Tightwire Guy
02:22 PM on 02/08/2012
Here's a guy, who simply did two things. He was competent at his job, and tried to save astronauts lives by warning NASA against the Challenger launch. And what was his reward for competency? Boisjoly said he was shunned by colleagues and neighbors after emerging as a whistleblower. He wasn't a whistleblower. He was doing the job they were paying him for. So competent was his analysis, that it even applied to the Columbia Shuttle demise as well. They should have built a statute of the man at NASA, instead of continuing to fund inept management who didn't listen to him!
05:29 PM on 02/08/2012
Thank you for your truthful analysis.
edtheengineer
Retired engineer with 40 years experience.
06:13 PM on 02/08/2012
Based on my own experience with the agency, the problem with NASA management in the 80s was not technical incompetence. Instead, all members of both the technical staff and management were given overriding orders that they must be "responsive" to any and all requests from politicians and their staff members at all times. Therefore, when an order to launch was received from on high, the automatic response was to click your heels, salute and say "yessir". To do otherwise or even raise a concern would cost you your job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
salamanca1
They're good eatin', but you need a lot of 'em
07:20 PM on 02/08/2012
Or, as the late Werner Von Braun would say: Jawohl!
07:53 PM on 02/08/2012
Sounds like you've read (or should read) "Truth, Lies, and O-Rings" witten by another engineer who was a part of this disaster.

http://ethicskeynotespeaker.com/
Allan McDonald's site.