More

HuffPost Social Reading

Postal Service Loses $3 Billion In First Quarter

Postal Service

HOPE YEN   02/ 9/12 04:32 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — Teetering on the brink of bankruptcy, the U.S. Postal Service's quarterly loss ballooned to $3.3 billion amid declining mail volume and the soaring costs of health benefits for future retirees.

From October through December 2011, losses were $3 billion more than the same period a year ago, even though that quarter is typically the strongest due to increased holiday shipping. The mail agency said that at this rate, it will run out of money by October.

The Postal Service is seeking new leeway from Congress to eliminate Saturday mail delivery, raise stamp prices and reduce health and other labor costs.

Also at stake are roughly 100,000 jobs, part of a postal cost-cutting plan to save up to $6.5 billion a year by closing 252 mail processing centers and up to 3,700 post offices. At the request of Congress, the cash-strapped agency agreed to wait until mid-May to begin closures so lawmakers would have time to stabilize its finances first.

Prospects for immediate congressional action remain uncertain.

"Passage of legislation is urgently needed that provides the Postal Service with the speed and flexibility needed to cut costs that are not under our control, including employee health costs," said Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe.

He said the post office must cut $20 billion in annual costs by 2015 so it can reach profitability, rather than becoming a "long-term burden to taxpayers." The agency forecasts a record $14.1 billion loss by the end of this year.

If the post office were to run out of money, officials said, they would prioritize what mail services to provide. Private companies such as FedEx and UPS could handle a small portion of the material the post office moves, but they do not go everywhere. No business has shown interest in delivering letters everywhere in the country for a set rate of 45 cents for a first-class letter.

"We have a Postal Service that essentially is living from paycheck to paycheck, which is a very risky proposition for the American economy and the 8 million private sector workers whose jobs rely on the mail," said Art Sackler, coordinator of the Coalition for a 21st Century Postal Service, a group representing the private sector mailing industry. "Each day Congress fails to enact postal reform, this problem grows more difficult and perhaps more expensive to resolve."

Overall, the post office had income of $17.7 billion from October through December, the first quarter of its 2012 fiscal year. That was down $200 million from the same period last year. Expenses were $17.5 billion.

In addition, the Postal Service had costs stemming from yearly advance payments of roughly $5.5 billion to a future retiree health-benefit fund. Because the agency is low on cash, Congress agreed to extend the legal deadline for last year's payment until this fall, when this year's payment will also be due.

In its financial statement, the post office spread the total $11.1 billion in costs over 12 months, creating additional quarterly debt of more than $3 billion. Without those annual payments – not required of other government agencies – the post office would have posted a profit in most recent years and had a loss of roughly $200 million in the last quarter.

The Postal Service also has been rocked by declining mail volume as people and businesses continue switching to the Internet in place of letters and paper bills. The number of items mailed during the last quarter was 43.7 billion pieces, a 6 percent decrease, much of it in first-class mail.

On the positive side, postal shipping services such as express and priority mail had an 8 percent increase in income to $3.2 billion, with package volume in the holiday period nearly double that of FedEx and UPS, according to postal officials.

Separate proposals passed last year by House and Senate panels would either scrap or provide temporary relief from the annual health prepayment, but they differ widely on financial oversight and a reduction to five-day-a-week delivery. The Senate initially planned action earlier this month but stalled as some lawmakers pushed for changes that would delay decisions on closings and delivery cuts for at least two more years.

"Record productivity and the strong growth in the shipping business show that the Postal Service can be a successful organization," said Fredric Rolando, president of the National Association of Letter Carriers, which opposes broad-scale cuts. "These results reveal the need for Congress to remove the crushing burden of the pre-funding payments."

On Thursday, Donahoe said reducing the size of its postal network was critical to its efforts to reduce costs. Closure of mail-processing centers were still planned to begin after mid-May. He said the mail agency was revising some of its proposals to accommodate the needs of rural communities, which rely more heavily on postal service for the delivery of newspapers, prescription drugs and other services.

As part of the changes, the mail agency plans cuts to first-class mail that would slow delivery and, for the first time, virtually eliminate the chance for stamped letters to arrive the next day.

"We have to make sure we are taking actions that are swift to maintain our liquidity and pay our bills," said chief financial officer Joe Corbett, warning that large losses will continue without changes. "This is no way to run a business."

Last year, postal losses totaled $5.1 billion.

___

Online:

http://www.usps.gov

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Teetering on the brink of bankruptcy, the U.S. Postal Service's quarterly loss ballooned to $3.3 billion amid declining mail volume and the soaring costs of health benefits for futu...
WASHINGTON — Teetering on the brink of bankruptcy, the U.S. Postal Service's quarterly loss ballooned to $3.3 billion amid declining mail volume and the soaring costs of health benefits for futu...
Filed by Leigh Owens  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 61
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:43 AM on 02/10/2012
I'm just wondering if the 300,000 postal workers on the chopping block will be counted by either side, in any figures published anywhere, by anybody...until at least their respective revisions are completed...IN 2013? CPAC ASSASSIN ATTEMPTS TO SILENCE "THOUGHTS"...and other stories. Thoughts at 3 A.M. http://thoughtsatthreeam.blogspot.com/?spref=tw
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
commonsense
06:38 PM on 02/09/2012
This losses are the sole fault of a republicans congress that is forcing this postal agencie to do what no other govt agencies does or corporation. Once that stupid rule is reversed and much needed reform( basically allowing the postal agencies to increase fee and provide other services) the post office would be a very profitable business. one that doesn't depend on the govt or need the govt. what republicans are slowly doing here, is trying to completely destroy the post office, so that it can be privatized and used to suck more money from the workers. At a time we need every job and every job creating demand. the republicans want to lay off another 100k worker, mostly vets. all in the name to destroying this president and greed.
04:13 PM on 02/09/2012
Bilions fewer pieces of mail being sent than just a decade ago.

Simple math.
There simply isn't enough volume to justify not laying off postal workers, closing a number of post offices, and removing Saturday delivery.

Economics 101.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
commonsense
06:42 PM on 02/09/2012
before all that is done, how about we look at some reforms. first stop forcing them to fund a retirement and pension account in the span of 10 years. how about allowing them to provide other services that would generate more revenue. fedex and ups charge close to 20 buck to next day. post office charges 15 buck. how about allow them to increase some fees. Do all that first before you start laying off people and closing post office.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wrightthewrong
Medicare for All
03:28 PM on 02/09/2012
I am interested in the article I saw a couple of months ago that mentioned the local savings/credit union-type banks that used to be a part of the postal service. It was local and available for everyone. The law still exists to bring it back. It began to deteriorate when the interest rates began climbing at the national banks to really high levels, and for some reason they were unable to raise their interest as much, either because of a glitch in the law or for some other reason that I do not know. This would allow people to move their money out of the big banks, and could very well save the post offices, especially in the little towns that may lose them. I wanted to move my money out of BAC, but even though I live in a capitol city (Columbia, SC), there was no small independent local bank or credit union within 25 miles of where I live. The idea of the postal bank coming back would solve that problem for me, and would help out the post office as well.
photo
Eileen Left
Lifes a bowl of punch, go ahead and spike it
03:07 PM on 02/09/2012
UPS and Fed-X rates are going to go way up once the GOP eliminates the post office. Their main goal in all of this is union busting. The Republican wish list is for the US to be the most polluted country with the cheapest work force.
04:11 PM on 02/09/2012
Hundreds of millions of less pieces of mail that need to be delivered.
The Internet removes the need to use the postal service for many services.

Quite blaming Conservatives for the fact that America simply does not need this many Postal Workers, post offices, or delivery days anymore.

Deal with it.
photo
Eileen Left
Lifes a bowl of punch, go ahead and spike it
03:23 PM on 02/10/2012
It's just part of Republicans union busting agenda. CONServatives under Bush passed legislation requiring the PO to fund their pensions 75 years in advance. No other agency has to do anything even close to this. You should wake up!
photo
War of Position
Lima! Lima! Foxtrot Charlie! Foxtrot Sierra!
04:32 PM on 02/09/2012
If a company fails to keep pace with changes in technology or competition it fails. Nothing to blame here but an antiquated unimaginative business model.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
commonsense
06:43 PM on 02/09/2012
when you can't change because the congress would not allow you to change. you don't blame the workers. congress is the reason why the post office is not making money.
photo
Eileen Left
Lifes a bowl of punch, go ahead and spike it
03:19 PM on 02/10/2012
Wrong. Blame the union busting agenda of Republicans that passed legislation under Bush requiring the PO to fund it's pensions for 75 years in advance. No other agency is required to do anything even close.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MotivatedInOhio
Wake Up, Vote Out The GOP
02:49 PM on 02/09/2012
The 2006 Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act Caused this. The Republican congress and G.W. Bush made the postal service fund their benefits 75 years into the future. That is something that no business or government agency has ever had to do. If a person retires at age 65, their retirement has to be started not when they start working, but 10 years before they are even born. It is simply a way to privatize the post office, and say that government doesn't work, but it is the Republicans who are ineffective, (except to mess things up).
photo
MarcDel
budget chair monster
03:26 PM on 02/09/2012
Yeah this was created to privatize services. I sent a package from Michigan to Alaska. Cost by a private carrier $85. US Postal Service $18 and just as fast. The difference; the postal service won't be making donations to the GOP. They want everything privatized so they can have lobbyists and get cash.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MotivatedInOhio
Wake Up, Vote Out The GOP
04:40 PM on 02/09/2012
They want to go after the largest union in the United States.
04:15 PM on 02/09/2012
Bush made the postal service "fund their benefits 75 years into the future?"

You are either dishonest or ill-informed.

I vote the former.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MotivatedInOhio
Wake Up, Vote Out The GOP
04:39 PM on 02/09/2012
Do some research. The Postal Accountability and Enhancement act of 2006. I'll be waiting for your apology. (They had 10 years to fund the 75 years.) But what do facts matter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MotivatedInOhio
Wake Up, Vote Out The GOP
08:06 PM on 02/09/2012
I'll wait for my apology.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
valley boy
02:46 PM on 02/09/2012
Just another example of the systematic dismantaling of the U.S. for the privatization and benefit of the wealthy. Just remember when you complained about $.47 cent stamps and you'll wish they were back, as well as your friendly mailman.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ms Disbelef
03:28 PM on 02/09/2012
Actually, I would pay $1 a stamp if it guaranteed that the postal service wouldn't be privatized. I sent a package UPS ground last week that weighted less than a pound and it cost me $12.37. Last time I checked FEDEX only delivers letters on a next day or second day rate, the least of which is $11. Good luck. As you said, wait until you see what we pay if it is privatized. What they did with the pension costs insuring that pension liablility for the next 75 years be funded in 10years time was as scheme to break the back of the USPS. What will happen to the money the postal service has already covered of this pension in the last 3 years? Sounds like a Bain Capital scam.
02:40 PM on 02/09/2012
The post office needs to shed about half of its overpaid workforce. Most of the clerks in the post offices can be replaced with these machines called APCs. They can perform most of the functions of the human clerks and you can put an Automatic Postal Center in any retail store. They are about the size of a liquor store ATM and could replace most of the costly postal clerks and their nasty attitudes and bloated wages and benefits. We also do not need Saturday mail delivery. Monday to Friday is just fine. The post office also needs to expand its flat rate package service which is extremely popular and competes well with UPS and FEDEX which does not have flat rate service. Congress can also help by passing federal right to work legislation and that would take care of the postal union and bring their wages and benefits back to reality.
photo
Eileen Left
Lifes a bowl of punch, go ahead and spike it
03:03 PM on 02/09/2012
Right to work = right to pay inferior wages.
04:17 PM on 02/09/2012
No, the right to pay fair wages.
Union states have businesses leaving.
Right-to-work states have businesses flocking in
People are pleased with their salaries and benefits
State income tax revenues grow rapidly

The 'prosperity' that Unions claim to want is actually spread this way.
NOT through strikes and threats, which is all they know.
02:07 PM on 02/09/2012
I worked for USPS for 22 years, in mail processing for about five of them, and as an electronics tech for the remainder. I was a dues-paying union member. I feel as if I am reasonably competent to have an opinion about some of the things that ail the USPS.

I just downloaded an ebook into my reader. Five years ago I would have ordered a hardcopy and had the USPS deliver it to my mailbox. This is an example of how an old economy is being displaced by a new one.

USPS must adapt, and it can, but it is severely hamstrung by a workplace that is dominated by union politics that were characteristic of a half-century ago. Union hates management, management hates union. Many employees are so hardened against the company that they have become professional scam artists. Rather than actually work, they spend their days trying to figure out innovative ways to gouge money out of the organization, or even the Federal gov't, for various minor infractions of arcane work rules. One former colleague is currently obsessed with getting a settlement (he expects $10k) because a supervisor disallowed two hours of overtime. He thinks this is an Equal Opportunity issue because he knows other employees who got some overtime. The really awful fact is, the USPS will probably settle with him to avoid a court case. This goes on all over the USPS, all the time. Most USPS employees can tell similar stories.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom95134
01:55 PM on 02/09/2012
And yet, based on a recent study, the USPS is considered one of the best, if not the best, Postal Service in the world.
04:18 PM on 02/09/2012
Hard not to be when you have more facilities and employees than you need.
Costwise, the only reason they can compete is because the gov't is covering their bills.

If they had to compete on a level playing field they wouldn't stand a chance.
01:19 PM on 02/09/2012
The funny thing is... most of those rural post offices that will close... Are in RED states!
04:20 PM on 02/09/2012
LOL You think the problems with the US Postal Service is because of Republicans?

Not the BILLIONS fewer pieces of mail being sent compared to just 10 years ago?
Not the fact that much of the mail traffic is no longer necessary due to Internet?

LOL Liberals......how can you not laugh at them?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AbeMartin
The best person fer a job is never a candidate
01:19 PM on 02/09/2012
If the USPS was a publicly traded company with an accountable board of directors, the entire enterprise would have been shaken  up and its management thrown out years ago.  I am a fan of the continuance of the USPS, especially as the Post Office in small communities is one of the last vestiges of an America that once enabled even those who were elderly and without access to cars to use Interurbans, light rail, trolleys and passenger trains to visit other communities.  For the elderly and disabled who live in the towns and villages being eyed for the elimination of post office service, the Post Office is a place for socialization, to gain local news and to see a friendly face.


1.  Three weeks ago, I visited my local post office to ship a package.  The mailer I bought was clearly stamped "Made in Mexico."  What kind of crap is that?  The United States has dozens of paper and box manufacturing facilities that would be delighted with a contract to provide mailers.  There are tens of thousands of post offices across the US.  How many people would be employed and earning a decent living had the USPS morons not decided to follow the outsourcing revolution?

2.   The 1 cent increase of postage to mail a first class letter of 1oz from 43c to 44c., is a total crock when the USPS is losing more than $1 billion each month.  Almost every other postal service has a rate which reflects the cost of service:  Great Britain?  73cents. Canada? 61cents.  Australia? 65 cents.  Japan?  $1.03.  Check it out yourself.  (postage rates worldwide: http://www.atms.ch/rates/, and a currency converter:  http://www.xe.com/ucc/convert.

3.  This week on February 6, I again visited my local branch post office in a large metropolitan area at 11:30AM to purchase the new post card stamps (yeah, I know, snail mail, but kids, nieces and nephews, etc. can save a picture postcard or stick it on the fridge), and make up postage (1 cent) stamps so I can finish off my supply of 43 cents stamps.  At 11:30AM, the postage customary line snaked out the door as one clerk tried to minister to their needs, while the other clerk was tending to a couple applying for a Passport.  I finally got to the service counter at 12:05PM, only to be told by the obviously stressed clerk that the branch has no post card stamps and no make up postage. 


Does this sound like a business being well managed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom95134
02:05 PM on 02/09/2012
"and [buy] make up postage (1 cent) stamps so I can finish off my supply of 43 cents stamps."

Why would you buy make up postage? Those 43 cent stamps should have been "Forever Postage" and good until you ran out of them. The selling of Forever Postage had been the common way to buy First Class Postage for years now.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AbeMartin
The best person fer a job is never a candidate
02:21 PM on 02/09/2012
Some of the issues (commemoratives and holiday stamps) are not forever stamps.  And also, post card postage is not forever.
photo
MarcDel
budget chair monster
03:30 PM on 02/09/2012
They also can't do things because of laws that hamper them. They can't provide copying or wrapping or many other things other country postal services provide. We need reform not destruction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason1953
No How, No Way, No Mitt...
01:11 PM on 02/09/2012
Senator Sanders has come up with a sensible plan that will make the Postal Service fiscally sound. First, we need to repeal the Republican death provision dealing with pension payments. Second, allow them to offer services such as Notary, and copiers. Common sense, practical changes that will cost us taxpayers nothing.
01:21 PM on 02/09/2012
People go to their banks for free notary service and copy machines cost as little as $20 or $30 dollars to purchase one for in home use. You are suggesting antiquated ideas for an antiquated post office.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Counter Sniper
Though I Wander I Am Not Lost...
02:00 PM on 02/09/2012
Nonsense, those inexpensive printers require expensive ink and even more expensive computers for them to work, in addition home pc printers are notoriously unreliable and anything that provides convenience for customers will help improve business.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom95134
02:08 PM on 02/09/2012
It is nearly impossible to get anything notarized at a bank anymore unless you live in a very small town. Banks got very gun-shy of doing notarization of documents because of the liability involved. About the only place you can get documents notarized anymore is at the Box Service businesses and it is NOT free.

Quality copy machines are not that cheap. However, if I have a need for quality copies I usually go to FedEx/Kinkos. They maintain the machines and the copy quality if always clean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom95134
02:13 PM on 02/09/2012
The biggest potential market for the USPS is to go more aggressively after the small box business. The cost of small box shipping through the USPS is much lower than FedEx or UPS as long as you stay within their Flat Rate Boxes.

The biggest reason I can see that the USPS doesn't get more of this business is that they don't provide a late-in-the-day pickup from the shipper's location. IMO, this is key to USPS being competitive for the small box business.
01:03 PM on 02/09/2012
"Each day Congress fails to enact postal reform, this problem grows more difficult and perhaps more expensive to resolve."

I think this has been an issue all along and major contributor to the current state of USPS. If the people on the ground were actually allowed to try things out or to run things a little differently (because it works for their district or region) without spending months and years waiting for Congressional approval (or rejection) things might be a little different now. The Postal Service has been saying, publicly, that the way things are is not working and they have been saying it for YEARS. But it seems that other than voting for the next commorative stamp Congress keeps saying "we'll get to it later"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Fattonecat
whoops !!
12:58 PM on 02/09/2012
Republicans are trying hard to tank the postal service so they can hand that business to their friends.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason1953
No How, No Way, No Mitt...
01:08 PM on 02/09/2012
Yes, and at many times the cost for those of us who use the Postal Service.
02:01 PM on 02/09/2012
What a stupid comment. Postal needs continue to decline every year as technology advances. To maintain this operation at these levels because it "feels right" or because you think the republicans want to prioritize it is just plain asinine.