iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Kodak To Stop Making Cameras

Kodak Cameras

02/ 9/12 06:16 PM ET  AP

ROCHESTER, N.Y. — Picture it: Save for a few disposable point-and-shoots, Kodak is exiting the camera business.

Eastman Kodak Co. said Thursday that it will stop making digital cameras, pocket video cameras and digital picture frames in a move that marks the end of an era for the beleaguered 132-year-old company.

Founded by George Eastman in 1880, Kodak was known all over the world for iconic cameras such as the Brownie and the Instamatic. For the last few decades, however, the Rochester, New York-based company has struggled. It was battered by Japanese competition in the 1980s, and failed to keep pace with the shift from film to digital technology.

The company sought bankruptcy protection from creditors last month in a case that covers $6.7 billion in debt. It has a year to devise a restructuring plan. Citigroup Inc. was approved to lend the company $650 million to continue operating.

Exiting the digital camera business is especially poignant for Kodak. In 1975, using an electronic sensor invented six years earlier at Bell Labs, a Kodak engineer named Steven Sasson created the world's first digital camera. It was an eight-pound, toaster-size device that captured low-resolution black-and-white images.

Reached at home Thursday, Sasson told The Associated Press that seeing Kodak exit the business is "a bit sad" but part of a transition facing all companies that use evolving technology.

"The average person probably owns more digital cameras than they realize," he said. "It's just the reality that digital imaging is a part of our lives and you can capture images in a lot of different ways. There's a lot of choices people have, cellphones being one of them."

Through the 1990s, Kodak spent some $4 billion developing the photo technology inside most of today's cellphones and digital devices. But fearing that it might cannibalize its celluloid film business, Kodak waited until 2001 to bring its own digital cameras to the consumer market. By then, it faced strong competitors like Sony Corp. and Canon.

These days, digital camera sales are suffering as consumers increasingly take photos on smartphones such as the iPhone. Certain smartphone makers such as LG, Nokia, Motorola and Samsung have agreed to pay Kodak to license its digital camera technology, while companies like Apple are fighting its patent claims.

Before Thursday's announcement, Kodak had already been trying to shrink its product line and sell in fewer retail venues, but as sales declines worsened, the company saw no way to make the business profitable.

"We made the logical conclusion that there was no clear path to profitability and we have to focus on generating profits at this point," said Kodak spokesman Chris Veronda.

Kodak said getting out the digital camera business by June should help cut losses by about $100 million a year as it struggles to emerge from Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

The company's digital camera line was part of a rapidly shrinking division that accounted for about a quarter of Kodak's revenue in the three-month period through September.

For the nine months through September, total company sales plunged 18 percent to $4.3 billion and it lost $647 million.

Kodak sees home photo printers, high-speed commercial inkjet presses, workflow software and packaging as the core of its future business. Since 2005, the company has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into new lines of inkjet printers. Once the digital camera business is phased out, Kodak said its consumer business will focus on printing. It will seek a company to license its EasyShare digital camera brand.

Kodak said it's working with retailers to ensure an orderly transition. The company will continue to honor product warranties and provide technical support for the discontinued products.

The company didn't say how many jobs would be eliminated as a result of the decision, but did say that it expects to take a charge of $30 million related to separation costs.

Kodak owns patents that cover a number of basic functions in many smartphone cameras, and the bankruptcy judge has given the company until June 30 to come up with a procedure to sell them.

The company picked up $27 million in patent-licensing fees in the first half of 2011. It made about $1.9 billion from those fees in the previous three years combined. But no buyers have emerged since Kodak started shopping them around in July.

___

AP Business Writer Ryan Nakashima in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

We recently ranked Kodak among the worst run companies in America. Here are the others:
FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Alana Horowitz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 458
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
07:23 PM on 04/07/2012
sad........ive only bought KODAK digital cameras! All eight of them!
02:16 AM on 02/12/2012
What?! NOOO! Kodak is the only brand camera I buy. :(
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:08 PM on 02/10/2012
They made a decent camera.
If you see one in a clearance bin feel free to snap it up.
09:50 AM on 02/10/2012
Will they stop dumping toxic chemicals into Lake Ontario?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:08 AM on 02/10/2012
In an effort to buy American, I have faithfully purchased Kodak digitals for at least a decade. However, the last one I bought was very disappointing. The picture quality went way downhill, for no reason that I could discern other than that the camera is not good. I was already contemplating having to buy my first non-Kodak digital.
09:33 AM on 02/10/2012
Kodak digital cameras are designed and built by Chinon Industries in China. Kodak just puts it's name on them.
09:48 AM on 02/10/2012
For 20 years or so already KODAK's camera production has been outsourced­, often made by Chinon.

Similar to Apple that has it's stuff produced by Foxconn.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beth24
04:35 AM on 02/10/2012
Ironic how a company that created so many wonderful and beautiful films destroyed film having no respect for photographers who loved various films that went extinct. They never marketed their films properly and then blamed the lack of sales on the market rather than their lack of marketing their products. Their new Portra 400 is a beautiful film and their B & W film still makes great images especially if you send it to DR5 Labs in Denver where the film is converted to a chrome transparency far superior for scanning than neg film. Try it. Its fabulous.
photo
born 2b different
research b4 u post
11:55 AM on 02/10/2012
That is such a small niche market that it has no revelavance to the overall picture of what happened to Kodak.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:25 AM on 02/10/2012
Original? They copied Polaroid back in the 1980's & got sued.
04:14 AM on 02/10/2012
Are they going to stop making printers?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
June25
08:57 AM on 02/10/2012
Not as long as they can force people to pay an arm and a leg for new ink cartridges.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:10 PM on 02/10/2012
The other guys charge an arm and a leg Kodak was getting just the leg.
03:41 AM on 02/10/2012
why why kodak send device to foreign make cameras for america,
how come kodak dont want to make AMERICA cameras than foreigns
04:03 AM on 02/10/2012
What?
03:31 AM on 02/10/2012
"Save your old cameras; some day they'll be worth something."

I have my doubts. Unless it's a Leica camera, it will be worth nothing.
I have an old 1932 Kodak camera in good condition, worth about 30-40$ today. Looks good as decoration, but that's about it.
02:52 AM on 02/10/2012
"When are Americans going to realize that buying foreign is killing this country?"

If you want a really good camera, you got to buy Japanese (Nikon, Canon) or German (Leica) or Swedish (Hasselblad).
When an American company comes up with something better, I might buy. If not, so be it.
08:40 AM on 02/10/2012
So really which side are you on?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:01 AM on 02/10/2012
The side of market forces.
09:40 AM on 02/10/2012
On the quality side.
02:50 AM on 02/10/2012
In the first half of the 20th century KODAK made some of the best cameras you could buy. They were also inexpensive because the company's profits came from film and paper sales.
Unfortunately, KODAK bought-in to the Reagen era philosophy of business and has seriously declined since the '80s, losing 90%+ of the employees since I joined the company in 1985.
It's really sad, but not unexpected. I always said that KODAK would end up with the board of directors, and a janitor to clean up after them, seems I was right. Such a pity!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
12:06 PM on 02/10/2012
Reagan invented the digital camera, destroying the paper film industry?

Who knew....
02:37 AM on 02/10/2012
I hate to see Kodak having problems but to read that Citigroup is approved to lend money to Kodak seems a bit ridiculous since it is the American taxpayer who bailed out Citigroup. It should not be the business of the U.S. or the American taxpayers to bailout banks especially when they did not bailout small businesses but still gave bonuses to their executives. It is ridiculous that some are pretty loose using the word socialism but the bailout of the banks was socialism in it's truest form. A nation needs to make products not just be salesmen, con artists and burger flippers.
02:29 AM on 02/10/2012
The Government should bail them out. It worked for Chrysler.
02:41 AM on 02/10/2012
Chrysler was bought by FIAT, that helped them.
03:27 AM on 02/10/2012
True, but if you ask most Obama supporters, including Obama himself, it was the government bailout that saved them. Not to mention the 100's of billions of $'s in bailouts for various industry and banks, etc. So maybe Kodak should also be bailed out too.
photo
RyanBurke
Devout follower of Zeus, the One True God.
02:26 AM on 02/10/2012
But now how am I supposed to take pictures of Pitbull in Times Square?

--Anyone? Anyone at all??