More

HuffPost Social Reading

Obama Birth Control Mandate Divides Democrats

Obama Birth Control Policy

DONNA CASSATA   02/ 9/12 08:57 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — Democrats are deeply divided over President Barack Obama's new rule that religious schools and hospitals must provide insurance for free birth control to their employees amid fresh signs that the administration was scrambling for a way out.

"This is not only unacceptable, it is un-American," says Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., a Catholic who faces re-election in November in a state where Wednesday nights are reserved for church services.

Another Catholic senator, Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, has pleaded with the administration "to correct this decision which will erode the conscience rights" that have been protected for decades. His opposition echoes the criticism of his bishop in Scranton, Rev. Joseph C. Bambera.

Several Democrats, including Senate candidate Tim Kaine in Virginia and Illinois Rep. Dan Lipinski, have been outspoken in assailing the recently announced administration mandate that has angered religious groups and unified Republicans in protest. In a reflection of the party split, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., on Thursday blocked a GOP effort to debate an amendment on religious freedom.

A day earlier, liberal female senators thanked Obama for the new policy during a closed-door retreat.

"We're here to stand up for the women of America who deserve to have access to free preventive care through their health insurance," Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., said later at a news conference.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., on Thursday promised a fierce debate on women's rights if Republicans tried to repeal the policy.

Even though church-affiliated hospitals, colleges and social service agencies will have one additional year to comply with the requirement, issued last month in regulations under Obama's health care overhaul, the outcry has been loud and fierce. Facing intense pressure, the White House indicated this week that it is trying to come up with a compromise.

Vice President Joe Biden, a Catholic, said in a radio interview Thursday that "there is going to be a significant attempt to work this out and there is time to do that." He said the one-year grace period is "to make sure that we do not force the Catholic Church to do something that they fundamentally think is inconsistent with their religious beliefs."

He spoke with Bill Cunningham of 700 WLW in Cincinnati.

The party break over the contentious issue could reverberate in an election year, with implications not only for Obama in battleground states with significant numbers of Catholic working-class voters such as Ohio and Pennsylvania, but also for Democrats in congressional races. The political upside for Casey or Manchin is a fresh opportunity to show their independence from the president; the political downside is potentially pushing too far on a matter that resonates with female voters critical to the Democrats' prospects in November.

In a show of defiance, Manchin joined forces with Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida on Thursday in introducing legislation to expand the religious exemption and undo the Obama policy.

"I don't know why the federal government jumped in at the level they did," Manchin said.

Another West Virginia Democrat, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, joined Casey and Kaine in pressing for continued access to preventive health care services for women but ensuring that religious liberties are protected. Rockefeller sent a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Thursday urging her to consider what Manchin signed into law when he was governor of West Virginia. The state is one of 28 that require health insurance plans to cover birth control. However, not all have the same exemptions for church-affiliated employers.

Manchin has been in touch with his bishop, Rev. Michael Bransfield, of the diocese for Wheeling and Charleston, who has called the rule "a radical break with the tradition of religious liberty and respect for conscience rights."

More than 150 Catholic cardinals and bishops throughout the country have been relentless in assailing the policy, with many of their letters on the policy sent to parishioners or read aloud at Sunday Masses.

Ramping up the pressure, a worldwide Catholic broadcasting network based in Alabama filed a lawsuit Thursday against the administration over the policy. The suit, filed by the nonprofit EWTN Global Catholic Network, claims the rules are unconstitutional because they would require the broadcaster to violate church principles on the sanctity of life.

"This is a moment when EWTN, as a Catholic organization, has to step up and say that enough is enough," said Michael Warsaw, the network's president. "Our hope is that our lawsuit does just that."

Among Democrats, Manchin and Casey are in line with their church's leaders and holding fast to their religious beliefs. Yet in West Virginia, the senator still has faced criticism from the Republican Party on the issue.

Frustration among some Democrats dates to early December when Casey, Manchin and several other moderate House and Senate lawmakers participated in a conference call with senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett. The lawmakers voiced their reservations but made no headway with Jarrett, who thanked them for their opinions, according to congressional aides who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.

Internally at the White House, Biden, then-Chief of Staff Bill Daley and deputy national security adviser Denis McDonough, all Catholics, raised concerns about how the administration proceeded on the policy. On the other side, senior White House advisers Nancy-Ann DeParle, Pete Rouse and David Plouffe argued for the need to ensure coverage for all without exception, as a matter of women's health and fairness.

Three Democratic senators – Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, Patty Murray of Washington state and Boxer – pressed for making birth control coverage widely available.

The discussions were described by administration officials who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private talks.

___

Associated Press writers Ben Feller, Erica Werner, Jim Kuhnhenn and Alan Fram in Washington and Jay Reeves in Birmingham, Ala., contributed to this report.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Democrats are deeply divided over President Barack Obama's new rule that religious schools and hospitals must provide insurance for free birth control to their employees amid fresh ...
WASHINGTON — Democrats are deeply divided over President Barack Obama's new rule that religious schools and hospitals must provide insurance for free birth control to their employees amid fresh ...
Filed by Leigh Owens  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,985
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (31 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
ChasG 01:54 AM on 02/10/2012
The fundamental position that church's should have the right to impose their religious views on their employees is a grotesque misinterpretation of the constitutional right to religious freedom.  This right not only includes freedom of one's own religion but freedom from the imposition of someone else's religion.  If the law mandates that employer-based healthcare benefits include certain  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Bays
ASSERTIONS ARE NOT FACTS
03:34 PM on 02/14/2012
Once again the GOP goes down playing to the abject stupidity of their Tea Bagger Caucus - taking the rediculous side of an argument and alienating the majority in order to placate the wingnut fringes. How does anyone come to the conclusion that refusing to impose the religious beliefs of a small minority within the Catholic Church on the rest of us is a "War on Religion? The conference of old men - women are excluded from participation - in the Vatican, prefers to live in the eighteenth century.They are certainly not infallable - as evidenced by "The Inquisition". These are not edicts from God - nor do they take their "Moral Imperitive" from any Bibical Text.
DO NOT TRY TO IMPOSE YOUR BELIEFS ON ME AND CALL IT PROTECTING YOUR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.
I just hope that, when we get to November, we will remember who protected the choices of individual conscience and Liberty, and who wanted to impose their beliefs on others.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janicedow1
Mama for Obama
10:30 AM on 02/14/2012
I have been listening to talking heads state that even Progressive Catholics opposed the mandate requiring Catholic employers to provide birth control coverage for employees. The supposed reason was although individual Catholics use birth control, they viewed requiring a Catholic business to provide contraception coverage, an attack on their church. Well, don't speak for me talking heads. I am a Progressive Catholic who supported President Obama from day one, and so did all my Catholic family and friends. The prohibition against birth control is not a teaching of Jesus, but of men (and ONLY men) who want to control everything. In today's world the need for population control is evident. When will my church come out of the Dark Ages?
2tru4u2c
Politically correct is neither!!
04:18 AM on 02/14/2012
Vasectomy should then be considered essential to men's health and therefore be foist upon hospitals, employers and insurance companies to cover at little or no cost to any man who wants the procedure. If and/or when he wants a reversal, that should be covered, as well. When that happens, we'll talk. Conditions such as endemetriosis (sp), risk of cervical cancer and other LEGITIMATE health issues should be the only reason for employer provided insurance to pay for hormone therapy. Any form of medically induced birth control, from pills to surgery, is purely an ELECTIVE decision, just like a nose job or liposuction, and should, therefore, not be covered by any health insurance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Babs Gladhand
Bandit nun on the loose.
01:48 PM on 02/14/2012
Sometimes, someone will bring up an argument that makes me that maybe vasectomies should be foisted upon people to make sure they can't reproduce.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Babs Gladhand
Bandit nun on the loose.
01:48 PM on 02/14/2012
*makes me think
12:40 PM on 02/13/2012
""I don't know why the federal government jumped in at the level they did," Manchin said."

Because birth control is a fundamental part of healthcare for women!!
05:06 PM on 02/12/2012
I'd like to know what the female posters think on this issue. It's kind of hard to tell by screen names if these posts are from men or women. What say you, ladies? Should birth control be available to every women regardless of where or who she works for???? Just asking for a female consensus on this issue. BTW I'm for birth control.
12:45 PM on 02/13/2012
Im a woman and of course it should be. The only reason this is an issue at all is BECAUSE health insurance is tied to employment. If we had a public option (which we dont because the increase in taxes would likely be prohibitive) we wouldnt even be arguing this issue.

Birth control is a fundamental aspect of healthcare for women.

The policy is not even unconstitutional. If your religiously affiliated but your employers, who you serve and the nature of the affiliate is not religious based its really not an affront to any religious positions. Catholic orgs are on the wrong side of this issue. Catholic Diocese in St. Pete, FL actually said they would discontinue health coverage for its 2300 employees. Their response is actually to cancel coverage for all. What a ridiculous threat because that will only force (some) people to look elsewhere for work, which for some stupid reason, Rubio thinks is the appropriate response for employees. The health insurance debate just shows how backwards our country still is imho.

Some of the comments I have read about this issue just show how little (some) people still understand about the constitution, how govt works and more importantly how health insurance works.
07:35 PM on 02/13/2012
Get serious. The Repubs are making a big mistake here.
06:29 AM on 02/12/2012
As a man let me say...

The men in this debate should sit down and shut up. This is a women's health issue and they clearly favor having the option to follow the precepts of their own conscience. We have nothing to add to the conservation except "Yes, Dear!"
12:46 PM on 02/13/2012
Ironically, men SHOULD be concerned about this! Birth control is necessary and effects men as well as partners to women. Some of the comments I have read by men make me do a double take. If they dont use condoms what are women going to use, I just dont get some of the positions, some are just plain stupid.
02:35 AM on 02/14/2012
Good point, men should fight for this provision too...
05:01 PM on 02/10/2012
I pray to God, we all take a good long look at the persons we will be voting for. We are steadily losing every principle our country was founded on, and the very freedoms we veterans and our forefathers have fought for these some past 300 years.
04:25 PM on 02/10/2012
The scary thing is, no matter how you feel about this issue, I don't know of president who has challenge the constitution as much or tried to bypass congress as much as this one. No matter how you feel on these issues, this president has done more to usurp power from the other branches of government than any before. Again, scary.
04:39 PM on 02/10/2012
This is a Constitutional Issue. and B Hussein Obama is and always was against our Constitution. Women can if they choose to get contraception and abortion if they want to. But to force a religious group or church to do anything against their believes is unconstitutional.
12:47 PM on 02/13/2012
This is not an unconstitutional policy and if you think it is you simply dont understand it.
01:20 PM on 02/13/2012
First Amendment separation of Church and State.
photo
stape45
Spin this!
04:44 PM on 02/10/2012
Remember Dubya the Great?
03:57 PM on 02/10/2012
As slate explains it after getting the r's all worked up over this his new plan gives any org. the right to opt out, leaving to it up to the ins co to directly contact women. The companies are behind this as contraception is cheaper than birth and this cant be argued as r's only argument is that corp America is never wrong. Eat s**t r America
04:41 PM on 02/10/2012
That is what BHO says. eat s**t America and the other two branches of government.
07:41 PM on 02/13/2012
You expect him to fold, on your account? Not happening!
04:48 PM on 02/11/2012
The problem the media are leaving out is that some of these religious-affiliated entities are self insured. It's not some outside company. Obama should know this. He voted yes on the Illinois exemption when in the legislature there 2003, making Illinois one of about 20 states with the religious exemption.
12:50 PM on 02/13/2012
"ome of these religious-­affiliated entities are self insured"

I would not think this is true since most Catholic Diocese employ 100s if not 1000s of people. Even if it was if it was not a religious entity, but merely a church affiliated entity the employees are still entitled to the birth control coverage.
03:02 PM on 02/13/2012
Given the choice between godless and cheap contraception or pregnancy and delivery? Ins co board members a majority of whom purport a christian life for self will vote in house to give contraceptives but on monday........ pitiful
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aodell
03:41 PM on 02/10/2012
I am a woman who is absolutely upset with all female Catholics that are taking birth control and let our President take the heat to protect your right for good healthcare.It is time for all women to quit letting men that head our religious institutes abuse our rights both civil and spirirtual ones!
05:10 PM on 02/10/2012
Please, let God be the judge of these persons. A thousand wrongs added up never makes something right. I like the part from scripture where Christ says to the people about to stone a woman to death for adultry, " Let the one without sin cast the first stone." They all left, leaving only Jesus and her..
08:49 PM on 02/10/2012
Aodell, why is it ok for you to infringe on a religious groups beleifs and put yours first? Infringe on women's rights? a Womens rights to have sex with multiple men, get pregnant, abort, over and over, costing me more and more because you can't close your legs. Then I, who have no use for contraceptives, have higher medical premiums. Oh, then there is population growth, more unplanned births, more hospital bills. Your right, we as women deserve.this civil right. And you blame men... If a man is concerned about your well being as well as the country.... He just must be a real creep huh.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aodell
12:03 PM on 02/12/2012
Because this is not a belief that most Catholic women uphold or they wouldn't be taking birth control.For years, women were told by the Church that birth control was just another means of abortion.It kept future lives from materializing.The Catholic women need to start voicing their beliefs and quit letting other people make strides for them!AS far as women having the right to have sex with as many men as they want is a spirirtual decsion that she will have to justify and ask forgiveness for.And all those babies that you claim are a result of this behavior wouldn't be a problem if birth control was provided.If birth control is paid for by the individual instead of by the insurance company the price would be jacked up where it would be difficult for some women to afford.That is what control is all about!
photo
ngulf
Searching for an honest politician
03:38 PM on 02/10/2012
Now let us see. The President and his staff believe it is quite alright for Muslims to be allowed to opt out of Obama Care, because their religion forbids them from buying insurance coverage. (It's gambling) But no problem for Catholic and other Christian organizations to offer services contrary to their long held religious tenets. Sure makes one think there very well might be an agenda unfolding.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aodell
03:43 PM on 02/10/2012
Yeah, this argument was about money not religious infringements! By the way viagra is paid for!
redvelvetflames
Mitt Romney 2012!!!
01:46 PM on 02/11/2012
More than 24 states have bills requiring health insurance to cover birth control Aodell (including my state.) Now do I agree that Viagra is covered in all states? Hell no, but the coverage of birth control is at the discretion of the state. What must also be kept in mind is this is not a situation about money or religious infringements. The problem is/was the constitutionality of the mandate by his majesty (in his mind). Government telling religious organizations what to do.
04:53 PM on 02/11/2012
The need for Viagra is generally a physiologic dysfunction or evidence of a disease process. Generally, pregnancy is not a disease or evidence of dysfunction.
03:59 PM on 02/10/2012
Only in the minds of the unhinged.
photo
ngulf
Searching for an honest politician
04:13 PM on 02/10/2012
Your few words speak volumes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tobcantine
03:09 PM on 02/10/2012
No one must vote for that Communist Fascist Socialist Muslim African born satanic black man ever again! He has divided the country. His policies have ruined our economy, and it is getting worse every day.. He has destroyed our image in the world so that our allies do not like us as much as they did under bush. He has not gotten Ben Ladin as promised or ended the war in Iraq either. He refuses to compromise on anything ever. There are fewer jobs every month. Everyone hates him. His popularity is dropping to record lows --worse than Bush. He is a poor speaker. He spent a lot of money on a teleprompter. He covers up pictures of Jesus when he speaks because he hates Jesus and not because he wants his speeches to be directed at everyone in the country and not just Christians. He spends too much money all the time on playing golf and going on trips. He has a secret agenda of turning the U.S. into one run by Shiria Law. His wife is not a nice person. He is racist in favor of Blacks.

Do I speak the truth above or am I lying?

I am practicing being sarcastic since I have a history of not doing this very much all my life. I think practice makes perfect: How am I doing?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stokes
03:15 PM on 02/11/2012
You hit the bottom of the barrel.. Can't go any lower than that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tobcantine
04:31 PM on 02/11/2012
I take it you liked my sarcasm? (I am joking).

I was just exagerrating things people had written on the board.
03:09 PM on 02/10/2012
President Obama brandished “new” jobs numbers last week as proof that his policies were having a beneficial effect on the unemployment rate, which the report claimed declined to 8.3 percent in January.
The president is right about one thing: his big government agenda and class warfare tactics are having an effect -- but it's not the one he claims. In actuality, January’s drop in the unemployment indicator was due largely to the “disappearance” of 1.2 million more people from the labor force number. When people become so discouraged they stop actively looking for work, the Bureau of Labor Statistics no longer counts them as unemployed, and extraordinarily, the unemployment rate drops, even though Americans are worse off than they were before.
In this same way, the number of unemployed people looking for work went down in January because, ostensibly in one month, 1.2 million people were so discouraged that they gave up looking for a job, permanently! AND, this is the number, subsequently, President Obama is touting as his lowering of the unemployment rate.
The January report caps an extraordinary string of declines in the participation rate that the Bureau of Labor Statistics has been reporting under the Obama administration Since January 2009, the BLS reports more than five million people have dropped out of the labor force -- the largest decline EVER in American history, and the lowest participation rate in more than three decades, harkening back to yet another Democrat administration, the Jimmy Carter days.
04:52 PM on 02/10/2012
The only accomplishment of B Hussein Obama is he made Jimmy Carter look good. When you walk down street after street more and more stores are being closed, going out of business.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BLMer
03:06 PM on 02/10/2012
I don't care what you think, none of these congressmen gives a darn about this ruling by the White House. Their only concern is that they get re-elected. Go ahead and let the religious business have their way. They will change their minds when they find its hard to get qualified people to work for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tobcantine
02:57 PM on 02/10/2012
Here is a logical solution:

Catholic institutions shouldn't offer Birth Control to the Catholics who work for them. . Will the government look at the name of the organization I work for and say a nonCatholic woman workiing there can not have Birth Control Pills? If notl, how can the nonCatholic prove she is nonCatholic?

Christian Science: Should this business pay medical insurance for anyone working for them? If not, how can non-Christian Scientist PROVE he is not one?

Scientology: They do not believe in going to a psychiatrist. Should a non-Scientologist be denied coverage for psychiatric care? If so, how can he prove he is a non- Scientologist?

What if a Mormon gets a medical condition resulting from alcohol or coffee? If not and I work for a Mormon run business, how can I prove that I am not a Mormon so that I will be eligible for the care I need?

Solution: the government has a set of the rules for each religion, and they ensure that people who work for people in each religion get ONLY the insurance which is consistent with the beliefs of the person who owns the business.
03:01 PM on 02/10/2012
Separation of Church and State exists for a reason
07:47 PM on 02/13/2012
The reason was the really nasty stuff that went on in England for about 150 years. Which we are drifting towards.
03:07 PM on 02/10/2012
Here is a better solution. NO ONE should be forced (via taxes) to pay for the health care of another.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tobcantine
09:36 PM on 02/13/2012
THAT is brilliant.

Let's get rid of emergency rooms and medicare. These are paid for by tax dollars, and this should stop right now!

If someone is ill and needs medical care but lacks the money for it, he should blame himself. While he is blaming himself, he will die. That means one less lazy good for nothing person in the world!

This is exactly what Jesus taught.