iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Pennsylvania Fracking Bill Sent To Governor Tom Corbett

First Posted: 02/ 9/2012 10:59 am Updated: 02/ 9/2012 4:24 pm

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Gov. Tom Corbett is expected to sign a sweeping bill that could force Pennsylvania's booming natural gas industry to help pay for a wide range of state and local government programs, toughen safety standards and limit the ability of local officials to keep drilling out of their towns.

The state House of Representatives' vote came more than three years after the exploration industry, armed with new technology, descended on Pennsylvania and began pouring billions of dollars into tapping the Marcellus Shale natural gas formation, the nation's largest-known natural gas reservoir.

The 174-page bill was negotiated among Republicans and unveiled Monday. It passed the House on Wednesday, 101-90, and the Senate on Tuesday, 31-19, largely along partisan lines. Only seven Democrats voted for it, while 13 Republicans voted against it.

Pennsylvania is the largest natural-gas producing state that doesn't impose some type of levy on the activity. Still, Democrats complained bitterly that the bill asks the industry to pay a meager price for extracting a valuable natural resource while it strips municipal officials of the kind of authority to control drilling that even towns in Texas enjoy.

Republicans insisted the bill strikes a careful balance between cultivating an enormous economic boost and protecting the environment, and that Pennsylvanians cannot wait any longer to update decades-old laws that never envisioned such deep, widespread drilling that generates huge volumes of often-toxic wastewater.

"This legislation reaffirms our strong commitment to safe and responsible natural gas development here in Pennsylvania," Corbett said in a statement shortly after the House vote.

Corbett, a Republican, did not say when he will sign the bill, but as soon as he does, about 35 counties will have 60 days to decide whether to impose a 15-year fee on their local wells. The first payment for Marcellus Shale wells drilled before this year would be due Sept. 1.

For counties that do not impose the fee, a critical mass of municipalities would have another 60 days to impose it countywide.

Because Corbett opposes the kind of tax on the industry that many other states impose, Republican legislative leaders instead pursued an "impact fee" that he views as being fundamentally different than a tax. Even so, several conservative groups, along with Democrats, insisted that the fee is really a tax.

The fee would rise and fall with the price of natural gas and inflation and would be roughly equivalent to a 3 percent tax rate, Republicans said. Democrats countered that it would reflect a 1 percent tax rate. Either way, it would net less money than many other natural-gas producing states.

"We've heard that this is the best we can do," Rep. Michael Sturla, D-Lancaster, said during nearly four hours of floor debate Wednesday. "Well, no, it's not. If this is the best you can do, then you haven't tried very hard."

Assuming local governments decide to impose the fee, the bill would raise $180 million in the first year, and the total amount would rise in ensuing years as more wells are drilled, tallying more than $1 billion over the first five years, according to Republicans.

About 5,000 Marcellus Shale wells have been drilled since the beginning of 2005, according to the Department of Environmental Protection, in an arc stretching from southwestern Pennsylvania's coal and steel regions north and east through large stretches of state-owned forests to its agricultural northern tier.

Environmental groups were split over the bill, and the industry has been largely silent on it. Local government groups supported it while one exploration company, Fort Worth, Texas-based Range Resources Corp., one the most active Marcellus Shale drillers, said it would provide strong, more predictable regulations that are nevertheless more costly.

"Either you are for a commonsense, balanced approach to the development of the natural gas discovery, or you are just always (saying) 'no,'" House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, R-Allegheny, said during floor debate. "You don't get to have it both ways."

Money from the fee would aid state agencies tasked with regulating the industry, communities that are home to the drilling and statewide environmental improvement programs.

Dollars also would flow to improve bridges and water and sewer plants, purchase natural gas-powered fleet vehicles, build affordable housing and help the development of a massive petrochemical refinery in southwestern Pennsylvania and the reuse of three Philadelphia-area oil refineries that are shutting down.

Corbett and the industry had sought provisions to prevent the ability of municipalities to regulate any drilling activity, but such a provision couldn't pass either chamber. Instead, the bill would require municipalities to allow drilling in all zones, including residential, and require them to follow state spacing requirements. But it also would allow them to apply zoning standards on things like lighting, noise and structures that are used for other industrial activities.

Rep. Scott Conklin, D-Centre, called the provisions tantamount to "corporate eminent domain."

"We don't need big brother coming in here and telling us how to live our lives," Conklin added.

The bill would increase penalties on violators and the required distances between drilling activities and homes, schools, streams and public water sources such as reservoirs, but not to the extent sought by Democrats.

It would require inspections of well sites for erosion and sediment controls before drilling starts, and operators of natural gas facilities, such as wells, waste pits, processors and compressors, would have to submit a report quantifying any air pollution at the site.

It also would strengthen disclosure requirements for chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process, although state regulators could keep confidential portions of the disclosures that the companies deemed to be proprietary.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Gov. Tom Corbett is expected to sign a sweeping bill that could force Pennsylvania's booming natural gas industry to help pay for a wide range of state and local government pr...
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Gov. Tom Corbett is expected to sign a sweeping bill that could force Pennsylvania's booming natural gas industry to help pay for a wide range of state and local government pr...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:25 PM on 02/11/2012
this quake bill is a fossil fuel fas*cist farce....it will be illegal in PA for doctors to report fracking related illnesses.....
photo
practical 1
Apply Truth liberally to the inflamed area
08:45 AM on 02/11/2012
Corbett cut higher education funding but gave tax breaks to gas companies. We continue to forgo long term gain of a more educated people for short term profits. I guess Pennsylvania companies will have to continue to bring in educated people from India and China since we won't have any here.
06:22 AM on 02/11/2012
It also says that if doctors have a patient who is having health problems due to exposure to drilling fluids the doctor can submit a request in writing to find out what the patient is exposed to. However, s/he must keep the chemicals confidential. So, if others are exposed to the same chemicals - fellow workers, area residents, for example - they will not be able to be warned of the health hazard.
10:28 AM on 02/10/2012
Harrisburg may not sit atop the Marcellus Shale, but it’s central to the nation's Fact-Free Zone.
PA Republicans repeatedly dismiss published, peer-reviewed studies while citing industry-friendly economic figures freely, as if their business acumen somehow compensates for their stunning dearth of facts. Good science should never be dismissed by bad lawmakers, so here's a list of the studies Gas Drillers don't want us to see:

http://brynmawr.patch.com/blog_posts/corbetts-valentine-to-gas-drillers
wilsoncombatgrl
Ignorance is curable, but stupidity is forever!
03:33 AM on 02/10/2012
You've got to be fracking kidding me.
06:17 PM on 02/09/2012
Hydraulic fracturing of millions of oil wells has been used all over the world for decades. It is used FAR below the depth of water wells. Done correctly, there is no threat to groundwater supplies. As you withdraw groundwater using a water well, rain replenishes it from the top down because of gravity, not from the bottom up.
06:30 AM on 02/11/2012
Remember, though - you drill THROUGH the aquifer to get down to the shale. You have to drill a hole first - with drilling muds - before you can even case the well. Casings often fail. Moreover, in the fracking process, explosive charges perforate the casing, creating holes through which the fracking fluid and water is pumped at very high pressures. It is not uncommon for frack water to come up the borehole on the OUTSIDE of the casing all the way up to the surface. This means it's coming up through the aquifer as well. We've got wells around here. We've seen it firsthand.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
barkingcat
Woof?
07:26 AM on 02/11/2012
Touché.
10:47 AM on 02/11/2012
Wrong Beth--it is not common or even rare. Use your common sense, how can you reach the threshold pressure to produce failure (fracturing) in the target formation if you have an imperfect seal of the casing annulus? Think about what you say before your fantasy takes hold with others.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeff4141
06:07 PM on 02/09/2012
Republicans looking to limit local communities from limiting fracking within thier own boundaries? Sounds like the whole "small government" thing only matters when drilling rights and potential environmental "oopsies" are not involved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Frey
unCommon sense for the common good
05:34 PM on 02/09/2012
Facts about fracking.

Decide for yourself.

http://napoleonlive.info/economics/opinion-about-fracking/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BoudiccaBlanc
~Yes, my micro-bio is emply! ~
05:19 PM on 02/09/2012
I hope the bill is signed into law!

It's not as if those oil-gas companies don't have money to set up funds, etc. To get off of Middle-Eastern oil; we probably will have to "Frack" as well as use, wind and solar power.

(What the CEOs of the big oil companies get paid is outrageous!..Tha's a whole 'nother issue)
04:49 PM on 02/09/2012
At least people in Pa. won't have to ride bikes to work and sit in the dark.
06:31 AM on 02/11/2012
Wrong. Most of the gas is being used for export.
11:27 AM on 02/11/2012
How Beth? Where are the LNG terminals (hint--there are none) or do you think there is secret pipeline across the Atlantic?
04:22 PM on 02/09/2012
There is no money in on-site solar, thus the insistence on toxic, dangerous, life threatening fracking. God, are we ever dumb, as animals go. We will be our own downfall very, very soon.
03:53 PM on 02/09/2012
The solution for fraccing pollution is waterless fraccing; Gasfrac has done over a 1000 fracs with gelled propane; you don’t need any water; you don’t produce any waste fluids (no need for injection wells); no need to flare (no CO2 emissions); truck traffic is cut to a trickle from 900+ trips per well for water fraccing to 30 with propane fracs; and on top of that the process increases oil and gas production; it is a win for the industry, a win for the community and a win for the environment.
04:23 PM on 02/09/2012
That must be why they aren't using it.
04:49 PM on 02/09/2012
Wow that sound like the solution to the problem
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mek0123
Merle from Michigan
01:59 PM on 02/09/2012
So............help me understand this. The companies could (will) contaminate the soil and groundwater and will end up NOT being held responsible for it. You've got to see the movie Gasland. (The producer, Josh Foxx got arrested last week for trying to LEGALLY record video of fracking hearings being held in DC by the RepubliCONS, because they knew the damage it would do to them politically, for pushing the fracking industry's agenda! Cancer, deformed pets, dead animals and people and the ability to ignite your kitchen water faucet on fire due to the chemicals used by the industry are just a few of the problems. The people impacted the most are the rural, poor, land rich but cash poor folks in this country. Shameful indeed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Living ECO
01:55 PM on 02/09/2012
Soon the Pro-Pollution for Profit lobby (Big Oil, Coal, Natural Gas and Nuclear energy) will be here posting their lies about the dangers of fossil fuels and putting their hatred of democracy and freedom on full display.

Clean energy represents energy freedom and energy democracy. Energy democracy is solar panels on every roof, wind generators in every yard, geothermal under every home. The Pro-Pollution for Profit lobby absolutely hates democracy.

Clean renewable energy represents freedom. Free energy. If you buy solar panels today, they will pay for themselves in 5 to 10 years and last for at least 25 years. That means you have at least 15 years of free energy. The Pro-Pollution for Profit lobby hates freedom.

Watch how they lie and twist the truth in order to prevent freedom and democracy. Big Oil, Natural Gas and Coal absolutely despise freedom and democracy. The Big Dirty energy lobby is the biggest threat to democracy and freedom that the world has ever known.