More

New England Cod Fishermen Meet Amid Bleak Prospects

AP    
First Posted: 02/10/2012 7:41 pm Updated: 02/11/2012 9:38 am

PORTSMOUTH, N.H. (AP) — Fishermen and federal officials grappled Friday with the increasingly bleak prospect of finding some way for the historic New England industry to avoid collapse amid troubles with the health of Gulf of Maine cod.

Their meeting came in the week after regional regulators bought fisherman a yearlong reprieve from what would have been devastating cuts in 2012. But projections discussed Friday showed fishermen still face disastrous cuts in 2013 that most won't survive.

"It's going to be hard to preserve the industry at those low numbers (in 2013) and that's something that concerns us a great deal," said Sam Rauch, the head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's fisheries arm, who led the meeting of fishermen, scientists and regulators.

"This truly is one of the iconic fisheries," he said in an interview after the meeting. "When you think of what the U.S. fisherman is, it's an inshore Gulf of Maine cod fisherman. That's why we are so devoted to working through this process to try to overturn every possibility we can. But the future, 2013, does not look rosy."

The cod in the Gulf of Maine has been crucial to New England fishermen from Cape Cod to Maine for hundreds of years, and four years ago, after a major assessment, it was thought to be one of the region's strongest species. It brought in $15.8 million in 2010, second highest amount behind Georges Bank haddock among the region's 20 regulated bottom-dwelling groundfish.

But data released last year indicated the fish was so severely overfished that even if all fishing on it ended immediately, it wouldn't rebound by 2014 to levels required under federal law.

As a result, fishermen were looking at an 82 percent cut in what they were allowed to catch in 2011, a catastrophic reduction that would have wiped out fishermen around the region — not just those who rely on cod. That's because major restrictions on cod severely limit fishing on the other key groundfish species, such as flounder and haddock, in order to protect the cod they swim among.

Last week, regional regulators at the New England Fishery Management Council asked NOAA to adopt a one-year emergency rule that would enable regulators to avoid the massive cut. And they recommended allowing fishermen to catch either 6,700 metric tons or 7,500 metric tons of Gulf of Maine cod in 2012.

On Friday, Rauch signaled that NOAA would allow the 6,700 catch limit in the 2012 fishing year, which starts in May. That would mean a tough 22 percent cut from what they were allowed to catch in 2011, though not nearly as deep a reduction as first feared.

The problem, according to new projections discussed Friday, is that after the emergency rule expires in 2013, fishermen are again looking at a cut in cod catch just as severe as the huge reduction they were originally facing.

From the first indications of cod trouble, fishermen and their advocates have questioned the science behind the new data and Friday was no exception.

"We don't trust your data," New Hampshire charter boat fisherman Bill Wagner told regulators. "We don't believe there's a shortage of codfish. We don't believe there's a crisis in codfish."

Massachusetts Rep. Ann-Margaret Ferrante, who represents the port of Gloucester, criticized what she characterized as the constant, massive swings in scientific assessments on the size of fish populations.

"We're always in the same dilemma and I don't understand why," she said.

Gloucester fisherman Al Cottone said the new assessment has put the fishing industry "on death row."

"The anxiety the industry feels is unprecedented," he said

With so much doubt about the science behind the new data, Cottone said, regulators should give fishermen as much fish to catch as possible while they try to remove uncertainties in the numbers.

"To basically flip the switch on the industry with so much reasonable doubt would be irresponsible," he said.

Rauch said the verifying and improving the science is a top priority, and no one can predict if the new work can find something in the next year that significantly improves the assessment of cod health.

"It's always possible we'll find something there, but even if we don't, this year allows us time to better plan ... for where this industry may end up," Rauch said. "Fishermen are resilient, they figure out ways to adapt. But this will be hard to adapt to."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

PORTSMOUTH, N.H. (AP) — Fishermen and federal officials grappled Friday with the increasingly bleak prospect of finding some way for the historic New England industry to avoid collapse amid troubles...
PORTSMOUTH, N.H. (AP) — Fishermen and federal officials grappled Friday with the increasingly bleak prospect of finding some way for the historic New England industry to avoid collapse amid troubles...
PORTSMOUTH, N.H. (AP) — Fishermen and federal officials grappled Friday with the increasingly bleak prospect of finding some way for the historic New England industry to avoid collapse amid troubles...
PORTSMOUTH, N.H. (AP) — Fishermen and federal officials grappled Friday with the increasingly bleak prospect of finding some way for the historic New England industry to avoid collapse amid troubles...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 75
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:24 PM on 02/14/2012
There was talk about converting some old factories into indoor fish farms in New Bedford, MA which is the largest fish port in New England. They would of used the excisting fish packing plants. The local politicians and fishermen were up in arms about it.
06:02 AM on 02/14/2012
Don't complain people - you had to fish the cod right into oblivion, or close to it. The same happened with the cod fisheries in Canada...fish, baby, fish and now? No cod, no fishing, no livelihood. Everything has to be 'instant gratification', never mind allowing the fish stocks to recover. So we are done depleting North America - so now we go and deplete Africa.
08:54 PM on 02/13/2012
This is all standard when the fishermen choose not to "believe" the science. (It's not a religion; you can gather data--and the scientists have gathered lots of data.) But, this is yet another example of money being more important than the environment. The cod situation has been there for many years, but the fishermen typically have had the political clout to get what they want, while the rest of us don't really think about the issues. What is desperately needed is some large preserves where the cod live in which no fishing is allowed. This has been done in a lot of places in the ocean. There are no fences so when the fish within the reserves recover, they can go where they want to go, which may be outside the preserve where they are then legal to catch. But, the most important aspect of the commercial fishing industry has to do with greed. Fishermen always think there are more fish somewhere else. But in a fishery that is overfished, the large ones will be caught first, so the symptom that we should recognize and honor is the catching of only small fish. That should tell us we are overdoing it. In addition, when it takes longer and costs more to get the same amount of the fish, that should also be a signal of overfishing.
08:27 PM on 02/13/2012
In Canada in 1992 we banded cod fishing of any kind in our terrortial waters 200 miles out from the shoreline because cod stocks had collapsed , if fact i don't think they came back .So when i read all the posts it feels like 1992 over all again.But what surprises me that no seems to mention our history of our fishing band and /or how we have done or haven't done seems odd considering were neighbours and all .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevRock
04:04 PM on 02/13/2012
This was inevitable. And it's just the beginning. Factory ships and over-fishing everywhere is destroying fish stocks up and down the east coast. Fisherman have known this for decades in NE, yet they fight every step of the way to just "fish a little longer." Well, the fish ain't there anymore!

As the world's population explodes, we're wiping out fish stocks worldwide. And the US is way more heavily policed in this area than other giants like China.

Time to pay the reaper, folks. The only solution is a several years' long moratorium.
photo
Son of Liberty 1765
Exposing Government Lies.
05:02 PM on 02/12/2012
I fish the Gulf of Maine recreationally. Cod are like fleas on you know what. The government is flat out lying about the data. The fisherman are right. th NMFS and NOAA have been trying to shutter the industry for decades. If the Cod were in trouble, I would support NOAA because I want to have Cod available for me to catch on my rod and reel. The fact is, Cod are NOT in trouble. NOAA is a rogue organization.
09:19 PM on 02/12/2012
Why would the government be lying about the Cod data and ruin an entire economy?
If the government has shown a willingess for noting else. Its shown a willingness to put peoples concerns over environmental ones.
And if people have shown nothing else in their history. Its been our willingness when unchecked to completely eradicate species off the face of the earth for their own short term gain under the false notion that they will just go on forever in spite of and often in complete denial of any and all data or evidence to the contrary.
This government conspiracy notion lacks any notion of logic or sense. And too much money is lost in tax revenue to lend it any credence.
Face it. To save the industry. Some people are going to have to at least temporarily find another line of work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Errant
Sic Transit Gloria Mundi
11:17 PM on 02/12/2012
Indeed. I've spent a lot of time studying natural fisheries an aquaculture to realize that our oceans are being depleted rapidly.

In fact, you don't even NEED to go to school to know this; just watch one of those factory ships sweep through an area. Whole schools annihilated by just one or a handful of ships and then you realize there are dozens of groups in an area and thousands of these vessels, big and small, combing the ocean. Nevermind however many hundreds of thousands of smaller ships doing their part to scoop up as much as they can as quickly as they can.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Milks
Ecologist
08:43 AM on 02/13/2012
The main reasons that the 2011 assessment (summary text here: http://1.usa.gov/zrg7Kv) is much lower than the 2008 assessment are:

1) "The 2011 assessment is more robust than that of 2008 because it does a better job of dealing with uncertainty in data—for example, adjusting for anomalously high survey tows."

2) "The 2008 assessment suggested that the 2005 year class was much larger than it actually was" due to a single anomalously high survey tow in two consecutive years.

3) "The new assessment also has the advantage of more data on both commercial and recreational discards that were not available in 2008. This allows for a better accounting of the total fish removals due to harvesting (that is, both the fish landed and the fish caught but discarded)."

4) "There is more detailed information on the age and weight of fish that were caught by commercial, recreational, and scientific survey vessels. The revised weights at age showed fish in recent year classes are lighter-than-average at younger ages. This contributed to the lower spawning stock biomass relative to the 2008 assessment (since reproduction potential in these fish is primarily a function of size, not age.)"

NOAA has much better data on the population size and reproductive rate than it had in 2008. So what is better? To continue to allow overfishing until the fishery collapses or to set restrictions now to allow the fishery to recover?
09:55 AM on 02/13/2012
Thanks Jim. The public needs to know that the scientific part of the process is transparent, and available on line. It does take a little time and attention to read through the documents; I guess it's just easier to say the gubmint is making it all up. And I don't think that we will ever be able to persuade some fishermen that just because their local fishing holes look ok, there may be real problems in the other 99 % of the ocean. Or that, even if the guy is catching just as many fish, if they are even 10% smaller than in the past, it may be an indicator of a downward trend.
photo
Son of Liberty 1765
Exposing Government Lies.
11:47 AM on 02/13/2012
"The 2008 assessment suggested that the 2005 year class was much larger than it actually was" due to a single anomalousl­y high survey tow in two consecutiv­e years."

This is the problem. one single mistake and the data s useless. Are we to believe they are mistake-free again?
10:14 AM on 02/12/2012
"It's a crisis" It's a crisis" It's a crisis" Come ON people!!!! Isn't it just painfully obvious that virtually everyone in the administration of just about every policy there is incompetant? If, at work, everything you did caused a crisis, how long would you be working there? This is rediculous.
No matter what the subject is.....it either WAS a crisis, IS a crisis, or is ABOUT to BE a crisis.
Making fun of China for limiting how man kids you can have reall sounds like we're being moral.....but leading us to starvation, bankruptcy and losing our homes and net worth is out and out cruelty...which will YOU choose?...because it's going to come down to this real soon....socialism or complete starvation?....and when the people at the top know this, and continue to collect big salaries, bonuses and benefits, it's crimminal. They are guilty of crimes against society.
The dynamics between big business and the population is nothing but a huge whack-a-mole game. We finally get them to back down (in some cases) and then they pop up with a new crisis making idea to fill their pockets at our expense.
08:53 AM on 02/12/2012
I guess it's time for soylient green .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sunwyn Ravenwood
Farewell my friends, time to go...
02:12 AM on 02/12/2012
When the first Europeans came to the Americas it wasn't for gold, or land, or spices, it was for cod. People were fishing for cod in the North-East, off the coasts of what are now Canada and New England before Columbus. Fishermen took cod with hand-held nets at first, then invented the log-line. 500 years of long-line fishing barely dented the cod stocks.

"In 1951 factory fishing began with new super-trawlers such as the 'Fairtry'; 280 feet (85 m) long and 2,600 gross tons. The cod catch peaked in 1968 at 810,000 tons, approximately three times more than the maximum yearly catch achieved before the super-trawlers. Approximately 8 million tons of cod were caught between 1647 and 1750, a period encompassing 25 to 40 cod generations. The factory trawlers took the same amount in 15 years."

In 60 years the insensate greed of the fishing industry has diminished the cod stocks to the point where the only way to save the cod stocks in the NW Atlantic is to ban commercial fishing altogether. Since politicians do not have the moral courage to do so the fishermen will continue killing every cod they can find until the species becomes extinct.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cod_fisheries
04:26 AM on 02/12/2012
I was up the west coast in 2008, and in a small town near the Cali/Oregon border I picked up a local magazine which featured an article about the Salmon season. They were cutting it short because there were just too few fish coming back up the rivers to spawn.

It's time for the fishing industry to pool their resources and diversify. Maybe invest in fish farming and maybe gett paid to help study and find ways to increase the yields from wild fish stocks.

Fish are a renewable resource as long as the fisherman and consumers are sensible about how the fisheries are managed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sunwyn Ravenwood
Farewell my friends, time to go...
04:53 AM on 02/12/2012
Don't talk about fish farming in Alaska, them's fighting words!

In Alaska there is a slogan that goes:

"Friends don't let friends eat farm-raised salmon!"

And that ain't no joke, pardner.
12:38 PM on 02/12/2012
Another iconic fish that we can't lose. All life subsists on it, bears, wolves, humans; even nitrogen in the riverside vegetation and trees,and the relationship are mutually beneficial. I remember watching a program about the salmon disappearing from the damming of all the rivers and was shocked. In Idaho, of all places, where you'd expect that nature would be the least disturbed, their numbers have fallen dramatically from damming the rivers. They are removing the dams in some areas of the West so they can travel freely to spawn again.
10:54 AM on 02/12/2012
It was really for white pine to build ship masts
09:29 PM on 02/12/2012
I believe the English, who were the dominate immigrants and ship builders, used white oak to build ship masts.
09:38 PM on 02/11/2012
when the ocean's die we die, and the ocean's are on life support
Mochilero
Have backpack, will travel
08:16 PM on 02/11/2012
And the Tragedy of the Commons marches on. This story is not going to have a happy ending. Our rapacious species is short on foresight, but no doubt will have 20/20 hindsight regarding the causes of our own approaching extinction.
07:59 PM on 02/11/2012
Better lose a year of good fishing than an entire species down the road.

The fishermen should get facts and not simply say "we don't believe what the government is saying".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sunwyn Ravenwood
Farewell my friends, time to go...
01:51 AM on 02/12/2012
They have been saying it for the last 80 years.

A fisheries expert once said that his job basically came down to finding 10,000 ways to say "you are taking too many fish".

That was about 30 years ago.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Errant
Sic Transit Gloria Mundi
11:23 PM on 02/12/2012
They have been. And the schools have been getting smaller and smaller and smaller.

Ask any fishermen and they'll tell you about the biggest fish they caught. Go back some years and you'll realize there were more fish that were bigger and healthier.
photo
Son of Liberty 1765
Exposing Government Lies.
05:03 PM on 02/12/2012
The fact is they catch the fish, see the fish and mark the schools. The government estimates. You need to get facts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Milks
Ecologist
08:26 AM on 02/13/2012
Those government estimates are taken from catch data along with mark-recapture and other techniques.
07:15 PM on 02/11/2012
Several fish species have been overfished on the west coast also. Less fish results in lower seal populations. Less seals results in diminishing polar bear populations. Yet we ignore all these facts so we can blame the demise of the polar bear on global warming. Go figure!
09:24 PM on 02/11/2012
As if there can't be more than one cause for something. Grow up.
photo
roy brophy
Dyslexic F. O. "Sorry!"
05:37 PM on 02/11/2012
And when it collapse they will want a government bail - out
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deckercat
change the world
05:23 PM on 02/11/2012
what's left after we kill every other living species on earth? can we find low fat humans?
photo
Son of Liberty 1765
Exposing Government Lies.
05:04 PM on 02/12/2012
Not if they are on foodstamps and Obamacare. THem are hefty humans.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sunwyn Ravenwood
Farewell my friends, time to go...
06:39 PM on 02/12/2012
More protein and fat for the soylent green.