iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Health Reform Bans Insurance Company Fine Print, Allows Baffling Terms

Kathleen Sebelius

First Posted: 02/ 9/2012 6:41 pm Updated: 02/ 9/2012 6:41 pm

The Obama administration aims to demystify shopping for health insurance and has created a standard form that explains in plain language without the fine print what plans actually cover. What they couldn't do was make health insurance itself less complicated, so consumers will still be confronted by baffling terms including "allowed amount," "balance billing," and "usual, customary, and reasonable charges."

The health reform law requires insurance companies to use a new document that presents a uniform summary of deductibles, co-payments and other features so consumers can compare one health plan to another. The new rules also eliminate the fine print: insurers can't use a typeface smaller than 12 points. Administration officials including Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius unveiled the forms Thursday and companies will have to comply beginning Sept. 23.

Consumer groups including Families USA and Health Care for America Now praised the policy as an important step that enhances transparency in the health insurance market. These new summaries of benefits and costs will help people choose the right health plans and are a big improvement over the confusing information and marketing material insurance companies currently use, said Lynn Quincy, a senior policy analyst at Consumers Union who helped develop the new form.

The "plain language" isn't always so plain and the jargon-heavy nature of the form underscores that health insurance is complicated. While the administration will require that insurers provide a four-page glossary of industry terms, shoppers will have to contend with terminology that isn't always easily understandable. "We don't want to over-promise here about what a form can do laid over top a very complex product," Quincy said. "We have to wait and see if the new form actually helps people."

The insurance summary can't be longer than eight pages and includes facts about a plan such as what its deductibles are, whether benefits are capped at a certain dollar amount every year, and if patients need referrals to visit specialists. Though the administration proposed last year that premiums be listed, that requirement isn't part of the final rule. The monthly price for a health plan, which may not be available until after an insurance company has reviewed a customer's application, will be provided separately.

The form includes examples of medical expenses, such as the birth of a child, so consumers can estimate how much would be covered by insurance and how much would come out of their own pockets. The administration characterizes this feature as a “Nutrition Facts” label for health benefits.

The health insurance industry's top lobbyist said the rule places too heavy a burden on companies and takes effect too quickly. "The final rule requires an almost complete overhaul and redesign of how information must be provided to consumers," Karen Ignagni, president and CEO of America's Health Insurance Plans, said in a statement.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The Obama administration aims to demystify shopping for health insurance and has created a standard form that explains in plain language without the fine print what plans actually cover. What they cou...
The Obama administration aims to demystify shopping for health insurance and has created a standard form that explains in plain language without the fine print what plans actually cover. What they cou...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 635
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
henrypapillon 03:32 AM on 02/10/2012
Sounds like  a step in the right direction. You get on the phone with these people and they run you through the hoops and then the pharmacy rules are another thing. I have been on the phone for 3 hours being shuffled around from person to person at the Merck-Medco mail order pharmacy and it is very tiring and confusing the things that they have told me and the times they have lied to me . They have  Read More...
01:38 PM on 02/15/2012
Insurance costs are eating us alive. As a retired couple on social security we pay out close to $1200 monthly in various insurance policies, minimum we need for a safety net. What is particularly upsetting to us is the need not only to pay premiums for Medicare, but also additional Supplemental Medical Insurance because Medicare does not pay everything. The next huge problem is increasing costs of Home Owner insurance, especially in hard hit states like Florida. On our home, valued at $175K, we pay out $335 monthly for basic home owner insurance. This is OUTRAGEOUS. Florida regulators do nothing to protect people on fixed incomes from the non-competitive home owner insurance companies in Florida. WE also have high auto insurance to pay. Of course our life insurance policies are a matter of choice, but that is less than $75 monthly. Most of our insurance is not a matter of choice, and we are being gouged. We are being EATEN ALIVE by insurance companies. It is a major problem that is not being addressed. We need to OccupyInsuranceCompanies as well as banks.There is NO WAY we can retire on our Social Security. We are terrified as to what we will do when we can no longer work.
10:30 PM on 02/13/2012
I am in a nightmare with my insurance co over a designation for a diagnostic as out patient surgery that triggered a $3,000 deductible. All the explanations sound like.....well if it has no info describing it than it's this. Say what? I can't even see the badly copied plans they send me. All the while whispering "you can't go anywhere else you know. You have a pre-existing condition. Be careful we don't drop you".
It was a long time before I realized that I pay an administrator a middle man as well as the insurance. They tack on their fees onto your premium. Ahhh for profit healthcare....should be outlawed.
05:29 PM on 02/13/2012
We have let the health care system drive us into poverty for so long it is going to take years to recover -- that if we have the will to fight for sanity and fair costs. This plan for "plain language" is a step in the right direction, but only a baby step. Still, this process allows us a bigger glimpse at how the insurance companies and their "plans" have hoodwinked us. My "senior advantage" plan book is 218 pages! This is presumably because there are so many loop holes -- and health care and treatment is all separated into micro pieces. Instead of having, say, a standard fee or no fee for cancer screening, each type of cancer is different.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramon Noches
Retired Air Force
03:03 PM on 02/13/2012
Most federal documents seem written for lawyers not the average person. Will the aforementioned parties make an effort to eschew obfuscation of the textual content formalized in obligatory federal tomes so people who need to comprehend the information can do so without climbing over towering barriers built atop huge stacks of polymorphic verbiage?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Steve Albin
.........I am a United State American citizen, God
02:44 PM on 02/13/2012
How much a month for the wonderful plan!!!!!!
10:51 AM on 02/13/2012
The critical point here to me is, you pay for health care insurance. You get sick. Does your insurance pay the bills? What's so complicated. Oh yeah, the health care insurance company doesn't want to pay your medical bills, they want to make money. So if they can get out of paying your medical bills, they will. This is why we need a National Health Care option. Just give us the choice. What are the insurance companies afraid of if they are doing such a great job. Want to introduce true competition or not?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Derrick
10:44 AM on 02/13/2012
My preferred solution to healthcare is it should be a "State-Sponsored" policy, not a Federally-sponsored mandate. Take the corrupt insurance companies out of healthcare all together so you eliminate the "profit" and "mystery" side of the equation. States (all 50 of them) could "compete" for the best managed healthcare program with the more efficient becoming popular with time. States could operate them much the same as the "college pre-paid tuition" programs.

States should look to the insurance companies for the "start-up" capital where there have been a windfall profit for some time. Banks and insurance companies have become very strange bedfellows these days and bought their way into mainstream politics....aka; corruption.
01:49 PM on 02/15/2012
Yes. It seems to me banks and insurance companies must be strange bedfellows. How else is it that they seem to own thousands of our homes. "Bank owned properties" must surely have been the result of people unable to pay the high cost of home owner insurance. I don't mind paying my property taxes, but I hate like hell paying my home owner insurance and my medical insurance premiums. We do need national insurance for both health care and catastrophic natural disaster damages. Unless we continue our counter-revolution against the Reagan-Thatcher-Bush revolution of deregulation, privatization and corruption.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Derrick
10:31 AM on 02/13/2012
Complicated forms, whether IRS or Healthcare or whoever, tend to serve it's publisher. Ask China about their addendum to their "Free Trade Agreement".... When I read a contract that has too much "double-talk" it demonstrates the author is a crook and I walk away. I treat others the same way they treat me...partner or adversary? Government all too often has been an adversary to the common citizen and small business these days. But it's just as important to discuss all the terms of a policy too, what's included and more importantly; what isn't included....
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
06:46 AM on 02/13/2012
Might have been easier, if the Health Insurance cartel were not the ones that wrote the health care reform bill.

When the argument was health care reform, Congress had a choice.

Work for the ones that voted them into office.

Or work for the ones that pay them the most, their corporate campaign contributors.

WE lost.................again.

Medicare for all was the answer.................but that wasn't even offered.

Big Business OWNS this country, they bought our government out from under us. Sad thing is, with wealth as concentrated as it now is, we don't even have enough money (comparatively speaking) to "buy it back"

They won, plain an simple, we lost. I don't think ANY reforms are possible anymore, except in name only. The entire system is too corrupt to even be fixed.

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution" -Abraham Lincoln-

As much as I hate to say it........I think we've arrived at that point.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rotorhead1871
who are you jivin' with that cosmic debris?...
10:34 PM on 02/12/2012
the administration didnt do enough research or oversimplified how easy it would be to sell this health insurance plan to the public now its turning into a debacle....sebellius is not capable of making the transition.....
iridium53
Semper Fi
12:12 PM on 02/12/2012
This healthcare insurance compromise creates an unfair, unconscionable, unconstitutional religion-based TAX on non-Religious businesses.

If Catholics won't pay their fair share of their employee's healthcare costs, the costs that ACA requires everyone to pay for, then other, non-Catholic businesses must pay for those costs.

It is a stupid, specious argument to say that insurance companes will pay.

What this creates is a special religion-based tax preferring some religions over others that will be forced to pay what their businesses won't.

A new middle-ages of government-preferred Catholicism.

I'm unalterably opposed to paying this tax and will pass this cost on to my employees - as a reduction in their bonus pool noting that this religion-based tax is due to Obama and the Catholics.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
authorized-user
macho macho man
08:42 AM on 02/11/2012
Here's one you can understand; DIE QUICKLY
05:55 AM on 02/11/2012
The Supreme Court will rule that Barack's "signature" piece of junk, Obamacare, is unconstitutional and the entire bill, with illegal mandate, will be repealed.

On 11.6.12, time to vote and get this Country back on track....no more lefties with an extreme agenda, that wants to "transform" the USA into a country that it's citizens would no longer know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martha Fair
Professional RepubliBilly Factchecker
10:26 AM on 02/11/2012
If you don't like Obama care than blame yourselves. Your party is the reason we don't have single payer tax based healthcare which eliminates the insurance industry from practicing medicine. The medical care we have right now is a direct result of special "welfare benefits" for the big Healthcare insurance industry and the contolling level of the pharmaceutical industry that subsidizes the continued re-election of your party. That's OK, because when all the employers are no longer willing to absorb the rising premiums, they will begin dropping you all like flys and then somehow that "socialized" medicine won't sound half bad. Quit voting Republican and we can than get a subsidized balanced version of healthcare like every other civilized nation in the world.
05:16 PM on 02/10/2012
It is time to make law that all small print is placed in BOLD print and make an electronic recording, an explanation of what the BOLD print means.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
04:32 PM on 02/10/2012
Bans fine print but not bamboozlement. This is what poor implementation, tainted by corrupt politics, looks like.