More

HuffPost Social Reading

U.S. Okinawa Base: Countries Look For Compromise Over Controversial American Base

Okinawa Base

ERIC TALMADGE   02/ 8/12 12:02 PM ET  AP

TOKYO — Japan and the United States agreed Wednesday to proceed with plans to transfer thousands of U.S. troops out of the southern Japanese island of Okinawa, leaving behind the stalled discussion about closing a major U.S. Marine base there.

The transfer, a key to U.S. troop restructuring in the Pacific, has been in limbo for years because it was linked to the closure and replacement of the strategically important base that Okinawans fiercely oppose.

The announcement Wednesday follows high-level talks to rework a 2006 agreement for 8,000 Marines to transfer to the U.S. territory of Guam by 2014 if a replacement for Marine Corps Air Station Futenma could be built elsewhere on Okinawa.

That agreement has been effectively scuttled by opposition on Okinawa, where many residents believe the base should simply be closed and moved overseas or elsewhere in Japan. More than half of the 50,000 U.S. troops in Japan, including 18,000 Marines, are stationed on Okinawa, taking up around 10 percent of the island with nearly 40 bases and facilities.

The two governments said in a joint statement that the transfer of thousands of U.S. Marines to Guam would not require the prior closure of Futenma, as the original pact required. Details of the realignment will be discussed further, but about 10,000 troops will remain on Okinawa, as in the original agreement.

Foreign Minister Koichiro Gemba told a news conference that he hoped the progress on the realignment plan would help the two countries step up deterrence in the Asia-Pacific region. He also said Tokyo and Washington would continue efforts to eventually close Futenma.

Progress on the issue is important to the United States, which is revising its military and diplomatic posture in Asia – in what is being called the "Pacific Pivot" – to reflect the rising power of China and increasing tensions over territorial disputes throughout the region.

Washington is also under pressure to make the most of its resources as budget cuts loom in Congress with combat operations are ending in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Wednesday's statement was vague on specifics of what lies ahead. But senior Japanese officials have said 4,700 Marines will be transferred to Guam. The remaining 3,300 would reportedly rotate among Australia, Hawaii and the Philippines.

Pentagon press secretary George Little said from Washington that talks would continue with both sides working on mitigating the impact on Okinawa, developing Guam as a strategic hub and maintaining an effective U.S. military presence in the region. He also said discussing troop numbers and locations was premature as the bilateral talks continue.

Tokyo is hoping the reduction of troops on Okinawa will ease opposition and demonstrate its desire to stand by promises to reduce the island's share of the troop-hosting burden. Officials say they remain committed to closing Futenma, which the U.S. and Japan agreed to do after the 1995 rape of a schoolgirl by three American servicemen led to mass protests.

"We decided to choose to reduce Okinawa's burden as much as possible rather than being stuck in a stalemate by sticking to an earlier package," Gemba said, stressing Tokyo's effort to serve Okinawa's interest as much as possible.

But Okinawa Gov. Hirokazu Nakaima gave a mixed response. He welcomed the agreement to move ahead with the Marines' relocation and a return of some of the bases as serving "Okinawans' desire to reduce the U.S. military presence," but repeated his rejection to move Futenma to another location on the island.

"A relocation without local consent would be impossible. We want Futenma moved out of Okinawa," Nakaima said in a statement.

The most likely replacement site, on a less crowded part of the island, is widely opposed on Okinawa and its viability remains a heated political debate.

Guam, meanwhie, has pushed hard for the troop buildup because of the potential economic boom.

"We are the closest U.S. community to Asia. We are very patriotic citizens. And unlike many foreign countries and even some U.S. communities, we welcome an increased military presence," Gov. Eddie Calvo said in a statement last week.

Guam, which is being built up to play a greater role in Washington's Asia-Pacific strategy, could also stand to get far fewer Marines than expected if the new plan goes through. The tiny U.S. territory had been counting on a huge boost from the restructuring plan, and may have to revise its forecasts.

But officials said the revised number could be more manageable.

A smaller contingent of Marines would alleviate concerns on Guam that the swelling military presence would overwhelm the island's infrastructure and environment.

Mark G. Calvo, the director of Guam's military buildup office, said the territory has been briefed by the Department of Defense about the talks with Japan and supports the transfer, even if it is smaller than expected. He said the idea of reducing it to about 4,000 Marines had been discussed after an environmental impact assessment two years ago pointed to possible problems.

"There are concerns about a loss of economic benefits, but it puts us in a better position to adjust our infrastructure," he said.

___

Associated Press writers Mari Yamaguchi in Tokyo and Matthew Pennington in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TOKYO — Japan and the United States agreed Wednesday to proceed with plans to transfer thousands of U.S. troops out of the southern Japanese island of Okinawa, leaving behind the stalled discuss...
TOKYO — Japan and the United States agreed Wednesday to proceed with plans to transfer thousands of U.S. troops out of the southern Japanese island of Okinawa, leaving behind the stalled discuss...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 333
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
10:13 PM on 02/09/2012
They cant close this base! How on earth will recruiters tempt new soldiers in without the holiday ...i mean training in Japan.
09:12 PM on 02/09/2012
You know, the Japanese helps pay for the troops we station there. Because Tokyo actually wants US protection, its the Okinawans that want us out. Seriously man, you guys need to do some research before you guys go "HURP DURP CLOSE THE BASE TO SAVE MONEY".
09:43 PM on 02/09/2012
Tokyo is as rotten as Washington. Listen to the Okinawans, it's their place.
07:59 PM on 02/09/2012
Its only been 67 years since the US defeated Japan at the end of WWII. There we go again. Cutting and running before the post war clean up job is finished.
09:41 PM on 02/09/2012
Lol. Good one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Notsosurearewe
Swish swish.
06:03 PM on 02/09/2012
Meh. Pull them out completely and let the Japanese pay for their own defense. That's an expense we can do without at this point anyway.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Language Learner
02:09 PM on 02/09/2012
Imperialism needs to end, we must allow other people to live their lives as they see fit as long as they don't harm anyone else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deluk
hot mess...
12:39 PM on 02/09/2012
These imperialists are the same people who'll squat on their stolen land and whine about Ireland.
12:38 PM on 02/09/2012
Like a cancer...once you have it you don't get rid of it! Why must people in an independent nation resort to all kinds of protests in order to get the US army to get out? Leeches!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maverick9808
klaatu barada necktie
12:24 PM on 02/09/2012
Occupation is an interesting thing especially when a powerful country like China is in the mix. If we were to pull our troops out of the islands to the south of Japan it would be no problem for china to move in and take those positions over, which then in turn would cause america to appear as aggressors when we try to protect those interests by taking back territorial interests. This whole idea of reducing bases in Asia is ridiculous and only works to expand the power that China has over the region; if anything now is the time to expand bases and increase our naval presence in China. Once we lose the upper hand derived from political and socio-economic weight within Asia the whole worlds supply chain will be disrupted by Chinese naval expansion. Don't believe me take a look at Indonesia.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
youarenotGod
02:54 PM on 02/09/2012
Why does the US have military bases in 135 countries around the world? A defense budget would fund sufficient personnel and equipment to "defend" our borders from invasion and foreign occupation. The US will soon be like every imperialist power that came before--overextended and vulnerable to economic collapse. The US has eleven 100,000-ton nuclear-powered aircraft carriers in service, one mothballed, one being built and two on order. No other country in the world has even ONE comparable carrier. And US warmongers fret over military build-up on China!!! In 2008, 2009 and 2010, US military spending accounted for 47-48% of total worldwide military spending. In the same three years, China had the second-largest military budget, accounting for only 7% of the total. Our govt and military leaders prey on the fear of Americans that Muslims are hell-bent on invading our country, destorying our way of life and imposing Sharia Law. It is the same ploy used by Hitler to identify Jews as the enemy of Germans, intent on destroying the German way of life.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canpete
12:04 PM on 02/09/2012
Japan does not have oil, why is amerrica still there 67 years after ww2 ?
08:03 PM on 02/09/2012
Good one. Funny and sad at the same time.
10:10 AM on 02/09/2012
Having served as both an artillery officer and a motor transport officer at the battalion staff level on Okinawa in the 1970's I know how ridiculously difficult and prohibitively expensive it is to support and supply our military units in such places. I suspect that things are worse now. Given the wonderful climate and demand for vacation condos. Our artillery units could not live fire train there. Guam is not the answer. Everything we have on Okinawa but Kadena should be closed. If we truly want to make those Marines, of which I was a part, the best trained units of their type in the world we should move them to 29 Palms. Make them and the 3rd Air wing the permanent aggressor force for Ft Irwin. I think that recent events have proven that no matter how good certain Army units are there are still things the Marines can do better and I expect that will always be the case. Many chicken hawks in congress who have gotten no closer to combat than their annual boondoggles to places like Kaneohe Bay on Oahu and who insist we much spend more on defense need to speak with the same tongue when they want to cut funds to domestic programs. We must live within our means across the board folks. We ar eno longer the 900 pound gorilla. If we ever were.
09:51 AM on 02/09/2012
It's about time we stop spending our tax dollars all over the world. We must concentrate on the Mid-East now. We have no business bein there, except to help Israel who has given us nothing in return.
08:47 AM on 02/09/2012
That was a confused piece of reporting. If the reporter does not understand the situation, stay mum.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
baskemp
Veteran, US Navy Nurse Corp
08:04 AM on 02/09/2012
Ron Paul can be kinda of kooky at times, but I agree with him on his point about closing a lot of these overseas bases and embassy's and bringing our guys home and reopening the bases here. Cuts Military spending but not Defense spending. Some of these embassies have budgets in the millions monthly and are staffed to the hilt and luxurious to boot. Close these places down and use the resources to upgrade enlisted pay and benefits. No privatization of veteran health care. Help out our men and women in uniform. They are giving us all they got!
07:18 AM on 02/09/2012
Naive to say the US are there now purely for Japan's Defence and Japanese interests. They are there because it provides them with a huge presence in Asia as a counterweight to China. It is precisely about projecting US boarders and US interests. You can't protect you interests by bringing all your troops home and having them sat in Idaho!! That's why you built a load of aircraft carriers! That's why you have bases all over the world. And that's why the Japanese might now want a relocation of such a huge base.

http://twitter.com/DavidWillder_UK
06:21 AM on 02/09/2012
Lol, we wrote their constitution, sent economic advisors there to teach them how to re-industrialize and learned our management methods, deter the Chinese and the North Koreans from threatening them, dump billions of dollars in revenues into local economies, etc., and they are going to decide what we will be doing in the future...?

They should be pleased that we are not like Rome, which spent ten years razing and burning most of Carthage in an attempt to wipe them off the face of the earth when Hannibal tried to do the same thing they attempted
08:32 AM on 02/09/2012
"and they are going to decide what we will be doing in the future...?"

Yes. That is called national sovereignty and democracy.

Beside that: The vast majority of today's Japanese, Americans (and Europeans for that matter) were not even born 70 years ago. And among the many atrocities the US fought against then was the practice of kin liability/ "Sippenhaft". I guess you don't want to enact that now yourself, do you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maverick9808
klaatu barada necktie
12:28 PM on 02/09/2012
Japan was already becoming industrialized before the war, how else do you think Taiwan and Korea were turned into the industrial centers they are today? Where did all those airplanes and war ships come from or fine silks pottery etc. Its not like we taught the Japanese how to make the wheel we simply destroyed their means.
02:49 PM on 02/09/2012
're-industrialize' is self-explanatory...

Management applies to all business
02:52 PM on 02/09/2012
Ever heard of the Deming Management Method...? The Trade Union Act...? the Labor Standards Act...?