More

HuffPost Social Reading

Texas School Prayer Ban: Judge Slams Critics Of Ruling

Graduation

By PAUL J. WEBER   02/ 9/12 04:55 PM ET  AP

SAN ANTONIO -- A federal judge who was vilified by Republican presidential hopefuls for banning prayer at a Texas high school graduation delivered a scathing and unusually personal response Thursday, saying those who used the case to further political goals "should be ashamed."

In a court filing laying out the settlement terms of the prayer case, U.S. District Judge Fred Biery wrote that he forgave Christians who "venomously and vomitously" threatened his assassination, he thanked the U.S. Marshals for providing him additional security and without singling anyone out by name, offered a self-deprecating nod to those wished him the worst.

"To those who have prayed for my death: Your prayers will someday be answered, as inevitably trumps probability," Biery wrote.

The unusually personal comments in a federal court order overshadowed the actual settlement. The case had been closely watched by social conservatives, and on the campaign trail, Newt Gingrich has portrayed Biery, a 1994 Clinton appointee, as the embodiment of so-called activist judges.

After winning the South Carolina primary, Gingrich singled out Biery as a "dictatorial religious bigot" for his decision in the San Antonio court case.

Under the settlement, the Medina Valley Independent School District won't officially make prayer part of graduation ceremonies. The settlement does not, however, prohibit valedictorians or other student speakers from praying during their remarks.

Craig Wood, an attorney for the school district, said the deal forces the district to make only minor changes.

Last May, Biery granted a temporary restraining order filed by an agnostic family who claimed that traditions at their son's graduation, including the invocation and benediction, excluded their beliefs and violated their constitutional rights.

Biery's ruling prohibited Medina Valley seniors from asking audience members to join in prayer, bow their heads, end remarks with "amen," or even use the word "prayer." A federal appeals court later reversed the ban before the ceremony took place.

Being overruled didn't prevent Biery from coming under fire. Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who hadn't yet officially announced his run for president, called Biery's decision "reprehensible" and an "inappropriate federal encroachment into the lives of Americans." His state's attorney general, Greg Abbott, joined the South Texas district in helping fight the case.

Although Biery didn't admonish any politicians by name, Perry appeared to be one of his targets.

"To those in the executive and legislative branches of government who have demagogued this case for their own political goals: You should be ashamed of yourselves," Biery wrote.

Perry spokesman Josh Havens said in a statement that Perry is a staunch defender of the Constitution and will continue to fight for the right to freely pray. He did not address Biery's personal remarks.

Biery began his opinion by stating that the case was not about right to pray. Instead, Biery said, the case was about whether the Constitution allows for a governmental body to promote and support a religious viewpoint not held by a minority.

Biery applauded the terms of the settlement.

"The settlement memorialized in today's Order signifies a bright point in our nation's long and difficult effort to harmonize the competing interests written into the First Amendment," he wrote.

The settlement prohibits Medina Valley school district employees from joining students in prayer circles or inviting others to pray. The district is also forbidden from displaying crosses, Bible verses or any other religious paraphernalia on school grounds. Wood, however, said teachers may still keep religious icons on their desks.

Students are still allowed to deliver prayers at graduations, football games and other school events. Those moments must generically be introduced to the audience as simply "student remarks."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

SAN ANTONIO -- A federal judge who was vilified by Republican presidential hopefuls for banning prayer at a Texas high school graduation delivered a scathing and unusually personal response Thursday, ...
SAN ANTONIO -- A federal judge who was vilified by Republican presidential hopefuls for banning prayer at a Texas high school graduation delivered a scathing and unusually personal response Thursday, ...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 35
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:12 PM on 02/21/2012
One commenter was admonished about her “lack†of Civics knowledge. My question is, "Are we talking about the new Civics or the old Civics class before the Supreme Court (and many others) took the term ‘separation of church and state’ and twisted it to mean that ‘religion’ has no place in the public square�

What is apparently widespread is the ignorance of most Americans of the fact that this nation was founded by Christian men and women who were not afraid to profess their belief in God. From the earliest days of our Constitutional government, religion had a very prominent place in society.

Prayer was offered by the delegates during the creation of a founding document, the Constitution of the United States. Government buildings in Washington held Sunday religious services in them. Congress approved funds to purchase Bibles and approved ‘missionary’ work among the Indians. The Ten Commandments are displayed throughout the Supreme Court building. Traditions began then which we still see today are: prayer opening up Congress, the President taking the oath of office with his hand on the Bible. Apparently, the Founding Fathers and that generation had no problem with display of religious faith in a government setting.
07:11 PM on 02/21/2012
“Separation of church and state†is not part of the Constitution! It is a quote from President Thomas Jefferson, who also did NOT write the amendment on religious freedom--he was in Paris.

In 1802, President Jefferson wrote a letter in response to a Baptist minister. He used the phrase to reassure the Minister that his congregation would not be unfairly targeted by the Federal government since they were a religious minority in the community. It meant the Federal government would not favor one religion over another.

This current ruling is clearly an abridgement of Christian religious freedom and would not have been given any credence by those who wrote and ratified the Constitution. Where was this young woman’s non-religious conscience violated? No one forced her to pray or is forcing her to become a Christian against her wishes. It amazes me how in our society things like pornography, violent entertainment, sodomy, abortion, are all tolerated, and defended as ‘rights,’ yet mention anything about religion and there’s an immediate and swift reprisal! Apparently, freedom is only afforded to those who are hedonistic or intolerant of religion.

I strongly disagree with anyone threatening this young woman, she is entitled to her own opinion. However, her belief should not be given preference over a whole community/school.

I agree that it should be put to vote of the community. Our nation has come to be known as a democracy, wherein the voice of the PEOPLE decides, not the voice of ONE.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snewell
12:48 PM on 02/14/2012
I'M FOR THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND HATE
10:34 PM on 02/12/2012
I believe that the students who wish to participate in morning prayer in school should be allowed to and those who don't want to shouldn't be forced to do so. It would not be hard to accommidate them all. Just put aside a certain time in the morning in a particular place to gather in the school for those who want to pray and another place at the same time to gather for those who don't want to pray. After that time is over they all go to class. That way you could please everyone, I think. Would that be so hard to do?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BobHiggins
Living on the brink of was.
12:40 PM on 02/13/2012
Students have the ability and opportunity to engage in private prayer 24/7 where ever they are. What you want is a license for pious displays of religiosity and organized Tebowing. There is no right to make your religious display a pain in my day.
01:34 PM on 02/13/2012
NO ONE IS ASKING OR FORCING YOU TO WATCH ME AS I SAY PRAYER AND I CERTAINLY WILL NOT BE WATCHING YOU AS YOU DO WHATEVER IT IS THAT YOU DO AT THE SAME TIME I AM PRAYING. AS FOR A LICENSES TO DISPLAY MY RELIGIOSITY AND TEBOWING, AS YOU CALL IT, IT WOULD ALSO GIVE YOU A LICENSE TO NOT DISPLAY YOURS. ALSO I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOW IN THE WORLD COULD ME SAYING A QUITE PRAYER BE OF ANY PAIN WHATSOEVER TO YOU OR ANYONE ELSE FOR THAT MATTER UNLESS IT HURTS YOU FOR ME TO ASK THAT MY GOD TO FORGIVE YOU OF YOUR SINS.
04:58 PM on 02/13/2012
It is already the law - children who want to pray can find a spot and do so as long as they do not harass other students, demand the other students pray with them or cause a disturbance while praying and as long as no teacher or administrator participate or promote the prayer gathering. There should be no state sponsored particular religion or prayer in a public school setting.
For politicians, like Perry, to continually promote the idea that children are not allowed to pray in the public school system either shows how really ignorant he is of the law or he is intentionally promoting a divisive point to further divide our country and state or he's just a lier.
11:05 PM on 02/13/2012
Perry is just trying to make political hay out of this issue.

I live in Kansas, where my grandson's sports team has team prayers before and after every meet. My grandson walks away while they pray, except when they pray on the starting line, and then he's stuck there.

When the team has social events such as cookouts, the chosen activity is several hours of hymn-singing. It's very awkward for those who aren't part of the large group of religious righties who make up most of the team. And apparently the coaches are okay with this or even encourage it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brokerallen
The Middle Class Needs To Take Back America
10:16 PM on 02/11/2012
A stupid Judge. A stupid response.
10:26 PM on 02/11/2012
Thank you for your well-thought-out reply...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lilbunnyfufu
If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep
08:45 PM on 02/12/2012
And yours is much better?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brokerallen
The Middle Class Needs To Take Back America
10:51 PM on 02/12/2012
Much!
photo
pphhrogg
domestic clown goddess
06:28 PM on 02/11/2012
People who don't know about the USSC rulings re seperation of church and state are being disingenuous at this point in time...using ther religion as a divisive issue. Some, of course, want a theocracy, and they should be removed from ANY political office asap.
10:54 AM on 02/11/2012
If there were organized Islamic prayers toward Mecca going on in schools, those same critics would be up in arms, saying that the government needed to ban it to "protect America." What a bunch of hypocrites...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snewell
12:50 PM on 02/14/2012
Ha ha ! You are so right!! The bullies LOVE to play the victim!!
03:37 AM on 02/11/2012
What would Jesus do? Get his homies and stomp this fool!
01:03 AM on 02/14/2012
Sounds pretty much like 2000 years of catholic history: Go 13 against one and then twist the story so it sounds like being a fair and ethically correct action. :)
03:55 AM on 02/14/2012
In reply to your deleted comment: No, I don't think your little Gethsemane replay would happen.

It's a matter of cause and effect. Before knife cuts ear and consequent miracle healing there was: right, kissing as part of the greeting/ meeting ceremony. Now, I am German, not French. We simply don't have the habit to kiss each other upon meeting.

But you just gave me an idea for another prank ;). Making a poster with two men sharing a welcome kiss and then attaching the headline:
Inspired by your book: Mt 26, 49.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Patricia Russell
We are sorry, your micro-bio did not meet our guid
04:17 PM on 02/10/2012
" Wood, however, said teachers may still keep religious icons on their desks."

Put a statue of Ganesha on your desk and see what happens.....the Lord of success and destroyer of evils and obstacles. ( He is also worshipped as the god of education, knowledge, wisdom and wealth.)
photo
Bienville
Make levees, not war
08:10 PM on 02/14/2012
The settlement forbids disparagement of whistle blowers, but, somewhat significantly, does not forbid disparagement of non-Christians
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockysparks
there's no law against being annoying.
04:12 PM on 02/10/2012
My friend Jay Spears said it best:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16R4aeYBXww
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
susanbsbi
Slave to 3 cats
12:04 PM on 02/10/2012
Once again the GOP are interfering in this countries freedom of religion
11:06 PM on 02/13/2012
Exactly. Being prevented from forcing their narrow religious beliefs on everyone else is perceived as interfering with THEIR freedom of religion. What hypocrites.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CoboWowbo1
atheist, freethinker, liberal leaning Independent
11:45 AM on 02/10/2012
"(some) "Christians" 'venomously and vomitously' threatened his assassination" ... seems to be common these days. Jessica Ahlquist of Rhode Island was also a victim of these "Christians".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eastfernstreet
Too micro to be seen . . .
11:44 AM on 02/10/2012
Christianists are a greater threat to this country than Islamists ever were.
02:39 PM on 02/10/2012
I must disagree with that as all religons are equally false and primative and hold back man kind.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eastfernstreet
Too micro to be seen . . .
02:51 PM on 02/10/2012
True enough . . . it's just that at the moment the Christianists hold great power in this particular country -- hence my feeling that they are a greater threat.